GRE Exam  >  GRE Questions  >   Directions: Answer the questions based on th... Start Learning for Free
Directions: Answer the questions based on the following passage.
Ludwig Wittgenstein asserted that with the publication of his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus he had solved all philosophical problems and retired to teach mathematics at the secondary level. He believed he had achieved this through his exploration of the logic of language, which he referred to as his “picture theory” of language.
Wittgenstein’s contention was that the world consisted of a collection of interconnected “facts” that created “pictures” of the world through propositions. These propositions are meaningful if they picture matters of empirical fact, such as “Meri is six feet tall.” In order for these linguistic pictures to accurately represent facts, they must have the same logical structure as matters of empirical fact.
The problem is that philosophical propositions, such as “truth is beauty,” are not matters of empirical fact. Since language itself is based on this relationship, philosophers cannot extricate themselves from the realm of language in order to actually say anything about whether or not the “pictures” have the same logical structure as the facts. One important consequence of this argument is that it is nonsensical to discuss philosophical problems. The propositions that philosophers commonly make are not technically wrong but nonsensical. For Wittgenstein, the ultimate goal of philosophy itself is not the actual study or pursuit of “truth.” Philosophy has more to do with clarifying the relationship between language and truth than truth itself. The Tractatus ends up subverting its own claims by concluding that the kind of propositions of which it is composed are senseless.
The most commonly quoted excerpt from the book is the proposition “What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence.”
Q. The author believes Wittgenstein would likely agree with which of the following statements?
  • a)
    The truth is not beautiful.
  • b)
    Beauty is not truthful.
  • c)
    Something cannot be both truthful and beautiful.
  • d)
    The proposition “truth is beauty” is nonsensical.
  • e)
    Beauty is the same as truth.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: Answer the questions based on the following passage.Ludwi...
The passage itself is largely concerned with the philosophical relationship between logical reasoning and language. The author notes that Wittgenstein distinguishes between propositions that are “pictures” of empirical fact and those that are not. The statement “truth is beauty” falls into the latter category. Since it is not a matter of empirical fact, you cannot determine if the linguistic picture (the proposition “truth is beauty”) has the same logical structure as the fact itself. Therefore, it is nonsensical. Choice (D) is your answer.
Free Test
Community Answer
Directions: Answer the questions based on the following passage.Ludwi...
Understanding Wittgenstein's View on Propositions
Wittgenstein's philosophy, particularly in his work *Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus*, emphasizes the relationship between language and the world. His assertions lead to the conclusion that some philosophical propositions, including "truth is beauty," are nonsensical.
Why "Truth is Beauty" is Nonsensical
- Lack of Empirical Fact: Wittgenstein argues that for a proposition to be meaningful, it must correspond to a matter of empirical fact. The statement "truth is beauty" does not describe a verifiable condition or fact about the world.
- Logical Structure: Propositions must have the same logical structure as the facts they represent. Since "truth is beauty" is a philosophical assertion rather than an empirical observation, it fails this criterion.
- Philosophical Limitations: Wittgenstein posits that philosophical inquiries often stray into nonsensical territory because they cannot be articulated within the confines of language that accurately represents reality.
Conclusion
Given this framework, Wittgenstein would agree with the statement that the proposition "truth is beauty" is nonsensical. This aligns with his broader aim to clarify the boundaries of language and philosophical discourse, asserting that many philosophical discussions do not produce meaningful statements about the world. Thus, option 'D' accurately reflects his position on such propositions.
Attention GRE Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GRE study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GRE.
Explore Courses for GRE exam

Similar GRE Doubts

Directions: Answer the questions based on the following passage.Ludwig Wittgenstein asserted that with the publication of his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus he had solved all philosophical problems and retired to teach mathematics at the secondary level. He believed he had achieved this through his exploration of the logic of language, which he referred to as his “picture theory” of language.Wittgenstein’s contention was that the world consisted of a collection of interconnected “facts” that created “pictures” of the world through propositions. These propositions are meaningful if they picture matters of empirical fact, such as “Meri is six feet tall.” In order for these linguistic pictures to accurately represent facts, they must have the same logical structure as matters of empirical fact.The problem is that philosophical propositions, such as “truth is beauty,” are not matters of empirical fact. Since language itself is based on this relationship, philosophers cannot extricate themselves from the realm of language in order to actually say anything about whether or not the “pictures” have the same logical structure as the facts. One important consequence of this argument is that it is nonsensical to discuss philosophical problems. The propositions that philosophers commonly make are not technically wrong but nonsensical. For Wittgenstein, the ultimate goal of philosophy itself is not the actual study or pursuit of “truth.” Philosophy has more to do with clarifying the relationship between language and truth than truth itself. The Tractatus ends up subverting its own claims by concluding that the kind of propositions of which it is composed are senseless.The most commonly quoted excerpt from the book is the proposition “What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence.”Q. Based on the context of the passage, the author’s use of the word “empirical” most nearly means which of the following?

Top Courses for GRE

Directions: Answer the questions based on the following passage.Ludwig Wittgenstein asserted that with the publication of his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus he had solved all philosophical problems and retired to teach mathematics at the secondary level. He believed he had achieved this through his exploration of the logic of language, which he referred to as his “picture theory” of language.Wittgenstein’s contention was that the world consisted of a collection of interconnected “facts” that created “pictures” of the world through propositions. These propositions are meaningful if they picture matters of empirical fact, such as “Meri is six feet tall.” In order for these linguistic pictures to accurately represent facts, they must have the same logical structure as matters of empirical fact.The problem is that philosophical propositions, such as “truth is beauty,” are not matters of empirical fact. Since language itself is based on this relationship, philosophers cannot extricate themselves from the realm of language in order to actually say anything about whether or not the “pictures” have the same logical structure as the facts. One important consequence of this argument is that it is nonsensical to discuss philosophical problems. The propositions that philosophers commonly make are not technically wrong but nonsensical. For Wittgenstein, the ultimate goal of philosophy itself is not the actual study or pursuit of “truth.” Philosophy has more to do with clarifying the relationship between language and truth than truth itself. The Tractatus ends up subverting its own claims by concluding that the kind of propositions of which it is composed are senseless.The most commonly quoted excerpt from the book is the proposition “What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence.”Q. The author believes Wittgenstein would likely agree with which of the following statements?a)The truth is not beautiful.b)Beauty is not truthful.c)Something cannot be both truthful and beautiful.d)The proposition “truth is beauty” is nonsensical.e)Beauty is the same as truth.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Answer the questions based on the following passage.Ludwig Wittgenstein asserted that with the publication of his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus he had solved all philosophical problems and retired to teach mathematics at the secondary level. He believed he had achieved this through his exploration of the logic of language, which he referred to as his “picture theory” of language.Wittgenstein’s contention was that the world consisted of a collection of interconnected “facts” that created “pictures” of the world through propositions. These propositions are meaningful if they picture matters of empirical fact, such as “Meri is six feet tall.” In order for these linguistic pictures to accurately represent facts, they must have the same logical structure as matters of empirical fact.The problem is that philosophical propositions, such as “truth is beauty,” are not matters of empirical fact. Since language itself is based on this relationship, philosophers cannot extricate themselves from the realm of language in order to actually say anything about whether or not the “pictures” have the same logical structure as the facts. One important consequence of this argument is that it is nonsensical to discuss philosophical problems. The propositions that philosophers commonly make are not technically wrong but nonsensical. For Wittgenstein, the ultimate goal of philosophy itself is not the actual study or pursuit of “truth.” Philosophy has more to do with clarifying the relationship between language and truth than truth itself. The Tractatus ends up subverting its own claims by concluding that the kind of propositions of which it is composed are senseless.The most commonly quoted excerpt from the book is the proposition “What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence.”Q. The author believes Wittgenstein would likely agree with which of the following statements?a)The truth is not beautiful.b)Beauty is not truthful.c)Something cannot be both truthful and beautiful.d)The proposition “truth is beauty” is nonsensical.e)Beauty is the same as truth.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GRE 2024 is part of GRE preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GRE exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Answer the questions based on the following passage.Ludwig Wittgenstein asserted that with the publication of his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus he had solved all philosophical problems and retired to teach mathematics at the secondary level. He believed he had achieved this through his exploration of the logic of language, which he referred to as his “picture theory” of language.Wittgenstein’s contention was that the world consisted of a collection of interconnected “facts” that created “pictures” of the world through propositions. These propositions are meaningful if they picture matters of empirical fact, such as “Meri is six feet tall.” In order for these linguistic pictures to accurately represent facts, they must have the same logical structure as matters of empirical fact.The problem is that philosophical propositions, such as “truth is beauty,” are not matters of empirical fact. Since language itself is based on this relationship, philosophers cannot extricate themselves from the realm of language in order to actually say anything about whether or not the “pictures” have the same logical structure as the facts. One important consequence of this argument is that it is nonsensical to discuss philosophical problems. The propositions that philosophers commonly make are not technically wrong but nonsensical. For Wittgenstein, the ultimate goal of philosophy itself is not the actual study or pursuit of “truth.” Philosophy has more to do with clarifying the relationship between language and truth than truth itself. The Tractatus ends up subverting its own claims by concluding that the kind of propositions of which it is composed are senseless.The most commonly quoted excerpt from the book is the proposition “What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence.”Q. The author believes Wittgenstein would likely agree with which of the following statements?a)The truth is not beautiful.b)Beauty is not truthful.c)Something cannot be both truthful and beautiful.d)The proposition “truth is beauty” is nonsensical.e)Beauty is the same as truth.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GRE 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Answer the questions based on the following passage.Ludwig Wittgenstein asserted that with the publication of his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus he had solved all philosophical problems and retired to teach mathematics at the secondary level. He believed he had achieved this through his exploration of the logic of language, which he referred to as his “picture theory” of language.Wittgenstein’s contention was that the world consisted of a collection of interconnected “facts” that created “pictures” of the world through propositions. These propositions are meaningful if they picture matters of empirical fact, such as “Meri is six feet tall.” In order for these linguistic pictures to accurately represent facts, they must have the same logical structure as matters of empirical fact.The problem is that philosophical propositions, such as “truth is beauty,” are not matters of empirical fact. Since language itself is based on this relationship, philosophers cannot extricate themselves from the realm of language in order to actually say anything about whether or not the “pictures” have the same logical structure as the facts. One important consequence of this argument is that it is nonsensical to discuss philosophical problems. The propositions that philosophers commonly make are not technically wrong but nonsensical. For Wittgenstein, the ultimate goal of philosophy itself is not the actual study or pursuit of “truth.” Philosophy has more to do with clarifying the relationship between language and truth than truth itself. The Tractatus ends up subverting its own claims by concluding that the kind of propositions of which it is composed are senseless.The most commonly quoted excerpt from the book is the proposition “What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence.”Q. The author believes Wittgenstein would likely agree with which of the following statements?a)The truth is not beautiful.b)Beauty is not truthful.c)Something cannot be both truthful and beautiful.d)The proposition “truth is beauty” is nonsensical.e)Beauty is the same as truth.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Answer the questions based on the following passage.Ludwig Wittgenstein asserted that with the publication of his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus he had solved all philosophical problems and retired to teach mathematics at the secondary level. He believed he had achieved this through his exploration of the logic of language, which he referred to as his “picture theory” of language.Wittgenstein’s contention was that the world consisted of a collection of interconnected “facts” that created “pictures” of the world through propositions. These propositions are meaningful if they picture matters of empirical fact, such as “Meri is six feet tall.” In order for these linguistic pictures to accurately represent facts, they must have the same logical structure as matters of empirical fact.The problem is that philosophical propositions, such as “truth is beauty,” are not matters of empirical fact. Since language itself is based on this relationship, philosophers cannot extricate themselves from the realm of language in order to actually say anything about whether or not the “pictures” have the same logical structure as the facts. One important consequence of this argument is that it is nonsensical to discuss philosophical problems. The propositions that philosophers commonly make are not technically wrong but nonsensical. For Wittgenstein, the ultimate goal of philosophy itself is not the actual study or pursuit of “truth.” Philosophy has more to do with clarifying the relationship between language and truth than truth itself. The Tractatus ends up subverting its own claims by concluding that the kind of propositions of which it is composed are senseless.The most commonly quoted excerpt from the book is the proposition “What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence.”Q. The author believes Wittgenstein would likely agree with which of the following statements?a)The truth is not beautiful.b)Beauty is not truthful.c)Something cannot be both truthful and beautiful.d)The proposition “truth is beauty” is nonsensical.e)Beauty is the same as truth.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GRE. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GRE Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Answer the questions based on the following passage.Ludwig Wittgenstein asserted that with the publication of his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus he had solved all philosophical problems and retired to teach mathematics at the secondary level. He believed he had achieved this through his exploration of the logic of language, which he referred to as his “picture theory” of language.Wittgenstein’s contention was that the world consisted of a collection of interconnected “facts” that created “pictures” of the world through propositions. These propositions are meaningful if they picture matters of empirical fact, such as “Meri is six feet tall.” In order for these linguistic pictures to accurately represent facts, they must have the same logical structure as matters of empirical fact.The problem is that philosophical propositions, such as “truth is beauty,” are not matters of empirical fact. Since language itself is based on this relationship, philosophers cannot extricate themselves from the realm of language in order to actually say anything about whether or not the “pictures” have the same logical structure as the facts. One important consequence of this argument is that it is nonsensical to discuss philosophical problems. The propositions that philosophers commonly make are not technically wrong but nonsensical. For Wittgenstein, the ultimate goal of philosophy itself is not the actual study or pursuit of “truth.” Philosophy has more to do with clarifying the relationship between language and truth than truth itself. The Tractatus ends up subverting its own claims by concluding that the kind of propositions of which it is composed are senseless.The most commonly quoted excerpt from the book is the proposition “What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence.”Q. The author believes Wittgenstein would likely agree with which of the following statements?a)The truth is not beautiful.b)Beauty is not truthful.c)Something cannot be both truthful and beautiful.d)The proposition “truth is beauty” is nonsensical.e)Beauty is the same as truth.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Answer the questions based on the following passage.Ludwig Wittgenstein asserted that with the publication of his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus he had solved all philosophical problems and retired to teach mathematics at the secondary level. He believed he had achieved this through his exploration of the logic of language, which he referred to as his “picture theory” of language.Wittgenstein’s contention was that the world consisted of a collection of interconnected “facts” that created “pictures” of the world through propositions. These propositions are meaningful if they picture matters of empirical fact, such as “Meri is six feet tall.” In order for these linguistic pictures to accurately represent facts, they must have the same logical structure as matters of empirical fact.The problem is that philosophical propositions, such as “truth is beauty,” are not matters of empirical fact. Since language itself is based on this relationship, philosophers cannot extricate themselves from the realm of language in order to actually say anything about whether or not the “pictures” have the same logical structure as the facts. One important consequence of this argument is that it is nonsensical to discuss philosophical problems. The propositions that philosophers commonly make are not technically wrong but nonsensical. For Wittgenstein, the ultimate goal of philosophy itself is not the actual study or pursuit of “truth.” Philosophy has more to do with clarifying the relationship between language and truth than truth itself. The Tractatus ends up subverting its own claims by concluding that the kind of propositions of which it is composed are senseless.The most commonly quoted excerpt from the book is the proposition “What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence.”Q. The author believes Wittgenstein would likely agree with which of the following statements?a)The truth is not beautiful.b)Beauty is not truthful.c)Something cannot be both truthful and beautiful.d)The proposition “truth is beauty” is nonsensical.e)Beauty is the same as truth.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Answer the questions based on the following passage.Ludwig Wittgenstein asserted that with the publication of his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus he had solved all philosophical problems and retired to teach mathematics at the secondary level. He believed he had achieved this through his exploration of the logic of language, which he referred to as his “picture theory” of language.Wittgenstein’s contention was that the world consisted of a collection of interconnected “facts” that created “pictures” of the world through propositions. These propositions are meaningful if they picture matters of empirical fact, such as “Meri is six feet tall.” In order for these linguistic pictures to accurately represent facts, they must have the same logical structure as matters of empirical fact.The problem is that philosophical propositions, such as “truth is beauty,” are not matters of empirical fact. Since language itself is based on this relationship, philosophers cannot extricate themselves from the realm of language in order to actually say anything about whether or not the “pictures” have the same logical structure as the facts. One important consequence of this argument is that it is nonsensical to discuss philosophical problems. The propositions that philosophers commonly make are not technically wrong but nonsensical. For Wittgenstein, the ultimate goal of philosophy itself is not the actual study or pursuit of “truth.” Philosophy has more to do with clarifying the relationship between language and truth than truth itself. The Tractatus ends up subverting its own claims by concluding that the kind of propositions of which it is composed are senseless.The most commonly quoted excerpt from the book is the proposition “What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence.”Q. The author believes Wittgenstein would likely agree with which of the following statements?a)The truth is not beautiful.b)Beauty is not truthful.c)Something cannot be both truthful and beautiful.d)The proposition “truth is beauty” is nonsensical.e)Beauty is the same as truth.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Answer the questions based on the following passage.Ludwig Wittgenstein asserted that with the publication of his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus he had solved all philosophical problems and retired to teach mathematics at the secondary level. He believed he had achieved this through his exploration of the logic of language, which he referred to as his “picture theory” of language.Wittgenstein’s contention was that the world consisted of a collection of interconnected “facts” that created “pictures” of the world through propositions. These propositions are meaningful if they picture matters of empirical fact, such as “Meri is six feet tall.” In order for these linguistic pictures to accurately represent facts, they must have the same logical structure as matters of empirical fact.The problem is that philosophical propositions, such as “truth is beauty,” are not matters of empirical fact. Since language itself is based on this relationship, philosophers cannot extricate themselves from the realm of language in order to actually say anything about whether or not the “pictures” have the same logical structure as the facts. One important consequence of this argument is that it is nonsensical to discuss philosophical problems. The propositions that philosophers commonly make are not technically wrong but nonsensical. For Wittgenstein, the ultimate goal of philosophy itself is not the actual study or pursuit of “truth.” Philosophy has more to do with clarifying the relationship between language and truth than truth itself. The Tractatus ends up subverting its own claims by concluding that the kind of propositions of which it is composed are senseless.The most commonly quoted excerpt from the book is the proposition “What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence.”Q. The author believes Wittgenstein would likely agree with which of the following statements?a)The truth is not beautiful.b)Beauty is not truthful.c)Something cannot be both truthful and beautiful.d)The proposition “truth is beauty” is nonsensical.e)Beauty is the same as truth.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Answer the questions based on the following passage.Ludwig Wittgenstein asserted that with the publication of his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus he had solved all philosophical problems and retired to teach mathematics at the secondary level. He believed he had achieved this through his exploration of the logic of language, which he referred to as his “picture theory” of language.Wittgenstein’s contention was that the world consisted of a collection of interconnected “facts” that created “pictures” of the world through propositions. These propositions are meaningful if they picture matters of empirical fact, such as “Meri is six feet tall.” In order for these linguistic pictures to accurately represent facts, they must have the same logical structure as matters of empirical fact.The problem is that philosophical propositions, such as “truth is beauty,” are not matters of empirical fact. Since language itself is based on this relationship, philosophers cannot extricate themselves from the realm of language in order to actually say anything about whether or not the “pictures” have the same logical structure as the facts. One important consequence of this argument is that it is nonsensical to discuss philosophical problems. The propositions that philosophers commonly make are not technically wrong but nonsensical. For Wittgenstein, the ultimate goal of philosophy itself is not the actual study or pursuit of “truth.” Philosophy has more to do with clarifying the relationship between language and truth than truth itself. The Tractatus ends up subverting its own claims by concluding that the kind of propositions of which it is composed are senseless.The most commonly quoted excerpt from the book is the proposition “What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence.”Q. The author believes Wittgenstein would likely agree with which of the following statements?a)The truth is not beautiful.b)Beauty is not truthful.c)Something cannot be both truthful and beautiful.d)The proposition “truth is beauty” is nonsensical.e)Beauty is the same as truth.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GRE tests.
Explore Courses for GRE exam

Top Courses for GRE

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev