Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Restricting the Right to Information only to citizens would be contrary to the Constitution of India and Right to Information Act. Right to Information ought to be available to both citizens and non-citizens. RTI Act exempts from disclosure information under Section 8. There is no obligation to disclose such information to any citizen. The categories of information so exempted include:Information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of the State, relation with foreign State or lead to incitement of an offence; Information, publication of which has been expressly forbidden by Court or tribunal; Information, disclosure of which may amount to contempt of court;Information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of parliamentary privilege.Commericially sensitive information is also barred under RTI for example, Information including trade secrets, commercial confidence or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would jeopardise a third partyandrsquo;s competitive position. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest Information accessible to a person in his fiduciary relationship. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest. Information received in confidence from foreign government; Lastly, Information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes; the information that would obstruct the process of investigating, apprehending, or prosecuting offenders etc.Q.Under the Right to Information Act, a non-citizen living in India requests information from a government organization. The government rejects the request and gives the Section 8 exception as justification. Which of the following options best exemplifies the proper legal justification?a)Non-citizens have no entitlement to access information under the RTI Act, and the agencys decision is legally sound.b)The agencys decision is valid because the requested information falls within the exemption categories delineated in Section 8 of the Act.c)Non-citizens are not granted access to information under the RTI Act. Nevertheless, the agency can furnish information falling under the exemption categories specified in Section 8 since they do not pertain to activities within the Indian State.d)The agencys decision is flawed as denying information access solely based on the requesters citizenship contradicts the Constitution and the RTI Act.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Direction: Read the following passage careful...

Join the Discussion on the App

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:

Restricting the Right to Information only to citizens would be contrary to the Constitution of India and Right to Information Act. Right to Information ought to be available to both citizens and non-citizens. RTI Act exempts from disclosure information under Section 8. There is no obligation to disclose such information to any citizen. The categories of information so exempted include:
Information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of the State, relation with foreign State or lead to incitement of an offence; Information, publication of which has been expressly forbidden by Court or tribunal; Information, disclosure of which may amount to contempt of court;Information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of parliamentary privilege.
Commericially sensitive information is also barred under RTI for example, Information including trade secrets, commercial confidence or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would jeopardise a third party’s competitive position. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest Information accessible to a person in his fiduciary relationship. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest. Information received in confidence from foreign government; Lastly, Information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes; the information that would obstruct the process of investigating, apprehending, or prosecuting offenders etc.

Q. Under the Right to Information Act, a non-citizen living in India requests information from a government organization. The government rejects the request and gives the Section 8 exception as justification. Which of the following options best exemplifies the proper legal justification?

a)
Non-citizens have no entitlement to access information under the RTI Act, and the agency's decision is legally sound.
b)
The agency's decision is valid because the requested information falls within the exemption categories delineated in Section 8 of the Act.
c)
Non-citizens are not granted access to information under the RTI Act. Nevertheless, the agency can furnish information falling under the exemption categories specified in Section 8 since they do not pertain to activities within the Indian State.
d)
The agency's decision is flawed as denying information access solely based on the requester's citizenship contradicts the Constitution and the RTI Act.

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: CLAT Mock Test - 10

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questio...

The agency's judgment is illegal because it violates both the RTI Act and the Constitution to refuse access to information based merely on the requester's citizenship. There is no provision in the Act that restricts access to information based on the requester's citizenship status, despite the fact that Section 8 of the Act exempts several types of information from disclosure.

The correct response is therefore Option D.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Attention CLAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Restricting the Right to Information only to citizens would be contrary to the Constitution of India and Right to Information Act. Right to Information ought to be available to both citizens and non-citizens. RTI Act exempts from disclosure information under Section 8. There is no obligation to disclose such information to any citizen. The categories of information so exempted include:Information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of the State, relation with foreign State or lead to incitement of an offence; Information, publication of which has been expressly forbidden by Court or tribunal; Information, disclosure of which may amount to contempt of court;Information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of parliamentary privilege.Commericially sensitive information is also barred under RTI for example, Information including trade secrets, commercial confidence or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would jeopardise a third party’s competitive position. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest Information accessible to a person in his fiduciary relationship. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest. Information received in confidence from foreign government; Lastly, Information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes; the information that would obstruct the process of investigating, apprehending, or prosecuting offenders etc.Q.Under the RTI Act, a non-governmental organization (NGO) requests details about the environmental effect assessment report of a proposed development project on Border Road communities that are nearby. The government agency rejects the request, claiming that the data is exempt because it "would adversely affect the sovereignty and integrity of India" if it were disclosed. Which of the following options best exemplifies the proper legal justification?

View answer

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Restricting the Right to Information only to citizens would be contrary to the Constitution of India and Right to Information Act. Right to Information ought to be available to both citizens and non-citizens. RTI Act exempts from disclosure information under Section 8. There is no obligation to disclose such information to any citizen. The categories of information so exempted include:Information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of the State, relation with foreign State or lead to incitement of an offence; Information, publication of which has been expressly forbidden by Court or tribunal; Information, disclosure of which may amount to contempt of court;Information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of parliamentary privilege.Commericially sensitive information is also barred under RTI for example, Information including trade secrets, commercial confidence or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would jeopardise a third party’s competitive position. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest Information accessible to a person in his fiduciary relationship. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest. Information received in confidence from foreign government; Lastly, Information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes; the information that would obstruct the process of investigating, apprehending, or prosecuting offenders etc.Q.Under the RTI Act, a person requests details on a government contract that was given to a private business. The government organization rejects the request, claiming that the data is excluded because it is "trade secrets, commercial confidence, or intellectual property." Which of the following scenarios best explains how the law should be applied when information is of public interest?

View answer

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Restricting the Right to Information only to citizens would be contrary to the Constitution of India and Right to Information Act. Right to Information ought to be available to both citizens and non-citizens. RTI Act exempts from disclosure information under Section 8. There is no obligation to disclose such information to any citizen. The categories of information so exempted include:Information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of the State, relation with foreign State or lead to incitement of an offence; Information, publication of which has been expressly forbidden by Court or tribunal; Information, disclosure of which may amount to contempt of court;Information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of parliamentary privilege.Commericially sensitive information is also barred under RTI for example, Information including trade secrets, commercial confidence or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would jeopardise a third party’s competitive position. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest Information accessible to a person in his fiduciary relationship. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest. Information received in confidence from foreign government; Lastly, Information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes; the information that would obstruct the process of investigating, apprehending, or prosecuting offenders etc.Q.When can commercially sensitive information be disclosed under the RTI Act, as per the passage?

View answer

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Restricting the Right to Information only to citizens would be contrary to the Constitution of India and Right to Information Act. Right to Information ought to be available to both citizens and non-citizens. RTI Act exempts from disclosure information under Section 8. There is no obligation to disclose such information to any citizen. The categories of information so exempted include:Information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of the State, relation with foreign State or lead to incitement of an offence; Information, publication of which has been expressly forbidden by Court or tribunal; Information, disclosure of which may amount to contempt of court;Information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of parliamentary privilege.Commericially sensitive information is also barred under RTI for example, Information including trade secrets, commercial confidence or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would jeopardise a third party’s competitive position. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest Information accessible to a person in his fiduciary relationship. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest. Information received in confidence from foreign government; Lastly, Information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes; the information that would obstruct the process of investigating, apprehending, or prosecuting offenders etc.Q.According to the passage, who is eligible to request information under the Right to Information Act (RTI)?

View answer

Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.It has been repeatedly held that the PMLA (Prevention of Money Laundering Act) is a sui generis legislation, enacted to tackle money laundering through white-collar crimes. According to Section 3 of the PMLA, the act of projecting or claiming proceeds of crime to be untainted property constitutes the offense of money laundering. Under the Schedule to the PMLA, a number of offenses under the Indian Penal Code and other special statutes have been included, which serve as the basis for the offense of money laundering. In other words, the existence of predicate offense is sine qua non to charge someone with money laundering. It is crucial to note that the investigation and prosecution of the predicate offense are done typically by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) or the State Police.Section 50 of the PMLA provides powers of a civil court to the ED authorities for summoning persons suspected of money laundering and recording statements. However, the Supreme Court held that ED authorities are not police officers. It observed in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary v. Union of India (2022) that “the process envisaged by Section 50 of the PMLA is in the nature of an inquiry against the proceeds of crime and is not ‘investigation’ in strict sense of the term for initiating prosecution.” There are other dissimilarities between ED authorities and the police. While the police are required to register a First Information Report (FIR) for a cognizable offense before conducting an investigation, ED authorities begin with search procedures and undertake their investigation for the purpose of gathering materials and tracing the ‘proceeds of crime’ by issuing summons. Any statement made by an accused to the police is inadmissible as evidence in court, whereas a statement made to an ED authority is admissible. A copy of the FIR is accessible to the accused, whereas the Enforcement Case Information Report is seldom available.While the police investigating the predicate offense are empowered to arrest and seek custody of the accused, the ED is meant to focus on recovering the proceeds of crime in order to redistribute the same to victims. It is not clear whether the ED has managed to do this. Per contra, the Proceeds of Crime Act, 2002, the analogous legislation in the U.K., almost entirely concentrates on the confiscation of assets through dedicated civil proceedings. Unfortunately, of late, much of the ED’s powers have been discharged in effecting pretrial arrests, which used to be the prerogative of the police investigating the predicate offence. In the past, the CBI was used to impart fear among political opponents. In the process, the agency received the condemnation of various courts and earned the nickname “caged parrot”. Whether the ED will go down the same path or reorient its approach will entirely depend on the intervention of the country’s constitutional courts.Q.Which of the following is not the appropriate cause-and-effect relationship in the passages context?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CLAT

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Restricting the Right to Information only to citizens would be contrary to the Constitution of India and Right to Information Act. Right to Information ought to be available to both citizens and non-citizens. RTI Act exempts from disclosure information under Section 8. There is no obligation to disclose such information to any citizen. The categories of information so exempted include:Information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of the State, relation with foreign State or lead to incitement of an offence; Information, publication of which has been expressly forbidden by Court or tribunal; Information, disclosure of which may amount to contempt of court;Information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of parliamentary privilege.Commericially sensitive information is also barred under RTI for example, Information including trade secrets, commercial confidence or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would jeopardise a third party’s competitive position. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest Information accessible to a person in his fiduciary relationship. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest. Information received in confidence from foreign government; Lastly, Information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes; the information that would obstruct the process of investigating, apprehending, or prosecuting offenders etc.Q.Under the Right to Information Act, a non-citizen living in India requests information from a government organization. The government rejects the request and gives the Section 8 exception as justification. Which of the following options best exemplifies the proper legal justification?a)Non-citizens have no entitlement to access information under the RTI Act, and the agencys decision is legally sound.b)The agencys decision is valid because the requested information falls within the exemption categories delineated in Section 8 of the Act.c)Non-citizens are not granted access to information under the RTI Act. Nevertheless, the agency can furnish information falling under the exemption categories specified in Section 8 since they do not pertain to activities within the Indian State.d)The agencys decision is flawed as denying information access solely based on the requesters citizenship contradicts the Constitution and the RTI Act.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Restricting the Right to Information only to citizens would be contrary to the Constitution of India and Right to Information Act. Right to Information ought to be available to both citizens and non-citizens. RTI Act exempts from disclosure information under Section 8. There is no obligation to disclose such information to any citizen. The categories of information so exempted include:Information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of the State, relation with foreign State or lead to incitement of an offence; Information, publication of which has been expressly forbidden by Court or tribunal; Information, disclosure of which may amount to contempt of court;Information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of parliamentary privilege.Commericially sensitive information is also barred under RTI for example, Information including trade secrets, commercial confidence or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would jeopardise a third party’s competitive position. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest Information accessible to a person in his fiduciary relationship. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest. Information received in confidence from foreign government; Lastly, Information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes; the information that would obstruct the process of investigating, apprehending, or prosecuting offenders etc.Q.Under the Right to Information Act, a non-citizen living in India requests information from a government organization. The government rejects the request and gives the Section 8 exception as justification. Which of the following options best exemplifies the proper legal justification?a)Non-citizens have no entitlement to access information under the RTI Act, and the agencys decision is legally sound.b)The agencys decision is valid because the requested information falls within the exemption categories delineated in Section 8 of the Act.c)Non-citizens are not granted access to information under the RTI Act. Nevertheless, the agency can furnish information falling under the exemption categories specified in Section 8 since they do not pertain to activities within the Indian State.d)The agencys decision is flawed as denying information access solely based on the requesters citizenship contradicts the Constitution and the RTI Act.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Restricting the Right to Information only to citizens would be contrary to the Constitution of India and Right to Information Act. Right to Information ought to be available to both citizens and non-citizens. RTI Act exempts from disclosure information under Section 8. There is no obligation to disclose such information to any citizen. The categories of information so exempted include:Information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of the State, relation with foreign State or lead to incitement of an offence; Information, publication of which has been expressly forbidden by Court or tribunal; Information, disclosure of which may amount to contempt of court;Information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of parliamentary privilege.Commericially sensitive information is also barred under RTI for example, Information including trade secrets, commercial confidence or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would jeopardise a third party’s competitive position. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest Information accessible to a person in his fiduciary relationship. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest. Information received in confidence from foreign government; Lastly, Information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes; the information that would obstruct the process of investigating, apprehending, or prosecuting offenders etc.Q.Under the Right to Information Act, a non-citizen living in India requests information from a government organization. The government rejects the request and gives the Section 8 exception as justification. Which of the following options best exemplifies the proper legal justification?a)Non-citizens have no entitlement to access information under the RTI Act, and the agencys decision is legally sound.b)The agencys decision is valid because the requested information falls within the exemption categories delineated in Section 8 of the Act.c)Non-citizens are not granted access to information under the RTI Act. Nevertheless, the agency can furnish information falling under the exemption categories specified in Section 8 since they do not pertain to activities within the Indian State.d)The agencys decision is flawed as denying information access solely based on the requesters citizenship contradicts the Constitution and the RTI Act.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Restricting the Right to Information only to citizens would be contrary to the Constitution of India and Right to Information Act. Right to Information ought to be available to both citizens and non-citizens. RTI Act exempts from disclosure information under Section 8. There is no obligation to disclose such information to any citizen. The categories of information so exempted include:Information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of the State, relation with foreign State or lead to incitement of an offence; Information, publication of which has been expressly forbidden by Court or tribunal; Information, disclosure of which may amount to contempt of court;Information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of parliamentary privilege.Commericially sensitive information is also barred under RTI for example, Information including trade secrets, commercial confidence or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would jeopardise a third party’s competitive position. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest Information accessible to a person in his fiduciary relationship. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest. Information received in confidence from foreign government; Lastly, Information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes; the information that would obstruct the process of investigating, apprehending, or prosecuting offenders etc.Q.Under the Right to Information Act, a non-citizen living in India requests information from a government organization. The government rejects the request and gives the Section 8 exception as justification. Which of the following options best exemplifies the proper legal justification?a)Non-citizens have no entitlement to access information under the RTI Act, and the agencys decision is legally sound.b)The agencys decision is valid because the requested information falls within the exemption categories delineated in Section 8 of the Act.c)Non-citizens are not granted access to information under the RTI Act. Nevertheless, the agency can furnish information falling under the exemption categories specified in Section 8 since they do not pertain to activities within the Indian State.d)The agencys decision is flawed as denying information access solely based on the requesters citizenship contradicts the Constitution and the RTI Act.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Restricting the Right to Information only to citizens would be contrary to the Constitution of India and Right to Information Act. Right to Information ought to be available to both citizens and non-citizens. RTI Act exempts from disclosure information under Section 8. There is no obligation to disclose such information to any citizen. The categories of information so exempted include:Information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of the State, relation with foreign State or lead to incitement of an offence; Information, publication of which has been expressly forbidden by Court or tribunal; Information, disclosure of which may amount to contempt of court;Information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of parliamentary privilege.Commericially sensitive information is also barred under RTI for example, Information including trade secrets, commercial confidence or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would jeopardise a third party’s competitive position. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest Information accessible to a person in his fiduciary relationship. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest. Information received in confidence from foreign government; Lastly, Information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes; the information that would obstruct the process of investigating, apprehending, or prosecuting offenders etc.Q.Under the Right to Information Act, a non-citizen living in India requests information from a government organization. The government rejects the request and gives the Section 8 exception as justification. Which of the following options best exemplifies the proper legal justification?a)Non-citizens have no entitlement to access information under the RTI Act, and the agencys decision is legally sound.b)The agencys decision is valid because the requested information falls within the exemption categories delineated in Section 8 of the Act.c)Non-citizens are not granted access to information under the RTI Act. Nevertheless, the agency can furnish information falling under the exemption categories specified in Section 8 since they do not pertain to activities within the Indian State.d)The agencys decision is flawed as denying information access solely based on the requesters citizenship contradicts the Constitution and the RTI Act.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Restricting the Right to Information only to citizens would be contrary to the Constitution of India and Right to Information Act. Right to Information ought to be available to both citizens and non-citizens. RTI Act exempts from disclosure information under Section 8. There is no obligation to disclose such information to any citizen. The categories of information so exempted include:Information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of the State, relation with foreign State or lead to incitement of an offence; Information, publication of which has been expressly forbidden by Court or tribunal; Information, disclosure of which may amount to contempt of court;Information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of parliamentary privilege.Commericially sensitive information is also barred under RTI for example, Information including trade secrets, commercial confidence or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would jeopardise a third party’s competitive position. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest Information accessible to a person in his fiduciary relationship. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest. Information received in confidence from foreign government; Lastly, Information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes; the information that would obstruct the process of investigating, apprehending, or prosecuting offenders etc.Q.Under the Right to Information Act, a non-citizen living in India requests information from a government organization. The government rejects the request and gives the Section 8 exception as justification. Which of the following options best exemplifies the proper legal justification?a)Non-citizens have no entitlement to access information under the RTI Act, and the agencys decision is legally sound.b)The agencys decision is valid because the requested information falls within the exemption categories delineated in Section 8 of the Act.c)Non-citizens are not granted access to information under the RTI Act. Nevertheless, the agency can furnish information falling under the exemption categories specified in Section 8 since they do not pertain to activities within the Indian State.d)The agencys decision is flawed as denying information access solely based on the requesters citizenship contradicts the Constitution and the RTI Act.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Restricting the Right to Information only to citizens would be contrary to the Constitution of India and Right to Information Act. Right to Information ought to be available to both citizens and non-citizens. RTI Act exempts from disclosure information under Section 8. There is no obligation to disclose such information to any citizen. The categories of information so exempted include:Information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of the State, relation with foreign State or lead to incitement of an offence; Information, publication of which has been expressly forbidden by Court or tribunal; Information, disclosure of which may amount to contempt of court;Information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of parliamentary privilege.Commericially sensitive information is also barred under RTI for example, Information including trade secrets, commercial confidence or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would jeopardise a third party’s competitive position. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest Information accessible to a person in his fiduciary relationship. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest. Information received in confidence from foreign government; Lastly, Information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes; the information that would obstruct the process of investigating, apprehending, or prosecuting offenders etc.Q.Under the Right to Information Act, a non-citizen living in India requests information from a government organization. The government rejects the request and gives the Section 8 exception as justification. Which of the following options best exemplifies the proper legal justification?a)Non-citizens have no entitlement to access information under the RTI Act, and the agencys decision is legally sound.b)The agencys decision is valid because the requested information falls within the exemption categories delineated in Section 8 of the Act.c)Non-citizens are not granted access to information under the RTI Act. Nevertheless, the agency can furnish information falling under the exemption categories specified in Section 8 since they do not pertain to activities within the Indian State.d)The agencys decision is flawed as denying information access solely based on the requesters citizenship contradicts the Constitution and the RTI Act.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Restricting the Right to Information only to citizens would be contrary to the Constitution of India and Right to Information Act. Right to Information ought to be available to both citizens and non-citizens. RTI Act exempts from disclosure information under Section 8. There is no obligation to disclose such information to any citizen. The categories of information so exempted include:Information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of the State, relation with foreign State or lead to incitement of an offence; Information, publication of which has been expressly forbidden by Court or tribunal; Information, disclosure of which may amount to contempt of court;Information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of parliamentary privilege.Commericially sensitive information is also barred under RTI for example, Information including trade secrets, commercial confidence or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would jeopardise a third party’s competitive position. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest Information accessible to a person in his fiduciary relationship. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest. Information received in confidence from foreign government; Lastly, Information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes; the information that would obstruct the process of investigating, apprehending, or prosecuting offenders etc.Q.Under the Right to Information Act, a non-citizen living in India requests information from a government organization. The government rejects the request and gives the Section 8 exception as justification. Which of the following options best exemplifies the proper legal justification?a)Non-citizens have no entitlement to access information under the RTI Act, and the agencys decision is legally sound.b)The agencys decision is valid because the requested information falls within the exemption categories delineated in Section 8 of the Act.c)Non-citizens are not granted access to information under the RTI Act. Nevertheless, the agency can furnish information falling under the exemption categories specified in Section 8 since they do not pertain to activities within the Indian State.d)The agencys decision is flawed as denying information access solely based on the requesters citizenship contradicts the Constitution and the RTI Act.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Restricting the Right to Information only to citizens would be contrary to the Constitution of India and Right to Information Act. Right to Information ought to be available to both citizens and non-citizens. RTI Act exempts from disclosure information under Section 8. There is no obligation to disclose such information to any citizen. The categories of information so exempted include:Information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of the State, relation with foreign State or lead to incitement of an offence; Information, publication of which has been expressly forbidden by Court or tribunal; Information, disclosure of which may amount to contempt of court;Information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of parliamentary privilege.Commericially sensitive information is also barred under RTI for example, Information including trade secrets, commercial confidence or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would jeopardise a third party’s competitive position. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest Information accessible to a person in his fiduciary relationship. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest. Information received in confidence from foreign government; Lastly, Information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes; the information that would obstruct the process of investigating, apprehending, or prosecuting offenders etc.Q.Under the Right to Information Act, a non-citizen living in India requests information from a government organization. The government rejects the request and gives the Section 8 exception as justification. Which of the following options best exemplifies the proper legal justification?a)Non-citizens have no entitlement to access information under the RTI Act, and the agencys decision is legally sound.b)The agencys decision is valid because the requested information falls within the exemption categories delineated in Section 8 of the Act.c)Non-citizens are not granted access to information under the RTI Act. Nevertheless, the agency can furnish information falling under the exemption categories specified in Section 8 since they do not pertain to activities within the Indian State.d)The agencys decision is flawed as denying information access solely based on the requesters citizenship contradicts the Constitution and the RTI Act.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Restricting the Right to Information only to citizens would be contrary to the Constitution of India and Right to Information Act. Right to Information ought to be available to both citizens and non-citizens. RTI Act exempts from disclosure information under Section 8. There is no obligation to disclose such information to any citizen. The categories of information so exempted include:Information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of the State, relation with foreign State or lead to incitement of an offence; Information, publication of which has been expressly forbidden by Court or tribunal; Information, disclosure of which may amount to contempt of court;Information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of parliamentary privilege.Commericially sensitive information is also barred under RTI for example, Information including trade secrets, commercial confidence or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would jeopardise a third party’s competitive position. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest Information accessible to a person in his fiduciary relationship. Such information can be furnished if the competent authority determines that it is necessary to disclose such information in the public interest. Information received in confidence from foreign government; Lastly, Information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes; the information that would obstruct the process of investigating, apprehending, or prosecuting offenders etc.Q.Under the Right to Information Act, a non-citizen living in India requests information from a government organization. The government rejects the request and gives the Section 8 exception as justification. Which of the following options best exemplifies the proper legal justification?a)Non-citizens have no entitlement to access information under the RTI Act, and the agencys decision is legally sound.b)The agencys decision is valid because the requested information falls within the exemption categories delineated in Section 8 of the Act.c)Non-citizens are not granted access to information under the RTI Act. Nevertheless, the agency can furnish information falling under the exemption categories specified in Section 8 since they do not pertain to activities within the Indian State.d)The agencys decision is flawed as denying information access solely based on the requesters citizenship contradicts the Constitution and the RTI Act.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam