Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.The Supreme Court has delivered a seminal judgment that could have a significant impact in enlarging and expanding womens reproductive rights in the country. The apex court bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant and AS Bopanna said that all women andmdash; whether married or in consensual relationships, and including andquot;persons other than cis-gender womenandquot; andmdash; are entitled to seek an abortion within 20-24 weeks of the pregnancy. The bench was hearing the case of a 25-year-old unmarried woman, whose plea for termination of her pregnancy in the 24th week was turned down by a division bench of the Delhi High Court on the ground that the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003, did not extend to unmarried women in consensual relationships.In a country where the womans body has, more often than not, been a site of the patriarchy index, the Supreme Courts recognition of her right to equality and, equally significantly, to her agency and choice, is momentous. In recent times, in comparison to many other countries, including the US andmdash; where the landmark Roe vs Wade judgment granting constitutional validity to the right to abort was recently overturned andmdash; abortion laws in India have moved in a more progressive direction, but much more needs to be done. Under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, abortion remains a criminal offence, to which the MTP Act provides exceptions, and, even within the wider ambit of the much-needed recent amendments to the law, it continues to adhere to hetero-patriarchal structures that make the approval of others integral to abortion-related services and do not recognise a broader gender spectrum.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Editorials, The Indian Express]Q.What does the passage suggest about the current state of abortion laws in India?a)Abortion is completely legal in India without any restrictions.b)Abortion laws in India have recently become more restrictive, following the overturning of the Roe vs. Wade judgment in the US.c)Abortion laws in India have become more progressive, but they still have room for improvement and are influenced by hetero-patriarchal structures.d)Abortion is only legal for married women in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions: Read the passage and answer the q...

Join the Discussion on the App

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.

The Supreme Court has delivered a seminal judgment that could have a significant impact in enlarging and expanding women's reproductive rights in the country. The apex court bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant and AS Bopanna said that all women — whether married or in consensual relationships, and including "persons other than cis-gender women" — are entitled to seek an abortion within 20-24 weeks of the pregnancy. The bench was hearing the case of a 25-year-old unmarried woman, whose plea for termination of her pregnancy in the 24th week was turned down by a division bench of the Delhi High Court on the ground that the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003, did not extend to unmarried women in consensual relationships.
In a country where the woman's body has, more often than not, been a site of the patriarchy index, the Supreme Court's recognition of her right to equality and, equally significantly, to her agency and choice, is momentous. In recent times, in comparison to many other countries, including the US — where the landmark Roe vs Wade judgment granting constitutional validity to the right to abort was recently overturned — abortion laws in India have moved in a more progressive direction, but much more needs to be done. Under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, abortion remains a criminal offence, to which the MTP Act provides exceptions, and, even within the wider ambit of the much-needed recent amendments to the law, it continues to adhere to hetero-patriarchal structures that make the approval of others integral to abortion-related services and do not recognise a broader gender spectrum.
[Extracted with edits and revisions from Editorials, The Indian Express]

Q. What does the passage suggest about the current state of abortion laws in India?

a)
Abortion is completely legal in India without any restrictions.
b)
Abortion laws in India have recently become more restrictive, following the overturning of the Roe vs. Wade judgment in the US.
c)
Abortion laws in India have become more progressive, but they still have room for improvement and are influenced by hetero-patriarchal structures.
d)
Abortion is only legal for married women in India.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: CLAT Mock Test - 11

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.The ...

The passage discusses the evolution of abortion laws in India, noting that they have moved in a more progressive direction compared to the past. However, it also highlights that there is more work to be done because abortion still remains a criminal offense under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, with exceptions provided by the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act. Additionally, the passage points out that these laws are influenced by hetero-patriarchal structures, which implies that there are societal and structural elements that can impact a woman's access to abortion services. Therefore, option C accurately summarizes the passage's discussion on the state of abortion laws in India.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Attention CLAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.The Supreme Court has delivered a seminal judgment that could have a significant impact in enlarging and expanding womens reproductive rights in the country. The apex court bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant and AS Bopanna said that all women — whether married or in consensual relationships, and including "persons other than cis-gender women" — are entitled to seek an abortion within 20-24 weeks of the pregnancy. The bench was hearing the case of a 25-year-old unmarried woman, whose plea for termination of her pregnancy in the 24th week was turned down by a division bench of the Delhi High Court on the ground that the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003, did not extend to unmarried women in consensual relationships.In a country where the womans body has, more often than not, been a site of the patriarchy index, the Supreme Courts recognition of her right to equality and, equally significantly, to her agency and choice, is momentous. In recent times, in comparison to many other countries, including the US — where the landmark Roe vs Wade judgment granting constitutional validity to the right to abort was recently overturned — abortion laws in India have moved in a more progressive direction, but much more needs to be done. Under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, abortion remains a criminal offence, to which the MTP Act provides exceptions, and, even within the wider ambit of the much-needed recent amendments to the law, it continues to adhere to hetero-patriarchal structures that make the approval of others integral to abortion-related services and do not recognise a broader gender spectrum.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Editorials, The Indian Express]Q.Which of the following statements about the passage can be made?

View answer

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.The Supreme Court has delivered a seminal judgment that could have a significant impact in enlarging and expanding womens reproductive rights in the country. The apex court bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant and AS Bopanna said that all women — whether married or in consensual relationships, and including "persons other than cis-gender women" — are entitled to seek an abortion within 20-24 weeks of the pregnancy. The bench was hearing the case of a 25-year-old unmarried woman, whose plea for termination of her pregnancy in the 24th week was turned down by a division bench of the Delhi High Court on the ground that the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003, did not extend to unmarried women in consensual relationships.In a country where the womans body has, more often than not, been a site of the patriarchy index, the Supreme Courts recognition of her right to equality and, equally significantly, to her agency and choice, is momentous. In recent times, in comparison to many other countries, including the US — where the landmark Roe vs Wade judgment granting constitutional validity to the right to abort was recently overturned — abortion laws in India have moved in a more progressive direction, but much more needs to be done. Under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, abortion remains a criminal offence, to which the MTP Act provides exceptions, and, even within the wider ambit of the much-needed recent amendments to the law, it continues to adhere to hetero-patriarchal structures that make the approval of others integral to abortion-related services and do not recognise a broader gender spectrum.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Editorials, The Indian Express]Q.Which of the following best describes the passages main idea?

View answer

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.The Supreme Court has delivered a seminal judgment that could have a significant impact in enlarging and expanding womens reproductive rights in the country. The apex court bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant and AS Bopanna said that all women — whether married or in consensual relationships, and including "persons other than cis-gender women" — are entitled to seek an abortion within 20-24 weeks of the pregnancy. The bench was hearing the case of a 25-year-old unmarried woman, whose plea for termination of her pregnancy in the 24th week was turned down by a division bench of the Delhi High Court on the ground that the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003, did not extend to unmarried women in consensual relationships.In a country where the womans body has, more often than not, been a site of the patriarchy index, the Supreme Courts recognition of her right to equality and, equally significantly, to her agency and choice, is momentous. In recent times, in comparison to many other countries, including the US — where the landmark Roe vs Wade judgment granting constitutional validity to the right to abort was recently overturned — abortion laws in India have moved in a more progressive direction, but much more needs to be done. Under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, abortion remains a criminal offence, to which the MTP Act provides exceptions, and, even within the wider ambit of the much-needed recent amendments to the law, it continues to adhere to hetero-patriarchal structures that make the approval of others integral to abortion-related services and do not recognise a broader gender spectrum.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Editorials, The Indian Express]Q.What is the main subject matter discussed in the passage?

View answer

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.The Supreme Court has delivered a seminal judgment that could have a significant impact in enlarging and expanding women's reproductive rights in the country. The apex court bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant and AS Bopanna said that all women — whether married or in consensual relationships, and including "persons other than cis-gender women" — are entitled to seek an abortion within 20-24 weeks of the pregnancy. The bench was hearing the case of a 25-year-old unmarried woman, whose plea for termination of her pregnancy in the 24th week was turned down by a division bench of the Delhi High Court on the ground that the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003, did not extend to unmarried women in consensual relationships.In a country where the woman's body has, more often than not, been a site of the patriarchy index, the Supreme Court's recognition of her right to equality and, equally significantly, to her agency and choice, is momentous. In recent times, in comparison to many other countries, including the US — where the landmark Roe vs Wade judgment granting constitutional validity to the right to abort was recently overturned — abortion laws in India have moved in a more progressive direction, but much more needs to be done. Under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, abortion remains a criminal offence, to which the MTP Act provides exceptions, and, even within the wider ambit of the much-needed recent amendments to the law, it continues to adhere to hetero-patriarchal structures that make the approval of others integral to abortion-related services and do not recognise a broader gender spectrum.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?

View answer

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.The Supreme Court has delivered a seminal judgment that could have a significant impact in enlarging and expanding women's reproductive rights in the country. The apex court bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant and AS Bopanna said that all women — whether married or in consensual relationships, and including "persons other than cis-gender women" — are entitled to seek an abortion within 20-24 weeks of the pregnancy. The bench was hearing the case of a 25-year-old unmarried woman, whose plea for termination of her pregnancy in the 24th week was turned down by a division bench of the Delhi High Court on the ground that the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003, did not extend to unmarried women in consensual relationships.In a country where the woman's body has, more often than not, been a site of the patriarchy index, the Supreme Court's recognition of her right to equality and, equally significantly, to her agency and choice, is momentous. In recent times, in comparison to many other countries, including the US — where the landmark Roe vs Wade judgment granting constitutional validity to the right to abort was recently overturned — abortion laws in India have moved in a more progressive direction, but much more needs to be done. Under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, abortion remains a criminal offence, to which the MTP Act provides exceptions, and, even within the wider ambit of the much-needed recent amendments to the law, it continues to adhere to hetero-patriarchal structures that make the approval of others integral to abortion-related services and do not recognise a broader gender spectrum.Q. 'The bench was hearing the case of a 25-year-old unmarried woman, whose plea for termination of her pregnancy in the 24th week was turned down by a division bench of the Delhi High Court on the ground that the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003, did not extend to unmarried women in consensual relationships.' What role does the given statement play in the passage?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CLAT

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.The Supreme Court has delivered a seminal judgment that could have a significant impact in enlarging and expanding womens reproductive rights in the country. The apex court bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant and AS Bopanna said that all women — whether married or in consensual relationships, and including "persons other than cis-gender women" — are entitled to seek an abortion within 20-24 weeks of the pregnancy. The bench was hearing the case of a 25-year-old unmarried woman, whose plea for termination of her pregnancy in the 24th week was turned down by a division bench of the Delhi High Court on the ground that the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003, did not extend to unmarried women in consensual relationships.In a country where the womans body has, more often than not, been a site of the patriarchy index, the Supreme Courts recognition of her right to equality and, equally significantly, to her agency and choice, is momentous. In recent times, in comparison to many other countries, including the US — where the landmark Roe vs Wade judgment granting constitutional validity to the right to abort was recently overturned — abortion laws in India have moved in a more progressive direction, but much more needs to be done. Under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, abortion remains a criminal offence, to which the MTP Act provides exceptions, and, even within the wider ambit of the much-needed recent amendments to the law, it continues to adhere to hetero-patriarchal structures that make the approval of others integral to abortion-related services and do not recognise a broader gender spectrum.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Editorials, The Indian Express]Q.What does the passage suggest about the current state of abortion laws in India?a)Abortion is completely legal in India without any restrictions.b)Abortion laws in India have recently become more restrictive, following the overturning of the Roe vs. Wade judgment in the US.c)Abortion laws in India have become more progressive, but they still have room for improvement and are influenced by hetero-patriarchal structures.d)Abortion is only legal for married women in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.The Supreme Court has delivered a seminal judgment that could have a significant impact in enlarging and expanding womens reproductive rights in the country. The apex court bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant and AS Bopanna said that all women — whether married or in consensual relationships, and including "persons other than cis-gender women" — are entitled to seek an abortion within 20-24 weeks of the pregnancy. The bench was hearing the case of a 25-year-old unmarried woman, whose plea for termination of her pregnancy in the 24th week was turned down by a division bench of the Delhi High Court on the ground that the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003, did not extend to unmarried women in consensual relationships.In a country where the womans body has, more often than not, been a site of the patriarchy index, the Supreme Courts recognition of her right to equality and, equally significantly, to her agency and choice, is momentous. In recent times, in comparison to many other countries, including the US — where the landmark Roe vs Wade judgment granting constitutional validity to the right to abort was recently overturned — abortion laws in India have moved in a more progressive direction, but much more needs to be done. Under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, abortion remains a criminal offence, to which the MTP Act provides exceptions, and, even within the wider ambit of the much-needed recent amendments to the law, it continues to adhere to hetero-patriarchal structures that make the approval of others integral to abortion-related services and do not recognise a broader gender spectrum.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Editorials, The Indian Express]Q.What does the passage suggest about the current state of abortion laws in India?a)Abortion is completely legal in India without any restrictions.b)Abortion laws in India have recently become more restrictive, following the overturning of the Roe vs. Wade judgment in the US.c)Abortion laws in India have become more progressive, but they still have room for improvement and are influenced by hetero-patriarchal structures.d)Abortion is only legal for married women in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.The Supreme Court has delivered a seminal judgment that could have a significant impact in enlarging and expanding womens reproductive rights in the country. The apex court bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant and AS Bopanna said that all women — whether married or in consensual relationships, and including "persons other than cis-gender women" — are entitled to seek an abortion within 20-24 weeks of the pregnancy. The bench was hearing the case of a 25-year-old unmarried woman, whose plea for termination of her pregnancy in the 24th week was turned down by a division bench of the Delhi High Court on the ground that the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003, did not extend to unmarried women in consensual relationships.In a country where the womans body has, more often than not, been a site of the patriarchy index, the Supreme Courts recognition of her right to equality and, equally significantly, to her agency and choice, is momentous. In recent times, in comparison to many other countries, including the US — where the landmark Roe vs Wade judgment granting constitutional validity to the right to abort was recently overturned — abortion laws in India have moved in a more progressive direction, but much more needs to be done. Under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, abortion remains a criminal offence, to which the MTP Act provides exceptions, and, even within the wider ambit of the much-needed recent amendments to the law, it continues to adhere to hetero-patriarchal structures that make the approval of others integral to abortion-related services and do not recognise a broader gender spectrum.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Editorials, The Indian Express]Q.What does the passage suggest about the current state of abortion laws in India?a)Abortion is completely legal in India without any restrictions.b)Abortion laws in India have recently become more restrictive, following the overturning of the Roe vs. Wade judgment in the US.c)Abortion laws in India have become more progressive, but they still have room for improvement and are influenced by hetero-patriarchal structures.d)Abortion is only legal for married women in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.The Supreme Court has delivered a seminal judgment that could have a significant impact in enlarging and expanding womens reproductive rights in the country. The apex court bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant and AS Bopanna said that all women — whether married or in consensual relationships, and including "persons other than cis-gender women" — are entitled to seek an abortion within 20-24 weeks of the pregnancy. The bench was hearing the case of a 25-year-old unmarried woman, whose plea for termination of her pregnancy in the 24th week was turned down by a division bench of the Delhi High Court on the ground that the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003, did not extend to unmarried women in consensual relationships.In a country where the womans body has, more often than not, been a site of the patriarchy index, the Supreme Courts recognition of her right to equality and, equally significantly, to her agency and choice, is momentous. In recent times, in comparison to many other countries, including the US — where the landmark Roe vs Wade judgment granting constitutional validity to the right to abort was recently overturned — abortion laws in India have moved in a more progressive direction, but much more needs to be done. Under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, abortion remains a criminal offence, to which the MTP Act provides exceptions, and, even within the wider ambit of the much-needed recent amendments to the law, it continues to adhere to hetero-patriarchal structures that make the approval of others integral to abortion-related services and do not recognise a broader gender spectrum.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Editorials, The Indian Express]Q.What does the passage suggest about the current state of abortion laws in India?a)Abortion is completely legal in India without any restrictions.b)Abortion laws in India have recently become more restrictive, following the overturning of the Roe vs. Wade judgment in the US.c)Abortion laws in India have become more progressive, but they still have room for improvement and are influenced by hetero-patriarchal structures.d)Abortion is only legal for married women in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.The Supreme Court has delivered a seminal judgment that could have a significant impact in enlarging and expanding womens reproductive rights in the country. The apex court bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant and AS Bopanna said that all women — whether married or in consensual relationships, and including "persons other than cis-gender women" — are entitled to seek an abortion within 20-24 weeks of the pregnancy. The bench was hearing the case of a 25-year-old unmarried woman, whose plea for termination of her pregnancy in the 24th week was turned down by a division bench of the Delhi High Court on the ground that the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003, did not extend to unmarried women in consensual relationships.In a country where the womans body has, more often than not, been a site of the patriarchy index, the Supreme Courts recognition of her right to equality and, equally significantly, to her agency and choice, is momentous. In recent times, in comparison to many other countries, including the US — where the landmark Roe vs Wade judgment granting constitutional validity to the right to abort was recently overturned — abortion laws in India have moved in a more progressive direction, but much more needs to be done. Under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, abortion remains a criminal offence, to which the MTP Act provides exceptions, and, even within the wider ambit of the much-needed recent amendments to the law, it continues to adhere to hetero-patriarchal structures that make the approval of others integral to abortion-related services and do not recognise a broader gender spectrum.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Editorials, The Indian Express]Q.What does the passage suggest about the current state of abortion laws in India?a)Abortion is completely legal in India without any restrictions.b)Abortion laws in India have recently become more restrictive, following the overturning of the Roe vs. Wade judgment in the US.c)Abortion laws in India have become more progressive, but they still have room for improvement and are influenced by hetero-patriarchal structures.d)Abortion is only legal for married women in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.The Supreme Court has delivered a seminal judgment that could have a significant impact in enlarging and expanding womens reproductive rights in the country. The apex court bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant and AS Bopanna said that all women — whether married or in consensual relationships, and including "persons other than cis-gender women" — are entitled to seek an abortion within 20-24 weeks of the pregnancy. The bench was hearing the case of a 25-year-old unmarried woman, whose plea for termination of her pregnancy in the 24th week was turned down by a division bench of the Delhi High Court on the ground that the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003, did not extend to unmarried women in consensual relationships.In a country where the womans body has, more often than not, been a site of the patriarchy index, the Supreme Courts recognition of her right to equality and, equally significantly, to her agency and choice, is momentous. In recent times, in comparison to many other countries, including the US — where the landmark Roe vs Wade judgment granting constitutional validity to the right to abort was recently overturned — abortion laws in India have moved in a more progressive direction, but much more needs to be done. Under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, abortion remains a criminal offence, to which the MTP Act provides exceptions, and, even within the wider ambit of the much-needed recent amendments to the law, it continues to adhere to hetero-patriarchal structures that make the approval of others integral to abortion-related services and do not recognise a broader gender spectrum.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Editorials, The Indian Express]Q.What does the passage suggest about the current state of abortion laws in India?a)Abortion is completely legal in India without any restrictions.b)Abortion laws in India have recently become more restrictive, following the overturning of the Roe vs. Wade judgment in the US.c)Abortion laws in India have become more progressive, but they still have room for improvement and are influenced by hetero-patriarchal structures.d)Abortion is only legal for married women in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.The Supreme Court has delivered a seminal judgment that could have a significant impact in enlarging and expanding womens reproductive rights in the country. The apex court bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant and AS Bopanna said that all women — whether married or in consensual relationships, and including "persons other than cis-gender women" — are entitled to seek an abortion within 20-24 weeks of the pregnancy. The bench was hearing the case of a 25-year-old unmarried woman, whose plea for termination of her pregnancy in the 24th week was turned down by a division bench of the Delhi High Court on the ground that the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003, did not extend to unmarried women in consensual relationships.In a country where the womans body has, more often than not, been a site of the patriarchy index, the Supreme Courts recognition of her right to equality and, equally significantly, to her agency and choice, is momentous. In recent times, in comparison to many other countries, including the US — where the landmark Roe vs Wade judgment granting constitutional validity to the right to abort was recently overturned — abortion laws in India have moved in a more progressive direction, but much more needs to be done. Under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, abortion remains a criminal offence, to which the MTP Act provides exceptions, and, even within the wider ambit of the much-needed recent amendments to the law, it continues to adhere to hetero-patriarchal structures that make the approval of others integral to abortion-related services and do not recognise a broader gender spectrum.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Editorials, The Indian Express]Q.What does the passage suggest about the current state of abortion laws in India?a)Abortion is completely legal in India without any restrictions.b)Abortion laws in India have recently become more restrictive, following the overturning of the Roe vs. Wade judgment in the US.c)Abortion laws in India have become more progressive, but they still have room for improvement and are influenced by hetero-patriarchal structures.d)Abortion is only legal for married women in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.The Supreme Court has delivered a seminal judgment that could have a significant impact in enlarging and expanding womens reproductive rights in the country. The apex court bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant and AS Bopanna said that all women — whether married or in consensual relationships, and including "persons other than cis-gender women" — are entitled to seek an abortion within 20-24 weeks of the pregnancy. The bench was hearing the case of a 25-year-old unmarried woman, whose plea for termination of her pregnancy in the 24th week was turned down by a division bench of the Delhi High Court on the ground that the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003, did not extend to unmarried women in consensual relationships.In a country where the womans body has, more often than not, been a site of the patriarchy index, the Supreme Courts recognition of her right to equality and, equally significantly, to her agency and choice, is momentous. In recent times, in comparison to many other countries, including the US — where the landmark Roe vs Wade judgment granting constitutional validity to the right to abort was recently overturned — abortion laws in India have moved in a more progressive direction, but much more needs to be done. Under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, abortion remains a criminal offence, to which the MTP Act provides exceptions, and, even within the wider ambit of the much-needed recent amendments to the law, it continues to adhere to hetero-patriarchal structures that make the approval of others integral to abortion-related services and do not recognise a broader gender spectrum.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Editorials, The Indian Express]Q.What does the passage suggest about the current state of abortion laws in India?a)Abortion is completely legal in India without any restrictions.b)Abortion laws in India have recently become more restrictive, following the overturning of the Roe vs. Wade judgment in the US.c)Abortion laws in India have become more progressive, but they still have room for improvement and are influenced by hetero-patriarchal structures.d)Abortion is only legal for married women in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.The Supreme Court has delivered a seminal judgment that could have a significant impact in enlarging and expanding womens reproductive rights in the country. The apex court bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant and AS Bopanna said that all women — whether married or in consensual relationships, and including "persons other than cis-gender women" — are entitled to seek an abortion within 20-24 weeks of the pregnancy. The bench was hearing the case of a 25-year-old unmarried woman, whose plea for termination of her pregnancy in the 24th week was turned down by a division bench of the Delhi High Court on the ground that the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003, did not extend to unmarried women in consensual relationships.In a country where the womans body has, more often than not, been a site of the patriarchy index, the Supreme Courts recognition of her right to equality and, equally significantly, to her agency and choice, is momentous. In recent times, in comparison to many other countries, including the US — where the landmark Roe vs Wade judgment granting constitutional validity to the right to abort was recently overturned — abortion laws in India have moved in a more progressive direction, but much more needs to be done. Under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, abortion remains a criminal offence, to which the MTP Act provides exceptions, and, even within the wider ambit of the much-needed recent amendments to the law, it continues to adhere to hetero-patriarchal structures that make the approval of others integral to abortion-related services and do not recognise a broader gender spectrum.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Editorials, The Indian Express]Q.What does the passage suggest about the current state of abortion laws in India?a)Abortion is completely legal in India without any restrictions.b)Abortion laws in India have recently become more restrictive, following the overturning of the Roe vs. Wade judgment in the US.c)Abortion laws in India have become more progressive, but they still have room for improvement and are influenced by hetero-patriarchal structures.d)Abortion is only legal for married women in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.The Supreme Court has delivered a seminal judgment that could have a significant impact in enlarging and expanding womens reproductive rights in the country. The apex court bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant and AS Bopanna said that all women — whether married or in consensual relationships, and including "persons other than cis-gender women" — are entitled to seek an abortion within 20-24 weeks of the pregnancy. The bench was hearing the case of a 25-year-old unmarried woman, whose plea for termination of her pregnancy in the 24th week was turned down by a division bench of the Delhi High Court on the ground that the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003, did not extend to unmarried women in consensual relationships.In a country where the womans body has, more often than not, been a site of the patriarchy index, the Supreme Courts recognition of her right to equality and, equally significantly, to her agency and choice, is momentous. In recent times, in comparison to many other countries, including the US — where the landmark Roe vs Wade judgment granting constitutional validity to the right to abort was recently overturned — abortion laws in India have moved in a more progressive direction, but much more needs to be done. Under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, abortion remains a criminal offence, to which the MTP Act provides exceptions, and, even within the wider ambit of the much-needed recent amendments to the law, it continues to adhere to hetero-patriarchal structures that make the approval of others integral to abortion-related services and do not recognise a broader gender spectrum.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Editorials, The Indian Express]Q.What does the passage suggest about the current state of abortion laws in India?a)Abortion is completely legal in India without any restrictions.b)Abortion laws in India have recently become more restrictive, following the overturning of the Roe vs. Wade judgment in the US.c)Abortion laws in India have become more progressive, but they still have room for improvement and are influenced by hetero-patriarchal structures.d)Abortion is only legal for married women in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam