Introduction:
In the field of Political Science and International Relations (PSIR), providing a balanced analysis is essential to showcase a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter. Including examples of both success stories and failures in your answers can greatly contribute to achieving this balance. Here's why:

1. Comprehensive understanding:
By including examples of both success stories and failures, you demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the topic. This shows that you have considered various perspectives, outcomes, and variables in your analysis, resulting in a more well-rounded and nuanced response.

2. Objective analysis:
Including both success stories and failures in your answers helps maintain objectivity. It shows that you are not biased towards only highlighting positive outcomes or ignoring the negative aspects. This approach strengthens the credibility of your analysis and prevents any potential bias from influencing your conclusions.

3. Realistic assessment:
Examining both success stories and failures provides a realistic assessment of the situation or phenomenon under discussion. It acknowledges that not all endeavors or policies are successful and that failures can provide valuable lessons for improvement. This realistic assessment adds depth to your analysis and showcases a deeper understanding of the complexities involved.

4. Comparative analysis:
Comparing success stories and failures allows for a more in-depth analysis. It helps identify common factors or patterns that contribute to success or failure. By studying both sides of the coin, you can draw meaningful conclusions about the underlying reasons for success or failure, enabling a more comprehensive understanding of the subject matter.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, including examples of both success stories and failures in your answers to showcase a balanced analysis is highly recommended in the field of PSIR. It demonstrates a comprehensive understanding, maintains objectivity, provides a realistic assessment, and allows for comparative analysis. By following this approach, you can enhance the quality of your responses and showcase a deeper understanding of the subject matter.