Banking Exams Exam  >  Banking Exams Questions  >  What is the main objective of the Women’s Res... Start Learning for Free
What is the main objective of the Women’s Reservation Bill 2023 recently approved by President Droupadi Murmu?
  • a)
    To provide 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha only.
  • b)
    To ensure 33% reservation for women in the State Legislative assemblies and National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi.
  • c)
    To grant equal rights to women in all aspects of governance.
  • d)
    To reserve 50% of all parliamentary seats for women.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
What is the main objective of the Women’s Reservation Bill 2023 recent...
The main objective of the Women’s Reservation Bill 2023 is to mandate a 33% reservation for women in the State Legislative assemblies and National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi, in addition to the Lok Sabha. This historic decision aims to increase women's representation in the political sphere and promote gender equality. The bill will take effect after the completion of the delimitation process in 2026.
Free Test
Community Answer
What is the main objective of the Women’s Reservation Bill 2023 recent...
The main objective of the Women’s Reservation Bill 2023 recently approved by President Droupadi Murmu is to ensure 33% reservation for women in the State Legislative assemblies and National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi.

Explanation:
The Women’s Reservation Bill 2023 aims to address the issue of gender inequality and underrepresentation of women in politics. It seeks to provide a certain percentage of seats reserved exclusively for women in the State Legislative assemblies and National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi. This move is considered a significant step towards promoting gender equality and empowering women in the political arena.

Here is a detailed explanation of the main objective of the Women’s Reservation Bill 2023:

1. Ensuring representation:
The primary objective of the Women’s Reservation Bill is to ensure adequate representation of women in the political decision-making process. By providing 33% reservation for women in the State Legislative assemblies and NCT of Delhi, the bill aims to create a more inclusive and representative political system.

2. Addressing gender inequality:
Gender inequality is a prevalent issue in many societies, including India. The Women’s Reservation Bill aims to address this inequality by promoting equal participation of women in politics. By reserving seats for women, the bill seeks to bridge the gender gap in political representation and decision-making.

3. Empowering women:
The reservation of seats for women in the State Legislative assemblies and NCT of Delhi can have a significant impact on empowering women. It provides them with a platform to voice their concerns, advocate for their rights, and contribute to policy-making processes. This empowerment can lead to positive social change and greater gender equality.

4. Promoting women's issues:
With increased representation of women in politics, the Women’s Reservation Bill aims to prioritize and address women's issues effectively. Women legislators can bring their unique perspectives and experiences to the forefront, leading to policies and legislation that better reflect the needs and aspirations of women.

5. Setting an example:
The passage of the Women’s Reservation Bill can serve as an example for other countries and societies facing similar challenges. By taking proactive steps to promote gender equality in politics, India can inspire and encourage other nations to follow suit.

In conclusion, the main objective of the Women’s Reservation Bill 2023 is to ensure 33% reservation for women in the State Legislative assemblies and NCT of Delhi. This move aims to promote gender equality, empower women, address gender inequality, prioritize women's issues, and set an example for other countries.
Explore Courses for Banking Exams exam

Similar Banking Exams Doubts

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.If the number of demands for implementing reforms is any guide, India's reservation system is clearly in disarray. [A] However, it is unlikely that the recently passed Constitution (124th Amendment) Bill, 2019, creating a 10% quota for the economically weaker sections (EWS), will serve as anything more than a band-aid.Given the deep inequalities prevalent in access to education and jobs based on caste and socio-economic status, affirmative action (or positive discrimination) makes a lot of sense. However, the system that was put in place during the early years of the Republic deserves serious re-evaluation in an era when technology has paved the way for deploying a better equipped arsenal. Here I present an evaluation of the potential implications of the EWS quota Bill, followed by some alternatives.The Bill promises 10% reservation to individuals classified as economically backward. However, while a number of criteria were discussed in the parliamentary debate, the Bill is quite silent on this. Assuming that among the criteria discussed in Parliament, those that are currently applied to the definition of the Other Backward Classes (OBC) creamy layer are the ones to be used, it is not clear how useful they would be. While the OBC creamy layer has been created to exclude people who are clearly well off, the EWS quota, in contrast, is expected to focus on the poor. One of the criteria — the income threshold of ₹8 lakh per annum — has been mentioned. The National Sample Survey (NSS) of 2011-12 shows that the annual per capita expenditure for 99% of households falls under this threshold, even when we take inflation into account. Similarly, as per the India Human Development Survey (IHDS), the annual household incomes of 98% of households are less than ₹8 lakh. Even if we apply all the other criteria for exclusion (e.g. amount of land owned and size of hom e), the Bill would still cover over 95% of the households. So, who are we excluding? Almost no one.While the benefits of the EWS quota are likely to be minimal, the cost may be higher than one anticipates. First, it is important to remember that general category jobs are open to everyone, including Scheduled Caste (SC), Scheduled Tribe (ST) and OBC individuals. Thus, by removing 10% jobs from the "open" category, it reduces the opportunities for currently reserved groups. Hence, this is by no means a win-win situation. This may be particularly problematic for OBCs since OBC reservation is limited to 27% of the seats whereas the OBC population is at least 40% of the population, possibly more. Thus, this move is almost certain to result in calls for greater OBC reservation, particularly if a constitutional amendment to increase the proportion of reserved seats from 50% to 60% is already being adopted.Second, actual implementation of the EWS quota could be challenging. Few non-SC/ST/OBC individuals have a caste certificate. A large number of SC/ST/OBC households report difficulties in obtaining these certificates. How would an individual practically lay claim to this status?Third, in an era when skill demands are rapidly outpacing supply of candidates in specialised fields, the EWS quota increases the constraints. If a university advertises for an associate professor for quantum physics under the EWS quota and the only suitable candidate happens to be from an OBC category, she could not be hired. [B] These challenges occur for all positions over specifically reserved categories and we have chosen to live with these difficulties in the interest of the greater good of equity. However, there is little benefit to be derived from the EWS quota.Arguably, the greatest cost of this amendment lies in the foregone opportunity to develop an enhanced and more effective reservation policy so that we can genuinely see an end to the entrenched inequalities in Indian society in the medium term. We have gotten so used to business as usual that we make no effort to sharpen our focus and look for more effective solutions, solutions that would make reservations redundant in 50 years.What is the need of the current reservation system according to the author?

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.If the number of demands for implementing reforms is any guide, India's reservation system is clearly in disarray. [A] However, it is unlikely that the recently passed Constitution (124th Amendment) Bill, 2019, creating a 10% quota for the economically weaker sections (EWS), will serve as anything more than a band-aid.Given the deep inequalities prevalent in access to education and jobs based on caste and socio-economic status, affirmative action (or positive discrimination) makes a lot of sense. However, the system that was put in place during the early years of the Republic deserves serious re-evaluation in an era when technology has paved the way for deploying a better equipped arsenal. Here I present an evaluation of the potential implications of the EWS quota Bill, followed by some alternatives.The Bill promises 10% reservation to individuals classified as economically backward. However, while a number of criteria were discussed in the parliamentary debate, the Bill is quite silent on this. Assuming that among the criteria discussed in Parliament, those that are currently applied to the definition of the Other Backward Classes (OBC) creamy layer are the ones to be used, it is not clear how useful they would be. While the OBC creamy layer has been created to exclude people who are clearly well off, the EWS quota, in contrast, is expected to focus on the poor. One of the criteria — the income threshold of ₹8 lakh per annum — has been mentioned. The National Sample Survey (NSS) of 2011-12 shows that the annual per capita expenditure for 99% of households falls under this threshold, even when we take inflation into account. Similarly, as per the India Human Development Survey (IHDS), the annual household incomes of 98% of households are less than ₹8 lakh. Even if we apply all the other criteria for exclusion (e.g. amount of land owned and size of hom e), the Bill would still cover over 95% of the households. So, who are we excluding? Almost no one.While the benefits of the EWS quota are likely to be minimal, the cost may be higher than one anticipates. First, it is important to remember that general category jobs are open to everyone, including Scheduled Caste (SC), Scheduled Tribe (ST) and OBC individuals. Thus, by removing 10% jobs from the "open" category, it reduces the opportunities for currently reserved groups. Hence, this is by no means a win-win situation. This may be particularly problematic for OBCs since OBC reservation is limited to 27% of the seats whereas the OBC population is at least 40% of the population, possibly more. Thus, this move is almost certain to result in calls for greater OBC reservation, particularly if a constitutional amendment to increase the proportion of reserved seats from 50% to 60% is already being adopted.Second, actual implementation of the EWS quota could be challenging. Few non-SC/ST/OBC individuals have a caste certificate. A large number of SC/ST/OBC households report difficulties in obtaining these certificates. How would an individual practically lay claim to this status?Third, in an era when skill demands are rapidly outpacing supply of candidates in specialised fields, the EWS quota increases the constraints. If a university advertises for an associate professor for quantum physics under the EWS quota and the only suitable candidate happens to be from an OBC category, she could not be hired. [B] These challenges occur for all positions over specifically reserved categories and we have chosen to live with these difficulties in the interest of the greater good of equity. However, there is little benefit to be derived from the EWS quota.Arguably, the greatest cost of this amendment lies in the foregone opportunity to develop an enhanced and more effective reservation policy so that we can genuinely see an end to the entrenched inequalities in Indian society in the medium term. We have gotten so used to business as usual that we make no effort to sharpen our focus and look for more effective solutions, solutions that would make reservations redundant in 50 years.What problems does the author highlight in the EWS quota reservation in regards to its criteria?

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.If the number of demands for implementing reforms is any guide, India's reservation system is clearly in disarray. [A] However, it is unlikely that the recently passed Constitution (124th Amendment) Bill, 2019, creating a 10% quota for the economically weaker sections (EWS), will serve as anything more than a band-aid.Given the deep inequalities prevalent in access to education and jobs based on caste and socio-economic status, affirmative action (or positive discrimination) makes a lot of sense. However, the system that was put in place during the early years of the Republic deserves serious re-evaluation in an era when technology has paved the way for deploying a better equipped arsenal. Here I present an evaluation of the potential implications of the EWS quota Bill, followed by some alternatives.The Bill promises 10% reservation to individuals classified as economically backward. However, while a number of criteria were discussed in the parliamentary debate, the Bill is quite silent on this. Assuming that among the criteria discussed in Parliament, those that are currently applied to the definition of the Other Backward Classes (OBC) creamy layer are the ones to be used, it is not clear how useful they would be. While the OBC creamy layer has been created to exclude people who are clearly well off, the EWS quota, in contrast, is expected to focus on the poor. One of the criteria — the income threshold of ₹8 lakh per annum — has been mentioned. The National Sample Survey (NSS) of 2011-12 shows that the annual per capita expenditure for 99% of households falls under this threshold, even when we take inflation into account. Similarly, as per the India Human Development Survey (IHDS), the annual household incomes of 98% of households are less than ₹8 lakh. Even if we apply all the other criteria for exclusion (e.g. amount of land owned and size of hom e), the Bill would still cover over 95% of the households. So, who are we excluding? Almost no one.While the benefits of the EWS quota are likely to be minimal, the cost may be higher than one anticipates. First, it is important to remember that general category jobs are open to everyone, including Scheduled Caste (SC), Scheduled Tribe (ST) and OBC individuals. Thus, by removing 10% jobs from the "open" category, it reduces the opportunities for currently reserved groups. Hence, this is by no means a win-win situation. This may be particularly problematic for OBCs since OBC reservation is limited to 27% of the seats whereas the OBC population is at least 40% of the population, possibly more. Thus, this move is almost certain to result in calls for greater OBC reservation, particularly if a constitutional amendment to increase the proportion of reserved seats from 50% to 60% is already being adopted.Second, actual implementation of the EWS quota could be challenging. Few non-SC/ST/OBC individuals have a caste certificate. A large number of SC/ST/OBC households report difficulties in obtaining these certificates. How would an individual practically lay claim to this status?Third, in an era when skill demands are rapidly outpacing supply of candidates in specialised fields, the EWS quota increases the constraints. If a university advertises for an associate professor for quantum physics under the EWS quota and the only suitable candidate happens to be from an OBC category, she could not be hired. [B] These challenges occur for all positions over specifically reserved categories and we have chosen to live with these difficulties in the interest of the greater good of equity. However, there is little benefit to be derived from the EWS quota.Arguably, the greatest cost of this amendment lies in the foregone opportunity to develop an enhanced and more effective reservation policy so that we can genuinely see an end to the entrenched inequalities in Indian society in the medium term. We have gotten so used to business as usual that we make no effort to sharpen our focus and look for more effective solutions, solutions that would make reservations redundant in 50 years.What would happen to the OBC category if the EWS quota is implemented?

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.If the number of demands for implementing reforms is any guide, India's reservation system is clearly in disarray. [A] However, it is unlikely that the recently passed Constitution (124th Amendment) Bill, 2019, creating a 10% quota for the economically weaker sections (EWS), will serve as anything more than a band-aid.Given the deep inequalities prevalent in access to education and jobs based on caste and socio-economic status, affirmative action (or positive discrimination) makes a lot of sense. However, the system that was put in place during the early years of the Republic deserves serious re-evaluation in an era when technology has paved the way for deploying a better equipped arsenal. Here I present an evaluation of the potential implications of the EWS quota Bill, followed by some alternatives.The Bill promises 10% reservation to individuals classified as economically backward. However, while a number of criteria were discussed in the parliamentary debate, the Bill is quite silent on this. Assuming that among the criteria discussed in Parliament, those that are currently applied to the definition of the Other Backward Classes (OBC) creamy layer are the ones to be used, it is not clear how useful they would be. While the OBC creamy layer has been created to exclude people who are clearly well off, the EWS quota, in contrast, is expected to focus on the poor. One of the criteria — the income threshold of ₹8 lakh per annum — has been mentioned. The National Sample Survey (NSS) of 2011-12 shows that the annual per capita expenditure for 99% of households falls under this threshold, even when we take inflation into account. Similarly, as per the India Human Development Survey (IHDS), the annual household incomes of 98% of households are less than ₹8 lakh. Even if we apply all the other criteria for exclusion (e.g. amount of land owned and size of hom e), the Bill would still cover over 95% of the households. So, who are we excluding? Almost no one.While the benefits of the EWS quota are likely to be minimal, the cost may be higher than one anticipates. First, it is important to remember that general category jobs are open to everyone, including Scheduled Caste (SC), Scheduled Tribe (ST) and OBC individuals. Thus, by removing 10% jobs from the "open" category, it reduces the opportunities for currently reserved groups. Hence, this is by no means a win-win situation. This may be particularly problematic for OBCs since OBC reservation is limited to 27% of the seats whereas the OBC population is at least 40% of the population, possibly more. Thus, this move is almost certain to result in calls for greater OBC reservation, particularly if a constitutional amendment to increase the proportion of reserved seats from 50% to 60% is already being adopted.Second, actual implementation of the EWS quota could be challenging. Few non-SC/ST/OBC individuals have a caste certificate. A large number of SC/ST/OBC households report difficulties in obtaining these certificates. How would an individual practically lay claim to this status?Third, in an era when skill demands are rapidly outpacing supply of candidates in specialised fields, the EWS quota increases the constraints. If a university advertises for an associate professor for quantum physics under the EWS quota and the only suitable candidate happens to be from an OBC category, she could not be hired. [B] These challenges occur for all positions over specifically reserved categories and we have chosen to live with these difficulties in the interest of the greater good of equity. However, there is little benefit to be derived from the EWS quota.Arguably, the greatest cost of this amendment lies in the foregone opportunity to develop an enhanced and more effective reservation policy so that we can genuinely see an end to the entrenched inequalities in Indian society in the medium term. We have gotten so used to business as usual that we make no effort to sharpen our focus and look for more effective solutions, solutions that would make reservations redundant in 50 years.What is the author's biggest concern regarding the EWS quota and its implementation?

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.If the number of demands for implementing reforms is any guide, India's reservation system is clearly in disarray. [A] However, it is unlikely that the recently passed Constitution (124th Amendment) Bill, 2019, creating a 10% quota for the economically weaker sections (EWS), will serve as anything more than a band-aid.Given the deep inequalities prevalent in access to education and jobs based on caste and socio-economic status, affirmative action (or positive discrimination) makes a lot of sense. However, the system that was put in place during the early years of the Republic deserves serious re-evaluation in an era when technology has paved the way for deploying a better equipped arsenal. Here I present an evaluation of the potential implications of the EWS quota Bill, followed by some alternatives.The Bill promises 10% reservation to individuals classified as economically backward. However, while a number of criteria were discussed in the parliamentary debate, the Bill is quite silent on this. Assuming that among the criteria discussed in Parliament, those that are currently applied to the definition of the Other Backward Classes (OBC) creamy layer are the ones to be used, it is not clear how useful they would be. While the OBC creamy layer has been created to exclude people who are clearly well off, the EWS quota, in contrast, is expected to focus on the poor. One of the criteria — the income threshold of ₹8 lakh per annum — has been mentioned. The National Sample Survey (NSS) of 2011-12 shows that the annual per capita expenditure for 99% of households falls under this threshold, even when we take inflation into account. Similarly, as per the India Human Development Survey (IHDS), the annual household incomes of 98% of households are less than ₹8 lakh. Even if we apply all the other criteria for exclusion (e.g. amount of land owned and size of hom e), the Bill would still cover over 95% of the households. So, who are we excluding? Almost no one.While the benefits of the EWS quota are likely to be minimal, the cost may be higher than one anticipates. First, it is important to remember that general category jobs are open to everyone, including Scheduled Caste (SC), Scheduled Tribe (ST) and OBC individuals. Thus, by removing 10% jobs from the "open" category, it reduces the opportunities for currently reserved groups. Hence, this is by no means a win-win situation. This may be particularly problematic for OBCs since OBC reservation is limited to 27% of the seats whereas the OBC population is at least 40% of the population, possibly more. Thus, this move is almost certain to result in calls for greater OBC reservation, particularly if a constitutional amendment to increase the proportion of reserved seats from 50% to 60% is already being adopted.Second, actual implementation of the EWS quota could be challenging. Few non-SC/ST/OBC individuals have a caste certificate. A large number of SC/ST/OBC households report difficulties in obtaining these certificates. How would an individual practically lay claim to this status?Third, in an era when skill demands are rapidly outpacing supply of candidates in specialised fields, the EWS quota increases the constraints. If a university advertises for an associate professor for quantum physics under the EWS quota and the only suitable candidate happens to be from an OBC category, she could not be hired. [B] These challenges occur for all positions over specifically reserved categories and we have chosen to live with these difficulties in the interest of the greater good of equity. However, there is little benefit to be derived from the EWS quota.Arguably, the greatest cost of this amendment lies in the foregone opportunity to develop an enhanced and more effective reservation policy so that we can genuinely see an end to the entrenched inequalities in Indian society in the medium term. We have gotten so used to business as usual that we make no effort to sharpen our focus and look for more effective solutions, solutions that would make reservations redundant in 50 years.What example(s) does the author cite to prove that EWS quota will be more disadvantageous than helpful?

What is the main objective of the Women’s Reservation Bill 2023 recently approved by President Droupadi Murmu?a)To provide 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha only.b)To ensure 33% reservation for women in the State Legislative assemblies and National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi.c)To grant equal rights to women in all aspects of governance.d)To reserve 50% of all parliamentary seats for women.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
What is the main objective of the Women’s Reservation Bill 2023 recently approved by President Droupadi Murmu?a)To provide 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha only.b)To ensure 33% reservation for women in the State Legislative assemblies and National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi.c)To grant equal rights to women in all aspects of governance.d)To reserve 50% of all parliamentary seats for women.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Banking Exams 2024 is part of Banking Exams preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Banking Exams exam syllabus. Information about What is the main objective of the Women’s Reservation Bill 2023 recently approved by President Droupadi Murmu?a)To provide 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha only.b)To ensure 33% reservation for women in the State Legislative assemblies and National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi.c)To grant equal rights to women in all aspects of governance.d)To reserve 50% of all parliamentary seats for women.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Banking Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What is the main objective of the Women’s Reservation Bill 2023 recently approved by President Droupadi Murmu?a)To provide 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha only.b)To ensure 33% reservation for women in the State Legislative assemblies and National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi.c)To grant equal rights to women in all aspects of governance.d)To reserve 50% of all parliamentary seats for women.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for What is the main objective of the Women’s Reservation Bill 2023 recently approved by President Droupadi Murmu?a)To provide 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha only.b)To ensure 33% reservation for women in the State Legislative assemblies and National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi.c)To grant equal rights to women in all aspects of governance.d)To reserve 50% of all parliamentary seats for women.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Banking Exams. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Banking Exams Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of What is the main objective of the Women’s Reservation Bill 2023 recently approved by President Droupadi Murmu?a)To provide 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha only.b)To ensure 33% reservation for women in the State Legislative assemblies and National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi.c)To grant equal rights to women in all aspects of governance.d)To reserve 50% of all parliamentary seats for women.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of What is the main objective of the Women’s Reservation Bill 2023 recently approved by President Droupadi Murmu?a)To provide 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha only.b)To ensure 33% reservation for women in the State Legislative assemblies and National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi.c)To grant equal rights to women in all aspects of governance.d)To reserve 50% of all parliamentary seats for women.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for What is the main objective of the Women’s Reservation Bill 2023 recently approved by President Droupadi Murmu?a)To provide 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha only.b)To ensure 33% reservation for women in the State Legislative assemblies and National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi.c)To grant equal rights to women in all aspects of governance.d)To reserve 50% of all parliamentary seats for women.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of What is the main objective of the Women’s Reservation Bill 2023 recently approved by President Droupadi Murmu?a)To provide 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha only.b)To ensure 33% reservation for women in the State Legislative assemblies and National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi.c)To grant equal rights to women in all aspects of governance.d)To reserve 50% of all parliamentary seats for women.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice What is the main objective of the Women’s Reservation Bill 2023 recently approved by President Droupadi Murmu?a)To provide 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha only.b)To ensure 33% reservation for women in the State Legislative assemblies and National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi.c)To grant equal rights to women in all aspects of governance.d)To reserve 50% of all parliamentary seats for women.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Banking Exams tests.
Explore Courses for Banking Exams exam

Top Courses for Banking Exams

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev