Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.Underlining that the Uniform Civil Code is “neither necessary nor desirable at this stage”, the 21st Law Commission of India, in 2018, argued for reform of family laws of every religion through amendments and codification of certain aspects so as to make them gender-just. Currently, Indian personal law is complex, with each religion adhering to its own specific laws. The exception to this rule is the state of Goa, where all religions have a common law regarding marriages, divorces, and adoption. A UCC would provide for one law for the entire country, applicable to all religious communities, in their personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption etc. Article 44 of the Constitution lays down that the state shall endeavour to secure a UCC for citizens throughout the territory of India. Article 44 is among the Directive Principles of State Policy. Directive Principles are not enforceable by court, but are supposed to inform and guide governance. Legal experts argue that the Constitution’s framers used the term “uniform” in Article 44 and not “common”. Common means one and the same in all circumstances, while uniform means the same in similar conditions. Even code does not necessarily mean one single law in every circumstance. Different people may have different laws, but the law within a particular group should be uniform. Such a classification is permissible even under the right to equality under Article 14. During the Mohd Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum and Others (1985) case, the top court exhorted the central government to enact a “common civil code” in the interests of national integration.Recently in 2023, The 22nd Law Commission of India has decided again to solicit views and ideas of the public at large and recognized religious organizations about the Uniform Civil Code. According to critics, the Law Commission’s decision appears to be a political initiative aimed at bringing the potentially divisive issue under focus. There is a rising demand from all parts of the country for a Uniform Civil Code. But it comes with a set of its own misconceptions. The foremost regarding personal laws is that they are invincible and aren’t subject to judicial review. Thus, people believe that UCC is the only option left after special marriage act which allows only monogamous marriages to filter out all discriminatory practices in personal laws. The truth is all laws whether personal or criminal or financial are judicially reviewable and the judiciary can declare them potentially void if they encroach upon Fundamental Rights.Q.Married couple Meera and Raj. The religious group to which Meera and Raj belong engages in polygamy. After several years of marriage, Raj tells Meera that, in keeping with the customs of her religious community, he wants to take a second wife. This suggestion has Meera very agitated since she feels that it would go against her rights and dignity as a wife. She requests a court order to defend her rights and stop Raj from adopting a second wife in accordance with Article 44. What legal justification should the court use in this case?a)The court ought to deny Rajs request to wed a second wife.b)The court should put Meeras rights and dignity first, and regardless of religious beliefs, it should deem polygamy unconstitutional and discriminatory.c)Because personal laws are a matter of individual choice and the state is not permitted to become involved, the court should dismiss the complaint while still respecting the plurality of religious practices.d)The court should assess whether Meeras fundamental rights, such as her right to dignity and equality, are violated by the practice of polygamy and decide if a fair reading of the Constitution necessitates changes to personal laws.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.Underlining that the Uniform Civil Code is “neither necessary nor desirable at this stage”, the 21st Law Commission of India, in 2018, argued for reform of family laws of every religion through amendments and codification of certain aspects so as to make them gender-just. Currently, Indian personal law is complex, with each religion adhering to its own specific laws. The exception to this rule is the state of Goa, where all religions have a common law regarding marriages, divorces, and adoption. A UCC would provide for one law for the entire country, applicable to all religious communities, in their personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption etc. Article 44 of the Constitution lays down that the state shall endeavour to secure a UCC for citizens throughout the territory of India. Article 44 is among the Directive Principles of State Policy. Directive Principles are not enforceable by court, but are supposed to inform and guide governance. Legal experts argue that the Constitution’s framers used the term “uniform” in Article 44 and not “common”. Common means one and the same in all circumstances, while uniform means the same in similar conditions. Even code does not necessarily mean one single law in every circumstance. Different people may have different laws, but the law within a particular group should be uniform. Such a classification is permissible even under the right to equality under Article 14. During the Mohd Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum and Others (1985) case, the top court exhorted the central government to enact a “common civil code” in the interests of national integration.Recently in 2023, The 22nd Law Commission of India has decided again to solicit views and ideas of the public at large and recognized religious organizations about the Uniform Civil Code. According to critics, the Law Commission’s decision appears to be a political initiative aimed at bringing the potentially divisive issue under focus. There is a rising demand from all parts of the country for a Uniform Civil Code. But it comes with a set of its own misconceptions. The foremost regarding personal laws is that they are invincible and aren’t subject to judicial review. Thus, people believe that UCC is the only option left after special marriage act which allows only monogamous marriages to filter out all discriminatory practices in personal laws. The truth is all laws whether personal or criminal or financial are judicially reviewable and the judiciary can declare them potentially void if they encroach upon Fundamental Rights.Q.Married couple Meera and Raj. The religious group to which Meera and Raj belong engages in polygamy. After several years of marriage, Raj tells Meera that, in keeping with the customs of her religious community, he wants to take a second wife. This suggestion has Meera very agitated since she feels that it would go against her rights and dignity as a wife. She requests a court order to defend her rights and stop Raj from adopting a second wife in accordance with Article 44. What legal justification should the court use in this case?a)The court ought to deny Rajs request to wed a second wife.b)The court should put Meeras rights and dignity first, and regardless of religious beliefs, it should deem polygamy unconstitutional and discriminatory.c)Because personal laws are a matter of individual choice and the state is not permitted to become involved, the court should dismiss the complaint while still respecting the plurality of religious practices.d)The court should assess whether Meeras fundamental rights, such as her right to dignity and equality, are violated by the practice of polygamy and decide if a fair reading of the Constitution necessitates changes to personal laws.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.Underlining that the Uniform Civil Code is “neither necessary nor desirable at this stage”, the 21st Law Commission of India, in 2018, argued for reform of family laws of every religion through amendments and codification of certain aspects so as to make them gender-just. Currently, Indian personal law is complex, with each religion adhering to its own specific laws. The exception to this rule is the state of Goa, where all religions have a common law regarding marriages, divorces, and adoption. A UCC would provide for one law for the entire country, applicable to all religious communities, in their personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption etc. Article 44 of the Constitution lays down that the state shall endeavour to secure a UCC for citizens throughout the territory of India. Article 44 is among the Directive Principles of State Policy. Directive Principles are not enforceable by court, but are supposed to inform and guide governance. Legal experts argue that the Constitution’s framers used the term “uniform” in Article 44 and not “common”. Common means one and the same in all circumstances, while uniform means the same in similar conditions. Even code does not necessarily mean one single law in every circumstance. Different people may have different laws, but the law within a particular group should be uniform. Such a classification is permissible even under the right to equality under Article 14. During the Mohd Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum and Others (1985) case, the top court exhorted the central government to enact a “common civil code” in the interests of national integration.Recently in 2023, The 22nd Law Commission of India has decided again to solicit views and ideas of the public at large and recognized religious organizations about the Uniform Civil Code. According to critics, the Law Commission’s decision appears to be a political initiative aimed at bringing the potentially divisive issue under focus. There is a rising demand from all parts of the country for a Uniform Civil Code. But it comes with a set of its own misconceptions. The foremost regarding personal laws is that they are invincible and aren’t subject to judicial review. Thus, people believe that UCC is the only option left after special marriage act which allows only monogamous marriages to filter out all discriminatory practices in personal laws. The truth is all laws whether personal or criminal or financial are judicially reviewable and the judiciary can declare them potentially void if they encroach upon Fundamental Rights.Q.Married couple Meera and Raj. The religious group to which Meera and Raj belong engages in polygamy. After several years of marriage, Raj tells Meera that, in keeping with the customs of her religious community, he wants to take a second wife. This suggestion has Meera very agitated since she feels that it would go against her rights and dignity as a wife. She requests a court order to defend her rights and stop Raj from adopting a second wife in accordance with Article 44. What legal justification should the court use in this case?a)The court ought to deny Rajs request to wed a second wife.b)The court should put Meeras rights and dignity first, and regardless of religious beliefs, it should deem polygamy unconstitutional and discriminatory.c)Because personal laws are a matter of individual choice and the state is not permitted to become involved, the court should dismiss the complaint while still respecting the plurality of religious practices.d)The court should assess whether Meeras fundamental rights, such as her right to dignity and equality, are violated by the practice of polygamy and decide if a fair reading of the Constitution necessitates changes to personal laws.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.Underlining that the Uniform Civil Code is “neither necessary nor desirable at this stage”, the 21st Law Commission of India, in 2018, argued for reform of family laws of every religion through amendments and codification of certain aspects so as to make them gender-just. Currently, Indian personal law is complex, with each religion adhering to its own specific laws. The exception to this rule is the state of Goa, where all religions have a common law regarding marriages, divorces, and adoption. A UCC would provide for one law for the entire country, applicable to all religious communities, in their personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption etc. Article 44 of the Constitution lays down that the state shall endeavour to secure a UCC for citizens throughout the territory of India. Article 44 is among the Directive Principles of State Policy. Directive Principles are not enforceable by court, but are supposed to inform and guide governance. Legal experts argue that the Constitution’s framers used the term “uniform” in Article 44 and not “common”. Common means one and the same in all circumstances, while uniform means the same in similar conditions. Even code does not necessarily mean one single law in every circumstance. Different people may have different laws, but the law within a particular group should be uniform. Such a classification is permissible even under the right to equality under Article 14. During the Mohd Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum and Others (1985) case, the top court exhorted the central government to enact a “common civil code” in the interests of national integration.Recently in 2023, The 22nd Law Commission of India has decided again to solicit views and ideas of the public at large and recognized religious organizations about the Uniform Civil Code. According to critics, the Law Commission’s decision appears to be a political initiative aimed at bringing the potentially divisive issue under focus. There is a rising demand from all parts of the country for a Uniform Civil Code. But it comes with a set of its own misconceptions. The foremost regarding personal laws is that they are invincible and aren’t subject to judicial review. Thus, people believe that UCC is the only option left after special marriage act which allows only monogamous marriages to filter out all discriminatory practices in personal laws. The truth is all laws whether personal or criminal or financial are judicially reviewable and the judiciary can declare them potentially void if they encroach upon Fundamental Rights.Q.Married couple Meera and Raj. The religious group to which Meera and Raj belong engages in polygamy. After several years of marriage, Raj tells Meera that, in keeping with the customs of her religious community, he wants to take a second wife. This suggestion has Meera very agitated since she feels that it would go against her rights and dignity as a wife. She requests a court order to defend her rights and stop Raj from adopting a second wife in accordance with Article 44. What legal justification should the court use in this case?a)The court ought to deny Rajs request to wed a second wife.b)The court should put Meeras rights and dignity first, and regardless of religious beliefs, it should deem polygamy unconstitutional and discriminatory.c)Because personal laws are a matter of individual choice and the state is not permitted to become involved, the court should dismiss the complaint while still respecting the plurality of religious practices.d)The court should assess whether Meeras fundamental rights, such as her right to dignity and equality, are violated by the practice of polygamy and decide if a fair reading of the Constitution necessitates changes to personal laws.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.Underlining that the Uniform Civil Code is “neither necessary nor desirable at this stage”, the 21st Law Commission of India, in 2018, argued for reform of family laws of every religion through amendments and codification of certain aspects so as to make them gender-just. Currently, Indian personal law is complex, with each religion adhering to its own specific laws. The exception to this rule is the state of Goa, where all religions have a common law regarding marriages, divorces, and adoption. A UCC would provide for one law for the entire country, applicable to all religious communities, in their personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption etc. Article 44 of the Constitution lays down that the state shall endeavour to secure a UCC for citizens throughout the territory of India. Article 44 is among the Directive Principles of State Policy. Directive Principles are not enforceable by court, but are supposed to inform and guide governance. Legal experts argue that the Constitution’s framers used the term “uniform” in Article 44 and not “common”. Common means one and the same in all circumstances, while uniform means the same in similar conditions. Even code does not necessarily mean one single law in every circumstance. Different people may have different laws, but the law within a particular group should be uniform. Such a classification is permissible even under the right to equality under Article 14. During the Mohd Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum and Others (1985) case, the top court exhorted the central government to enact a “common civil code” in the interests of national integration.Recently in 2023, The 22nd Law Commission of India has decided again to solicit views and ideas of the public at large and recognized religious organizations about the Uniform Civil Code. According to critics, the Law Commission’s decision appears to be a political initiative aimed at bringing the potentially divisive issue under focus. There is a rising demand from all parts of the country for a Uniform Civil Code. But it comes with a set of its own misconceptions. The foremost regarding personal laws is that they are invincible and aren’t subject to judicial review. Thus, people believe that UCC is the only option left after special marriage act which allows only monogamous marriages to filter out all discriminatory practices in personal laws. The truth is all laws whether personal or criminal or financial are judicially reviewable and the judiciary can declare them potentially void if they encroach upon Fundamental Rights.Q.Married couple Meera and Raj. The religious group to which Meera and Raj belong engages in polygamy. After several years of marriage, Raj tells Meera that, in keeping with the customs of her religious community, he wants to take a second wife. This suggestion has Meera very agitated since she feels that it would go against her rights and dignity as a wife. She requests a court order to defend her rights and stop Raj from adopting a second wife in accordance with Article 44. What legal justification should the court use in this case?a)The court ought to deny Rajs request to wed a second wife.b)The court should put Meeras rights and dignity first, and regardless of religious beliefs, it should deem polygamy unconstitutional and discriminatory.c)Because personal laws are a matter of individual choice and the state is not permitted to become involved, the court should dismiss the complaint while still respecting the plurality of religious practices.d)The court should assess whether Meeras fundamental rights, such as her right to dignity and equality, are violated by the practice of polygamy and decide if a fair reading of the Constitution necessitates changes to personal laws.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.Underlining that the Uniform Civil Code is “neither necessary nor desirable at this stage”, the 21st Law Commission of India, in 2018, argued for reform of family laws of every religion through amendments and codification of certain aspects so as to make them gender-just. Currently, Indian personal law is complex, with each religion adhering to its own specific laws. The exception to this rule is the state of Goa, where all religions have a common law regarding marriages, divorces, and adoption. A UCC would provide for one law for the entire country, applicable to all religious communities, in their personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption etc. Article 44 of the Constitution lays down that the state shall endeavour to secure a UCC for citizens throughout the territory of India. Article 44 is among the Directive Principles of State Policy. Directive Principles are not enforceable by court, but are supposed to inform and guide governance. Legal experts argue that the Constitution’s framers used the term “uniform” in Article 44 and not “common”. Common means one and the same in all circumstances, while uniform means the same in similar conditions. Even code does not necessarily mean one single law in every circumstance. Different people may have different laws, but the law within a particular group should be uniform. Such a classification is permissible even under the right to equality under Article 14. During the Mohd Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum and Others (1985) case, the top court exhorted the central government to enact a “common civil code” in the interests of national integration.Recently in 2023, The 22nd Law Commission of India has decided again to solicit views and ideas of the public at large and recognized religious organizations about the Uniform Civil Code. According to critics, the Law Commission’s decision appears to be a political initiative aimed at bringing the potentially divisive issue under focus. There is a rising demand from all parts of the country for a Uniform Civil Code. But it comes with a set of its own misconceptions. The foremost regarding personal laws is that they are invincible and aren’t subject to judicial review. Thus, people believe that UCC is the only option left after special marriage act which allows only monogamous marriages to filter out all discriminatory practices in personal laws. The truth is all laws whether personal or criminal or financial are judicially reviewable and the judiciary can declare them potentially void if they encroach upon Fundamental Rights.Q.Married couple Meera and Raj. The religious group to which Meera and Raj belong engages in polygamy. After several years of marriage, Raj tells Meera that, in keeping with the customs of her religious community, he wants to take a second wife. This suggestion has Meera very agitated since she feels that it would go against her rights and dignity as a wife. She requests a court order to defend her rights and stop Raj from adopting a second wife in accordance with Article 44. What legal justification should the court use in this case?a)The court ought to deny Rajs request to wed a second wife.b)The court should put Meeras rights and dignity first, and regardless of religious beliefs, it should deem polygamy unconstitutional and discriminatory.c)Because personal laws are a matter of individual choice and the state is not permitted to become involved, the court should dismiss the complaint while still respecting the plurality of religious practices.d)The court should assess whether Meeras fundamental rights, such as her right to dignity and equality, are violated by the practice of polygamy and decide if a fair reading of the Constitution necessitates changes to personal laws.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.Underlining that the Uniform Civil Code is “neither necessary nor desirable at this stage”, the 21st Law Commission of India, in 2018, argued for reform of family laws of every religion through amendments and codification of certain aspects so as to make them gender-just. Currently, Indian personal law is complex, with each religion adhering to its own specific laws. The exception to this rule is the state of Goa, where all religions have a common law regarding marriages, divorces, and adoption. A UCC would provide for one law for the entire country, applicable to all religious communities, in their personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption etc. Article 44 of the Constitution lays down that the state shall endeavour to secure a UCC for citizens throughout the territory of India. Article 44 is among the Directive Principles of State Policy. Directive Principles are not enforceable by court, but are supposed to inform and guide governance. Legal experts argue that the Constitution’s framers used the term “uniform” in Article 44 and not “common”. Common means one and the same in all circumstances, while uniform means the same in similar conditions. Even code does not necessarily mean one single law in every circumstance. Different people may have different laws, but the law within a particular group should be uniform. Such a classification is permissible even under the right to equality under Article 14. During the Mohd Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum and Others (1985) case, the top court exhorted the central government to enact a “common civil code” in the interests of national integration.Recently in 2023, The 22nd Law Commission of India has decided again to solicit views and ideas of the public at large and recognized religious organizations about the Uniform Civil Code. According to critics, the Law Commission’s decision appears to be a political initiative aimed at bringing the potentially divisive issue under focus. There is a rising demand from all parts of the country for a Uniform Civil Code. But it comes with a set of its own misconceptions. The foremost regarding personal laws is that they are invincible and aren’t subject to judicial review. Thus, people believe that UCC is the only option left after special marriage act which allows only monogamous marriages to filter out all discriminatory practices in personal laws. The truth is all laws whether personal or criminal or financial are judicially reviewable and the judiciary can declare them potentially void if they encroach upon Fundamental Rights.Q.Married couple Meera and Raj. The religious group to which Meera and Raj belong engages in polygamy. After several years of marriage, Raj tells Meera that, in keeping with the customs of her religious community, he wants to take a second wife. This suggestion has Meera very agitated since she feels that it would go against her rights and dignity as a wife. She requests a court order to defend her rights and stop Raj from adopting a second wife in accordance with Article 44. What legal justification should the court use in this case?a)The court ought to deny Rajs request to wed a second wife.b)The court should put Meeras rights and dignity first, and regardless of religious beliefs, it should deem polygamy unconstitutional and discriminatory.c)Because personal laws are a matter of individual choice and the state is not permitted to become involved, the court should dismiss the complaint while still respecting the plurality of religious practices.d)The court should assess whether Meeras fundamental rights, such as her right to dignity and equality, are violated by the practice of polygamy and decide if a fair reading of the Constitution necessitates changes to personal laws.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.Underlining that the Uniform Civil Code is “neither necessary nor desirable at this stage”, the 21st Law Commission of India, in 2018, argued for reform of family laws of every religion through amendments and codification of certain aspects so as to make them gender-just. Currently, Indian personal law is complex, with each religion adhering to its own specific laws. The exception to this rule is the state of Goa, where all religions have a common law regarding marriages, divorces, and adoption. A UCC would provide for one law for the entire country, applicable to all religious communities, in their personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption etc. Article 44 of the Constitution lays down that the state shall endeavour to secure a UCC for citizens throughout the territory of India. Article 44 is among the Directive Principles of State Policy. Directive Principles are not enforceable by court, but are supposed to inform and guide governance. Legal experts argue that the Constitution’s framers used the term “uniform” in Article 44 and not “common”. Common means one and the same in all circumstances, while uniform means the same in similar conditions. Even code does not necessarily mean one single law in every circumstance. Different people may have different laws, but the law within a particular group should be uniform. Such a classification is permissible even under the right to equality under Article 14. During the Mohd Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum and Others (1985) case, the top court exhorted the central government to enact a “common civil code” in the interests of national integration.Recently in 2023, The 22nd Law Commission of India has decided again to solicit views and ideas of the public at large and recognized religious organizations about the Uniform Civil Code. According to critics, the Law Commission’s decision appears to be a political initiative aimed at bringing the potentially divisive issue under focus. There is a rising demand from all parts of the country for a Uniform Civil Code. But it comes with a set of its own misconceptions. The foremost regarding personal laws is that they are invincible and aren’t subject to judicial review. Thus, people believe that UCC is the only option left after special marriage act which allows only monogamous marriages to filter out all discriminatory practices in personal laws. The truth is all laws whether personal or criminal or financial are judicially reviewable and the judiciary can declare them potentially void if they encroach upon Fundamental Rights.Q.Married couple Meera and Raj. The religious group to which Meera and Raj belong engages in polygamy. After several years of marriage, Raj tells Meera that, in keeping with the customs of her religious community, he wants to take a second wife. This suggestion has Meera very agitated since she feels that it would go against her rights and dignity as a wife. She requests a court order to defend her rights and stop Raj from adopting a second wife in accordance with Article 44. What legal justification should the court use in this case?a)The court ought to deny Rajs request to wed a second wife.b)The court should put Meeras rights and dignity first, and regardless of religious beliefs, it should deem polygamy unconstitutional and discriminatory.c)Because personal laws are a matter of individual choice and the state is not permitted to become involved, the court should dismiss the complaint while still respecting the plurality of religious practices.d)The court should assess whether Meeras fundamental rights, such as her right to dignity and equality, are violated by the practice of polygamy and decide if a fair reading of the Constitution necessitates changes to personal laws.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.Underlining that the Uniform Civil Code is “neither necessary nor desirable at this stage”, the 21st Law Commission of India, in 2018, argued for reform of family laws of every religion through amendments and codification of certain aspects so as to make them gender-just. Currently, Indian personal law is complex, with each religion adhering to its own specific laws. The exception to this rule is the state of Goa, where all religions have a common law regarding marriages, divorces, and adoption. A UCC would provide for one law for the entire country, applicable to all religious communities, in their personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption etc. Article 44 of the Constitution lays down that the state shall endeavour to secure a UCC for citizens throughout the territory of India. Article 44 is among the Directive Principles of State Policy. Directive Principles are not enforceable by court, but are supposed to inform and guide governance. Legal experts argue that the Constitution’s framers used the term “uniform” in Article 44 and not “common”. Common means one and the same in all circumstances, while uniform means the same in similar conditions. Even code does not necessarily mean one single law in every circumstance. Different people may have different laws, but the law within a particular group should be uniform. Such a classification is permissible even under the right to equality under Article 14. During the Mohd Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum and Others (1985) case, the top court exhorted the central government to enact a “common civil code” in the interests of national integration.Recently in 2023, The 22nd Law Commission of India has decided again to solicit views and ideas of the public at large and recognized religious organizations about the Uniform Civil Code. According to critics, the Law Commission’s decision appears to be a political initiative aimed at bringing the potentially divisive issue under focus. There is a rising demand from all parts of the country for a Uniform Civil Code. But it comes with a set of its own misconceptions. The foremost regarding personal laws is that they are invincible and aren’t subject to judicial review. Thus, people believe that UCC is the only option left after special marriage act which allows only monogamous marriages to filter out all discriminatory practices in personal laws. The truth is all laws whether personal or criminal or financial are judicially reviewable and the judiciary can declare them potentially void if they encroach upon Fundamental Rights.Q.Married couple Meera and Raj. The religious group to which Meera and Raj belong engages in polygamy. After several years of marriage, Raj tells Meera that, in keeping with the customs of her religious community, he wants to take a second wife. This suggestion has Meera very agitated since she feels that it would go against her rights and dignity as a wife. She requests a court order to defend her rights and stop Raj from adopting a second wife in accordance with Article 44. What legal justification should the court use in this case?a)The court ought to deny Rajs request to wed a second wife.b)The court should put Meeras rights and dignity first, and regardless of religious beliefs, it should deem polygamy unconstitutional and discriminatory.c)Because personal laws are a matter of individual choice and the state is not permitted to become involved, the court should dismiss the complaint while still respecting the plurality of religious practices.d)The court should assess whether Meeras fundamental rights, such as her right to dignity and equality, are violated by the practice of polygamy and decide if a fair reading of the Constitution necessitates changes to personal laws.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.