Question Description
M, a shopkeeper, sold a Television set to N, who purchased it in good faith. The set had some manufacturing defect and it did not work after a few days in spite of repairs. In this case, the television was not merchantable as it was not fit for ordinary purposea)the buyer has no right to reject the television.b)the buyer has the right to reject the television and to have refund of the price.c)both of the above.d)none of the above [(a) (b)]Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CA Foundation 2025 is part of CA Foundation preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared
according to
the CA Foundation exam syllabus. Information about M, a shopkeeper, sold a Television set to N, who purchased it in good faith. The set had some manufacturing defect and it did not work after a few days in spite of repairs. In this case, the television was not merchantable as it was not fit for ordinary purposea)the buyer has no right to reject the television.b)the buyer has the right to reject the television and to have refund of the price.c)both of the above.d)none of the above [(a) (b)]Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CA Foundation 2025 Exam.
Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for M, a shopkeeper, sold a Television set to N, who purchased it in good faith. The set had some manufacturing defect and it did not work after a few days in spite of repairs. In this case, the television was not merchantable as it was not fit for ordinary purposea)the buyer has no right to reject the television.b)the buyer has the right to reject the television and to have refund of the price.c)both of the above.d)none of the above [(a) (b)]Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for M, a shopkeeper, sold a Television set to N, who purchased it in good faith. The set had some manufacturing defect and it did not work after a few days in spite of repairs. In this case, the television was not merchantable as it was not fit for ordinary purposea)the buyer has no right to reject the television.b)the buyer has the right to reject the television and to have refund of the price.c)both of the above.d)none of the above [(a) (b)]Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CA Foundation.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CA Foundation Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of M, a shopkeeper, sold a Television set to N, who purchased it in good faith. The set had some manufacturing defect and it did not work after a few days in spite of repairs. In this case, the television was not merchantable as it was not fit for ordinary purposea)the buyer has no right to reject the television.b)the buyer has the right to reject the television and to have refund of the price.c)both of the above.d)none of the above [(a) (b)]Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
M, a shopkeeper, sold a Television set to N, who purchased it in good faith. The set had some manufacturing defect and it did not work after a few days in spite of repairs. In this case, the television was not merchantable as it was not fit for ordinary purposea)the buyer has no right to reject the television.b)the buyer has the right to reject the television and to have refund of the price.c)both of the above.d)none of the above [(a) (b)]Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for M, a shopkeeper, sold a Television set to N, who purchased it in good faith. The set had some manufacturing defect and it did not work after a few days in spite of repairs. In this case, the television was not merchantable as it was not fit for ordinary purposea)the buyer has no right to reject the television.b)the buyer has the right to reject the television and to have refund of the price.c)both of the above.d)none of the above [(a) (b)]Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of M, a shopkeeper, sold a Television set to N, who purchased it in good faith. The set had some manufacturing defect and it did not work after a few days in spite of repairs. In this case, the television was not merchantable as it was not fit for ordinary purposea)the buyer has no right to reject the television.b)the buyer has the right to reject the television and to have refund of the price.c)both of the above.d)none of the above [(a) (b)]Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice M, a shopkeeper, sold a Television set to N, who purchased it in good faith. The set had some manufacturing defect and it did not work after a few days in spite of repairs. In this case, the television was not merchantable as it was not fit for ordinary purposea)the buyer has no right to reject the television.b)the buyer has the right to reject the television and to have refund of the price.c)both of the above.d)none of the above [(a) (b)]Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CA Foundation tests.