Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.An amusing report about a well-known donor that implied they were covertly supporting a circus of trained squirrels was published on a satirical news website. The philanthropist has sued for defamation on the grounds that the piece has damaged their reputation. What rule of law is most likely to influence the courts judgment in this case?a)Satirical material is exempt from defamation laws and is protected by press freedom.b)Media organizations are not liable for how their hilarious articles affect a persons reputation.c)Due to their public stature, philanthropists are shielded from defamation claims.d)Media outlets must weigh freedom of expression against any potential harm that satirical content may create.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.An amusing report about a well-known donor that implied they were covertly supporting a circus of trained squirrels was published on a satirical news website. The philanthropist has sued for defamation on the grounds that the piece has damaged their reputation. What rule of law is most likely to influence the courts judgment in this case?a)Satirical material is exempt from defamation laws and is protected by press freedom.b)Media organizations are not liable for how their hilarious articles affect a persons reputation.c)Due to their public stature, philanthropists are shielded from defamation claims.d)Media outlets must weigh freedom of expression against any potential harm that satirical content may create.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.An amusing report about a well-known donor that implied they were covertly supporting a circus of trained squirrels was published on a satirical news website. The philanthropist has sued for defamation on the grounds that the piece has damaged their reputation. What rule of law is most likely to influence the courts judgment in this case?a)Satirical material is exempt from defamation laws and is protected by press freedom.b)Media organizations are not liable for how their hilarious articles affect a persons reputation.c)Due to their public stature, philanthropists are shielded from defamation claims.d)Media outlets must weigh freedom of expression against any potential harm that satirical content may create.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.An amusing report about a well-known donor that implied they were covertly supporting a circus of trained squirrels was published on a satirical news website. The philanthropist has sued for defamation on the grounds that the piece has damaged their reputation. What rule of law is most likely to influence the courts judgment in this case?a)Satirical material is exempt from defamation laws and is protected by press freedom.b)Media organizations are not liable for how their hilarious articles affect a persons reputation.c)Due to their public stature, philanthropists are shielded from defamation claims.d)Media outlets must weigh freedom of expression against any potential harm that satirical content may create.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.An amusing report about a well-known donor that implied they were covertly supporting a circus of trained squirrels was published on a satirical news website. The philanthropist has sued for defamation on the grounds that the piece has damaged their reputation. What rule of law is most likely to influence the courts judgment in this case?a)Satirical material is exempt from defamation laws and is protected by press freedom.b)Media organizations are not liable for how their hilarious articles affect a persons reputation.c)Due to their public stature, philanthropists are shielded from defamation claims.d)Media outlets must weigh freedom of expression against any potential harm that satirical content may create.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.An amusing report about a well-known donor that implied they were covertly supporting a circus of trained squirrels was published on a satirical news website. The philanthropist has sued for defamation on the grounds that the piece has damaged their reputation. What rule of law is most likely to influence the courts judgment in this case?a)Satirical material is exempt from defamation laws and is protected by press freedom.b)Media organizations are not liable for how their hilarious articles affect a persons reputation.c)Due to their public stature, philanthropists are shielded from defamation claims.d)Media outlets must weigh freedom of expression against any potential harm that satirical content may create.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.An amusing report about a well-known donor that implied they were covertly supporting a circus of trained squirrels was published on a satirical news website. The philanthropist has sued for defamation on the grounds that the piece has damaged their reputation. What rule of law is most likely to influence the courts judgment in this case?a)Satirical material is exempt from defamation laws and is protected by press freedom.b)Media organizations are not liable for how their hilarious articles affect a persons reputation.c)Due to their public stature, philanthropists are shielded from defamation claims.d)Media outlets must weigh freedom of expression against any potential harm that satirical content may create.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.An amusing report about a well-known donor that implied they were covertly supporting a circus of trained squirrels was published on a satirical news website. The philanthropist has sued for defamation on the grounds that the piece has damaged their reputation. What rule of law is most likely to influence the courts judgment in this case?a)Satirical material is exempt from defamation laws and is protected by press freedom.b)Media organizations are not liable for how their hilarious articles affect a persons reputation.c)Due to their public stature, philanthropists are shielded from defamation claims.d)Media outlets must weigh freedom of expression against any potential harm that satirical content may create.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.An amusing report about a well-known donor that implied they were covertly supporting a circus of trained squirrels was published on a satirical news website. The philanthropist has sued for defamation on the grounds that the piece has damaged their reputation. What rule of law is most likely to influence the courts judgment in this case?a)Satirical material is exempt from defamation laws and is protected by press freedom.b)Media organizations are not liable for how their hilarious articles affect a persons reputation.c)Due to their public stature, philanthropists are shielded from defamation claims.d)Media outlets must weigh freedom of expression against any potential harm that satirical content may create.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.