All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Regulations in Guravia dictate that commercia... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Regulations in Guravia dictate that commercial aircraft are subject to government inspection and maintenance at least once per week. A proposed law would allow airlines to opt out of the required inspection and maintenance. Opponents object that the airlines may attempt to cut costs and perform inadequate safety procedures. But since airlines are accountable to their customers, and air travelers consistently rate safety their first priority in choosing an airline, airlines would follow safety procedures at least as thorough as those currently undertaken by government inspectors and maintenance workers.
Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?
  • a)
    Whether shifting the safety procedures to the airlines themselves would reduce the cost and time required for sufficient inspection and maintenance
  • b)
    Whether safety regulations in other countries grant airlines more responsibility in keeping their aircraft at or above a certain standard of airworthiness
  • c)
    Whether government inspectors and maintenance workers would be hired by the airlines to perform tasks similar to their current assignments
  • d)
    Whether airlines that are not known for their safety records would suffer financially as a result of the proposed law
  • e)
    Whether airline customers would have a way to determine which airlines followed safety procedures at or above the standard established by government inspectors and maintenance workers
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Regulations in Guravia dictate that commercial aircraft are subject to...
This is an evidence question, so we're looking for answer that addresses an unstated assumption in the passage. The argument is that, because airlines are accountable to their customers, they will follow safety procedures comparable to those followed by the government-mandated ones.
Choice (A) is irrelevant: we're concerned with whether the safety procedures would be as thorough, not how much they would cost.
(B) is another irrelevant comparison, as we're concerned only with the effect of the shift in Guravia.
(C) might sound tempting, but it doesn't matter who does the work, it matters what standards are set by the organization (the government, or the airlines) who are accountable for it.
Choice (D) is somewhat supported by the passage, but this isn't an inference question. We're looking for evidence to close a loophole in the argument.
Choice (E) is what we're looking for. The argument claims that customers will hold airlines accountable, but if there is no way to know which airlines are following safety procedures, the argument would fall apart.
Choice (E) is correct.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

The accumulation of scientific knowledge regarding the environmental impact of oil well drilling in North America has tended to lag behind the actual drilling of oil wells. Most attempts to regulate the industry have relied on hindsight: the need for regulation becomes apparent only after undesirable events occur. The problems associated with oil wells’ potential contamination of groundwater—fresh water within the earth that supplies wells and springs—provide a case in point.When commercial drilling for oil began in North America in the mid-nineteenth century, regulations reflected the industry’s concern for the purity of the wells’ oil. In 1893, for example, regulations were enacted specifying well construction requirements to protect oil and gas reserves from contamination by fresh water. Thousands of wells were drilled in such a way as to protect the oil, but no thought was given to the possibility that the groundwater itself might need protection until many drinking-water wells near the oil well sites began to produce unpotable, oil contaminated water.The reason for this contamination was that groundwater is usually found in porous and permeable geologic formations near the earth’s surface, whereas petroleum and unpotable saline water reservoirs are generally found in similar formations but at greater depths. Drilling a well creates a conduit connecting all the formations that it has penetrated. Consequently, without appropriate safeguards, wells that penetrate both groundwater and oil or saline water formations inevitably contaminate the groundwater. Initial attempts to prevent this contamination consisted of sealing off the groundwater formations with some form of protective barrier to prevent the oil flowing up the well from entering or mixing with the natural groundwater reservoir. This method, which is still in use today, initially involved using hollow trees to seal off the groundwater formations; now, however, large metal pipe casings, set in place with cement, are used.Regulations currently govern the kinds of casing and cement that can be used in these practices; however, the hazards of insufficient knowledge persist. For example, the long-term stability of this way of protecting groundwater is unknown. The protective barrier may fail due to corrosion of the casing by certain fluids flowing up the well, or because of dissolution of the cement by these fluids. The effects of groundwater bacteria, traffic vibrations, and changing groundwater chemistry are likewise unassessed. Further, there is no guarantee that wells drilled in compliance with existing regulations will not expose a need for research in additional areas: on the west coast of North America, a major disaster recently occurred because a well’s location was based on a poor understanding of the area’s subsurface geology. Because the well was drilled in a channel accessing the ocean, not only was the area’s groundwater completely contaminated, but widespread coastal contamination also occurred, prompting international concern over oil exploration and initiating further attempts to refine regulations.Which one of the following most accurately states the main point of the passage?

The accumulation of scientific knowledge regarding the environmental impact of oil well drilling in North America has tended to lag behind the actual drilling of oil wells. Most attempts to regulate the industry have relied on hindsight: the need for regulation becomes apparent only after undesirable events occur. The problems associated with oil wells’ potential contamination of groundwater—fresh water within the earth that supplies wells and springs—provide a case in point.When commercial drilling for oil began in North America in the mid-nineteenth century, regulations reflected the industry’s concern for the purity of the wells’ oil. In 1893, for example, regulations were enacted specifying well construction requirements to protect oil and gas reserves from contamination by fresh water. Thousands of wells were drilled in such a way as to protect the oil, but no thought was given to the possibility that the groundwater itself might need protection until many drinking-water wells near the oil well sites began to produce unpotable, oil contaminated water.The reason for this contamination was that groundwater is usually found in porous and permeable geologic formations near the earth’s surface, whereas petroleum and unpotable saline water reservoirs are generally found in similar formations but at greater depths. Drilling a well creates a conduit connecting all the formations that it has penetrated. Consequently, without appropriate safeguards, wells that penetrate both groundwater and oil or saline water formations inevitably contaminate the groundwater. Initial attempts to prevent this contamination consisted of sealing off the groundwater formations with some form of protective barrier to prevent the oil flowing up the well from entering or mixing with the natural groundwater reservoir. This method, which is still in use today, initially involved using hollow trees to seal off the groundwater formations; now, however, large metal pipe casings, set in place with cement, are used.Regulations currently govern the kinds of casing and cement that can be used in these practices; however, the hazards of insufficient knowledge persist. For example, the long-term stability of this way of protecting groundwater is unknown. The protective barrier may fail due to corrosion of the casing by certain fluids flowing up the well, or because of dissolution of the cement by these fluids. The effects of groundwater bacteria, traffic vibrations, and changing groundwater chemistry are likewise unassessed. Further, there is no guarantee that wells drilled in compliance with existing regulations will not expose a need for research in additional areas: on the west coast of North America, a major disaster recently occurred because a well’s location was based on a poor understanding of the area’s subsurface geology. Because the well was drilled in a channel accessing the ocean, not only was the area’s groundwater completely contaminated, but widespread coastal contamination also occurred, prompting international concern over oil exploration and initiating further attempts to refine regulations.The author’s attitude regarding oil well drilling regulations can most accurately be described as

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

Regulations in Guravia dictate that commercial aircraft are subject to government inspection and maintenance at least once per week. A proposed law would allow airlines to opt out of the required inspection and maintenance. Opponents object that the airlines may attempt to cut costs and perform inadequate safety procedures. But since airlines are accountable to their customers, and air travelers consistently rate safety their first priority in choosing an airline, airlines would follow safety procedures at least as thorough as those currently undertaken by government inspectors and maintenance workers.Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?a)Whether shifting the safety procedures to the airlines themselves would reduce the cost and time required for sufficient inspection and maintenanceb)Whether safety regulations in other countries grant airlines more responsibility in keeping their aircraft at or above a certain standard of airworthinessc)Whether government inspectors and maintenance workers would be hired by the airlines to perform tasks similar to their current assignmentsd)Whether airlines that are not known for their safety records would suffer financially as a result of the proposed lawe)Whether airline customers would have a way to determine which airlines followed safety procedures at or above the standard established by government inspectors and maintenance workersCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Regulations in Guravia dictate that commercial aircraft are subject to government inspection and maintenance at least once per week. A proposed law would allow airlines to opt out of the required inspection and maintenance. Opponents object that the airlines may attempt to cut costs and perform inadequate safety procedures. But since airlines are accountable to their customers, and air travelers consistently rate safety their first priority in choosing an airline, airlines would follow safety procedures at least as thorough as those currently undertaken by government inspectors and maintenance workers.Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?a)Whether shifting the safety procedures to the airlines themselves would reduce the cost and time required for sufficient inspection and maintenanceb)Whether safety regulations in other countries grant airlines more responsibility in keeping their aircraft at or above a certain standard of airworthinessc)Whether government inspectors and maintenance workers would be hired by the airlines to perform tasks similar to their current assignmentsd)Whether airlines that are not known for their safety records would suffer financially as a result of the proposed lawe)Whether airline customers would have a way to determine which airlines followed safety procedures at or above the standard established by government inspectors and maintenance workersCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Regulations in Guravia dictate that commercial aircraft are subject to government inspection and maintenance at least once per week. A proposed law would allow airlines to opt out of the required inspection and maintenance. Opponents object that the airlines may attempt to cut costs and perform inadequate safety procedures. But since airlines are accountable to their customers, and air travelers consistently rate safety their first priority in choosing an airline, airlines would follow safety procedures at least as thorough as those currently undertaken by government inspectors and maintenance workers.Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?a)Whether shifting the safety procedures to the airlines themselves would reduce the cost and time required for sufficient inspection and maintenanceb)Whether safety regulations in other countries grant airlines more responsibility in keeping their aircraft at or above a certain standard of airworthinessc)Whether government inspectors and maintenance workers would be hired by the airlines to perform tasks similar to their current assignmentsd)Whether airlines that are not known for their safety records would suffer financially as a result of the proposed lawe)Whether airline customers would have a way to determine which airlines followed safety procedures at or above the standard established by government inspectors and maintenance workersCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Regulations in Guravia dictate that commercial aircraft are subject to government inspection and maintenance at least once per week. A proposed law would allow airlines to opt out of the required inspection and maintenance. Opponents object that the airlines may attempt to cut costs and perform inadequate safety procedures. But since airlines are accountable to their customers, and air travelers consistently rate safety their first priority in choosing an airline, airlines would follow safety procedures at least as thorough as those currently undertaken by government inspectors and maintenance workers.Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?a)Whether shifting the safety procedures to the airlines themselves would reduce the cost and time required for sufficient inspection and maintenanceb)Whether safety regulations in other countries grant airlines more responsibility in keeping their aircraft at or above a certain standard of airworthinessc)Whether government inspectors and maintenance workers would be hired by the airlines to perform tasks similar to their current assignmentsd)Whether airlines that are not known for their safety records would suffer financially as a result of the proposed lawe)Whether airline customers would have a way to determine which airlines followed safety procedures at or above the standard established by government inspectors and maintenance workersCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Regulations in Guravia dictate that commercial aircraft are subject to government inspection and maintenance at least once per week. A proposed law would allow airlines to opt out of the required inspection and maintenance. Opponents object that the airlines may attempt to cut costs and perform inadequate safety procedures. But since airlines are accountable to their customers, and air travelers consistently rate safety their first priority in choosing an airline, airlines would follow safety procedures at least as thorough as those currently undertaken by government inspectors and maintenance workers.Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?a)Whether shifting the safety procedures to the airlines themselves would reduce the cost and time required for sufficient inspection and maintenanceb)Whether safety regulations in other countries grant airlines more responsibility in keeping their aircraft at or above a certain standard of airworthinessc)Whether government inspectors and maintenance workers would be hired by the airlines to perform tasks similar to their current assignmentsd)Whether airlines that are not known for their safety records would suffer financially as a result of the proposed lawe)Whether airline customers would have a way to determine which airlines followed safety procedures at or above the standard established by government inspectors and maintenance workersCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Regulations in Guravia dictate that commercial aircraft are subject to government inspection and maintenance at least once per week. A proposed law would allow airlines to opt out of the required inspection and maintenance. Opponents object that the airlines may attempt to cut costs and perform inadequate safety procedures. But since airlines are accountable to their customers, and air travelers consistently rate safety their first priority in choosing an airline, airlines would follow safety procedures at least as thorough as those currently undertaken by government inspectors and maintenance workers.Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?a)Whether shifting the safety procedures to the airlines themselves would reduce the cost and time required for sufficient inspection and maintenanceb)Whether safety regulations in other countries grant airlines more responsibility in keeping their aircraft at or above a certain standard of airworthinessc)Whether government inspectors and maintenance workers would be hired by the airlines to perform tasks similar to their current assignmentsd)Whether airlines that are not known for their safety records would suffer financially as a result of the proposed lawe)Whether airline customers would have a way to determine which airlines followed safety procedures at or above the standard established by government inspectors and maintenance workersCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Regulations in Guravia dictate that commercial aircraft are subject to government inspection and maintenance at least once per week. A proposed law would allow airlines to opt out of the required inspection and maintenance. Opponents object that the airlines may attempt to cut costs and perform inadequate safety procedures. But since airlines are accountable to their customers, and air travelers consistently rate safety their first priority in choosing an airline, airlines would follow safety procedures at least as thorough as those currently undertaken by government inspectors and maintenance workers.Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?a)Whether shifting the safety procedures to the airlines themselves would reduce the cost and time required for sufficient inspection and maintenanceb)Whether safety regulations in other countries grant airlines more responsibility in keeping their aircraft at or above a certain standard of airworthinessc)Whether government inspectors and maintenance workers would be hired by the airlines to perform tasks similar to their current assignmentsd)Whether airlines that are not known for their safety records would suffer financially as a result of the proposed lawe)Whether airline customers would have a way to determine which airlines followed safety procedures at or above the standard established by government inspectors and maintenance workersCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Regulations in Guravia dictate that commercial aircraft are subject to government inspection and maintenance at least once per week. A proposed law would allow airlines to opt out of the required inspection and maintenance. Opponents object that the airlines may attempt to cut costs and perform inadequate safety procedures. But since airlines are accountable to their customers, and air travelers consistently rate safety their first priority in choosing an airline, airlines would follow safety procedures at least as thorough as those currently undertaken by government inspectors and maintenance workers.Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?a)Whether shifting the safety procedures to the airlines themselves would reduce the cost and time required for sufficient inspection and maintenanceb)Whether safety regulations in other countries grant airlines more responsibility in keeping their aircraft at or above a certain standard of airworthinessc)Whether government inspectors and maintenance workers would be hired by the airlines to perform tasks similar to their current assignmentsd)Whether airlines that are not known for their safety records would suffer financially as a result of the proposed lawe)Whether airline customers would have a way to determine which airlines followed safety procedures at or above the standard established by government inspectors and maintenance workersCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Regulations in Guravia dictate that commercial aircraft are subject to government inspection and maintenance at least once per week. A proposed law would allow airlines to opt out of the required inspection and maintenance. Opponents object that the airlines may attempt to cut costs and perform inadequate safety procedures. But since airlines are accountable to their customers, and air travelers consistently rate safety their first priority in choosing an airline, airlines would follow safety procedures at least as thorough as those currently undertaken by government inspectors and maintenance workers.Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?a)Whether shifting the safety procedures to the airlines themselves would reduce the cost and time required for sufficient inspection and maintenanceb)Whether safety regulations in other countries grant airlines more responsibility in keeping their aircraft at or above a certain standard of airworthinessc)Whether government inspectors and maintenance workers would be hired by the airlines to perform tasks similar to their current assignmentsd)Whether airlines that are not known for their safety records would suffer financially as a result of the proposed lawe)Whether airline customers would have a way to determine which airlines followed safety procedures at or above the standard established by government inspectors and maintenance workersCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Regulations in Guravia dictate that commercial aircraft are subject to government inspection and maintenance at least once per week. A proposed law would allow airlines to opt out of the required inspection and maintenance. Opponents object that the airlines may attempt to cut costs and perform inadequate safety procedures. But since airlines are accountable to their customers, and air travelers consistently rate safety their first priority in choosing an airline, airlines would follow safety procedures at least as thorough as those currently undertaken by government inspectors and maintenance workers.Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?a)Whether shifting the safety procedures to the airlines themselves would reduce the cost and time required for sufficient inspection and maintenanceb)Whether safety regulations in other countries grant airlines more responsibility in keeping their aircraft at or above a certain standard of airworthinessc)Whether government inspectors and maintenance workers would be hired by the airlines to perform tasks similar to their current assignmentsd)Whether airlines that are not known for their safety records would suffer financially as a result of the proposed lawe)Whether airline customers would have a way to determine which airlines followed safety procedures at or above the standard established by government inspectors and maintenance workersCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup