Question Description
The question consist of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.PRINCIPLE: ignorantia juris non excusat and ingnorantia facit excusat.FACT: George was a passenger from Zurich to Manila in a Swiss Plane. When the plane landed at the airport at Bombay on 28th Nov. 1962 it was found on search that George carried 34 kgs of gold bars in person and that he had not declared it in the Manifest for transit. On 26th Nov. 1962 Government of India issued a notification and modified its earlier exemption and now it is necessary that, the gold must be declared in the Manifest- of the aircraft.a)George cannot be prosecuted because he had actually no knowledge about the new notification issued only two days ago.b)George cannot be prosecuted because it is mistake of fact which is excusable.c)Georges will be prosecuted because mistake of law is not excusable.d)George liability would depend on the discretion of the courtCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2025 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about The question consist of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.PRINCIPLE: ignorantia juris non excusat and ingnorantia facit excusat.FACT: George was a passenger from Zurich to Manila in a Swiss Plane. When the plane landed at the airport at Bombay on 28th Nov. 1962 it was found on search that George carried 34 kgs of gold bars in person and that he had not declared it in the Manifest for transit. On 26th Nov. 1962 Government of India issued a notification and modified its earlier exemption and now it is necessary that, the gold must be declared in the Manifest- of the aircraft.a)George cannot be prosecuted because he had actually no knowledge about the new notification issued only two days ago.b)George cannot be prosecuted because it is mistake of fact which is excusable.c)Georges will be prosecuted because mistake of law is not excusable.d)George liability would depend on the discretion of the courtCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The question consist of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.PRINCIPLE: ignorantia juris non excusat and ingnorantia facit excusat.FACT: George was a passenger from Zurich to Manila in a Swiss Plane. When the plane landed at the airport at Bombay on 28th Nov. 1962 it was found on search that George carried 34 kgs of gold bars in person and that he had not declared it in the Manifest for transit. On 26th Nov. 1962 Government of India issued a notification and modified its earlier exemption and now it is necessary that, the gold must be declared in the Manifest- of the aircraft.a)George cannot be prosecuted because he had actually no knowledge about the new notification issued only two days ago.b)George cannot be prosecuted because it is mistake of fact which is excusable.c)Georges will be prosecuted because mistake of law is not excusable.d)George liability would depend on the discretion of the courtCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The question consist of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.PRINCIPLE: ignorantia juris non excusat and ingnorantia facit excusat.FACT: George was a passenger from Zurich to Manila in a Swiss Plane. When the plane landed at the airport at Bombay on 28th Nov. 1962 it was found on search that George carried 34 kgs of gold bars in person and that he had not declared it in the Manifest for transit. On 26th Nov. 1962 Government of India issued a notification and modified its earlier exemption and now it is necessary that, the gold must be declared in the Manifest- of the aircraft.a)George cannot be prosecuted because he had actually no knowledge about the new notification issued only two days ago.b)George cannot be prosecuted because it is mistake of fact which is excusable.c)Georges will be prosecuted because mistake of law is not excusable.d)George liability would depend on the discretion of the courtCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The question consist of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.PRINCIPLE: ignorantia juris non excusat and ingnorantia facit excusat.FACT: George was a passenger from Zurich to Manila in a Swiss Plane. When the plane landed at the airport at Bombay on 28th Nov. 1962 it was found on search that George carried 34 kgs of gold bars in person and that he had not declared it in the Manifest for transit. On 26th Nov. 1962 Government of India issued a notification and modified its earlier exemption and now it is necessary that, the gold must be declared in the Manifest- of the aircraft.a)George cannot be prosecuted because he had actually no knowledge about the new notification issued only two days ago.b)George cannot be prosecuted because it is mistake of fact which is excusable.c)Georges will be prosecuted because mistake of law is not excusable.d)George liability would depend on the discretion of the courtCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The question consist of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.PRINCIPLE: ignorantia juris non excusat and ingnorantia facit excusat.FACT: George was a passenger from Zurich to Manila in a Swiss Plane. When the plane landed at the airport at Bombay on 28th Nov. 1962 it was found on search that George carried 34 kgs of gold bars in person and that he had not declared it in the Manifest for transit. On 26th Nov. 1962 Government of India issued a notification and modified its earlier exemption and now it is necessary that, the gold must be declared in the Manifest- of the aircraft.a)George cannot be prosecuted because he had actually no knowledge about the new notification issued only two days ago.b)George cannot be prosecuted because it is mistake of fact which is excusable.c)Georges will be prosecuted because mistake of law is not excusable.d)George liability would depend on the discretion of the courtCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The question consist of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.PRINCIPLE: ignorantia juris non excusat and ingnorantia facit excusat.FACT: George was a passenger from Zurich to Manila in a Swiss Plane. When the plane landed at the airport at Bombay on 28th Nov. 1962 it was found on search that George carried 34 kgs of gold bars in person and that he had not declared it in the Manifest for transit. On 26th Nov. 1962 Government of India issued a notification and modified its earlier exemption and now it is necessary that, the gold must be declared in the Manifest- of the aircraft.a)George cannot be prosecuted because he had actually no knowledge about the new notification issued only two days ago.b)George cannot be prosecuted because it is mistake of fact which is excusable.c)Georges will be prosecuted because mistake of law is not excusable.d)George liability would depend on the discretion of the courtCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The question consist of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.PRINCIPLE: ignorantia juris non excusat and ingnorantia facit excusat.FACT: George was a passenger from Zurich to Manila in a Swiss Plane. When the plane landed at the airport at Bombay on 28th Nov. 1962 it was found on search that George carried 34 kgs of gold bars in person and that he had not declared it in the Manifest for transit. On 26th Nov. 1962 Government of India issued a notification and modified its earlier exemption and now it is necessary that, the gold must be declared in the Manifest- of the aircraft.a)George cannot be prosecuted because he had actually no knowledge about the new notification issued only two days ago.b)George cannot be prosecuted because it is mistake of fact which is excusable.c)Georges will be prosecuted because mistake of law is not excusable.d)George liability would depend on the discretion of the courtCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The question consist of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.PRINCIPLE: ignorantia juris non excusat and ingnorantia facit excusat.FACT: George was a passenger from Zurich to Manila in a Swiss Plane. When the plane landed at the airport at Bombay on 28th Nov. 1962 it was found on search that George carried 34 kgs of gold bars in person and that he had not declared it in the Manifest for transit. On 26th Nov. 1962 Government of India issued a notification and modified its earlier exemption and now it is necessary that, the gold must be declared in the Manifest- of the aircraft.a)George cannot be prosecuted because he had actually no knowledge about the new notification issued only two days ago.b)George cannot be prosecuted because it is mistake of fact which is excusable.c)Georges will be prosecuted because mistake of law is not excusable.d)George liability would depend on the discretion of the courtCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.