Question Description
Directions: Read the given information carefully and answer the questions given beside:The Centre told the Supreme Court Wednesday that it will form a committee headed by the Cabinet Secretary to address “human concerns” of same-sex couples without legally recognising their relationship as a marriage. Calling it a “very fair suggestion”, a five-judge Constitution Bench, headed by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, said if what the government says goes through, it “will be a substantial advancement over what we have today” and a “building block for the future” of the movement for gay rights.It asked the petitioners if, at this stage, they would still like to stick to their demand for a declaration that they have the right to marry under the Special Marriage Act (SMA), 1954. The Bench asked the petitioners to sit with Attorney General R Venkataramani and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta over the weekend and discuss matters. Senior Advocate A M Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, said he “fully understands what” the court “is saying” and “will reflect on that, and build that into our argument”.The CJI said “from the drift of the submissions made by the Solicitor General on the last occasion, it appears that the SG also accepts that of course people do have a right to cohabit and the right to cohabit itself is something which is now an accepted social reality at least.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from: “Will form committee on concerns of same-sex couples: Centre to Supreme Court”, by Ananthakrishnan G, The Indian Express]Q.According to the Constitution Bench, what did they consider the governments suggestion to address the concerns of same-sex couples?a)A significant legal recognition of same-sex marriagesb)A substantial advancement for gay rightsc)A rejection of same-sex couples rightsd)An unconstitutional moveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the given information carefully and answer the questions given beside:The Centre told the Supreme Court Wednesday that it will form a committee headed by the Cabinet Secretary to address “human concerns” of same-sex couples without legally recognising their relationship as a marriage. Calling it a “very fair suggestion”, a five-judge Constitution Bench, headed by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, said if what the government says goes through, it “will be a substantial advancement over what we have today” and a “building block for the future” of the movement for gay rights.It asked the petitioners if, at this stage, they would still like to stick to their demand for a declaration that they have the right to marry under the Special Marriage Act (SMA), 1954. The Bench asked the petitioners to sit with Attorney General R Venkataramani and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta over the weekend and discuss matters. Senior Advocate A M Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, said he “fully understands what” the court “is saying” and “will reflect on that, and build that into our argument”.The CJI said “from the drift of the submissions made by the Solicitor General on the last occasion, it appears that the SG also accepts that of course people do have a right to cohabit and the right to cohabit itself is something which is now an accepted social reality at least.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from: “Will form committee on concerns of same-sex couples: Centre to Supreme Court”, by Ananthakrishnan G, The Indian Express]Q.According to the Constitution Bench, what did they consider the governments suggestion to address the concerns of same-sex couples?a)A significant legal recognition of same-sex marriagesb)A substantial advancement for gay rightsc)A rejection of same-sex couples rightsd)An unconstitutional moveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the given information carefully and answer the questions given beside:The Centre told the Supreme Court Wednesday that it will form a committee headed by the Cabinet Secretary to address “human concerns” of same-sex couples without legally recognising their relationship as a marriage. Calling it a “very fair suggestion”, a five-judge Constitution Bench, headed by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, said if what the government says goes through, it “will be a substantial advancement over what we have today” and a “building block for the future” of the movement for gay rights.It asked the petitioners if, at this stage, they would still like to stick to their demand for a declaration that they have the right to marry under the Special Marriage Act (SMA), 1954. The Bench asked the petitioners to sit with Attorney General R Venkataramani and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta over the weekend and discuss matters. Senior Advocate A M Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, said he “fully understands what” the court “is saying” and “will reflect on that, and build that into our argument”.The CJI said “from the drift of the submissions made by the Solicitor General on the last occasion, it appears that the SG also accepts that of course people do have a right to cohabit and the right to cohabit itself is something which is now an accepted social reality at least.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from: “Will form committee on concerns of same-sex couples: Centre to Supreme Court”, by Ananthakrishnan G, The Indian Express]Q.According to the Constitution Bench, what did they consider the governments suggestion to address the concerns of same-sex couples?a)A significant legal recognition of same-sex marriagesb)A substantial advancement for gay rightsc)A rejection of same-sex couples rightsd)An unconstitutional moveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Read the given information carefully and answer the questions given beside:The Centre told the Supreme Court Wednesday that it will form a committee headed by the Cabinet Secretary to address “human concerns” of same-sex couples without legally recognising their relationship as a marriage. Calling it a “very fair suggestion”, a five-judge Constitution Bench, headed by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, said if what the government says goes through, it “will be a substantial advancement over what we have today” and a “building block for the future” of the movement for gay rights.It asked the petitioners if, at this stage, they would still like to stick to their demand for a declaration that they have the right to marry under the Special Marriage Act (SMA), 1954. The Bench asked the petitioners to sit with Attorney General R Venkataramani and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta over the weekend and discuss matters. Senior Advocate A M Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, said he “fully understands what” the court “is saying” and “will reflect on that, and build that into our argument”.The CJI said “from the drift of the submissions made by the Solicitor General on the last occasion, it appears that the SG also accepts that of course people do have a right to cohabit and the right to cohabit itself is something which is now an accepted social reality at least.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from: “Will form committee on concerns of same-sex couples: Centre to Supreme Court”, by Ananthakrishnan G, The Indian Express]Q.According to the Constitution Bench, what did they consider the governments suggestion to address the concerns of same-sex couples?a)A significant legal recognition of same-sex marriagesb)A substantial advancement for gay rightsc)A rejection of same-sex couples rightsd)An unconstitutional moveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the given information carefully and answer the questions given beside:The Centre told the Supreme Court Wednesday that it will form a committee headed by the Cabinet Secretary to address “human concerns” of same-sex couples without legally recognising their relationship as a marriage. Calling it a “very fair suggestion”, a five-judge Constitution Bench, headed by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, said if what the government says goes through, it “will be a substantial advancement over what we have today” and a “building block for the future” of the movement for gay rights.It asked the petitioners if, at this stage, they would still like to stick to their demand for a declaration that they have the right to marry under the Special Marriage Act (SMA), 1954. The Bench asked the petitioners to sit with Attorney General R Venkataramani and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta over the weekend and discuss matters. Senior Advocate A M Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, said he “fully understands what” the court “is saying” and “will reflect on that, and build that into our argument”.The CJI said “from the drift of the submissions made by the Solicitor General on the last occasion, it appears that the SG also accepts that of course people do have a right to cohabit and the right to cohabit itself is something which is now an accepted social reality at least.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from: “Will form committee on concerns of same-sex couples: Centre to Supreme Court”, by Ananthakrishnan G, The Indian Express]Q.According to the Constitution Bench, what did they consider the governments suggestion to address the concerns of same-sex couples?a)A significant legal recognition of same-sex marriagesb)A substantial advancement for gay rightsc)A rejection of same-sex couples rightsd)An unconstitutional moveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the given information carefully and answer the questions given beside:The Centre told the Supreme Court Wednesday that it will form a committee headed by the Cabinet Secretary to address “human concerns” of same-sex couples without legally recognising their relationship as a marriage. Calling it a “very fair suggestion”, a five-judge Constitution Bench, headed by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, said if what the government says goes through, it “will be a substantial advancement over what we have today” and a “building block for the future” of the movement for gay rights.It asked the petitioners if, at this stage, they would still like to stick to their demand for a declaration that they have the right to marry under the Special Marriage Act (SMA), 1954. The Bench asked the petitioners to sit with Attorney General R Venkataramani and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta over the weekend and discuss matters. Senior Advocate A M Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, said he “fully understands what” the court “is saying” and “will reflect on that, and build that into our argument”.The CJI said “from the drift of the submissions made by the Solicitor General on the last occasion, it appears that the SG also accepts that of course people do have a right to cohabit and the right to cohabit itself is something which is now an accepted social reality at least.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from: “Will form committee on concerns of same-sex couples: Centre to Supreme Court”, by Ananthakrishnan G, The Indian Express]Q.According to the Constitution Bench, what did they consider the governments suggestion to address the concerns of same-sex couples?a)A significant legal recognition of same-sex marriagesb)A substantial advancement for gay rightsc)A rejection of same-sex couples rightsd)An unconstitutional moveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the given information carefully and answer the questions given beside:The Centre told the Supreme Court Wednesday that it will form a committee headed by the Cabinet Secretary to address “human concerns” of same-sex couples without legally recognising their relationship as a marriage. Calling it a “very fair suggestion”, a five-judge Constitution Bench, headed by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, said if what the government says goes through, it “will be a substantial advancement over what we have today” and a “building block for the future” of the movement for gay rights.It asked the petitioners if, at this stage, they would still like to stick to their demand for a declaration that they have the right to marry under the Special Marriage Act (SMA), 1954. The Bench asked the petitioners to sit with Attorney General R Venkataramani and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta over the weekend and discuss matters. Senior Advocate A M Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, said he “fully understands what” the court “is saying” and “will reflect on that, and build that into our argument”.The CJI said “from the drift of the submissions made by the Solicitor General on the last occasion, it appears that the SG also accepts that of course people do have a right to cohabit and the right to cohabit itself is something which is now an accepted social reality at least.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from: “Will form committee on concerns of same-sex couples: Centre to Supreme Court”, by Ananthakrishnan G, The Indian Express]Q.According to the Constitution Bench, what did they consider the governments suggestion to address the concerns of same-sex couples?a)A significant legal recognition of same-sex marriagesb)A substantial advancement for gay rightsc)A rejection of same-sex couples rightsd)An unconstitutional moveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the given information carefully and answer the questions given beside:The Centre told the Supreme Court Wednesday that it will form a committee headed by the Cabinet Secretary to address “human concerns” of same-sex couples without legally recognising their relationship as a marriage. Calling it a “very fair suggestion”, a five-judge Constitution Bench, headed by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, said if what the government says goes through, it “will be a substantial advancement over what we have today” and a “building block for the future” of the movement for gay rights.It asked the petitioners if, at this stage, they would still like to stick to their demand for a declaration that they have the right to marry under the Special Marriage Act (SMA), 1954. The Bench asked the petitioners to sit with Attorney General R Venkataramani and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta over the weekend and discuss matters. Senior Advocate A M Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, said he “fully understands what” the court “is saying” and “will reflect on that, and build that into our argument”.The CJI said “from the drift of the submissions made by the Solicitor General on the last occasion, it appears that the SG also accepts that of course people do have a right to cohabit and the right to cohabit itself is something which is now an accepted social reality at least.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from: “Will form committee on concerns of same-sex couples: Centre to Supreme Court”, by Ananthakrishnan G, The Indian Express]Q.According to the Constitution Bench, what did they consider the governments suggestion to address the concerns of same-sex couples?a)A significant legal recognition of same-sex marriagesb)A substantial advancement for gay rightsc)A rejection of same-sex couples rightsd)An unconstitutional moveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the given information carefully and answer the questions given beside:The Centre told the Supreme Court Wednesday that it will form a committee headed by the Cabinet Secretary to address “human concerns” of same-sex couples without legally recognising their relationship as a marriage. Calling it a “very fair suggestion”, a five-judge Constitution Bench, headed by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, said if what the government says goes through, it “will be a substantial advancement over what we have today” and a “building block for the future” of the movement for gay rights.It asked the petitioners if, at this stage, they would still like to stick to their demand for a declaration that they have the right to marry under the Special Marriage Act (SMA), 1954. The Bench asked the petitioners to sit with Attorney General R Venkataramani and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta over the weekend and discuss matters. Senior Advocate A M Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, said he “fully understands what” the court “is saying” and “will reflect on that, and build that into our argument”.The CJI said “from the drift of the submissions made by the Solicitor General on the last occasion, it appears that the SG also accepts that of course people do have a right to cohabit and the right to cohabit itself is something which is now an accepted social reality at least.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from: “Will form committee on concerns of same-sex couples: Centre to Supreme Court”, by Ananthakrishnan G, The Indian Express]Q.According to the Constitution Bench, what did they consider the governments suggestion to address the concerns of same-sex couples?a)A significant legal recognition of same-sex marriagesb)A substantial advancement for gay rightsc)A rejection of same-sex couples rightsd)An unconstitutional moveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.