Booker awards are not merely about who wins the coveted literary prize, an annual honor that bestows instant celebrity status and a windfall in terms of book sales. They are also about such things as who deserved to win, why someone lost and whether someone else was unfairly overlooked - issues that become the stuff of intense literary brawls, vicious backbiting on occasion - but always engaging.Which of the following weakens the assessment made in the above argument?a)The Nobel Prize for literature brings with it more acclaim, honor and recognition than the Booker Prize.b)Whenever any literary award is announced, it is usual for the people in the field the world over to raise controversies, most of which are unjustifiedc)There have been some years, including the year in which Arundati Roy was chosen for the award, when there was universal approval of the choices.d)This years Booker Prize for the novel The Line of Beauty has raised a controversy that it is not better than another entry Cloud Atlas.e)Literature is a field where one would think the practitioners have risen well over petty squabbles and criticisms.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Booker awards are not merely about who wins t...

Join the Discussion on the App

Which of the following weakens the assessment made in the above argument?

a)
The Nobel Prize for literature brings with it more acclaim, honor and recognition than the Booker Prize.
b)
Whenever any literary award is announced, it is usual for the people in the field the world over to raise controversies, most of which are unjustified
c)
There have been some years, including the year in which Arundati Roy was chosen for the award, when there was universal approval of the choices.
d)
This year's Booker Prize for the novel 'The Line of Beauty' has raised a controversy that it is not better than another entry 'Cloud Atlas'.
e)
Literature is a field where one would think the practitioners have risen well over petty squabbles and criticisms.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: Weaken

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

Booker awards are not merely about who wins the coveted literary prize...

The argument presented states that Booker awards generate intense debates and controversies regarding the deserving winners, unjust overlooks, and unfair judgments. To weaken this assessment, we need to provide information that undermines the idea that Booker awards consistently lead to intense literary brawls and backbiting.

Let's evaluate each option:

(A) The Nobel Prize for literature brings with it more acclaim, honor, and recognition than the Booker Prize.

This statement is irrelevant to the argument. It discusses the relative merits of the Nobel Prize and does not provide any information about the intensity of debates or controversies surrounding the Booker Prize. Therefore, it does not weaken the assessment made in the argument.

(B) Whenever any literary award is announced, it is usual for the people in the field the world over to raise controversies, most of which are unjustified.

This option strengthens the argument by suggesting that controversies surrounding literary awards are common and often unjustified. It does not weaken the assessment that Booker awards specifically generate intense debates and backbiting.

(C) There have been some years, including the year in which Arundati Roy was chosen for the award, when there was universal approval of the choices.

This option weakens the argument by providing a counterexample. If there have been years when the choices for the Booker Prize were universally approved, it undermines the claim that controversies and backbiting are always present. It suggests that there are instances where the winners are widely accepted and appreciated.

(D) This year's Booker Prize for the novel 'The Line of Beauty' has raised a controversy that it is not better than another entry 'Cloud Atlas.'

This option strengthens the argument by providing a specific example of a controversy surrounding a Booker Prize decision. It supports the claim that the Booker Prize leads to intense debates and judgments.

(E) Literature is a field where one would think the practitioners have risen well over petty squabbles and criticisms.

This option does not provide any specific information about Booker awards or the intensity of debates and controversies. It is a general statement about the field of literature and does not weaken the assessment made in the argument.

Based on the analysis, the option that weakens the assessment made in the argument is (C) There have been some years, including the year in which Arundati Roy was chosen for the award, when there was universal approval of the choices.

Answered by Talent Skill Learning · View profile

Attention GMAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay, insists that the values of certain tasks performed in dissimilar jobs can be compared. In the last decade, this approach has become a critical social policy issue, as large numbers of private-sector firms and industries as well as federal, state, and local governmental entities have adopted comparable worth policies or begun to consider doing so.This widespread institutional awareness of comparable worth indicates increased public awareness that pay inequities—that is, situations in which pay is not "fair" because it does not reflect the true value of a job—exist in the labor market. However, the question still remains: have the gains already made in pay equity under comparable worth principles been of a precedent-setting nature or are they mostly transitory, a function of concessions made by employers to mislead female employees into believing that they have made long-term pay equity gains?Comparable worth pay adjustments are indeed precedent-setting. Because of the principles driving them, other mandates that can be applied to reduce or eliminate unjustified pay gaps between male and female workers have not remedied perceived pay inequities satisfactorily for the litigants in cases in which men and women hold different jobs. But whenever comparable worth principles are applied to pay schedules, perceived unjustified pay differences are eliminated. In this sense then, comparable worth is more comprehensive than other mandates, such as the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Neither compares tasks in dissimilar jobs (that is, jobs across occupational categories) in an effort to determine whether or not what is necessary to perform these tasks—know-how, problem-solving, and accountability—can be quantified in terms of its dollar value to the employer. Comparable worth, on the other hand, takes as its premise that certain tasks in dissimilar jobs may require a similar amount of training, effort, and skill; may carry similar responsibility; may be carried on in an environment having a similar impact upon the worker; and may have a similar dollar value to the employer.Which of the following best describes an application of the principles of comparable worth as they are described in the passage?

View answer

Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay, insists that the values of certain tasks performed in dissimilar jobs can be compared. In the last decade, this approach has become a critical social policy issue, as large numbers of private-sector firms and industries as well as federal, state, and local governmental entities have adopted comparable worth policies or begun to consider doing so.This widespread institutional awareness of comparable worth indicates increased public awareness that pay inequities—that is, situations in which pay is not "fair" because it does not reflect the true value of a job—exist in the labor market. However, the question still remains: have the gains already made in pay equity under comparable worth principles been of a precedent-setting nature or are they mostly transitory, a function of concessions made by employers to mislead female employees into believing that they have made long-term pay equity gains?Comparable worth pay adjustments are indeed precedent-setting. Because of the principles driving them, other mandates that can be applied to reduce or eliminate unjustified pay gaps between male and female workers have not remedied perceived pay inequities satisfactorily for the litigants in cases in which men and women hold different jobs. But whenever comparable worth principles are applied to pay schedules, perceived unjustified pay differences are eliminated. In this sense then, comparable worth is more comprehensive than other mandates, such as the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Neither compares tasks in dissimilar jobs (that is, jobs across occupational categories) in an effort to determine whether or not what is necessary to perform these tasks—know-how, problem-solving, and accountability—can be quantified in terms of its dollar value to the employer. Comparable worth, on the other hand, takes as its premise that certain tasks in dissimilar jobs may require a similar amount of training, effort, and skill; may carry similar responsibility; may be carried on in an environment having a similar impact upon the worker; and may have a similar dollar value to the employer.Which of the following most accurately states the central purpose of the passage?

View answer

Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay, insists that the values of certain tasks performed in dissimilar jobs can be compared. In the last decade, this approach has become a critical social policy issue, as large numbers of private-sector firms and industries as well as federal, state, and local governmental entities have adopted comparable worth policies or begun to consider doing so.This widespread institutional awareness of comparable worth indicates increased public awareness that pay inequities—that is, situations in which pay is not "fair" because it does not reflect the true value of a job—exist in the labor market. However, the question still remains: have the gains already made in pay equity under comparable worth principles been of a precedent-setting nature or are they mostly transitory, a function of concessions made by employers to mislead female employees into believing that they have made long-term pay equity gains?Comparable worth pay adjustments are indeed precedent-setting. Because of the principles driving them, other mandates that can be applied to reduce or eliminate unjustified pay gaps between male and female workers have not remedied perceived pay inequities satisfactorily for the litigants in cases in which men and women hold different jobs. But whenever comparable worth principles are applied to pay schedules, perceived unjustified pay differences are eliminated. In this sense then, comparable worth is more comprehensive than other mandates, such as the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Neither compares tasks in dissimilar jobs (that is, jobs across occupational categories) in an effort to determine whether or not what is necessary to perform these tasks—know-how, problem-solving, and accountability—can be quantified in terms of its dollar value to the employer. Comparable worth, on the other hand, takes as its premise that certain tasks in dissimilar jobs may require a similar amount of training, effort, and skill; may carry similar responsibility; may be carried on in an environment having a similar impact upon the worker; and may have a similar dollar value to the employer.According to the passage, comparable worth principles are different in which of the following ways from other mandates intended to reduce or eliminate pay inequities

View answer

Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay, insists that the values of certain tasks performed in dissimilar jobs can be compared. In the last decade, this approach has become a critical social policy issue, as large numbers of private-sector firms and industries as well as federal, state, and local governmental entities have adopted comparable worth policies or begun to consider doing so.This widespread institutional awareness of comparable worth indicates increased public awareness that pay inequities—that is, situations in which pay is not "fair" because it does not reflect the true value of a job—exist in the labor market. However, the question still remains: have the gains already made in pay equity under comparable worth principles been of a precedent-setting nature or are they mostly transitory, a function of concessions made by employers to mislead female employees into believing that they have made long-term pay equity gains?Comparable worth pay adjustments are indeed precedent-setting. Because of the principles driving them, other mandates that can be applied to reduce or eliminate unjustified pay gaps between male and female workers have not remedied perceived pay inequities satisfactorily for the litigants in cases in which men and women hold different jobs. But whenever comparable worth principles are applied to pay schedules, perceived unjustified pay differences are eliminated. In this sense then, comparable worth is more comprehensive than other mandates, such as the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Neither compares tasks in dissimilar jobs (that is, jobs across occupational categories) in an effort to determine whether or not what is necessary to perform these tasks—know-how, problem-solving, and accountability—can be quantified in terms of its dollar value to the employer. Comparable worth, on the other hand, takes as its premise that certain tasks in dissimilar jobs may require a similar amount of training, effort, and skill; may carry similar responsibility; may be carried on in an environment having a similar impact upon the worker; and may have a similar dollar value to the employer.According to the passage, which of the following is true of comparable worth as a policy?

View answer

In a survey of consumers in an Eastern European nation, respondents were asked two questions about each of 400 famous Western brands: whether or not they recognized the brand name and whether or not they thought the products bearing that name were of high quality. The results of the survey were a rating and corresponding rank order for each brand based on recognition, and a second rating-plus-ranking based on approval. The brands ranked in the top 27 for recognition were those actually available in that nation. The approval rankings of these 27 brands often differed sharply from their recognition rankings. By contrast, most of the other brands had ratings, and thus rankings, that were essentially the same for recognition as for approval.Which one of the following, if each is a principle about consumer surveys, is violated by the survey described?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

Booker awards are not merely about who wins the coveted literary prize, an annual honor that bestows instant celebrity status and a windfall in terms of book sales. They are also about such things as who deserved to win, why someone lost and whether someone else was unfairly overlooked - issues that become the stuff of intense literary brawls, vicious backbiting on occasion - but always engaging.Which of the following weakens the assessment made in the above argument?a)The Nobel Prize for literature brings with it more acclaim, honor and recognition than the Booker Prize.b)Whenever any literary award is announced, it is usual for the people in the field the world over to raise controversies, most of which are unjustifiedc)There have been some years, including the year in which Arundati Roy was chosen for the award, when there was universal approval of the choices.d)This years Booker Prize for the novel The Line of Beauty has raised a controversy that it is not better than another entry Cloud Atlas.e)Literature is a field where one would think the practitioners have risen well over petty squabbles and criticisms.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Booker awards are not merely about who wins the coveted literary prize, an annual honor that bestows instant celebrity status and a windfall in terms of book sales. They are also about such things as who deserved to win, why someone lost and whether someone else was unfairly overlooked - issues that become the stuff of intense literary brawls, vicious backbiting on occasion - but always engaging.Which of the following weakens the assessment made in the above argument?a)The Nobel Prize for literature brings with it more acclaim, honor and recognition than the Booker Prize.b)Whenever any literary award is announced, it is usual for the people in the field the world over to raise controversies, most of which are unjustifiedc)There have been some years, including the year in which Arundati Roy was chosen for the award, when there was universal approval of the choices.d)This years Booker Prize for the novel The Line of Beauty has raised a controversy that it is not better than another entry Cloud Atlas.e)Literature is a field where one would think the practitioners have risen well over petty squabbles and criticisms.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Booker awards are not merely about who wins the coveted literary prize, an annual honor that bestows instant celebrity status and a windfall in terms of book sales. They are also about such things as who deserved to win, why someone lost and whether someone else was unfairly overlooked - issues that become the stuff of intense literary brawls, vicious backbiting on occasion - but always engaging.Which of the following weakens the assessment made in the above argument?a)The Nobel Prize for literature brings with it more acclaim, honor and recognition than the Booker Prize.b)Whenever any literary award is announced, it is usual for the people in the field the world over to raise controversies, most of which are unjustifiedc)There have been some years, including the year in which Arundati Roy was chosen for the award, when there was universal approval of the choices.d)This years Booker Prize for the novel The Line of Beauty has raised a controversy that it is not better than another entry Cloud Atlas.e)Literature is a field where one would think the practitioners have risen well over petty squabbles and criticisms.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Booker awards are not merely about who wins the coveted literary prize, an annual honor that bestows instant celebrity status and a windfall in terms of book sales. They are also about such things as who deserved to win, why someone lost and whether someone else was unfairly overlooked - issues that become the stuff of intense literary brawls, vicious backbiting on occasion - but always engaging.Which of the following weakens the assessment made in the above argument?a)The Nobel Prize for literature brings with it more acclaim, honor and recognition than the Booker Prize.b)Whenever any literary award is announced, it is usual for the people in the field the world over to raise controversies, most of which are unjustifiedc)There have been some years, including the year in which Arundati Roy was chosen for the award, when there was universal approval of the choices.d)This years Booker Prize for the novel The Line of Beauty has raised a controversy that it is not better than another entry Cloud Atlas.e)Literature is a field where one would think the practitioners have risen well over petty squabbles and criticisms.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Booker awards are not merely about who wins the coveted literary prize, an annual honor that bestows instant celebrity status and a windfall in terms of book sales. They are also about such things as who deserved to win, why someone lost and whether someone else was unfairly overlooked - issues that become the stuff of intense literary brawls, vicious backbiting on occasion - but always engaging.Which of the following weakens the assessment made in the above argument?a)The Nobel Prize for literature brings with it more acclaim, honor and recognition than the Booker Prize.b)Whenever any literary award is announced, it is usual for the people in the field the world over to raise controversies, most of which are unjustifiedc)There have been some years, including the year in which Arundati Roy was chosen for the award, when there was universal approval of the choices.d)This years Booker Prize for the novel The Line of Beauty has raised a controversy that it is not better than another entry Cloud Atlas.e)Literature is a field where one would think the practitioners have risen well over petty squabbles and criticisms.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Booker awards are not merely about who wins the coveted literary prize, an annual honor that bestows instant celebrity status and a windfall in terms of book sales. They are also about such things as who deserved to win, why someone lost and whether someone else was unfairly overlooked - issues that become the stuff of intense literary brawls, vicious backbiting on occasion - but always engaging.Which of the following weakens the assessment made in the above argument?a)The Nobel Prize for literature brings with it more acclaim, honor and recognition than the Booker Prize.b)Whenever any literary award is announced, it is usual for the people in the field the world over to raise controversies, most of which are unjustifiedc)There have been some years, including the year in which Arundati Roy was chosen for the award, when there was universal approval of the choices.d)This years Booker Prize for the novel The Line of Beauty has raised a controversy that it is not better than another entry Cloud Atlas.e)Literature is a field where one would think the practitioners have risen well over petty squabbles and criticisms.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Booker awards are not merely about who wins the coveted literary prize, an annual honor that bestows instant celebrity status and a windfall in terms of book sales. They are also about such things as who deserved to win, why someone lost and whether someone else was unfairly overlooked - issues that become the stuff of intense literary brawls, vicious backbiting on occasion - but always engaging.Which of the following weakens the assessment made in the above argument?a)The Nobel Prize for literature brings with it more acclaim, honor and recognition than the Booker Prize.b)Whenever any literary award is announced, it is usual for the people in the field the world over to raise controversies, most of which are unjustifiedc)There have been some years, including the year in which Arundati Roy was chosen for the award, when there was universal approval of the choices.d)This years Booker Prize for the novel The Line of Beauty has raised a controversy that it is not better than another entry Cloud Atlas.e)Literature is a field where one would think the practitioners have risen well over petty squabbles and criticisms.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Booker awards are not merely about who wins the coveted literary prize, an annual honor that bestows instant celebrity status and a windfall in terms of book sales. They are also about such things as who deserved to win, why someone lost and whether someone else was unfairly overlooked - issues that become the stuff of intense literary brawls, vicious backbiting on occasion - but always engaging.Which of the following weakens the assessment made in the above argument?a)The Nobel Prize for literature brings with it more acclaim, honor and recognition than the Booker Prize.b)Whenever any literary award is announced, it is usual for the people in the field the world over to raise controversies, most of which are unjustifiedc)There have been some years, including the year in which Arundati Roy was chosen for the award, when there was universal approval of the choices.d)This years Booker Prize for the novel The Line of Beauty has raised a controversy that it is not better than another entry Cloud Atlas.e)Literature is a field where one would think the practitioners have risen well over petty squabbles and criticisms.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Booker awards are not merely about who wins the coveted literary prize, an annual honor that bestows instant celebrity status and a windfall in terms of book sales. They are also about such things as who deserved to win, why someone lost and whether someone else was unfairly overlooked - issues that become the stuff of intense literary brawls, vicious backbiting on occasion - but always engaging.Which of the following weakens the assessment made in the above argument?a)The Nobel Prize for literature brings with it more acclaim, honor and recognition than the Booker Prize.b)Whenever any literary award is announced, it is usual for the people in the field the world over to raise controversies, most of which are unjustifiedc)There have been some years, including the year in which Arundati Roy was chosen for the award, when there was universal approval of the choices.d)This years Booker Prize for the novel The Line of Beauty has raised a controversy that it is not better than another entry Cloud Atlas.e)Literature is a field where one would think the practitioners have risen well over petty squabbles and criticisms.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Booker awards are not merely about who wins the coveted literary prize, an annual honor that bestows instant celebrity status and a windfall in terms of book sales. They are also about such things as who deserved to win, why someone lost and whether someone else was unfairly overlooked - issues that become the stuff of intense literary brawls, vicious backbiting on occasion - but always engaging.Which of the following weakens the assessment made in the above argument?a)The Nobel Prize for literature brings with it more acclaim, honor and recognition than the Booker Prize.b)Whenever any literary award is announced, it is usual for the people in the field the world over to raise controversies, most of which are unjustifiedc)There have been some years, including the year in which Arundati Roy was chosen for the award, when there was universal approval of the choices.d)This years Booker Prize for the novel The Line of Beauty has raised a controversy that it is not better than another entry Cloud Atlas.e)Literature is a field where one would think the practitioners have risen well over petty squabbles and criticisms.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam