GRE Exam > GRE Questions > Direction: Read the following passage careful...
Start Learning for Free
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it.
Upton Sinclair’s 1906 novel The Jungle, set in the meatpacking plants of early 20th-century Chicago, was intended to provoke a strong public reaction. The book, based on Sinclair’s own experience working incognito at a meatpacking plant, tells of the horrific working conditions in the meat industry. The stories of contaminated or diseased meat were intended to incite outrage at the system of worker exploitation that led to these issues; however, the response of both the public and the government focused on food safety. Less than a year after publication of The Jungle, Congress passed the Pure Food and Drug Act, which eventually led to the creation of the modern Food and Drug Administration. Sinclair himself was not pleased with what he saw as a misinterpretation of his work; he famously said, “I aimed at the public's heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach.”
Upton Sinclair’s 1906 novel The Jungle, set in the meatpacking plants of early 20th-century Chicago, was intended to provoke a strong public reaction. The book, based on Sinclair’s own experience working incognito at a meatpacking plant, tells of the horrific working conditions in the meat industry. The stories of contaminated or diseased meat were intended to incite outrage at the system of worker exploitation that led to these issues; however, the response of both the public and the government focused on food safety. Less than a year after publication of The Jungle, Congress passed the Pure Food and Drug Act, which eventually led to the creation of the modern Food and Drug Administration. Sinclair himself was not pleased with what he saw as a misinterpretation of his work; he famously said, “I aimed at the public's heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach.”
The reaction to The Jungle is hardly the first time that concerns over food safety and purity have won out over more compassionate objectives. In 1516, Bavaria (then part of the Holy Roman Empire) passed the Reinheitsgebot, a law mandating, among other things, that the only ingredients that could be used in the production of beer were barley, hops, and water. Although Reinheitsgebot literally translates to “purity order,” the main impetus behind the law was not to protect the purity of beer but rather to prevent competition between bakers and brewers for the purchase of grains. By ensuring that wheat and rye would be available only for bakers, the Bavarian government hoped to keep bread affordable for everyone. Many modern breweries, however, tout that their beers conform to the Reinheitsgebot in an attempt to convince consumers of the quality and purity of their beer, completely ignoring the original empathetic intent of the law. Perhaps the public’s stomach is, in fact, more sensitive than its heart.
Q. With which of the following statements about the Pure Food and Drug Act would the author of the passage likely agree?
- a)It did not do enough to ensure the safety of America’s food supplies, given the state of the meatpacking industry.
- b)It was a misguided response to the transgressions of the meatpacking industry exposed in The Jungle.
- c)Congress enacted the law to limit competition for resources, although its effect was to improve food quality.
- d)The act was likely to increase the price of food by imposing regulations on the meatpacking industry.
- e)It was intended to fix problems that were not highlighted in The Jungle.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questio...
The question asks what the author of the passage would think about the Pure Food and Drug Act; this law is discussed in the first paragraph, so start your research there. The only opinion there is that of Upton Sinclair, who was not happy that the act focused on food safety rather than the worker exploitation he sought to highlight in The Jungle. Look further to find the opinion of the passage's author. In the first sentence of the second paragraph, the author indicates an opinion through a comparison, saying that "concerns over food safety and purity . . . won out over more compassionate objectives." Thus, the author feels that Congress with the Pure Food and Drug Act addressed a less important problem than it should have. Then again, in the last sentence of the passage, the author expresses agreement with Sinclair, saying that “the public’s stomach is, in fact, more sensitive than its heart.” Look for an answer choice that lines up with the opinion. (B) does so nicely; the author would think, just as Sinclair did, that this law was a misguided response to The Jungle, so this is the correct answer.
(A) is incorrect because the author does not express any opinion on the effectiveness of the law; she thinks a law protecting workers would have been a more appropriate response, but that doesn’t mean she thinks the law that was passed didn’t work. (C) confuses the U.S. law this question asks about with the Bavarian law discussed in the second paragraph. (D) is wrong because the only discussion of food prices comes in the second paragraph in connection to the Reinheitsgebot, not the Pure Food and Drug Act. (E) may be tempting because the author does think the act addressed a problem that should have been a lower priority. However, it's clear that The Jungle did highlight a problem with food quality, given its "stories of contaminated or diseased meat," and the law addressed that issue.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questio...
The question asks what the author of the passage would think about the Pure Food and Drug Act; this law is discussed in the first paragraph, so start your research there. The only opinion there is that of Upton Sinclair, who was not happy that the act focused on food safety rather than the worker exploitation he sought to highlight in The Jungle. Look further to find the opinion of the passage's author. In the first sentence of the second paragraph, the author indicates an opinion through a comparison, saying that "concerns over food safety and purity . . . won out over more compassionate objectives." Thus, the author feels that Congress with the Pure Food and Drug Act addressed a less important problem than it should have. Then again, in the last sentence of the passage, the author expresses agreement with Sinclair, saying that “the public’s stomach is, in fact, more sensitive than its heart.” Look for an answer choice that lines up with the opinion. (B) does so nicely; the author would think, just as Sinclair did, that this law was a misguided response to The Jungle, so this is the correct answer.
(A) is incorrect because the author does not express any opinion on the effectiveness of the law; she thinks a law protecting workers would have been a more appropriate response, but that doesn’t mean she thinks the law that was passed didn’t work. (C) confuses the U.S. law this question asks about with the Bavarian law discussed in the second paragraph. (D) is wrong because the only discussion of food prices comes in the second paragraph in connection to the Reinheitsgebot, not the Pure Food and Drug Act. (E) may be tempting because the author does think the act addressed a problem that should have been a lower priority. However, it's clear that The Jungle did highlight a problem with food quality, given its "stories of contaminated or diseased meat," and the law addressed that issue.
Attention GRE Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GRE study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GRE.
|
Explore Courses for GRE exam
|
|
Similar GRE Doubts
Top Courses for GREView all
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it.Upton Sinclair’s 1906 novel The Jungle, set in the meatpacking plants of early 20th-century Chicago, was intended to provoke a strong public reaction. The book, based on Sinclair’s own experience working incognito at a meatpacking plant, tells of the horrific working conditions in the meat industry. The stories of contaminated or diseased meat were intended to incite outrage at the system of worker exploitation that led to these issues; however, the response of both the public and the government focused on food safety. Less than a year after publication of The Jungle, Congress passed the Pure Food and Drug Act, which eventually led to the creation of the modern Food and Drug Administration. Sinclair himself was not pleased with what he saw as a misinterpretation of his work; he famously said, “I aimed at the publics heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach.”The reaction to The Jungle is hardly the first time that concerns over food safety and purity have won out over more compassionate objectives. In 1516, Bavaria (then part of the Holy Roman Empire) passed the Reinheitsgebot, a law mandating, among other things, that the only ingredients that could be used in the production of beer were barley, hops, and water. Although Reinheitsgebot literally translates to “purity order,” the main impetus behind the law was not to protect the purity of beer but rather to prevent competition between bakers and brewers for the purchase of grains. By ensuring that wheat and rye would be available only for bakers, the Bavarian government hoped to keep bread affordable for everyone. Many modern breweries, however, tout that their beers conform to the Reinheitsgebot in an attempt toconvince consumers of the quality and purity of their beer, completely ignoring the original empathetic intent of the law. Perhaps the public’s stomach is, in fact, more sensitive than its heart.Q.With which of the following statements about the Pure Food and Drug Act would the author of the passage likely agree?a)It did not do enough to ensure the safety of America’s food supplies, given the state of the meatpacking industry.b)It was a misguided response to the transgressions of the meatpacking industry exposed in The Jungle.c)Congress enacted the law to limit competition for resources, although its effect was to improve food quality.d)The act was likely to increase the price of food by imposing regulations on the meatpacking industry.e)It was intended to fix problems that were not highlighted in The Jungle.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it.Upton Sinclair’s 1906 novel The Jungle, set in the meatpacking plants of early 20th-century Chicago, was intended to provoke a strong public reaction. The book, based on Sinclair’s own experience working incognito at a meatpacking plant, tells of the horrific working conditions in the meat industry. The stories of contaminated or diseased meat were intended to incite outrage at the system of worker exploitation that led to these issues; however, the response of both the public and the government focused on food safety. Less than a year after publication of The Jungle, Congress passed the Pure Food and Drug Act, which eventually led to the creation of the modern Food and Drug Administration. Sinclair himself was not pleased with what he saw as a misinterpretation of his work; he famously said, “I aimed at the publics heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach.”The reaction to The Jungle is hardly the first time that concerns over food safety and purity have won out over more compassionate objectives. In 1516, Bavaria (then part of the Holy Roman Empire) passed the Reinheitsgebot, a law mandating, among other things, that the only ingredients that could be used in the production of beer were barley, hops, and water. Although Reinheitsgebot literally translates to “purity order,” the main impetus behind the law was not to protect the purity of beer but rather to prevent competition between bakers and brewers for the purchase of grains. By ensuring that wheat and rye would be available only for bakers, the Bavarian government hoped to keep bread affordable for everyone. Many modern breweries, however, tout that their beers conform to the Reinheitsgebot in an attempt toconvince consumers of the quality and purity of their beer, completely ignoring the original empathetic intent of the law. Perhaps the public’s stomach is, in fact, more sensitive than its heart.Q.With which of the following statements about the Pure Food and Drug Act would the author of the passage likely agree?a)It did not do enough to ensure the safety of America’s food supplies, given the state of the meatpacking industry.b)It was a misguided response to the transgressions of the meatpacking industry exposed in The Jungle.c)Congress enacted the law to limit competition for resources, although its effect was to improve food quality.d)The act was likely to increase the price of food by imposing regulations on the meatpacking industry.e)It was intended to fix problems that were not highlighted in The Jungle.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GRE 2024 is part of GRE preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GRE exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it.Upton Sinclair’s 1906 novel The Jungle, set in the meatpacking plants of early 20th-century Chicago, was intended to provoke a strong public reaction. The book, based on Sinclair’s own experience working incognito at a meatpacking plant, tells of the horrific working conditions in the meat industry. The stories of contaminated or diseased meat were intended to incite outrage at the system of worker exploitation that led to these issues; however, the response of both the public and the government focused on food safety. Less than a year after publication of The Jungle, Congress passed the Pure Food and Drug Act, which eventually led to the creation of the modern Food and Drug Administration. Sinclair himself was not pleased with what he saw as a misinterpretation of his work; he famously said, “I aimed at the publics heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach.”The reaction to The Jungle is hardly the first time that concerns over food safety and purity have won out over more compassionate objectives. In 1516, Bavaria (then part of the Holy Roman Empire) passed the Reinheitsgebot, a law mandating, among other things, that the only ingredients that could be used in the production of beer were barley, hops, and water. Although Reinheitsgebot literally translates to “purity order,” the main impetus behind the law was not to protect the purity of beer but rather to prevent competition between bakers and brewers for the purchase of grains. By ensuring that wheat and rye would be available only for bakers, the Bavarian government hoped to keep bread affordable for everyone. Many modern breweries, however, tout that their beers conform to the Reinheitsgebot in an attempt toconvince consumers of the quality and purity of their beer, completely ignoring the original empathetic intent of the law. Perhaps the public’s stomach is, in fact, more sensitive than its heart.Q.With which of the following statements about the Pure Food and Drug Act would the author of the passage likely agree?a)It did not do enough to ensure the safety of America’s food supplies, given the state of the meatpacking industry.b)It was a misguided response to the transgressions of the meatpacking industry exposed in The Jungle.c)Congress enacted the law to limit competition for resources, although its effect was to improve food quality.d)The act was likely to increase the price of food by imposing regulations on the meatpacking industry.e)It was intended to fix problems that were not highlighted in The Jungle.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GRE 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it.Upton Sinclair’s 1906 novel The Jungle, set in the meatpacking plants of early 20th-century Chicago, was intended to provoke a strong public reaction. The book, based on Sinclair’s own experience working incognito at a meatpacking plant, tells of the horrific working conditions in the meat industry. The stories of contaminated or diseased meat were intended to incite outrage at the system of worker exploitation that led to these issues; however, the response of both the public and the government focused on food safety. Less than a year after publication of The Jungle, Congress passed the Pure Food and Drug Act, which eventually led to the creation of the modern Food and Drug Administration. Sinclair himself was not pleased with what he saw as a misinterpretation of his work; he famously said, “I aimed at the publics heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach.”The reaction to The Jungle is hardly the first time that concerns over food safety and purity have won out over more compassionate objectives. In 1516, Bavaria (then part of the Holy Roman Empire) passed the Reinheitsgebot, a law mandating, among other things, that the only ingredients that could be used in the production of beer were barley, hops, and water. Although Reinheitsgebot literally translates to “purity order,” the main impetus behind the law was not to protect the purity of beer but rather to prevent competition between bakers and brewers for the purchase of grains. By ensuring that wheat and rye would be available only for bakers, the Bavarian government hoped to keep bread affordable for everyone. Many modern breweries, however, tout that their beers conform to the Reinheitsgebot in an attempt toconvince consumers of the quality and purity of their beer, completely ignoring the original empathetic intent of the law. Perhaps the public’s stomach is, in fact, more sensitive than its heart.Q.With which of the following statements about the Pure Food and Drug Act would the author of the passage likely agree?a)It did not do enough to ensure the safety of America’s food supplies, given the state of the meatpacking industry.b)It was a misguided response to the transgressions of the meatpacking industry exposed in The Jungle.c)Congress enacted the law to limit competition for resources, although its effect was to improve food quality.d)The act was likely to increase the price of food by imposing regulations on the meatpacking industry.e)It was intended to fix problems that were not highlighted in The Jungle.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it.Upton Sinclair’s 1906 novel The Jungle, set in the meatpacking plants of early 20th-century Chicago, was intended to provoke a strong public reaction. The book, based on Sinclair’s own experience working incognito at a meatpacking plant, tells of the horrific working conditions in the meat industry. The stories of contaminated or diseased meat were intended to incite outrage at the system of worker exploitation that led to these issues; however, the response of both the public and the government focused on food safety. Less than a year after publication of The Jungle, Congress passed the Pure Food and Drug Act, which eventually led to the creation of the modern Food and Drug Administration. Sinclair himself was not pleased with what he saw as a misinterpretation of his work; he famously said, “I aimed at the publics heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach.”The reaction to The Jungle is hardly the first time that concerns over food safety and purity have won out over more compassionate objectives. In 1516, Bavaria (then part of the Holy Roman Empire) passed the Reinheitsgebot, a law mandating, among other things, that the only ingredients that could be used in the production of beer were barley, hops, and water. Although Reinheitsgebot literally translates to “purity order,” the main impetus behind the law was not to protect the purity of beer but rather to prevent competition between bakers and brewers for the purchase of grains. By ensuring that wheat and rye would be available only for bakers, the Bavarian government hoped to keep bread affordable for everyone. Many modern breweries, however, tout that their beers conform to the Reinheitsgebot in an attempt toconvince consumers of the quality and purity of their beer, completely ignoring the original empathetic intent of the law. Perhaps the public’s stomach is, in fact, more sensitive than its heart.Q.With which of the following statements about the Pure Food and Drug Act would the author of the passage likely agree?a)It did not do enough to ensure the safety of America’s food supplies, given the state of the meatpacking industry.b)It was a misguided response to the transgressions of the meatpacking industry exposed in The Jungle.c)Congress enacted the law to limit competition for resources, although its effect was to improve food quality.d)The act was likely to increase the price of food by imposing regulations on the meatpacking industry.e)It was intended to fix problems that were not highlighted in The Jungle.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GRE 2024 is part of GRE preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GRE exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it.Upton Sinclair’s 1906 novel The Jungle, set in the meatpacking plants of early 20th-century Chicago, was intended to provoke a strong public reaction. The book, based on Sinclair’s own experience working incognito at a meatpacking plant, tells of the horrific working conditions in the meat industry. The stories of contaminated or diseased meat were intended to incite outrage at the system of worker exploitation that led to these issues; however, the response of both the public and the government focused on food safety. Less than a year after publication of The Jungle, Congress passed the Pure Food and Drug Act, which eventually led to the creation of the modern Food and Drug Administration. Sinclair himself was not pleased with what he saw as a misinterpretation of his work; he famously said, “I aimed at the publics heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach.”The reaction to The Jungle is hardly the first time that concerns over food safety and purity have won out over more compassionate objectives. In 1516, Bavaria (then part of the Holy Roman Empire) passed the Reinheitsgebot, a law mandating, among other things, that the only ingredients that could be used in the production of beer were barley, hops, and water. Although Reinheitsgebot literally translates to “purity order,” the main impetus behind the law was not to protect the purity of beer but rather to prevent competition between bakers and brewers for the purchase of grains. By ensuring that wheat and rye would be available only for bakers, the Bavarian government hoped to keep bread affordable for everyone. Many modern breweries, however, tout that their beers conform to the Reinheitsgebot in an attempt toconvince consumers of the quality and purity of their beer, completely ignoring the original empathetic intent of the law. Perhaps the public’s stomach is, in fact, more sensitive than its heart.Q.With which of the following statements about the Pure Food and Drug Act would the author of the passage likely agree?a)It did not do enough to ensure the safety of America’s food supplies, given the state of the meatpacking industry.b)It was a misguided response to the transgressions of the meatpacking industry exposed in The Jungle.c)Congress enacted the law to limit competition for resources, although its effect was to improve food quality.d)The act was likely to increase the price of food by imposing regulations on the meatpacking industry.e)It was intended to fix problems that were not highlighted in The Jungle.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GRE 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it.Upton Sinclair’s 1906 novel The Jungle, set in the meatpacking plants of early 20th-century Chicago, was intended to provoke a strong public reaction. The book, based on Sinclair’s own experience working incognito at a meatpacking plant, tells of the horrific working conditions in the meat industry. The stories of contaminated or diseased meat were intended to incite outrage at the system of worker exploitation that led to these issues; however, the response of both the public and the government focused on food safety. Less than a year after publication of The Jungle, Congress passed the Pure Food and Drug Act, which eventually led to the creation of the modern Food and Drug Administration. Sinclair himself was not pleased with what he saw as a misinterpretation of his work; he famously said, “I aimed at the publics heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach.”The reaction to The Jungle is hardly the first time that concerns over food safety and purity have won out over more compassionate objectives. In 1516, Bavaria (then part of the Holy Roman Empire) passed the Reinheitsgebot, a law mandating, among other things, that the only ingredients that could be used in the production of beer were barley, hops, and water. Although Reinheitsgebot literally translates to “purity order,” the main impetus behind the law was not to protect the purity of beer but rather to prevent competition between bakers and brewers for the purchase of grains. By ensuring that wheat and rye would be available only for bakers, the Bavarian government hoped to keep bread affordable for everyone. Many modern breweries, however, tout that their beers conform to the Reinheitsgebot in an attempt toconvince consumers of the quality and purity of their beer, completely ignoring the original empathetic intent of the law. Perhaps the public’s stomach is, in fact, more sensitive than its heart.Q.With which of the following statements about the Pure Food and Drug Act would the author of the passage likely agree?a)It did not do enough to ensure the safety of America’s food supplies, given the state of the meatpacking industry.b)It was a misguided response to the transgressions of the meatpacking industry exposed in The Jungle.c)Congress enacted the law to limit competition for resources, although its effect was to improve food quality.d)The act was likely to increase the price of food by imposing regulations on the meatpacking industry.e)It was intended to fix problems that were not highlighted in The Jungle.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it.Upton Sinclair’s 1906 novel The Jungle, set in the meatpacking plants of early 20th-century Chicago, was intended to provoke a strong public reaction. The book, based on Sinclair’s own experience working incognito at a meatpacking plant, tells of the horrific working conditions in the meat industry. The stories of contaminated or diseased meat were intended to incite outrage at the system of worker exploitation that led to these issues; however, the response of both the public and the government focused on food safety. Less than a year after publication of The Jungle, Congress passed the Pure Food and Drug Act, which eventually led to the creation of the modern Food and Drug Administration. Sinclair himself was not pleased with what he saw as a misinterpretation of his work; he famously said, “I aimed at the publics heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach.”The reaction to The Jungle is hardly the first time that concerns over food safety and purity have won out over more compassionate objectives. In 1516, Bavaria (then part of the Holy Roman Empire) passed the Reinheitsgebot, a law mandating, among other things, that the only ingredients that could be used in the production of beer were barley, hops, and water. Although Reinheitsgebot literally translates to “purity order,” the main impetus behind the law was not to protect the purity of beer but rather to prevent competition between bakers and brewers for the purchase of grains. By ensuring that wheat and rye would be available only for bakers, the Bavarian government hoped to keep bread affordable for everyone. Many modern breweries, however, tout that their beers conform to the Reinheitsgebot in an attempt toconvince consumers of the quality and purity of their beer, completely ignoring the original empathetic intent of the law. Perhaps the public’s stomach is, in fact, more sensitive than its heart.Q.With which of the following statements about the Pure Food and Drug Act would the author of the passage likely agree?a)It did not do enough to ensure the safety of America’s food supplies, given the state of the meatpacking industry.b)It was a misguided response to the transgressions of the meatpacking industry exposed in The Jungle.c)Congress enacted the law to limit competition for resources, although its effect was to improve food quality.d)The act was likely to increase the price of food by imposing regulations on the meatpacking industry.e)It was intended to fix problems that were not highlighted in The Jungle.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GRE.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GRE Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it.Upton Sinclair’s 1906 novel The Jungle, set in the meatpacking plants of early 20th-century Chicago, was intended to provoke a strong public reaction. The book, based on Sinclair’s own experience working incognito at a meatpacking plant, tells of the horrific working conditions in the meat industry. The stories of contaminated or diseased meat were intended to incite outrage at the system of worker exploitation that led to these issues; however, the response of both the public and the government focused on food safety. Less than a year after publication of The Jungle, Congress passed the Pure Food and Drug Act, which eventually led to the creation of the modern Food and Drug Administration. Sinclair himself was not pleased with what he saw as a misinterpretation of his work; he famously said, “I aimed at the publics heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach.”The reaction to The Jungle is hardly the first time that concerns over food safety and purity have won out over more compassionate objectives. In 1516, Bavaria (then part of the Holy Roman Empire) passed the Reinheitsgebot, a law mandating, among other things, that the only ingredients that could be used in the production of beer were barley, hops, and water. Although Reinheitsgebot literally translates to “purity order,” the main impetus behind the law was not to protect the purity of beer but rather to prevent competition between bakers and brewers for the purchase of grains. By ensuring that wheat and rye would be available only for bakers, the Bavarian government hoped to keep bread affordable for everyone. Many modern breweries, however, tout that their beers conform to the Reinheitsgebot in an attempt toconvince consumers of the quality and purity of their beer, completely ignoring the original empathetic intent of the law. Perhaps the public’s stomach is, in fact, more sensitive than its heart.Q.With which of the following statements about the Pure Food and Drug Act would the author of the passage likely agree?a)It did not do enough to ensure the safety of America’s food supplies, given the state of the meatpacking industry.b)It was a misguided response to the transgressions of the meatpacking industry exposed in The Jungle.c)Congress enacted the law to limit competition for resources, although its effect was to improve food quality.d)The act was likely to increase the price of food by imposing regulations on the meatpacking industry.e)It was intended to fix problems that were not highlighted in The Jungle.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it.Upton Sinclair’s 1906 novel The Jungle, set in the meatpacking plants of early 20th-century Chicago, was intended to provoke a strong public reaction. The book, based on Sinclair’s own experience working incognito at a meatpacking plant, tells of the horrific working conditions in the meat industry. The stories of contaminated or diseased meat were intended to incite outrage at the system of worker exploitation that led to these issues; however, the response of both the public and the government focused on food safety. Less than a year after publication of The Jungle, Congress passed the Pure Food and Drug Act, which eventually led to the creation of the modern Food and Drug Administration. Sinclair himself was not pleased with what he saw as a misinterpretation of his work; he famously said, “I aimed at the publics heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach.”The reaction to The Jungle is hardly the first time that concerns over food safety and purity have won out over more compassionate objectives. In 1516, Bavaria (then part of the Holy Roman Empire) passed the Reinheitsgebot, a law mandating, among other things, that the only ingredients that could be used in the production of beer were barley, hops, and water. Although Reinheitsgebot literally translates to “purity order,” the main impetus behind the law was not to protect the purity of beer but rather to prevent competition between bakers and brewers for the purchase of grains. By ensuring that wheat and rye would be available only for bakers, the Bavarian government hoped to keep bread affordable for everyone. Many modern breweries, however, tout that their beers conform to the Reinheitsgebot in an attempt toconvince consumers of the quality and purity of their beer, completely ignoring the original empathetic intent of the law. Perhaps the public’s stomach is, in fact, more sensitive than its heart.Q.With which of the following statements about the Pure Food and Drug Act would the author of the passage likely agree?a)It did not do enough to ensure the safety of America’s food supplies, given the state of the meatpacking industry.b)It was a misguided response to the transgressions of the meatpacking industry exposed in The Jungle.c)Congress enacted the law to limit competition for resources, although its effect was to improve food quality.d)The act was likely to increase the price of food by imposing regulations on the meatpacking industry.e)It was intended to fix problems that were not highlighted in The Jungle.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it.Upton Sinclair’s 1906 novel The Jungle, set in the meatpacking plants of early 20th-century Chicago, was intended to provoke a strong public reaction. The book, based on Sinclair’s own experience working incognito at a meatpacking plant, tells of the horrific working conditions in the meat industry. The stories of contaminated or diseased meat were intended to incite outrage at the system of worker exploitation that led to these issues; however, the response of both the public and the government focused on food safety. Less than a year after publication of The Jungle, Congress passed the Pure Food and Drug Act, which eventually led to the creation of the modern Food and Drug Administration. Sinclair himself was not pleased with what he saw as a misinterpretation of his work; he famously said, “I aimed at the publics heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach.”The reaction to The Jungle is hardly the first time that concerns over food safety and purity have won out over more compassionate objectives. In 1516, Bavaria (then part of the Holy Roman Empire) passed the Reinheitsgebot, a law mandating, among other things, that the only ingredients that could be used in the production of beer were barley, hops, and water. Although Reinheitsgebot literally translates to “purity order,” the main impetus behind the law was not to protect the purity of beer but rather to prevent competition between bakers and brewers for the purchase of grains. By ensuring that wheat and rye would be available only for bakers, the Bavarian government hoped to keep bread affordable for everyone. Many modern breweries, however, tout that their beers conform to the Reinheitsgebot in an attempt toconvince consumers of the quality and purity of their beer, completely ignoring the original empathetic intent of the law. Perhaps the public’s stomach is, in fact, more sensitive than its heart.Q.With which of the following statements about the Pure Food and Drug Act would the author of the passage likely agree?a)It did not do enough to ensure the safety of America’s food supplies, given the state of the meatpacking industry.b)It was a misguided response to the transgressions of the meatpacking industry exposed in The Jungle.c)Congress enacted the law to limit competition for resources, although its effect was to improve food quality.d)The act was likely to increase the price of food by imposing regulations on the meatpacking industry.e)It was intended to fix problems that were not highlighted in The Jungle.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it.Upton Sinclair’s 1906 novel The Jungle, set in the meatpacking plants of early 20th-century Chicago, was intended to provoke a strong public reaction. The book, based on Sinclair’s own experience working incognito at a meatpacking plant, tells of the horrific working conditions in the meat industry. The stories of contaminated or diseased meat were intended to incite outrage at the system of worker exploitation that led to these issues; however, the response of both the public and the government focused on food safety. Less than a year after publication of The Jungle, Congress passed the Pure Food and Drug Act, which eventually led to the creation of the modern Food and Drug Administration. Sinclair himself was not pleased with what he saw as a misinterpretation of his work; he famously said, “I aimed at the publics heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach.”The reaction to The Jungle is hardly the first time that concerns over food safety and purity have won out over more compassionate objectives. In 1516, Bavaria (then part of the Holy Roman Empire) passed the Reinheitsgebot, a law mandating, among other things, that the only ingredients that could be used in the production of beer were barley, hops, and water. Although Reinheitsgebot literally translates to “purity order,” the main impetus behind the law was not to protect the purity of beer but rather to prevent competition between bakers and brewers for the purchase of grains. By ensuring that wheat and rye would be available only for bakers, the Bavarian government hoped to keep bread affordable for everyone. Many modern breweries, however, tout that their beers conform to the Reinheitsgebot in an attempt toconvince consumers of the quality and purity of their beer, completely ignoring the original empathetic intent of the law. Perhaps the public’s stomach is, in fact, more sensitive than its heart.Q.With which of the following statements about the Pure Food and Drug Act would the author of the passage likely agree?a)It did not do enough to ensure the safety of America’s food supplies, given the state of the meatpacking industry.b)It was a misguided response to the transgressions of the meatpacking industry exposed in The Jungle.c)Congress enacted the law to limit competition for resources, although its effect was to improve food quality.d)The act was likely to increase the price of food by imposing regulations on the meatpacking industry.e)It was intended to fix problems that were not highlighted in The Jungle.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it.Upton Sinclair’s 1906 novel The Jungle, set in the meatpacking plants of early 20th-century Chicago, was intended to provoke a strong public reaction. The book, based on Sinclair’s own experience working incognito at a meatpacking plant, tells of the horrific working conditions in the meat industry. The stories of contaminated or diseased meat were intended to incite outrage at the system of worker exploitation that led to these issues; however, the response of both the public and the government focused on food safety. Less than a year after publication of The Jungle, Congress passed the Pure Food and Drug Act, which eventually led to the creation of the modern Food and Drug Administration. Sinclair himself was not pleased with what he saw as a misinterpretation of his work; he famously said, “I aimed at the publics heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach.”The reaction to The Jungle is hardly the first time that concerns over food safety and purity have won out over more compassionate objectives. In 1516, Bavaria (then part of the Holy Roman Empire) passed the Reinheitsgebot, a law mandating, among other things, that the only ingredients that could be used in the production of beer were barley, hops, and water. Although Reinheitsgebot literally translates to “purity order,” the main impetus behind the law was not to protect the purity of beer but rather to prevent competition between bakers and brewers for the purchase of grains. By ensuring that wheat and rye would be available only for bakers, the Bavarian government hoped to keep bread affordable for everyone. Many modern breweries, however, tout that their beers conform to the Reinheitsgebot in an attempt toconvince consumers of the quality and purity of their beer, completely ignoring the original empathetic intent of the law. Perhaps the public’s stomach is, in fact, more sensitive than its heart.Q.With which of the following statements about the Pure Food and Drug Act would the author of the passage likely agree?a)It did not do enough to ensure the safety of America’s food supplies, given the state of the meatpacking industry.b)It was a misguided response to the transgressions of the meatpacking industry exposed in The Jungle.c)Congress enacted the law to limit competition for resources, although its effect was to improve food quality.d)The act was likely to increase the price of food by imposing regulations on the meatpacking industry.e)It was intended to fix problems that were not highlighted in The Jungle.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GRE tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GRE exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup