Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.The war in Ukraine has fundamentally altered Europeandrsquo;s internal and external reference points of what was once a European security order. To its credit, Europe has been quick to condition itself to radically changed realities. A lot of that re-conditioning continues to be economically painful and is on a constant lookout for openings amid an era of poly-crises.But at a fundamental level, Europe mulls a viable security architecture for itself, best expressed through its recently held flagship security dialogue with two major verticals of engagement andndash; one with NATO and the US and another with forging global defence partnerships; one extra layer of smaller but proactive deterrents, and several challenges. The first edition of EUandrsquo;s biennial security dialogue, The Schuman Defence and Security Forum, which falls under the aegis of the European External Action Service, was held on 20 and 21 March at the EU parliament in Brussels. Not only is this dialogue a departure from the dominant geo-economic personality of the EU with its security outsourced to the US, it also merits attention for its singular emphasis on achieving strategic autonomy by building equal, pragmatic and flexible security partnerships across the globe as originally conceived in EUandrsquo;s strategic compass. Does that mean the EU is looking for strategic autonomy? Quite the contrary.The future course of how Europe builds its security architecture will depend largely on how well it blends its dependence and deepening ties with NATO and its quest for strategic autonomy. From Europeandrsquo;s perspective, these two verticals should complement each other. But can they? The first vertical of EU security is, unarguably, deepening ties with NATO that the war in Ukraine has cemented.The panel discussions at Schuman highlighted growing cooperation with organisations like the United Nations, the African Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as well as Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions for crisis management and stabilisation. But EUandrsquo;s evolving association with NATO remained the most pronounced of all.The January 2023 EU-NATO Joint Declaration ramps up this partnership with a sharp focus on climate change, space, artificial intelligence, and emerging and disruptive tech. Increase in overlapping membership with Finland already in NATO, Sweden next in line, and Denmark incorporated fully into CSDP-Europe, transatlantic ties have never been so strong.Q.What is the main idea conveyed by the passage?a)The war in Ukraine has altered Europes security order, and the EU aims to achieve strategic autonomy by forging security partnerships while still relying on NATO.b)The EUs security structure relies heavily on NATO, and it has struggled to adjust to evolving security conditions.c)The EU is actively searching for opportunities in the midst of a period marked by multiple crises, which has economic repercussions.d)The EU is endeavoring to establish worldwide defense collaborations and is continuously seeking opportunities in a time characterized by numerous crises.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully...

Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.

The war in Ukraine has fundamentally altered Europe’s internal and external reference points of what was once a European security order. To its credit, Europe has been quick to condition itself to radically changed realities. A lot of that re-conditioning continues to be economically painful and is on a constant lookout for openings amid an era of poly-crises.

But at a fundamental level, Europe mulls a viable security architecture for itself, best expressed through its recently held flagship security dialogue with two major verticals of engagement – one with NATO and the US and another with forging global defence partnerships; one extra layer of smaller but proactive deterrents, and several challenges. The first edition of EU’s biennial security dialogue, The Schuman Defence and Security Forum, which falls under the aegis of the European External Action Service, was held on 20 and 21 March at the EU parliament in Brussels. Not only is this dialogue a departure from the dominant geo-economic personality of the EU with its security outsourced to the US, it also merits attention for its singular emphasis on achieving strategic autonomy by building equal, pragmatic and flexible security partnerships across the globe as originally conceived in EU’s strategic compass. Does that mean the EU is looking for strategic autonomy? Quite the contrary.

The future course of how Europe builds its security architecture will depend largely on how well it blends its dependence and deepening ties with NATO and its quest for strategic autonomy. From Europe’s perspective, these two verticals should complement each other. But can they? The first vertical of EU security is, unarguably, deepening ties with NATO that the war in Ukraine has cemented.

The panel discussions at Schuman highlighted growing cooperation with organisations like the United Nations, the African Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as well as Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions for crisis management and stabilisation. But EU’s evolving association with NATO remained the most pronounced of all.

The January 2023 EU-NATO Joint Declaration ramps up this partnership with a sharp focus on climate change, space, artificial intelligence, and emerging and disruptive tech. Increase in overlapping membership with Finland already in NATO, Sweden next in line, and Denmark incorporated fully into CSDP-Europe, transatlantic ties have never been so strong.

Q. What is the main idea conveyed by the passage?

a)
The war in Ukraine has altered Europe's security order, and the EU aims to achieve strategic autonomy by forging security partnerships while still relying on NATO.
b)
The EU's security structure relies heavily on NATO, and it has struggled to adjust to evolving security conditions.
c)
The EU is actively searching for opportunities in the midst of a period marked by multiple crises, which has economic repercussions.
d)
The EU is endeavoring to establish worldwide defense collaborations and is continuously seeking opportunities in a time characterized by numerous crises.

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions...

The summary should encapsulate the key elements of the passage. The passage highlights the significant impact of the war in Ukraine on Europe's security dynamics, both internally and externally. It further delves into the EU's endeavor to attain strategic autonomy by establishing adaptable security alliances worldwide while concurrently upholding its reliance on NATO. Consequently, Option A accurately summarizes the main points of the passage.

Therefore, Option A is the correct response.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.The war in Ukraine has fundamentally altered Europe’s internal and external reference points of what was once a European security order. To its credit, Europe has been quick to condition itself to radically changed realities. A lot of that re-conditioning continues to be economically painful and is on a constant lookout for openings amid an era of poly-crises.But at a fundamental level, Europe mulls a viable security architecture for itself, best expressed through its recently held flagship security dialogue with two major verticals of engagement – one with NATO and the US and another with forging global defence partnerships; one extra layer of smaller but proactive deterrents, and several challenges. The first edition of EU’s biennial security dialogue, The Schuman Defence and Security Forum, which falls under the aegis of the European External Action Service, was held on 20 and 21 March at the EU parliament in Brussels. Not only is this dialogue a departure from the dominant geo-economic personality of the EU with its security outsourced to the US, it also merits attention for its singular emphasis on achieving strategic autonomy by building equal, pragmatic and flexible security partnerships across the globe as originally conceived in EU’s strategic compass. Does that mean the EU is looking for strategic autonomy? Quite the contrary.The future course of how Europe builds its security architecture will depend largely on how well it blends its dependence and deepening ties with NATO and its quest for strategic autonomy. From Europe’s perspective, these two verticals should complement each other. But can they? The first vertical of EU security is, unarguably, deepening ties with NATO that the war in Ukraine has cemented.The panel discussions at Schuman highlighted growing cooperation with organisations like the United Nations, the African Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as well as Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions for crisis management and stabilisation. But EU’s evolving association with NATO remained the most pronounced of all.The January 2023 EU-NATO Joint Declaration ramps up this partnership with a sharp focus on climate change, space, artificial intelligence, and emerging and disruptive tech. Increase in overlapping membership with Finland already in NATO, Sweden next in line, and Denmark incorporated fully into CSDP-Europe, transatlantic ties have never been so strong.Q.What can be deduced from the passage concerning the future of Europes security structure?

View answer

Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.The war in Ukraine has fundamentally altered Europe’s internal and external reference points of what was once a European security order. To its credit, Europe has been quick to condition itself to radically changed realities. A lot of that re-conditioning continues to be economically painful and is on a constant lookout for openings amid an era of poly-crises.But at a fundamental level, Europe mulls a viable security architecture for itself, best expressed through its recently held flagship security dialogue with two major verticals of engagement – one with NATO and the US and another with forging global defence partnerships; one extra layer of smaller but proactive deterrents, and several challenges. The first edition of EU’s biennial security dialogue, The Schuman Defence and Security Forum, which falls under the aegis of the European External Action Service, was held on 20 and 21 March at the EU parliament in Brussels. Not only is this dialogue a departure from the dominant geo-economic personality of the EU with its security outsourced to the US, it also merits attention for its singular emphasis on achieving strategic autonomy by building equal, pragmatic and flexible security partnerships across the globe as originally conceived in EU’s strategic compass. Does that mean the EU is looking for strategic autonomy? Quite the contrary.The future course of how Europe builds its security architecture will depend largely on how well it blends its dependence and deepening ties with NATO and its quest for strategic autonomy. From Europe’s perspective, these two verticals should complement each other. But can they? The first vertical of EU security is, unarguably, deepening ties with NATO that the war in Ukraine has cemented.The panel discussions at Schuman highlighted growing cooperation with organisations like the United Nations, the African Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as well as Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions for crisis management and stabilisation. But EU’s evolving association with NATO remained the most pronounced of all.The January 2023 EU-NATO Joint Declaration ramps up this partnership with a sharp focus on climate change, space, artificial intelligence, and emerging and disruptive tech. Increase in overlapping membership with Finland already in NATO, Sweden next in line, and Denmark incorporated fully into CSDP-Europe, transatlantic ties have never been so strong.Q.What is the meaning of "poly-crises" in the context of the passage?

View answer

Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.The war in Ukraine has fundamentally altered Europe’s internal and external reference points of what was once a European security order. To its credit, Europe has been quick to condition itself to radically changed realities. A lot of that re-conditioning continues to be economically painful and is on a constant lookout for openings amid an era of poly-crises.But at a fundamental level, Europe mulls a viable security architecture for itself, best expressed through its recently held flagship security dialogue with two major verticals of engagement – one with NATO and the US and another with forging global defence partnerships; one extra layer of smaller but proactive deterrents, and several challenges. The first edition of EU’s biennial security dialogue, The Schuman Defence and Security Forum, which falls under the aegis of the European External Action Service, was held on 20 and 21 March at the EU parliament in Brussels. Not only is this dialogue a departure from the dominant geo-economic personality of the EU with its security outsourced to the US, it also merits attention for its singular emphasis on achieving strategic autonomy by building equal, pragmatic and flexible security partnerships across the globe as originally conceived in EU’s strategic compass. Does that mean the EU is looking for strategic autonomy? Quite the contrary.The future course of how Europe builds its security architecture will depend largely on how well it blends its dependence and deepening ties with NATO and its quest for strategic autonomy. From Europe’s perspective, these two verticals should complement each other. But can they? The first vertical of EU security is, unarguably, deepening ties with NATO that the war in Ukraine has cemented.The panel discussions at Schuman highlighted growing cooperation with organisations like the United Nations, the African Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as well as Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions for crisis management and stabilisation. But EU’s evolving association with NATO remained the most pronounced of all.The January 2023 EU-NATO Joint Declaration ramps up this partnership with a sharp focus on climate change, space, artificial intelligence, and emerging and disruptive tech. Increase in overlapping membership with Finland already in NATO, Sweden next in line, and Denmark incorporated fully into CSDP-Europe, transatlantic ties have never been so strong.Q.What is the primary focus of the EUs Schuman Defence and Security Forum as mentioned in the passage?

View answer

Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.The war in Ukraine has fundamentally altered Europe’s internal and external reference points of what was once a European security order. To its credit, Europe has been quick to condition itself to radically changed realities. A lot of that re-conditioning continues to be economically painful and is on a constant lookout for openings amid an era of poly-crises.But at a fundamental level, Europe mulls a viable security architecture for itself, best expressed through its recently held flagship security dialogue with two major verticals of engagement – one with NATO and the US and another with forging global defence partnerships; one extra layer of smaller but proactive deterrents, and several challenges. The first edition of EU’s biennial security dialogue, The Schuman Defence and Security Forum, which falls under the aegis of the European External Action Service, was held on 20 and 21 March at the EU parliament in Brussels. Not only is this dialogue a departure from the dominant geo-economic personality of the EU with its security outsourced to the US, it also merits attention for its singular emphasis on achieving strategic autonomy by building equal, pragmatic and flexible security partnerships across the globe as originally conceived in EU’s strategic compass. Does that mean the EU is looking for strategic autonomy? Quite the contrary.The future course of how Europe builds its security architecture will depend largely on how well it blends its dependence and deepening ties with NATO and its quest for strategic autonomy. From Europe’s perspective, these two verticals should complement each other. But can they? The first vertical of EU security is, unarguably, deepening ties with NATO that the war in Ukraine has cemented.The panel discussions at Schuman highlighted growing cooperation with organisations like the United Nations, the African Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as well as Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions for crisis management and stabilisation. But EU’s evolving association with NATO remained the most pronounced of all.The January 2023 EU-NATO Joint Declaration ramps up this partnership with a sharp focus on climate change, space, artificial intelligence, and emerging and disruptive tech. Increase in overlapping membership with Finland already in NATO, Sweden next in line, and Denmark incorporated fully into CSDP-Europe, transatlantic ties have never been so strong.Q.What word, opposite in meaning to complement, can be found in the following sentence: "From Europe’s perspective, these two verticals should complement each other."

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.With the launch of Brazils Amazonia-1 satellite from Sriharikota, a new chapter has begun in Indias space history. The satellite, a 637-kilogram entity, was the first dedicated commercial mission of NewSpace India Limited, a two-year-old commercial arm of the Department of Space. This is not the first time that NSIL has organised a launch of foreign satellites aboard an Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) launch vehicle. The organisation has had launches last November as well as in December 2019. However, the primary satellites aboard both these missions were Indian satellites — the RISAT-2BRI and the EOS-01 — with smaller satellites from several other countries, as well as India, piggybacking on them. The Amazonia mission also saw 18 other satellites being launched and was the first fully commercial mission. India has so far launched 342 foreign satellites from 34 countries using its Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle platform and many of them have involved ISROs first commercial entity, the Antrix Corporation. There is still confusion on how exactly the responsibilities of NSIL differ from those of Antrix. But with the formation of the Indian National Space Promotion and Authorization Center (IN-SPAC e) — a regulatory agency — as well as plans of an independent tribunal to adjudicate disputes among private space entities, there is a potential explosion of market opportunities from space applications on the anvil. Though the private sector plays a major role in developing launch and satellite infrastructure for ISRO, there are now several companies that offer myriad services. Many of these companies want to launch their own satellites, of varying dimensions, and the experience with ISRO has not been smooth always. The most conspicuous has been the controversy involving Devas Multimedia, to which the Government of India owes nearly $1.2 billion going by an order of a tribunal of the International Chamber of Commerce and upheld by a United States federal court last year. NSIL, it is said, is also a move by Indias space establishment to insulate the prospects of the space industry in India from repercussions of the Devas-Antrix imbroglio.Much like unfettered access to the Internet has spawned industries that were inconceivable, similarly, space applications and mapping have barely scratched the surface in terms of the opportunities that they can create. NSIL has a broad ambit and will be involved in collaborations spanning from launches to new space-related industries. NSIL is also expected to be more than just a marketer of ISROs technologies; it is to find newer business opportunities and expand the sector itself. NSIL must endeavour to not be another Antrix but be continuously in start-up mode. It must conceive of ways to aid space start-ups reach out to rural India and facilitate more recruits from Indias young to facilitate careers in space applications and sciences. It must see itself both as an Indian ambassador and disruptor in the space arena.[Extracted from an editorial published in The Hindu, dated March 6, 2021]Q.According to the passage, why was the launch of the Amazonia-1 satellite significant?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.The war in Ukraine has fundamentally altered Europe’s internal and external reference points of what was once a European security order. To its credit, Europe has been quick to condition itself to radically changed realities. A lot of that re-conditioning continues to be economically painful and is on a constant lookout for openings amid an era of poly-crises.But at a fundamental level, Europe mulls a viable security architecture for itself, best expressed through its recently held flagship security dialogue with two major verticals of engagement – one with NATO and the US and another with forging global defence partnerships; one extra layer of smaller but proactive deterrents, and several challenges. The first edition of EU’s biennial security dialogue, The Schuman Defence and Security Forum, which falls under the aegis of the European External Action Service, was held on 20 and 21 March at the EU parliament in Brussels. Not only is this dialogue a departure from the dominant geo-economic personality of the EU with its security outsourced to the US, it also merits attention for its singular emphasis on achieving strategic autonomy by building equal, pragmatic and flexible security partnerships across the globe as originally conceived in EU’s strategic compass. Does that mean the EU is looking for strategic autonomy? Quite the contrary.The future course of how Europe builds its security architecture will depend largely on how well it blends its dependence and deepening ties with NATO and its quest for strategic autonomy. From Europe’s perspective, these two verticals should complement each other. But can they? The first vertical of EU security is, unarguably, deepening ties with NATO that the war in Ukraine has cemented.The panel discussions at Schuman highlighted growing cooperation with organisations like the United Nations, the African Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as well as Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions for crisis management and stabilisation. But EU’s evolving association with NATO remained the most pronounced of all.The January 2023 EU-NATO Joint Declaration ramps up this partnership with a sharp focus on climate change, space, artificial intelligence, and emerging and disruptive tech. Increase in overlapping membership with Finland already in NATO, Sweden next in line, and Denmark incorporated fully into CSDP-Europe, transatlantic ties have never been so strong.Q.What is the main idea conveyed by the passage?a)The war in Ukraine has altered Europes security order, and the EU aims to achieve strategic autonomy by forging security partnerships while still relying on NATO.b)The EUs security structure relies heavily on NATO, and it has struggled to adjust to evolving security conditions.c)The EU is actively searching for opportunities in the midst of a period marked by multiple crises, which has economic repercussions.d)The EU is endeavoring to establish worldwide defense collaborations and is continuously seeking opportunities in a time characterized by numerous crises.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.The war in Ukraine has fundamentally altered Europe’s internal and external reference points of what was once a European security order. To its credit, Europe has been quick to condition itself to radically changed realities. A lot of that re-conditioning continues to be economically painful and is on a constant lookout for openings amid an era of poly-crises.But at a fundamental level, Europe mulls a viable security architecture for itself, best expressed through its recently held flagship security dialogue with two major verticals of engagement – one with NATO and the US and another with forging global defence partnerships; one extra layer of smaller but proactive deterrents, and several challenges. The first edition of EU’s biennial security dialogue, The Schuman Defence and Security Forum, which falls under the aegis of the European External Action Service, was held on 20 and 21 March at the EU parliament in Brussels. Not only is this dialogue a departure from the dominant geo-economic personality of the EU with its security outsourced to the US, it also merits attention for its singular emphasis on achieving strategic autonomy by building equal, pragmatic and flexible security partnerships across the globe as originally conceived in EU’s strategic compass. Does that mean the EU is looking for strategic autonomy? Quite the contrary.The future course of how Europe builds its security architecture will depend largely on how well it blends its dependence and deepening ties with NATO and its quest for strategic autonomy. From Europe’s perspective, these two verticals should complement each other. But can they? The first vertical of EU security is, unarguably, deepening ties with NATO that the war in Ukraine has cemented.The panel discussions at Schuman highlighted growing cooperation with organisations like the United Nations, the African Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as well as Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions for crisis management and stabilisation. But EU’s evolving association with NATO remained the most pronounced of all.The January 2023 EU-NATO Joint Declaration ramps up this partnership with a sharp focus on climate change, space, artificial intelligence, and emerging and disruptive tech. Increase in overlapping membership with Finland already in NATO, Sweden next in line, and Denmark incorporated fully into CSDP-Europe, transatlantic ties have never been so strong.Q.What is the main idea conveyed by the passage?a)The war in Ukraine has altered Europes security order, and the EU aims to achieve strategic autonomy by forging security partnerships while still relying on NATO.b)The EUs security structure relies heavily on NATO, and it has struggled to adjust to evolving security conditions.c)The EU is actively searching for opportunities in the midst of a period marked by multiple crises, which has economic repercussions.d)The EU is endeavoring to establish worldwide defense collaborations and is continuously seeking opportunities in a time characterized by numerous crises.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.The war in Ukraine has fundamentally altered Europe’s internal and external reference points of what was once a European security order. To its credit, Europe has been quick to condition itself to radically changed realities. A lot of that re-conditioning continues to be economically painful and is on a constant lookout for openings amid an era of poly-crises.But at a fundamental level, Europe mulls a viable security architecture for itself, best expressed through its recently held flagship security dialogue with two major verticals of engagement – one with NATO and the US and another with forging global defence partnerships; one extra layer of smaller but proactive deterrents, and several challenges. The first edition of EU’s biennial security dialogue, The Schuman Defence and Security Forum, which falls under the aegis of the European External Action Service, was held on 20 and 21 March at the EU parliament in Brussels. Not only is this dialogue a departure from the dominant geo-economic personality of the EU with its security outsourced to the US, it also merits attention for its singular emphasis on achieving strategic autonomy by building equal, pragmatic and flexible security partnerships across the globe as originally conceived in EU’s strategic compass. Does that mean the EU is looking for strategic autonomy? Quite the contrary.The future course of how Europe builds its security architecture will depend largely on how well it blends its dependence and deepening ties with NATO and its quest for strategic autonomy. From Europe’s perspective, these two verticals should complement each other. But can they? The first vertical of EU security is, unarguably, deepening ties with NATO that the war in Ukraine has cemented.The panel discussions at Schuman highlighted growing cooperation with organisations like the United Nations, the African Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as well as Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions for crisis management and stabilisation. But EU’s evolving association with NATO remained the most pronounced of all.The January 2023 EU-NATO Joint Declaration ramps up this partnership with a sharp focus on climate change, space, artificial intelligence, and emerging and disruptive tech. Increase in overlapping membership with Finland already in NATO, Sweden next in line, and Denmark incorporated fully into CSDP-Europe, transatlantic ties have never been so strong.Q.What is the main idea conveyed by the passage?a)The war in Ukraine has altered Europes security order, and the EU aims to achieve strategic autonomy by forging security partnerships while still relying on NATO.b)The EUs security structure relies heavily on NATO, and it has struggled to adjust to evolving security conditions.c)The EU is actively searching for opportunities in the midst of a period marked by multiple crises, which has economic repercussions.d)The EU is endeavoring to establish worldwide defense collaborations and is continuously seeking opportunities in a time characterized by numerous crises.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.The war in Ukraine has fundamentally altered Europe’s internal and external reference points of what was once a European security order. To its credit, Europe has been quick to condition itself to radically changed realities. A lot of that re-conditioning continues to be economically painful and is on a constant lookout for openings amid an era of poly-crises.But at a fundamental level, Europe mulls a viable security architecture for itself, best expressed through its recently held flagship security dialogue with two major verticals of engagement – one with NATO and the US and another with forging global defence partnerships; one extra layer of smaller but proactive deterrents, and several challenges. The first edition of EU’s biennial security dialogue, The Schuman Defence and Security Forum, which falls under the aegis of the European External Action Service, was held on 20 and 21 March at the EU parliament in Brussels. Not only is this dialogue a departure from the dominant geo-economic personality of the EU with its security outsourced to the US, it also merits attention for its singular emphasis on achieving strategic autonomy by building equal, pragmatic and flexible security partnerships across the globe as originally conceived in EU’s strategic compass. Does that mean the EU is looking for strategic autonomy? Quite the contrary.The future course of how Europe builds its security architecture will depend largely on how well it blends its dependence and deepening ties with NATO and its quest for strategic autonomy. From Europe’s perspective, these two verticals should complement each other. But can they? The first vertical of EU security is, unarguably, deepening ties with NATO that the war in Ukraine has cemented.The panel discussions at Schuman highlighted growing cooperation with organisations like the United Nations, the African Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as well as Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions for crisis management and stabilisation. But EU’s evolving association with NATO remained the most pronounced of all.The January 2023 EU-NATO Joint Declaration ramps up this partnership with a sharp focus on climate change, space, artificial intelligence, and emerging and disruptive tech. Increase in overlapping membership with Finland already in NATO, Sweden next in line, and Denmark incorporated fully into CSDP-Europe, transatlantic ties have never been so strong.Q.What is the main idea conveyed by the passage?a)The war in Ukraine has altered Europes security order, and the EU aims to achieve strategic autonomy by forging security partnerships while still relying on NATO.b)The EUs security structure relies heavily on NATO, and it has struggled to adjust to evolving security conditions.c)The EU is actively searching for opportunities in the midst of a period marked by multiple crises, which has economic repercussions.d)The EU is endeavoring to establish worldwide defense collaborations and is continuously seeking opportunities in a time characterized by numerous crises.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.The war in Ukraine has fundamentally altered Europe’s internal and external reference points of what was once a European security order. To its credit, Europe has been quick to condition itself to radically changed realities. A lot of that re-conditioning continues to be economically painful and is on a constant lookout for openings amid an era of poly-crises.But at a fundamental level, Europe mulls a viable security architecture for itself, best expressed through its recently held flagship security dialogue with two major verticals of engagement – one with NATO and the US and another with forging global defence partnerships; one extra layer of smaller but proactive deterrents, and several challenges. The first edition of EU’s biennial security dialogue, The Schuman Defence and Security Forum, which falls under the aegis of the European External Action Service, was held on 20 and 21 March at the EU parliament in Brussels. Not only is this dialogue a departure from the dominant geo-economic personality of the EU with its security outsourced to the US, it also merits attention for its singular emphasis on achieving strategic autonomy by building equal, pragmatic and flexible security partnerships across the globe as originally conceived in EU’s strategic compass. Does that mean the EU is looking for strategic autonomy? Quite the contrary.The future course of how Europe builds its security architecture will depend largely on how well it blends its dependence and deepening ties with NATO and its quest for strategic autonomy. From Europe’s perspective, these two verticals should complement each other. But can they? The first vertical of EU security is, unarguably, deepening ties with NATO that the war in Ukraine has cemented.The panel discussions at Schuman highlighted growing cooperation with organisations like the United Nations, the African Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as well as Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions for crisis management and stabilisation. But EU’s evolving association with NATO remained the most pronounced of all.The January 2023 EU-NATO Joint Declaration ramps up this partnership with a sharp focus on climate change, space, artificial intelligence, and emerging and disruptive tech. Increase in overlapping membership with Finland already in NATO, Sweden next in line, and Denmark incorporated fully into CSDP-Europe, transatlantic ties have never been so strong.Q.What is the main idea conveyed by the passage?a)The war in Ukraine has altered Europes security order, and the EU aims to achieve strategic autonomy by forging security partnerships while still relying on NATO.b)The EUs security structure relies heavily on NATO, and it has struggled to adjust to evolving security conditions.c)The EU is actively searching for opportunities in the midst of a period marked by multiple crises, which has economic repercussions.d)The EU is endeavoring to establish worldwide defense collaborations and is continuously seeking opportunities in a time characterized by numerous crises.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.The war in Ukraine has fundamentally altered Europe’s internal and external reference points of what was once a European security order. To its credit, Europe has been quick to condition itself to radically changed realities. A lot of that re-conditioning continues to be economically painful and is on a constant lookout for openings amid an era of poly-crises.But at a fundamental level, Europe mulls a viable security architecture for itself, best expressed through its recently held flagship security dialogue with two major verticals of engagement – one with NATO and the US and another with forging global defence partnerships; one extra layer of smaller but proactive deterrents, and several challenges. The first edition of EU’s biennial security dialogue, The Schuman Defence and Security Forum, which falls under the aegis of the European External Action Service, was held on 20 and 21 March at the EU parliament in Brussels. Not only is this dialogue a departure from the dominant geo-economic personality of the EU with its security outsourced to the US, it also merits attention for its singular emphasis on achieving strategic autonomy by building equal, pragmatic and flexible security partnerships across the globe as originally conceived in EU’s strategic compass. Does that mean the EU is looking for strategic autonomy? Quite the contrary.The future course of how Europe builds its security architecture will depend largely on how well it blends its dependence and deepening ties with NATO and its quest for strategic autonomy. From Europe’s perspective, these two verticals should complement each other. But can they? The first vertical of EU security is, unarguably, deepening ties with NATO that the war in Ukraine has cemented.The panel discussions at Schuman highlighted growing cooperation with organisations like the United Nations, the African Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as well as Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions for crisis management and stabilisation. But EU’s evolving association with NATO remained the most pronounced of all.The January 2023 EU-NATO Joint Declaration ramps up this partnership with a sharp focus on climate change, space, artificial intelligence, and emerging and disruptive tech. Increase in overlapping membership with Finland already in NATO, Sweden next in line, and Denmark incorporated fully into CSDP-Europe, transatlantic ties have never been so strong.Q.What is the main idea conveyed by the passage?a)The war in Ukraine has altered Europes security order, and the EU aims to achieve strategic autonomy by forging security partnerships while still relying on NATO.b)The EUs security structure relies heavily on NATO, and it has struggled to adjust to evolving security conditions.c)The EU is actively searching for opportunities in the midst of a period marked by multiple crises, which has economic repercussions.d)The EU is endeavoring to establish worldwide defense collaborations and is continuously seeking opportunities in a time characterized by numerous crises.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.The war in Ukraine has fundamentally altered Europe’s internal and external reference points of what was once a European security order. To its credit, Europe has been quick to condition itself to radically changed realities. A lot of that re-conditioning continues to be economically painful and is on a constant lookout for openings amid an era of poly-crises.But at a fundamental level, Europe mulls a viable security architecture for itself, best expressed through its recently held flagship security dialogue with two major verticals of engagement – one with NATO and the US and another with forging global defence partnerships; one extra layer of smaller but proactive deterrents, and several challenges. The first edition of EU’s biennial security dialogue, The Schuman Defence and Security Forum, which falls under the aegis of the European External Action Service, was held on 20 and 21 March at the EU parliament in Brussels. Not only is this dialogue a departure from the dominant geo-economic personality of the EU with its security outsourced to the US, it also merits attention for its singular emphasis on achieving strategic autonomy by building equal, pragmatic and flexible security partnerships across the globe as originally conceived in EU’s strategic compass. Does that mean the EU is looking for strategic autonomy? Quite the contrary.The future course of how Europe builds its security architecture will depend largely on how well it blends its dependence and deepening ties with NATO and its quest for strategic autonomy. From Europe’s perspective, these two verticals should complement each other. But can they? The first vertical of EU security is, unarguably, deepening ties with NATO that the war in Ukraine has cemented.The panel discussions at Schuman highlighted growing cooperation with organisations like the United Nations, the African Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as well as Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions for crisis management and stabilisation. But EU’s evolving association with NATO remained the most pronounced of all.The January 2023 EU-NATO Joint Declaration ramps up this partnership with a sharp focus on climate change, space, artificial intelligence, and emerging and disruptive tech. Increase in overlapping membership with Finland already in NATO, Sweden next in line, and Denmark incorporated fully into CSDP-Europe, transatlantic ties have never been so strong.Q.What is the main idea conveyed by the passage?a)The war in Ukraine has altered Europes security order, and the EU aims to achieve strategic autonomy by forging security partnerships while still relying on NATO.b)The EUs security structure relies heavily on NATO, and it has struggled to adjust to evolving security conditions.c)The EU is actively searching for opportunities in the midst of a period marked by multiple crises, which has economic repercussions.d)The EU is endeavoring to establish worldwide defense collaborations and is continuously seeking opportunities in a time characterized by numerous crises.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.The war in Ukraine has fundamentally altered Europe’s internal and external reference points of what was once a European security order. To its credit, Europe has been quick to condition itself to radically changed realities. A lot of that re-conditioning continues to be economically painful and is on a constant lookout for openings amid an era of poly-crises.But at a fundamental level, Europe mulls a viable security architecture for itself, best expressed through its recently held flagship security dialogue with two major verticals of engagement – one with NATO and the US and another with forging global defence partnerships; one extra layer of smaller but proactive deterrents, and several challenges. The first edition of EU’s biennial security dialogue, The Schuman Defence and Security Forum, which falls under the aegis of the European External Action Service, was held on 20 and 21 March at the EU parliament in Brussels. Not only is this dialogue a departure from the dominant geo-economic personality of the EU with its security outsourced to the US, it also merits attention for its singular emphasis on achieving strategic autonomy by building equal, pragmatic and flexible security partnerships across the globe as originally conceived in EU’s strategic compass. Does that mean the EU is looking for strategic autonomy? Quite the contrary.The future course of how Europe builds its security architecture will depend largely on how well it blends its dependence and deepening ties with NATO and its quest for strategic autonomy. From Europe’s perspective, these two verticals should complement each other. But can they? The first vertical of EU security is, unarguably, deepening ties with NATO that the war in Ukraine has cemented.The panel discussions at Schuman highlighted growing cooperation with organisations like the United Nations, the African Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as well as Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions for crisis management and stabilisation. But EU’s evolving association with NATO remained the most pronounced of all.The January 2023 EU-NATO Joint Declaration ramps up this partnership with a sharp focus on climate change, space, artificial intelligence, and emerging and disruptive tech. Increase in overlapping membership with Finland already in NATO, Sweden next in line, and Denmark incorporated fully into CSDP-Europe, transatlantic ties have never been so strong.Q.What is the main idea conveyed by the passage?a)The war in Ukraine has altered Europes security order, and the EU aims to achieve strategic autonomy by forging security partnerships while still relying on NATO.b)The EUs security structure relies heavily on NATO, and it has struggled to adjust to evolving security conditions.c)The EU is actively searching for opportunities in the midst of a period marked by multiple crises, which has economic repercussions.d)The EU is endeavoring to establish worldwide defense collaborations and is continuously seeking opportunities in a time characterized by numerous crises.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.The war in Ukraine has fundamentally altered Europe’s internal and external reference points of what was once a European security order. To its credit, Europe has been quick to condition itself to radically changed realities. A lot of that re-conditioning continues to be economically painful and is on a constant lookout for openings amid an era of poly-crises.But at a fundamental level, Europe mulls a viable security architecture for itself, best expressed through its recently held flagship security dialogue with two major verticals of engagement – one with NATO and the US and another with forging global defence partnerships; one extra layer of smaller but proactive deterrents, and several challenges. The first edition of EU’s biennial security dialogue, The Schuman Defence and Security Forum, which falls under the aegis of the European External Action Service, was held on 20 and 21 March at the EU parliament in Brussels. Not only is this dialogue a departure from the dominant geo-economic personality of the EU with its security outsourced to the US, it also merits attention for its singular emphasis on achieving strategic autonomy by building equal, pragmatic and flexible security partnerships across the globe as originally conceived in EU’s strategic compass. Does that mean the EU is looking for strategic autonomy? Quite the contrary.The future course of how Europe builds its security architecture will depend largely on how well it blends its dependence and deepening ties with NATO and its quest for strategic autonomy. From Europe’s perspective, these two verticals should complement each other. But can they? The first vertical of EU security is, unarguably, deepening ties with NATO that the war in Ukraine has cemented.The panel discussions at Schuman highlighted growing cooperation with organisations like the United Nations, the African Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as well as Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions for crisis management and stabilisation. But EU’s evolving association with NATO remained the most pronounced of all.The January 2023 EU-NATO Joint Declaration ramps up this partnership with a sharp focus on climate change, space, artificial intelligence, and emerging and disruptive tech. Increase in overlapping membership with Finland already in NATO, Sweden next in line, and Denmark incorporated fully into CSDP-Europe, transatlantic ties have never been so strong.Q.What is the main idea conveyed by the passage?a)The war in Ukraine has altered Europes security order, and the EU aims to achieve strategic autonomy by forging security partnerships while still relying on NATO.b)The EUs security structure relies heavily on NATO, and it has struggled to adjust to evolving security conditions.c)The EU is actively searching for opportunities in the midst of a period marked by multiple crises, which has economic repercussions.d)The EU is endeavoring to establish worldwide defense collaborations and is continuously seeking opportunities in a time characterized by numerous crises.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.The war in Ukraine has fundamentally altered Europe’s internal and external reference points of what was once a European security order. To its credit, Europe has been quick to condition itself to radically changed realities. A lot of that re-conditioning continues to be economically painful and is on a constant lookout for openings amid an era of poly-crises.But at a fundamental level, Europe mulls a viable security architecture for itself, best expressed through its recently held flagship security dialogue with two major verticals of engagement – one with NATO and the US and another with forging global defence partnerships; one extra layer of smaller but proactive deterrents, and several challenges. The first edition of EU’s biennial security dialogue, The Schuman Defence and Security Forum, which falls under the aegis of the European External Action Service, was held on 20 and 21 March at the EU parliament in Brussels. Not only is this dialogue a departure from the dominant geo-economic personality of the EU with its security outsourced to the US, it also merits attention for its singular emphasis on achieving strategic autonomy by building equal, pragmatic and flexible security partnerships across the globe as originally conceived in EU’s strategic compass. Does that mean the EU is looking for strategic autonomy? Quite the contrary.The future course of how Europe builds its security architecture will depend largely on how well it blends its dependence and deepening ties with NATO and its quest for strategic autonomy. From Europe’s perspective, these two verticals should complement each other. But can they? The first vertical of EU security is, unarguably, deepening ties with NATO that the war in Ukraine has cemented.The panel discussions at Schuman highlighted growing cooperation with organisations like the United Nations, the African Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as well as Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions for crisis management and stabilisation. But EU’s evolving association with NATO remained the most pronounced of all.The January 2023 EU-NATO Joint Declaration ramps up this partnership with a sharp focus on climate change, space, artificial intelligence, and emerging and disruptive tech. Increase in overlapping membership with Finland already in NATO, Sweden next in line, and Denmark incorporated fully into CSDP-Europe, transatlantic ties have never been so strong.Q.What is the main idea conveyed by the passage?a)The war in Ukraine has altered Europes security order, and the EU aims to achieve strategic autonomy by forging security partnerships while still relying on NATO.b)The EUs security structure relies heavily on NATO, and it has struggled to adjust to evolving security conditions.c)The EU is actively searching for opportunities in the midst of a period marked by multiple crises, which has economic repercussions.d)The EU is endeavoring to establish worldwide defense collaborations and is continuously seeking opportunities in a time characterized by numerous crises.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam