Principle: An independent contractor is one who is employed to do some work of his employer. He is engaged under a contract for services. He undertakes to produce a given result, and in the actual executive of the work, he is not under the direct control or following directions of his employer. He may use his own discretion in execution of the work assigned.In general, an employer is not liable for the torts(wrongful acts) of his independent contractor. But, the employer may be held liable if he directs him to do some careless acts.Facts: Ramesh hired a taxi-cab to go to Delhi Airport. As he started late from his home, he kept on urging the taxi-driver to drive at a high speed and driver followed and directions; and ultimately due to high speed an accident took place causing injuries to a person.a)Ramesh would be held liable for damages as he exercised the control by giving directions to the driverb)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because the driver was an independent contractor and not his servantc)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because Ramesh did not know the consequences of such rash drivingd)Ramesh would not be liable as car was not owned by himCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Humanities/Arts Exam > Humanities/Arts Questions > Principle: An independent contractor is one w...

Join the Discussion on the App

Principle: An independent contractor is one who is employed to do some work of his employer. He is engaged under a contract for services. He undertakes to produce a given result, and in the actual executive of the work, he is not under the direct control or following directions of his employer. He may use his own discretion in execution of the work assigned.
In general, an employer is not liable for the torts(wrongful acts) of his independent contractor. But, the employer may be held liable if he directs him to do some careless acts.
Facts: Ramesh hired a taxi-cab to go to Delhi Airport. As he started late from his home, he kept on urging the taxi-driver to drive at a high speed and driver followed and directions; and ultimately due to high speed an accident took place causing injuries to a person.

a)
Ramesh would be held liable for damages as he exercised the control by giving directions to the driver
b)
Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because the driver was an independent contractor and not his servant
c)
Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because Ramesh did not know the consequences of such rash driving
d)
Ramesh would not be liable as car was not owned by him

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: Judiciary - Constitutional, Civil and Criminal Courts and Processes - 1

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

Principle: An independent contractor is one who is employed to do some...

Ramesh would be held liable as he paid booked the cab , now the whole authority was of Ramesh , he wanted the driver to drive car fast . This leads to the accident . Driver was the servant at that time of Ramesh , and it was his duty to follow his master's order . Hence , Ramesh will be held liable for the damages.

Answered by Crafty Classes · View profile

Attention Humanities/Arts Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Humanities/Arts study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Humanities/Arts.

Chapter Notes for Humanities

NCERT Books & Solutions for Humanities

Online MCQ Tests for Humanities

Short & Long Question Answers for Humanities

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Similar Humanities/Arts Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage carefully:The Indian Contract Act, 1872 is a legislation governing the contractual relationship between two or more parties - individuals, companies, governments. It deals with all aspects of contracts, such as formation, performance, enforceability of contracts, indemnities and guarantees, bailment and pledge and agency, among others. A contract brought as a result of coercion, undue influence, fraud or misrepresentation would be voidable at the option of the person whose consent was caused.Although one of the oldest laws in India, legal experts note that the Indian Contract Acts relevance has grown manifold in the current business environment with significant increase in the number of contracts being entered into between various parties, and the resultant disputes. Over the last one year or so, there has been an effort to step up corporate governance across boards through new company law provisions, and updating Securities and Exchange Board of Indias (SEBIs) listing agreement for companies.Many legal experts feel that the time has come to take a hard look at the Indian Contract Act to bring it in sync with the changing business environment."Good corporate governance demands well-defined and executed contracts, where the Indian Contract Act plays a crucial role," said Ramesh Vaidyanathan, managing partner, Advaya Legal.Most legal experts say the Indian Contract Act is a relevant and comprehensive piece of legislation. The concepts under the contract law are based on the contract law of the United Kingdom. However, the Act contains certain provisions which are different.As per Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the communication of an acceptance is complete as against the acceptor when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer. An acceptance may be revoked at any time before the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the acceptor, but not afterwards.Section 9 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 contemplates implied contracts when it lays down that in so far as such proposal or acceptance is made otherwise than in words, the promise is said to be implied.Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act provides for compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract, naturally arising in the usual course of things from such breach. However, remote and indirect loss or damage sustained by reason of the breach is not provided under the contract law.Under the Indian Contract Act, a contract without consideration is void subject to certain exceptions provided in Section 25 of the Act, such as love and affection u/s 25(1), compensation for voluntary services u/s 25(2), etc. However, the English law recognises contracts without consideration in some cases.Q.A coolie in uniform picks up the luggage of S to be carried out of the railway station without being asked by A, and S does not stop him as well. Examine whether the coolie is entitled to receive money from S under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully:The Indian Contract Act, 1872 is a legislation governing the contractual relationship between two or more parties - individuals, companies, governments. It deals with all aspects of contracts, such as formation, performance, enforceability of contracts, indemnities and guarantees, bailment and pledge and agency, among others. A contract brought as a result of coercion, undue influence, fraud or misrepresentation would be voidable at the option of the person whose consent was caused.Although one of the oldest laws in India, legal experts note that the Indian Contract Acts relevance has grown manifold in the current business environment with significant increase in the number of contracts being entered into between various parties, and the resultant disputes. Over the last one year or so, there has been an effort to step up corporate governance across boards through new company law provisions, and updating Securities and Exchange Board of Indias (SEBIs) listing agreement for companies.Many legal experts feel that the time has come to take a hard look at the Indian Contract Act to bring it in sync with the changing business environment."Good corporate governance demands well-defined and executed contracts, where the Indian Contract Act plays a crucial role," said Ramesh Vaidyanathan, managing partner, Advaya Legal.Most legal experts say the Indian Contract Act is a relevant and comprehensive piece of legislation. The concepts under the contract law are based on the contract law of the United Kingdom. However, the Act contains certain provisions which are different.As per Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the communication of an acceptance is complete as against the acceptor when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer. An acceptance may be revoked at any time before the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the acceptor, but not afterwards.Section 9 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 contemplates implied contracts when it lays down that in so far as such proposal or acceptance is made otherwise than in words, the promise is said to be implied.Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act provides for compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract, naturally arising in the usual course of things from such breach. However, remote and indirect loss or damage sustained by reason of the breach is not provided under the contract law.Under the Indian Contract Act, a contract without consideration is void subject to certain exceptions provided in Section 25 of the Act, such as love and affection u/s 25(1), compensation for voluntary services u/s 25(2), etc. However, the English law recognises contracts without consideration in some cases.Q.A student was induced by his teacher to sell his brand new car to the latter at less than the market price to secure more marks in the examination. Accordingly, the car was sold. However, the father of the student persuaded him to sue his teacher. Can the student sue the teacher?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully:The Indian Contract Act, 1872 is a legislation governing the contractual relationship between two or more parties - individuals, companies, governments. It deals with all aspects of contracts, such as formation, performance, enforceability of contracts, indemnities and guarantees, bailment and pledge and agency, among others. A contract brought as a result of coercion, undue influence, fraud or misrepresentation would be voidable at the option of the person whose consent was caused.Although one of the oldest laws in India, legal experts note that the Indian Contract Acts relevance has grown manifold in the current business environment with significant increase in the number of contracts being entered into between various parties, and the resultant disputes. Over the last one year or so, there has been an effort to step up corporate governance across boards through new company law provisions, and updating Securities and Exchange Board of Indias (SEBIs) listing agreement for companies.Many legal experts feel that the time has come to take a hard look at the Indian Contract Act to bring it in sync with the changing business environment."Good corporate governance demands well-defined and executed contracts, where the Indian Contract Act plays a crucial role," said Ramesh Vaidyanathan, managing partner, Advaya Legal.Most legal experts say the Indian Contract Act is a relevant and comprehensive piece of legislation. The concepts under the contract law are based on the contract law of the United Kingdom. However, the Act contains certain provisions which are different.As per Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the communication of an acceptance is complete as against the acceptor when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer. An acceptance may be revoked at any time before the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the acceptor, but not afterwards.Section 9 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 contemplates implied contracts when it lays down that in so far as such proposal or acceptance is made otherwise than in words, the promise is said to be implied.Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act provides for compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract, naturally arising in the usual course of things from such breach. However, remote and indirect loss or damage sustained by reason of the breach is not provided under the contract law.Under the Indian Contract Act, a contract without consideration is void subject to certain exceptions provided in Section 25 of the Act, such as love and affection u/s 25(1), compensation for voluntary services u/s 25(2), etc. However, the English law recognises contracts without consideration in some cases.Q.A husband formed and registered an agreement with his wife that he will give his earnings to her but later denied to fulfil his promise arguing that he was not getting any consideration for the same. As per the passage, is the argument by the husband legally valid?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully:The Indian Contract Act, 1872 is a legislation governing the contractual relationship between two or more parties - individuals, companies, governments. It deals with all aspects of contracts, such as formation, performance, enforceability of contracts, indemnities and guarantees, bailment and pledge and agency, among others. A contract brought as a result of coercion, undue influence, fraud or misrepresentation would be voidable at the option of the person whose consent was caused.Although one of the oldest laws in India, legal experts note that the Indian Contract Acts relevance has grown manifold in the current business environment with significant increase in the number of contracts being entered into between various parties, and the resultant disputes. Over the last one year or so, there has been an effort to step up corporate governance across boards through new company law provisions, and updating Securities and Exchange Board of Indias (SEBIs) listing agreement for companies.Many legal experts feel that the time has come to take a hard look at the Indian Contract Act to bring it in sync with the changing business environment."Good corporate governance demands well-defined and executed contracts, where the Indian Contract Act plays a crucial role," said Ramesh Vaidyanathan, managing partner, Advaya Legal.Most legal experts say the Indian Contract Act is a relevant and comprehensive piece of legislation. The concepts under the contract law are based on the contract law of the United Kingdom. However, the Act contains certain provisions which are different.As per Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the communication of an acceptance is complete as against the acceptor when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer. An acceptance may be revoked at any time before the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the acceptor, but not afterwards.Section 9 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 contemplates implied contracts when it lays down that in so far as such proposal or acceptance is made otherwise than in words, the promise is said to be implied.Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act provides for compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract, naturally arising in the usual course of things from such breach. However, remote and indirect loss or damage sustained by reason of the breach is not provided under the contract law.Under the Indian Contract Act, a contract without consideration is void subject to certain exceptions provided in Section 25 of the Act, such as love and affection u/s 25(1), compensation for voluntary services u/s 25(2), etc. However, the English law recognises contracts without consideration in some cases.Q.Ramaswami proposed to sell his house to Ramanathan. Ramanathan sent his acceptance by post. Next day, Ramanathan sent a telegram withdrawing his acceptance. The telegram of revocation of acceptance was received by Ramaswami before the letter of acceptance.In the light of the above situation, examine the validity of the acceptance according to the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully:The Indian Contract Act, 1872 is a legislation governing the contractual relationship between two or more parties - individuals, companies, governments. It deals with all aspects of contracts, such as formation, performance, enforceability of contracts, indemnities and guarantees, bailment and pledge and agency, among others. A contract brought as a result of coercion, undue influence, fraud or misrepresentation would be voidable at the option of the person whose consent was caused.Although one of the oldest laws in India, legal experts note that the Indian Contract Acts relevance has grown manifold in the current business environment with significant increase in the number of contracts being entered into between various parties, and the resultant disputes. Over the last one year or so, there has been an effort to step up corporate governance across boards through new company law provisions, and updating Securities and Exchange Board of Indias (SEBIs) listing agreement for companies.Many legal experts feel that the time has come to take a hard look at the Indian Contract Act to bring it in sync with the changing business environment."Good corporate governance demands well-defined and executed contracts, where the Indian Contract Act plays a crucial role," said Ramesh Vaidyanathan, managing partner, Advaya Legal.Most legal experts say the Indian Contract Act is a relevant and comprehensive piece of legislation. The concepts under the contract law are based on the contract law of the United Kingdom. However, the Act contains certain provisions which are different.As per Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the communication of an acceptance is complete as against the acceptor when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer. An acceptance may be revoked at any time before the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the acceptor, but not afterwards.Section 9 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 contemplates implied contracts when it lays down that in so far as such proposal or acceptance is made otherwise than in words, the promise is said to be implied.Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act provides for compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract, naturally arising in the usual course of things from such breach. However, remote and indirect loss or damage sustained by reason of the breach is not provided under the contract law.Under the Indian Contract Act, a contract without consideration is void subject to certain exceptions provided in Section 25 of the Act, such as love and affection u/s 25(1), compensation for voluntary services u/s 25(2), etc. However, the English law recognises contracts without consideration in some cases.Q.Aman contracts to repair Birs house in a certain way and receives the money in advance. Aman repairs the house but not according to the contract. Is Bir entitled to recover the cost of making the repairs?

View answer

Top Courses for Humanities/ArtsView all

Chapter Notes for Humanities

NCERT Books & Solutions for Humanities

Online MCQ Tests for Humanities

Short & Long Question Answers for Humanities

Geography Class 11

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

View all

Principle: An independent contractor is one who is employed to do some work of his employer. He is engaged under a contract for services. He undertakes to produce a given result, and in the actual executive of the work, he is not under the direct control or following directions of his employer. He may use his own discretion in execution of the work assigned.In general, an employer is not liable for the torts(wrongful acts) of his independent contractor. But, the employer may be held liable if he directs him to do some careless acts.Facts: Ramesh hired a taxi-cab to go to Delhi Airport. As he started late from his home, he kept on urging the taxi-driver to drive at a high speed and driver followed and directions; and ultimately due to high speed an accident took place causing injuries to a person.a)Ramesh would be held liable for damages as he exercised the control by giving directions to the driverb)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because the driver was an independent contractor and not his servantc)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because Ramesh did not know the consequences of such rash drivingd)Ramesh would not be liable as car was not owned by himCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Principle: An independent contractor is one who is employed to do some work of his employer. He is engaged under a contract for services. He undertakes to produce a given result, and in the actual executive of the work, he is not under the direct control or following directions of his employer. He may use his own discretion in execution of the work assigned.In general, an employer is not liable for the torts(wrongful acts) of his independent contractor. But, the employer may be held liable if he directs him to do some careless acts.Facts: Ramesh hired a taxi-cab to go to Delhi Airport. As he started late from his home, he kept on urging the taxi-driver to drive at a high speed and driver followed and directions; and ultimately due to high speed an accident took place causing injuries to a person.a)Ramesh would be held liable for damages as he exercised the control by giving directions to the driverb)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because the driver was an independent contractor and not his servantc)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because Ramesh did not know the consequences of such rash drivingd)Ramesh would not be liable as car was not owned by himCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Principle: An independent contractor is one who is employed to do some work of his employer. He is engaged under a contract for services. He undertakes to produce a given result, and in the actual executive of the work, he is not under the direct control or following directions of his employer. He may use his own discretion in execution of the work assigned.In general, an employer is not liable for the torts(wrongful acts) of his independent contractor. But, the employer may be held liable if he directs him to do some careless acts.Facts: Ramesh hired a taxi-cab to go to Delhi Airport. As he started late from his home, he kept on urging the taxi-driver to drive at a high speed and driver followed and directions; and ultimately due to high speed an accident took place causing injuries to a person.a)Ramesh would be held liable for damages as he exercised the control by giving directions to the driverb)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because the driver was an independent contractor and not his servantc)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because Ramesh did not know the consequences of such rash drivingd)Ramesh would not be liable as car was not owned by himCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: An independent contractor is one who is employed to do some work of his employer. He is engaged under a contract for services. He undertakes to produce a given result, and in the actual executive of the work, he is not under the direct control or following directions of his employer. He may use his own discretion in execution of the work assigned.In general, an employer is not liable for the torts(wrongful acts) of his independent contractor. But, the employer may be held liable if he directs him to do some careless acts.Facts: Ramesh hired a taxi-cab to go to Delhi Airport. As he started late from his home, he kept on urging the taxi-driver to drive at a high speed and driver followed and directions; and ultimately due to high speed an accident took place causing injuries to a person.a)Ramesh would be held liable for damages as he exercised the control by giving directions to the driverb)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because the driver was an independent contractor and not his servantc)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because Ramesh did not know the consequences of such rash drivingd)Ramesh would not be liable as car was not owned by himCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Principle: An independent contractor is one who is employed to do some work of his employer. He is engaged under a contract for services. He undertakes to produce a given result, and in the actual executive of the work, he is not under the direct control or following directions of his employer. He may use his own discretion in execution of the work assigned.In general, an employer is not liable for the torts(wrongful acts) of his independent contractor. But, the employer may be held liable if he directs him to do some careless acts.Facts: Ramesh hired a taxi-cab to go to Delhi Airport. As he started late from his home, he kept on urging the taxi-driver to drive at a high speed and driver followed and directions; and ultimately due to high speed an accident took place causing injuries to a person.a)Ramesh would be held liable for damages as he exercised the control by giving directions to the driverb)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because the driver was an independent contractor and not his servantc)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because Ramesh did not know the consequences of such rash drivingd)Ramesh would not be liable as car was not owned by himCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Principle: An independent contractor is one who is employed to do some work of his employer. He is engaged under a contract for services. He undertakes to produce a given result, and in the actual executive of the work, he is not under the direct control or following directions of his employer. He may use his own discretion in execution of the work assigned.In general, an employer is not liable for the torts(wrongful acts) of his independent contractor. But, the employer may be held liable if he directs him to do some careless acts.Facts: Ramesh hired a taxi-cab to go to Delhi Airport. As he started late from his home, he kept on urging the taxi-driver to drive at a high speed and driver followed and directions; and ultimately due to high speed an accident took place causing injuries to a person.a)Ramesh would be held liable for damages as he exercised the control by giving directions to the driverb)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because the driver was an independent contractor and not his servantc)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because Ramesh did not know the consequences of such rash drivingd)Ramesh would not be liable as car was not owned by himCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle: An independent contractor is one who is employed to do some work of his employer. He is engaged under a contract for services. He undertakes to produce a given result, and in the actual executive of the work, he is not under the direct control or following directions of his employer. He may use his own discretion in execution of the work assigned.In general, an employer is not liable for the torts(wrongful acts) of his independent contractor. But, the employer may be held liable if he directs him to do some careless acts.Facts: Ramesh hired a taxi-cab to go to Delhi Airport. As he started late from his home, he kept on urging the taxi-driver to drive at a high speed and driver followed and directions; and ultimately due to high speed an accident took place causing injuries to a person.a)Ramesh would be held liable for damages as he exercised the control by giving directions to the driverb)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because the driver was an independent contractor and not his servantc)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because Ramesh did not know the consequences of such rash drivingd)Ramesh would not be liable as car was not owned by himCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle: An independent contractor is one who is employed to do some work of his employer. He is engaged under a contract for services. He undertakes to produce a given result, and in the actual executive of the work, he is not under the direct control or following directions of his employer. He may use his own discretion in execution of the work assigned.In general, an employer is not liable for the torts(wrongful acts) of his independent contractor. But, the employer may be held liable if he directs him to do some careless acts.Facts: Ramesh hired a taxi-cab to go to Delhi Airport. As he started late from his home, he kept on urging the taxi-driver to drive at a high speed and driver followed and directions; and ultimately due to high speed an accident took place causing injuries to a person.a)Ramesh would be held liable for damages as he exercised the control by giving directions to the driverb)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because the driver was an independent contractor and not his servantc)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because Ramesh did not know the consequences of such rash drivingd)Ramesh would not be liable as car was not owned by himCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle: An independent contractor is one who is employed to do some work of his employer. He is engaged under a contract for services. He undertakes to produce a given result, and in the actual executive of the work, he is not under the direct control or following directions of his employer. He may use his own discretion in execution of the work assigned.In general, an employer is not liable for the torts(wrongful acts) of his independent contractor. But, the employer may be held liable if he directs him to do some careless acts.Facts: Ramesh hired a taxi-cab to go to Delhi Airport. As he started late from his home, he kept on urging the taxi-driver to drive at a high speed and driver followed and directions; and ultimately due to high speed an accident took place causing injuries to a person.a)Ramesh would be held liable for damages as he exercised the control by giving directions to the driverb)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because the driver was an independent contractor and not his servantc)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because Ramesh did not know the consequences of such rash drivingd)Ramesh would not be liable as car was not owned by himCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle: An independent contractor is one who is employed to do some work of his employer. He is engaged under a contract for services. He undertakes to produce a given result, and in the actual executive of the work, he is not under the direct control or following directions of his employer. He may use his own discretion in execution of the work assigned.In general, an employer is not liable for the torts(wrongful acts) of his independent contractor. But, the employer may be held liable if he directs him to do some careless acts.Facts: Ramesh hired a taxi-cab to go to Delhi Airport. As he started late from his home, he kept on urging the taxi-driver to drive at a high speed and driver followed and directions; and ultimately due to high speed an accident took place causing injuries to a person.a)Ramesh would be held liable for damages as he exercised the control by giving directions to the driverb)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because the driver was an independent contractor and not his servantc)Ramesh would not be held liable for damages because Ramesh did not know the consequences of such rash drivingd)Ramesh would not be liable as car was not owned by himCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.

Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam