Principle: A gift comprising both existing and future property is void as to the latter.Facts: X has a house which is owned by him. He contracted to purchase a plot of land adjacent to the said house, but the sale (of the plot of land) in his favour is yet to be completed. He makes a gift of both the properties (house and land) to YUnder the afore-mentioned circumstances, which of the following derivations is correct?a)Gift a both the properties is validb)Gift a both the properties is voidc)Gift of house is void, but the gift of the plot of land is validd)Gift of house is valid, but the gift of the plot of land is voidCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Humanities/Arts Exam > Humanities/Arts Questions > Principle: A gift comprising both existing an...

Principle: A gift comprising both existing and future property is void as to the latter.
Facts: 'X' has a house which is owned by him. He contracted to purchase a plot of land adjacent to the said house, but the sale (of the plot of land) in his favour is yet to be completed. He makes a gift of both the properties (house and land) to 'Y'
Under the afore-mentioned circumstances, which of the following derivations is correct?

a)
Gift a both the properties is valid
b)
Gift a both the properties is void
c)
Gift of house is void, but the gift of the plot of land is valid
d)
Gift of house is valid, but the gift of the plot of land is void

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Principle: A gift comprising both existing and future property is void...

Section 122 of the Transfer of Property Act states that, 'Gift' is the transfer a certain existing movable or immovable property made voluntarily and without consideration, by one person, called the donor, to another, called the doner and accepted by or on behalf of the done.
The subject matter of the gift has to be an existing property and not a future property. In the given case, gift of house is valid as it is an existing property, but the gift of the plot of land is invalid because it is a future property.

Answered by Crafty Classes · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Similar Humanities/Arts Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage carefully:The Indian Contract Act, 1872 is a legislation governing the contractual relationship between two or more parties - individuals, companies, governments. It deals with all aspects of contracts, such as formation, performance, enforceability of contracts, indemnities and guarantees, bailment and pledge and agency, among others. A contract brought as a result of coercion, undue influence, fraud or misrepresentation would be voidable at the option of the person whose consent was caused.Although one of the oldest laws in India, legal experts note that the Indian Contract Acts relevance has grown manifold in the current business environment with significant increase in the number of contracts being entered into between various parties, and the resultant disputes. Over the last one year or so, there has been an effort to step up corporate governance across boards through new company law provisions, and updating Securities and Exchange Board of Indias (SEBIs) listing agreement for companies.Many legal experts feel that the time has come to take a hard look at the Indian Contract Act to bring it in sync with the changing business environment."Good corporate governance demands well-defined and executed contracts, where the Indian Contract Act plays a crucial role," said Ramesh Vaidyanathan, managing partner, Advaya Legal.Most legal experts say the Indian Contract Act is a relevant and comprehensive piece of legislation. The concepts under the contract law are based on the contract law of the United Kingdom. However, the Act contains certain provisions which are different.As per Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the communication of an acceptance is complete as against the acceptor when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer. An acceptance may be revoked at any time before the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the acceptor, but not afterwards.Section 9 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 contemplates implied contracts when it lays down that in so far as such proposal or acceptance is made otherwise than in words, the promise is said to be implied.Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act provides for compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract, naturally arising in the usual course of things from such breach. However, remote and indirect loss or damage sustained by reason of the breach is not provided under the contract law.Under the Indian Contract Act, a contract without consideration is void subject to certain exceptions provided in Section 25 of the Act, such as love and affection u/s 25(1), compensation for voluntary services u/s 25(2), etc. However, the English law recognises contracts without consideration in some cases.Q.A student was induced by his teacher to sell his brand new car to the latter at less than the market price to secure more marks in the examination. Accordingly, the car was sold. However, the father of the student persuaded him to sue his teacher. Can the student sue the teacher?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully:The Indian Contract Act, 1872 is a legislation governing the contractual relationship between two or more parties - individuals, companies, governments. It deals with all aspects of contracts, such as formation, performance, enforceability of contracts, indemnities and guarantees, bailment and pledge and agency, among others. A contract brought as a result of coercion, undue influence, fraud or misrepresentation would be voidable at the option of the person whose consent was caused.Although one of the oldest laws in India, legal experts note that the Indian Contract Acts relevance has grown manifold in the current business environment with significant increase in the number of contracts being entered into between various parties, and the resultant disputes. Over the last one year or so, there has been an effort to step up corporate governance across boards through new company law provisions, and updating Securities and Exchange Board of Indias (SEBIs) listing agreement for companies.Many legal experts feel that the time has come to take a hard look at the Indian Contract Act to bring it in sync with the changing business environment."Good corporate governance demands well-defined and executed contracts, where the Indian Contract Act plays a crucial role," said Ramesh Vaidyanathan, managing partner, Advaya Legal.Most legal experts say the Indian Contract Act is a relevant and comprehensive piece of legislation. The concepts under the contract law are based on the contract law of the United Kingdom. However, the Act contains certain provisions which are different.As per Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the communication of an acceptance is complete as against the acceptor when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer. An acceptance may be revoked at any time before the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the acceptor, but not afterwards.Section 9 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 contemplates implied contracts when it lays down that in so far as such proposal or acceptance is made otherwise than in words, the promise is said to be implied.Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act provides for compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract, naturally arising in the usual course of things from such breach. However, remote and indirect loss or damage sustained by reason of the breach is not provided under the contract law.Under the Indian Contract Act, a contract without consideration is void subject to certain exceptions provided in Section 25 of the Act, such as love and affection u/s 25(1), compensation for voluntary services u/s 25(2), etc. However, the English law recognises contracts without consideration in some cases.Q.A husband formed and registered an agreement with his wife that he will give his earnings to her but later denied to fulfil his promise arguing that he was not getting any consideration for the same. As per the passage, is the argument by the husband legally valid?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully:The Indian Contract Act, 1872 is a legislation governing the contractual relationship between two or more parties - individuals, companies, governments. It deals with all aspects of contracts, such as formation, performance, enforceability of contracts, indemnities and guarantees, bailment and pledge and agency, among others. A contract brought as a result of coercion, undue influence, fraud or misrepresentation would be voidable at the option of the person whose consent was caused.Although one of the oldest laws in India, legal experts note that the Indian Contract Acts relevance has grown manifold in the current business environment with significant increase in the number of contracts being entered into between various parties, and the resultant disputes. Over the last one year or so, there has been an effort to step up corporate governance across boards through new company law provisions, and updating Securities and Exchange Board of Indias (SEBIs) listing agreement for companies.Many legal experts feel that the time has come to take a hard look at the Indian Contract Act to bring it in sync with the changing business environment."Good corporate governance demands well-defined and executed contracts, where the Indian Contract Act plays a crucial role," said Ramesh Vaidyanathan, managing partner, Advaya Legal.Most legal experts say the Indian Contract Act is a relevant and comprehensive piece of legislation. The concepts under the contract law are based on the contract law of the United Kingdom. However, the Act contains certain provisions which are different.As per Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the communication of an acceptance is complete as against the acceptor when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer. An acceptance may be revoked at any time before the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the acceptor, but not afterwards.Section 9 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 contemplates implied contracts when it lays down that in so far as such proposal or acceptance is made otherwise than in words, the promise is said to be implied.Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act provides for compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract, naturally arising in the usual course of things from such breach. However, remote and indirect loss or damage sustained by reason of the breach is not provided under the contract law.Under the Indian Contract Act, a contract without consideration is void subject to certain exceptions provided in Section 25 of the Act, such as love and affection u/s 25(1), compensation for voluntary services u/s 25(2), etc. However, the English law recognises contracts without consideration in some cases.Q.Ramaswami proposed to sell his house to Ramanathan. Ramanathan sent his acceptance by post. Next day, Ramanathan sent a telegram withdrawing his acceptance. The telegram of revocation of acceptance was received by Ramaswami before the letter of acceptance.In the light of the above situation, examine the validity of the acceptance according to the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully:The Indian Contract Act, 1872 is a legislation governing the contractual relationship between two or more parties - individuals, companies, governments. It deals with all aspects of contracts, such as formation, performance, enforceability of contracts, indemnities and guarantees, bailment and pledge and agency, among others. A contract brought as a result of coercion, undue influence, fraud or misrepresentation would be voidable at the option of the person whose consent was caused.Although one of the oldest laws in India, legal experts note that the Indian Contract Acts relevance has grown manifold in the current business environment with significant increase in the number of contracts being entered into between various parties, and the resultant disputes. Over the last one year or so, there has been an effort to step up corporate governance across boards through new company law provisions, and updating Securities and Exchange Board of Indias (SEBIs) listing agreement for companies.Many legal experts feel that the time has come to take a hard look at the Indian Contract Act to bring it in sync with the changing business environment."Good corporate governance demands well-defined and executed contracts, where the Indian Contract Act plays a crucial role," said Ramesh Vaidyanathan, managing partner, Advaya Legal.Most legal experts say the Indian Contract Act is a relevant and comprehensive piece of legislation. The concepts under the contract law are based on the contract law of the United Kingdom. However, the Act contains certain provisions which are different.As per Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the communication of an acceptance is complete as against the acceptor when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer. An acceptance may be revoked at any time before the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the acceptor, but not afterwards.Section 9 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 contemplates implied contracts when it lays down that in so far as such proposal or acceptance is made otherwise than in words, the promise is said to be implied.Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act provides for compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract, naturally arising in the usual course of things from such breach. However, remote and indirect loss or damage sustained by reason of the breach is not provided under the contract law.Under the Indian Contract Act, a contract without consideration is void subject to certain exceptions provided in Section 25 of the Act, such as love and affection u/s 25(1), compensation for voluntary services u/s 25(2), etc. However, the English law recognises contracts without consideration in some cases.Q.A coolie in uniform picks up the luggage of S to be carried out of the railway station without being asked by A, and S does not stop him as well. Examine whether the coolie is entitled to receive money from S under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully:The Indian Contract Act, 1872 is a legislation governing the contractual relationship between two or more parties - individuals, companies, governments. It deals with all aspects of contracts, such as formation, performance, enforceability of contracts, indemnities and guarantees, bailment and pledge and agency, among others. A contract brought as a result of coercion, undue influence, fraud or misrepresentation would be voidable at the option of the person whose consent was caused.Although one of the oldest laws in India, legal experts note that the Indian Contract Acts relevance has grown manifold in the current business environment with significant increase in the number of contracts being entered into between various parties, and the resultant disputes. Over the last one year or so, there has been an effort to step up corporate governance across boards through new company law provisions, and updating Securities and Exchange Board of Indias (SEBIs) listing agreement for companies.Many legal experts feel that the time has come to take a hard look at the Indian Contract Act to bring it in sync with the changing business environment."Good corporate governance demands well-defined and executed contracts, where the Indian Contract Act plays a crucial role," said Ramesh Vaidyanathan, managing partner, Advaya Legal.Most legal experts say the Indian Contract Act is a relevant and comprehensive piece of legislation. The concepts under the contract law are based on the contract law of the United Kingdom. However, the Act contains certain provisions which are different.As per Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the communication of an acceptance is complete as against the acceptor when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer. An acceptance may be revoked at any time before the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the acceptor, but not afterwards.Section 9 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 contemplates implied contracts when it lays down that in so far as such proposal or acceptance is made otherwise than in words, the promise is said to be implied.Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act provides for compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract, naturally arising in the usual course of things from such breach. However, remote and indirect loss or damage sustained by reason of the breach is not provided under the contract law.Under the Indian Contract Act, a contract without consideration is void subject to certain exceptions provided in Section 25 of the Act, such as love and affection u/s 25(1), compensation for voluntary services u/s 25(2), etc. However, the English law recognises contracts without consideration in some cases.Q.Aman contracts to repair Birs house in a certain way and receives the money in advance. Aman repairs the house but not according to the contract. Is Bir entitled to recover the cost of making the repairs?

View answer

Top Courses for Humanities/ArtsView all

Chapter Notes for Humanities

NCERT Books & Solutions for Humanities

Online MCQ Tests for Humanities

Short & Long Question Answers for Humanities

Geography Class 11

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

View all

Principle: A gift comprising both existing and future property is void as to the latter.Facts: X has a house which is owned by him. He contracted to purchase a plot of land adjacent to the said house, but the sale (of the plot of land) in his favour is yet to be completed. He makes a gift of both the properties (house and land) to YUnder the afore-mentioned circumstances, which of the following derivations is correct?a)Gift a both the properties is validb)Gift a both the properties is voidc)Gift of house is void, but the gift of the plot of land is validd)Gift of house is valid, but the gift of the plot of land is voidCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Principle: A gift comprising both existing and future property is void as to the latter.Facts: X has a house which is owned by him. He contracted to purchase a plot of land adjacent to the said house, but the sale (of the plot of land) in his favour is yet to be completed. He makes a gift of both the properties (house and land) to YUnder the afore-mentioned circumstances, which of the following derivations is correct?a)Gift a both the properties is validb)Gift a both the properties is voidc)Gift of house is void, but the gift of the plot of land is validd)Gift of house is valid, but the gift of the plot of land is voidCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2025 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Principle: A gift comprising both existing and future property is void as to the latter.Facts: X has a house which is owned by him. He contracted to purchase a plot of land adjacent to the said house, but the sale (of the plot of land) in his favour is yet to be completed. He makes a gift of both the properties (house and land) to YUnder the afore-mentioned circumstances, which of the following derivations is correct?a)Gift a both the properties is validb)Gift a both the properties is voidc)Gift of house is void, but the gift of the plot of land is validd)Gift of house is valid, but the gift of the plot of land is voidCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: A gift comprising both existing and future property is void as to the latter.Facts: X has a house which is owned by him. He contracted to purchase a plot of land adjacent to the said house, but the sale (of the plot of land) in his favour is yet to be completed. He makes a gift of both the properties (house and land) to YUnder the afore-mentioned circumstances, which of the following derivations is correct?a)Gift a both the properties is validb)Gift a both the properties is voidc)Gift of house is void, but the gift of the plot of land is validd)Gift of house is valid, but the gift of the plot of land is voidCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Principle: A gift comprising both existing and future property is void as to the latter.Facts: X has a house which is owned by him. He contracted to purchase a plot of land adjacent to the said house, but the sale (of the plot of land) in his favour is yet to be completed. He makes a gift of both the properties (house and land) to YUnder the afore-mentioned circumstances, which of the following derivations is correct?a)Gift a both the properties is validb)Gift a both the properties is voidc)Gift of house is void, but the gift of the plot of land is validd)Gift of house is valid, but the gift of the plot of land is voidCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Principle: A gift comprising both existing and future property is void as to the latter.Facts: X has a house which is owned by him. He contracted to purchase a plot of land adjacent to the said house, but the sale (of the plot of land) in his favour is yet to be completed. He makes a gift of both the properties (house and land) to YUnder the afore-mentioned circumstances, which of the following derivations is correct?a)Gift a both the properties is validb)Gift a both the properties is voidc)Gift of house is void, but the gift of the plot of land is validd)Gift of house is valid, but the gift of the plot of land is voidCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle: A gift comprising both existing and future property is void as to the latter.Facts: X has a house which is owned by him. He contracted to purchase a plot of land adjacent to the said house, but the sale (of the plot of land) in his favour is yet to be completed. He makes a gift of both the properties (house and land) to YUnder the afore-mentioned circumstances, which of the following derivations is correct?a)Gift a both the properties is validb)Gift a both the properties is voidc)Gift of house is void, but the gift of the plot of land is validd)Gift of house is valid, but the gift of the plot of land is voidCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle: A gift comprising both existing and future property is void as to the latter.Facts: X has a house which is owned by him. He contracted to purchase a plot of land adjacent to the said house, but the sale (of the plot of land) in his favour is yet to be completed. He makes a gift of both the properties (house and land) to YUnder the afore-mentioned circumstances, which of the following derivations is correct?a)Gift a both the properties is validb)Gift a both the properties is voidc)Gift of house is void, but the gift of the plot of land is validd)Gift of house is valid, but the gift of the plot of land is voidCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle: A gift comprising both existing and future property is void as to the latter.Facts: X has a house which is owned by him. He contracted to purchase a plot of land adjacent to the said house, but the sale (of the plot of land) in his favour is yet to be completed. He makes a gift of both the properties (house and land) to YUnder the afore-mentioned circumstances, which of the following derivations is correct?a)Gift a both the properties is validb)Gift a both the properties is voidc)Gift of house is void, but the gift of the plot of land is validd)Gift of house is valid, but the gift of the plot of land is voidCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle: A gift comprising both existing and future property is void as to the latter.Facts: X has a house which is owned by him. He contracted to purchase a plot of land adjacent to the said house, but the sale (of the plot of land) in his favour is yet to be completed. He makes a gift of both the properties (house and land) to YUnder the afore-mentioned circumstances, which of the following derivations is correct?a)Gift a both the properties is validb)Gift a both the properties is voidc)Gift of house is void, but the gift of the plot of land is validd)Gift of house is valid, but the gift of the plot of land is voidCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.

Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam