It is believed that keeping poultry in brightly lit cages significantly increases the amount of head-pecking among them. However, in recent experiments, commercially reared chickens when kept in brightly lit cages were found to behave much less aggressively; instead, they indulged in an almost andldquo;sleepyandrdquo; behavior andndash; they tended to mostly put their heads between their wings and seemed to doze off, an action unusual for such chickens. This raises serious questions on the belief that the visibility accorded by the bright lights is majorly responsible for the increased display of head pecking among the poultry.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)The pecking order is established early in a chickens life when raised in a flock; the young chicks peck each other and bully one another when they are around food.b)Head-pecking, is almost always the result of high stress levels and when that happens, the birds will sometimes pluck each otherandrsquo;s feathers out, and can really hurt one another.c)Commercially reared chicken when put in cages are often equipped with blinding glasses that prevent more than 90% of the light from entering the retina.d)While Commercially reared chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour in cages, they were much more aggressive a few hours later when allowed to roam freely on the farm.e)While most chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour when in cages, a few were unusually aggressive.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > It is believed that keeping poultry in bright...

Join the Discussion on the App

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

a)
The pecking order is established early in a chicken's life when raised in a flock; the young chicks peck each other and bully one another when they are around food.
b)
Head-pecking, is almost always the result of high stress levels and when that happens, the birds will sometimes pluck each other’s feathers out, and can really hurt one another.
c)
Commercially reared chicken when put in cages are often equipped with blinding glasses that prevent more than 90% of the light from entering the retina.
d)
While Commercially reared chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour in cages, they were much more aggressive a few hours later when allowed to roam freely on the farm.
e)
While most chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour when in cages, a few were unusually aggressive.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: Verbal Reasoning (Level 600) - 2

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

It is believed that keeping poultry in brightly lit cages significantl...

Argument summary:
The argument presents a contradiction between the belief that brightly lit cages increase head-pecking among poultry and the results of recent experiments, where commercially reared chickens in brightly lit cages exhibited sleepy behavior instead of increased aggression. The argument suggests that this challenges the belief that visibility due to bright lights is the main cause of head pecking.

We need to find the option that weakens this argument by providing an alternative explanation or a factor that could explain the observed behavior of the commercially reared chickens.

(A) This option provides information about the pecking order and aggressive behavior among young chicks. However, it does not directly address the behavior of commercially reared chickens in brightly lit cages. It does not weaken the argument.

(B) This option explains that head-pecking is the result of high stress levels and can cause harm to chickens. However, it does not provide an alternative explanation for the behavior of commercially reared chickens in brightly lit cages. It does not weaken the argument.

(C) This option states that commercially reared chickens in cages are equipped with blinding glasses that prevent most light from entering their retinas. This information weakens the argument by suggesting an alternative reason for the observed behavior. The lack of visibility due to the blinding glasses could explain why the chickens exhibited sleepy behavior instead of aggression. This option weakens the argument and is the correct answer.

(D) This option introduces a new factor where the commercially reared chickens were more aggressive when allowed to roam freely on the farm. However, this information does not directly relate to their behavior in brightly lit cages. It does not weaken the argument.

(E) This option states that a few chickens exhibited unusually aggressive behavior. However, it does not provide an alternative explanation for the majority of the chickens exhibiting sleepy behavior. It does not weaken the argument.

In conclusion, option C weakens the argument by providing an alternative explanation for the observed behavior of commercially reared chickens in brightly lit cages. The presence of blinding glasses suggests that visibility may not be the primary factor causing aggression or head-pecking.

Answered by Talent Skill Learning · View profile

Attention GMAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Read the passage and answer the question given below.The study of the analog position of mental representation has many fascinating branches which help illuminate the inner workings of our minds and how we perceive images in our mind‘s eye. This theory points to the link between the time it takes to solve mental problems and their complexity.In a now-famous study, Stephen Kosslyn asked subjects to imagine an animal, such as a rabbit, next to either an elephant or a fly. When the image was formed, Kosslyn would ask whether or not the target animal had a particular attribute. For example, Kosslyn might say, elephant, rabbit, and then leg. He found that it took subjects longer to answer when the target animal was next to the large animal than when it was next to the small animal. Kosslyn interpreted this to mean that subjects had to zoom in on the image to detect the particular feature. Just as one has difficulty seeing details on small objects, so the subjects could not simply mentally see details on the smaller object in their mental image.Second, Kosslyn and colleagues demonstrated that the time it takes to scan between two points depends on the distance between the two points [in a memorized image]. In one experiment, subjects memorized an array of letters separated by different distances. Kosslyn found that the farther apart the letters were from each other, the longer it took to answer questions about one of the letters. One of the principal hypotheses of the analog position of mental representation, which is the idea that mental processing requires one to move sequentially through all intervening steps to solve a problem, is that mental images have regular properties.In a similar experiment, Kosslyn had subjects memorize pictures of objects like a plane or a motorboat. Then he had them focus on one part of the object (e.g., the motor) and move to another (e.g., the anchor). He found that the time it took to determine whether the second part was present depended on the distance between the two parts in the memorized picture.Using a completely different paradigm, Shepard and Feng tested the amount of time that it would take for subjects to specify whether two arrows on unfolded blocks matched up. They found a linear relationship between the number of folds between the arrows and the time it took to make this judgment, suggesting that subjects went through a discrete series of organized steps in order to solve this problem.The final type of experiment showing that mental images have regular properties is perhaps the most famous: mental rotation experiments. In 1971, Shepard and Metzler tested subjects‘ abilities to make complex figure comparisons. They presented subjects with a three dimensional standard figure and a comparison figure which was either identical to the standard figure, or its mirror image; the comparison stimulus was rotated, either clockwise or into the third dimension. Shepard and Metzler found that the time needed to judge whether the comparison stimulus was identical or a mirror image depended directly on the size of the angle between the target orientation and the orientation of the standard.Q.According to the scanning experiments mentioned in the passage, it should take longer to scan longer distances because the subjects

View answer

Researchers have found that children as young as two year old toddlers use mathematical concepts such as probability to understand the world around them and make decisions accordingly. In an experiment conducted to study such behaviour, toddlers observed an experimenter play a game with two different colored buttons. The pressing of the button would sometimes release a marble and sometimes not. When these toddlers were asked to play the same game, 23 out of 32 toddlers chose to press the button that was more successful in generating a marble.Which of the following, if true, is important to rule out the possibility that the toddlers made a choice purely based on frequency, i.e. the number of times a button returned marbles, rather than probability?

View answer

The government of Storinia has proposed to conduct several particle physics experiments in Antarctica, as described below.The ultra-high-energy cosmic ray detector (UHECR-D) will track a variety of subatomic particles traveling from outer space with exceptionally high kinetic energy by recording secondary showers of particles created by these UHECRs as they collide with the upper atmosphere.The polyethylene naphthalate neutrino observatory (PEN-NO) will search for neutrinos, extremely light and fast subatomic particles that interact only weakly with normal matter.To prevent spurious results from cosmic rays, PEN-NO will be buried deep below the ice.The magnetic monopole detector (MaMoD) will attempt to verify the existence of magnetic monopoles, hypothetical subatomic particles postulated by some physical theories to be left over from the creation of the universe.The purpose of UHECR-D is to ascertain the identity, composition, and extraterrestrial origin of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays, which are much less prevalent and well-understood than lower-energy cosmic rays. PEN-NO will measure the mass and speed of neutrinos produced in particle accelerators and nuclear reactors, both to reduce uncertainty in the known mass of a neutrino and to contribute to the resolution of a recent challenge to Einsteins theory of relativity posed by the observation of neutrinos supposedly traveling slightly faster than light. PEN-NO will also measure the passage of solar and other neutrinos of astronomical origin. Finally, if MaMoD is successful in its search, it will provide experimental proof for Diracs explanation of charge quantization and fix an asymmetry in Maxwells equations of electromagnetism.The government of Storinia projects that it will cost $42 million in total and take 2 years to construct UHECR-D, PEN-NO, and MaMoD. The government also projects that once construction is finished, the annual operating budget for each experiment will be $3.6 million for UHECR-D, $4.3 million for PEN-NO, and $2.7 million for MaMoD. All these figures are in real 2012 dollars (removing the effect of predicted inflation).Q.For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is supported by the evidenceprovided. Otherwise, select No.1.With a construction budget of $30 million, the Storinian governmentwill be able to search for a proof of an explanation of charge quantizationand to help resolve a controversy by measuring the speed ofneutrinos produced in nuclear reactors.2.In its Antarctic experiments, the Storinian government will attemptto ascertain the mass and speed of cosmic rays and to confirm thecomposition of magnetic monopoles.3.If the PEN-NO experiment is kept in operation on the surface of theice in Antarctica, its findings will be considered more valid than thoseproduced by the experiment as currently envisioned.

View answer

A recent ball-catching experiment conducted in space by astronauts on board a space shuttle has led neuroscientists to conclude that the brain contains an internal model of gravity that is both powerful and persistent. At the same time, the experiment provided evidence that the brain can adapt to environments in which the force of downward acceleration is less pronounced than it is on earth.The experiment’s outcomes suggested that an individual’s understanding of motion is hard-wired from an earthcentric perspective. In the experiment, the astronauts were asked to catch balls released from a spring-loaded cannon.Analyzing data gathered from infrared tracking cameras and electrodes placed on the astronauts’ arms, McIntyre, the experiment’s principal designer, noticed that the astronauts’ anticipation of the ball’s motion was slightly off. Though they were able to catch the ball, the astronauts expected the ball to move faster than it did. He theorized that this over-anticipation is due to the fact that the brain expects the force of the earth’s gravity to act on the ball.The experiment also demonstrates the brain’s ability to adjust to conditions that run counter to its pre-set wiring.While the astronauts did not adapt to the conditions in space for some time, by day 15 of the experiment, the amplitude of the premature arm movements decreased and a new well-timed arm movement immediately preceded the catch. Upon returning to earth, the astronauts again mis-anticipated the ball’s motion, though this time the ball moved faster than anticipated. However, the astronauts were able to adjust back to the earth’s gravitational effect on the balls much more quickly than they had been able to adapt to the conditions in space.Many scientists view the findings as a first step in research that could have serious practical benefits. The ability of astronauts to safely explore space and investigate other planets is dependent on understanding the differences between our physical reactions on earth and elsewhere.On another level, understanding timing processes in the body might lead to the development of treatments for coordination problems experienced by individuals with certain types of brain damage.Q.The primary purpose of the passage is to

View answer

New research by Paul Fildes and K. Whitaker challenges the theory that strains of bacteria can be “trained” to mutate by withholding a metabolite necessary for their regular function. In particular, they consider the case of bacteria typhosum, which needs tryptophan in order to reproduce. Earlier researchers had grown the bacteria in a medium somewhat deficient in tryptophan and observed the growth of mutant strains of the bacteria which did not need tryptophan in order to reproduce.Fildes and Whitaker argue that the withholding of tryptophan did not induce these mutant strains of bacteria.Rather, these mutants were already present in the original sample of bacteria typhosum, albeit in a concentration too small to detect. In experimenting with the bacteria grown in agar cultures, they found that by plating out huge quantities of the bacteria, one could locate mutant strains. Because of the possibility that the lack of uniformity of the agar cultures had in fact trained mutant strains, they conducted similar experiments with liquid cultures and again found that mutant strains of the bacteria were present in the original sampling. From these experiments, Fildes and Whitaker conclude that the mutants are of genetic origin and are not induced by environmental training. They asserted that the concentration of tryptophan is unrelated to the appearance of these mutants in the bacteria.To confirm these results, Fildes and Whitaker used an innovative plating technique using pile fabrics, such as velvet or velveteen, to accurately imprint the growth found on an original agar plate to a series of replica agar plates.The process entails taking the original agar plate, inverting it onto the velvet while using light finger pressure to transfer growth, and then imprinting the fabric, with its pattern of growth, on the new agar plates. By using this replica plating method, Fildes and Whitaker demonstrated that the mutants were in fact genetically present or preadapted, as the locations of the mutant strains of bacteria on the replica plates were identical to the locations of the mutant strains on the original agar plate.Q.Which of the following most accurately states the purpose of the passage?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

It is believed that keeping poultry in brightly lit cages significantly increases the amount of head-pecking among them. However, in recent experiments, commercially reared chickens when kept in brightly lit cages were found to behave much less aggressively; instead, they indulged in an almost “sleepy” behavior – they tended to mostly put their heads between their wings and seemed to doze off, an action unusual for such chickens. This raises serious questions on the belief that the visibility accorded by the bright lights is majorly responsible for the increased display of head pecking among the poultry.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)The pecking order is established early in a chickens life when raised in a flock; the young chicks peck each other and bully one another when they are around food.b)Head-pecking, is almost always the result of high stress levels and when that happens, the birds will sometimes pluck each other’s feathers out, and can really hurt one another.c)Commercially reared chicken when put in cages are often equipped with blinding glasses that prevent more than 90% of the light from entering the retina.d)While Commercially reared chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour in cages, they were much more aggressive a few hours later when allowed to roam freely on the farm.e)While most chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour when in cages, a few were unusually aggressive.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
It is believed that keeping poultry in brightly lit cages significantly increases the amount of head-pecking among them. However, in recent experiments, commercially reared chickens when kept in brightly lit cages were found to behave much less aggressively; instead, they indulged in an almost “sleepy” behavior – they tended to mostly put their heads between their wings and seemed to doze off, an action unusual for such chickens. This raises serious questions on the belief that the visibility accorded by the bright lights is majorly responsible for the increased display of head pecking among the poultry.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)The pecking order is established early in a chickens life when raised in a flock; the young chicks peck each other and bully one another when they are around food.b)Head-pecking, is almost always the result of high stress levels and when that happens, the birds will sometimes pluck each other’s feathers out, and can really hurt one another.c)Commercially reared chicken when put in cages are often equipped with blinding glasses that prevent more than 90% of the light from entering the retina.d)While Commercially reared chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour in cages, they were much more aggressive a few hours later when allowed to roam freely on the farm.e)While most chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour when in cages, a few were unusually aggressive.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about It is believed that keeping poultry in brightly lit cages significantly increases the amount of head-pecking among them. However, in recent experiments, commercially reared chickens when kept in brightly lit cages were found to behave much less aggressively; instead, they indulged in an almost “sleepy” behavior – they tended to mostly put their heads between their wings and seemed to doze off, an action unusual for such chickens. This raises serious questions on the belief that the visibility accorded by the bright lights is majorly responsible for the increased display of head pecking among the poultry.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)The pecking order is established early in a chickens life when raised in a flock; the young chicks peck each other and bully one another when they are around food.b)Head-pecking, is almost always the result of high stress levels and when that happens, the birds will sometimes pluck each other’s feathers out, and can really hurt one another.c)Commercially reared chicken when put in cages are often equipped with blinding glasses that prevent more than 90% of the light from entering the retina.d)While Commercially reared chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour in cages, they were much more aggressive a few hours later when allowed to roam freely on the farm.e)While most chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour when in cages, a few were unusually aggressive.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for It is believed that keeping poultry in brightly lit cages significantly increases the amount of head-pecking among them. However, in recent experiments, commercially reared chickens when kept in brightly lit cages were found to behave much less aggressively; instead, they indulged in an almost “sleepy” behavior – they tended to mostly put their heads between their wings and seemed to doze off, an action unusual for such chickens. This raises serious questions on the belief that the visibility accorded by the bright lights is majorly responsible for the increased display of head pecking among the poultry.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)The pecking order is established early in a chickens life when raised in a flock; the young chicks peck each other and bully one another when they are around food.b)Head-pecking, is almost always the result of high stress levels and when that happens, the birds will sometimes pluck each other’s feathers out, and can really hurt one another.c)Commercially reared chicken when put in cages are often equipped with blinding glasses that prevent more than 90% of the light from entering the retina.d)While Commercially reared chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour in cages, they were much more aggressive a few hours later when allowed to roam freely on the farm.e)While most chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour when in cages, a few were unusually aggressive.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for It is believed that keeping poultry in brightly lit cages significantly increases the amount of head-pecking among them. However, in recent experiments, commercially reared chickens when kept in brightly lit cages were found to behave much less aggressively; instead, they indulged in an almost “sleepy” behavior – they tended to mostly put their heads between their wings and seemed to doze off, an action unusual for such chickens. This raises serious questions on the belief that the visibility accorded by the bright lights is majorly responsible for the increased display of head pecking among the poultry.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)The pecking order is established early in a chickens life when raised in a flock; the young chicks peck each other and bully one another when they are around food.b)Head-pecking, is almost always the result of high stress levels and when that happens, the birds will sometimes pluck each other’s feathers out, and can really hurt one another.c)Commercially reared chicken when put in cages are often equipped with blinding glasses that prevent more than 90% of the light from entering the retina.d)While Commercially reared chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour in cages, they were much more aggressive a few hours later when allowed to roam freely on the farm.e)While most chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour when in cages, a few were unusually aggressive.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of It is believed that keeping poultry in brightly lit cages significantly increases the amount of head-pecking among them. However, in recent experiments, commercially reared chickens when kept in brightly lit cages were found to behave much less aggressively; instead, they indulged in an almost “sleepy” behavior – they tended to mostly put their heads between their wings and seemed to doze off, an action unusual for such chickens. This raises serious questions on the belief that the visibility accorded by the bright lights is majorly responsible for the increased display of head pecking among the poultry.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)The pecking order is established early in a chickens life when raised in a flock; the young chicks peck each other and bully one another when they are around food.b)Head-pecking, is almost always the result of high stress levels and when that happens, the birds will sometimes pluck each other’s feathers out, and can really hurt one another.c)Commercially reared chicken when put in cages are often equipped with blinding glasses that prevent more than 90% of the light from entering the retina.d)While Commercially reared chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour in cages, they were much more aggressive a few hours later when allowed to roam freely on the farm.e)While most chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour when in cages, a few were unusually aggressive.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of It is believed that keeping poultry in brightly lit cages significantly increases the amount of head-pecking among them. However, in recent experiments, commercially reared chickens when kept in brightly lit cages were found to behave much less aggressively; instead, they indulged in an almost “sleepy” behavior – they tended to mostly put their heads between their wings and seemed to doze off, an action unusual for such chickens. This raises serious questions on the belief that the visibility accorded by the bright lights is majorly responsible for the increased display of head pecking among the poultry.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)The pecking order is established early in a chickens life when raised in a flock; the young chicks peck each other and bully one another when they are around food.b)Head-pecking, is almost always the result of high stress levels and when that happens, the birds will sometimes pluck each other’s feathers out, and can really hurt one another.c)Commercially reared chicken when put in cages are often equipped with blinding glasses that prevent more than 90% of the light from entering the retina.d)While Commercially reared chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour in cages, they were much more aggressive a few hours later when allowed to roam freely on the farm.e)While most chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour when in cages, a few were unusually aggressive.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for It is believed that keeping poultry in brightly lit cages significantly increases the amount of head-pecking among them. However, in recent experiments, commercially reared chickens when kept in brightly lit cages were found to behave much less aggressively; instead, they indulged in an almost “sleepy” behavior – they tended to mostly put their heads between their wings and seemed to doze off, an action unusual for such chickens. This raises serious questions on the belief that the visibility accorded by the bright lights is majorly responsible for the increased display of head pecking among the poultry.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)The pecking order is established early in a chickens life when raised in a flock; the young chicks peck each other and bully one another when they are around food.b)Head-pecking, is almost always the result of high stress levels and when that happens, the birds will sometimes pluck each other’s feathers out, and can really hurt one another.c)Commercially reared chicken when put in cages are often equipped with blinding glasses that prevent more than 90% of the light from entering the retina.d)While Commercially reared chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour in cages, they were much more aggressive a few hours later when allowed to roam freely on the farm.e)While most chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour when in cages, a few were unusually aggressive.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of It is believed that keeping poultry in brightly lit cages significantly increases the amount of head-pecking among them. However, in recent experiments, commercially reared chickens when kept in brightly lit cages were found to behave much less aggressively; instead, they indulged in an almost “sleepy” behavior – they tended to mostly put their heads between their wings and seemed to doze off, an action unusual for such chickens. This raises serious questions on the belief that the visibility accorded by the bright lights is majorly responsible for the increased display of head pecking among the poultry.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)The pecking order is established early in a chickens life when raised in a flock; the young chicks peck each other and bully one another when they are around food.b)Head-pecking, is almost always the result of high stress levels and when that happens, the birds will sometimes pluck each other’s feathers out, and can really hurt one another.c)Commercially reared chicken when put in cages are often equipped with blinding glasses that prevent more than 90% of the light from entering the retina.d)While Commercially reared chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour in cages, they were much more aggressive a few hours later when allowed to roam freely on the farm.e)While most chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour when in cages, a few were unusually aggressive.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice It is believed that keeping poultry in brightly lit cages significantly increases the amount of head-pecking among them. However, in recent experiments, commercially reared chickens when kept in brightly lit cages were found to behave much less aggressively; instead, they indulged in an almost “sleepy” behavior – they tended to mostly put their heads between their wings and seemed to doze off, an action unusual for such chickens. This raises serious questions on the belief that the visibility accorded by the bright lights is majorly responsible for the increased display of head pecking among the poultry.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)The pecking order is established early in a chickens life when raised in a flock; the young chicks peck each other and bully one another when they are around food.b)Head-pecking, is almost always the result of high stress levels and when that happens, the birds will sometimes pluck each other’s feathers out, and can really hurt one another.c)Commercially reared chicken when put in cages are often equipped with blinding glasses that prevent more than 90% of the light from entering the retina.d)While Commercially reared chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour in cages, they were much more aggressive a few hours later when allowed to roam freely on the farm.e)While most chicken in the experiment exhibited a docile behaviour when in cages, a few were unusually aggressive.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam