CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully ... Start Learning for Free
Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.
The scathing report by Hindenburg Research on the Adani Group has put the spotlight on short selling, a practice nearly as old as the stock market. Regulators around the world, the courts, investing masses...everybody has once again started taking notice of short sellers aka the misfits in the investing world. Why? Because, in the conventional investing world, the buy and hold philosophy is heavily marketed as the cure for all investment maladies, and everybody expects asset prices to only rise. So, swimming against the tide by selling something first, contrary to buying first, brings its share of controversies. This could be why short sellers are seen as outcasts as they bet on asset prices going down! But for every Warren Buffett, or Rakesh Jhunjhunwala in the long only investment world, there would be a Jim Chanos or George Soros — like a true bear smacking its lips — as they seek out yet another security whose shares, they believe to be overvalued, whether by exuberance or fraud or simply based on technical. Here is a lowdown on short selling, how and why investors do it, the pros and cons, local and global perspective, and much more. Short selling, or shorting, is a tricky concept primarily because we are not used to shorting in our day-to-day transactions. Be it groceries, apparel, real estate, eating out, travel et c., we buy it first. The current price, subconsciously, is held out to be right. So, buying first is a highly intuitive transaction. To generate profit in investments, buying first means the entry price has to be lower than the exit price. However, in a short sale, the transactions are carried out in the exact opposite direction i.e., to sell first and buy later. For instance, you first sell a security for ₹100 and then buy it for ₹80, pocketing ₹20 profit (pre-tax and charges).
Equity short sellers typically use one or more of the following approaches to identify targets they feel trade at higher prices than they should. Fundamental analysis: Analysing a company’s financials helps them determine if its stock may be a candidate for a decline in price. An impactful change in fundamentals warrants such a stance. Technical analysis: Patterns in a stock’s price movement help determine if the stock is on the cusp of a downtrend. Technical based shorting is practised every day by traders in the spot market or by using derivative instruments. Typically, technical short sellers use scenarios such as selling a pullback in a downtrend, entering within a trading range and waiting for a breakdown, or selling into an active decline. Thematic research: This approach involves betting against companies whose business models or technologies are outdated and thus face implosion. A popular example here is the large institutional short selling of the shares of GameStop, which backfired in 2021. Forensic short selling: Spotting cooked up Balance sheets or outright frauds comes under this category. Some of the world’s most astonishing frauds have come to light, thanks to such short sellers. Such frauds usually took place in companies involved in the hottest sectors of those times.
Regulated short selling is legal practice. Securities market regulators in most countries, in particular, in all developed securities markets, recognise it. The International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) reviewed short selling and recommended transparency, rather than prohibiting it. Short selling can be effective under a few scenarios but the sword can cut both ways and be counterproductive too.
Q. Which of the following provides additional support for the case in favor of short selling as outlined in the passage?
  • a)
    Highlighting that short selling is a contentious practice opposing the buy and hold philosophy.
  • b)
    Noting that short sellers employ various methods, including fundamental and technical analysis, thematic research, and forensic analysis, to pinpoint shorting opportunities.
  • c)
    Confirming that short selling is legally acknowledged as a valid practice by securities market regulators in many nations.
  • d)
    Emphasizing that while short selling can yield positive results in specific circumstances, it can also have adverse consequences.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The scathing report by Hindenburg Research on the Adani Group has put the spotlight on short selling, a practice nearly as old as the stock market. Regulators around the world, the courts, investing masses...everybody has once again started taking notice of short sellers aka the misfits in the investing world. Why? Because, in the conventional investing world, the buy and hold philosophy is heavily marketed as the cure for all investment maladies, and everybody expects asset prices to only rise. So, swimming against the tide by selling something first, contrary to buying first, brings its share of controversies. This could be why short sellers are seen as outcasts as they bet on asset prices going down! But for every Warren Buffett, or Rakesh Jhunjhunwala in the long only investment world, there would be a Jim Chanos or George Soros — like a true bear smacking its lips — as they seek out yet another security whose shares, they believe to be overvalued, whether by exuberance or fraud or simply based on technical. Here is a lowdown on short selling, how and why investors do it, the pros and cons, local and global perspective, and much more. Short selling, or shorting, is a tricky concept primarily because we are not used to shorting in our day-to-day transactions. Be it groceries, apparel, real estate, eating out, travel et c., we buy it first. The current price, subconsciously, is held out to be right. So, buying first is a highly intuitive transaction. To generate profit in investments, buying first means the entry price has to be lower than the exit price. However, in a short sale, the transactions are carried out in the exact opposite direction i.e., to sell first and buy later. For instance, you first sell a security for 100 and then buy it for 80, pocketing 20 profit (pre-tax and charges).Equity short sellers typically use one or more of the following approaches to identify targets they feel trade at higher prices than they should. Fundamental analysis: Analysing a company’s financials helps them determine if its stock may be a candidate for a decline in price. An impactful change in fundamentals warrants such a stance. Technical analysis: Patterns in a stock’s price movement help determine if the stock is on the cusp of a downtrend. Technical based shorting is practised every day by traders in the spot market or by using derivative instruments. Typically, technical short sellers use scenarios such as selling a pullback in a downtrend, entering within a trading range and waiting for a breakdown, or selling into an active decline. Thematic research: This approach involves betting against companies whose business models or technologies are outdated and thus face implosion. A popular example here is the large institutional short selling of the shares of GameStop, which backfired in 2021. Forensic short selling: Spotting cooked up Balance sheets or outright frauds comes under this category. Some of the world’s most astonishing frauds have come to light, thanks to such short sellers. Such frauds usually took place in companies involved in the hottest sectors of those times.Regulated short selling is legal practice. Securities market regulators in most countries, in particular, in all developed securities markets, recognise it. The International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) reviewed short selling and recommended transparency, rather than prohibiting it. Short selling can be effective under a few scenarios but the sword can cut both ways and be counterproductive too.Q.Which of the following undermines the case against short selling as presented in the passage?

Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The scathing report by Hindenburg Research on the Adani Group has put the spotlight on short selling, a practice nearly as old as the stock market. Regulators around the world, the courts, investing masses...everybody has once again started taking notice of short sellers aka the misfits in the investing world. Why? Because, in the conventional investing world, the buy and hold philosophy is heavily marketed as the cure for all investment maladies, and everybody expects asset prices to only rise. So, swimming against the tide by selling something first, contrary to buying first, brings its share of controversies. This could be why short sellers are seen as outcasts as they bet on asset prices going down! But for every Warren Buffett, or Rakesh Jhunjhunwala in the long only investment world, there would be a Jim Chanos or George Soros — like a true bear smacking its lips — as they seek out yet another security whose shares, they believe to be overvalued, whether by exuberance or fraud or simply based on technical. Here is a lowdown on short selling, how and why investors do it, the pros and cons, local and global perspective, and much more. Short selling, or shorting, is a tricky concept primarily because we are not used to shorting in our day-to-day transactions. Be it groceries, apparel, real estate, eating out, travel et c., we buy it first. The current price, subconsciously, is held out to be right. So, buying first is a highly intuitive transaction. To generate profit in investments, buying first means the entry price has to be lower than the exit price. However, in a short sale, the transactions are carried out in the exact opposite direction i.e., to sell first and buy later. For instance, you first sell a security for 100 and then buy it for 80, pocketing 20 profit (pre-tax and charges).Equity short sellers typically use one or more of the following approaches to identify targets they feel trade at higher prices than they should. Fundamental analysis: Analysing a company’s financials helps them determine if its stock may be a candidate for a decline in price. An impactful change in fundamentals warrants such a stance. Technical analysis: Patterns in a stock’s price movement help determine if the stock is on the cusp of a downtrend. Technical based shorting is practised every day by traders in the spot market or by using derivative instruments. Typically, technical short sellers use scenarios such as selling a pullback in a downtrend, entering within a trading range and waiting for a breakdown, or selling into an active decline. Thematic research: This approach involves betting against companies whose business models or technologies are outdated and thus face implosion. A popular example here is the large institutional short selling of the shares of GameStop, which backfired in 2021. Forensic short selling: Spotting cooked up Balance sheets or outright frauds comes under this category. Some of the world’s most astonishing frauds have come to light, thanks to such short sellers. Such frauds usually took place in companies involved in the hottest sectors of those times.Regulated short selling is legal practice. Securities market regulators in most countries, in particular, in all developed securities markets, recognise it. The International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) reviewed short selling and recommended transparency, rather than prohibiting it. Short selling can be effective under a few scenarios but the sword can cut both ways and be counterproductive too.Q.What could be a probable consequence of short selling gaining a reputation as a contentious practice?

Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The scathing report by Hindenburg Research on the Adani Group has put the spotlight on short selling, a practice nearly as old as the stock market. Regulators around the world, the courts, investing masses...everybody has once again started taking notice of short sellers aka the misfits in the investing world. Why? Because, in the conventional investing world, the buy and hold philosophy is heavily marketed as the cure for all investment maladies, and everybody expects asset prices to only rise. So, swimming against the tide by selling something first, contrary to buying first, brings its share of controversies. This could be why short sellers are seen as outcasts as they bet on asset prices going down! But for every Warren Buffett, or Rakesh Jhunjhunwala in the long only investment world, there would be a Jim Chanos or George Soros — like a true bear smacking its lips — as they seek out yet another security whose shares, they believe to be overvalued, whether by exuberance or fraud or simply based on technical. Here is a lowdown on short selling, how and why investors do it, the pros and cons, local and global perspective, and much more. Short selling, or shorting, is a tricky concept primarily because we are not used to shorting in our day-to-day transactions. Be it groceries, apparel, real estate, eating out, travel et c., we buy it first. The current price, subconsciously, is held out to be right. So, buying first is a highly intuitive transaction. To generate profit in investments, buying first means the entry price has to be lower than the exit price. However, in a short sale, the transactions are carried out in the exact opposite direction i.e., to sell first and buy later. For instance, you first sell a security for 100 and then buy it for 80, pocketing 20 profit (pre-tax and charges).Equity short sellers typically use one or more of the following approaches to identify targets they feel trade at higher prices than they should. Fundamental analysis: Analysing a company’s financials helps them determine if its stock may be a candidate for a decline in price. An impactful change in fundamentals warrants such a stance. Technical analysis: Patterns in a stock’s price movement help determine if the stock is on the cusp of a downtrend. Technical based shorting is practised every day by traders in the spot market or by using derivative instruments. Typically, technical short sellers use scenarios such as selling a pullback in a downtrend, entering within a trading range and waiting for a breakdown, or selling into an active decline. Thematic research: This approach involves betting against companies whose business models or technologies are outdated and thus face implosion. A popular example here is the large institutional short selling of the shares of GameStop, which backfired in 2021. Forensic short selling: Spotting cooked up Balance sheets or outright frauds comes under this category. Some of the world’s most astonishing frauds have come to light, thanks to such short sellers. Such frauds usually took place in companies involved in the hottest sectors of those times.Regulated short selling is legal practice. Securities market regulators in most countries, in particular, in all developed securities markets, recognise it. The International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) reviewed short selling and recommended transparency, rather than prohibiting it. Short selling can be effective under a few scenarios but the sword can cut both ways and be counterproductive too.Q.What can be concluded about short selling from the passage?

The World Trade Organisation (WTO) was created in the early 1990s as a component of the Uruguay Round negotiation. However, it could have been negotiated as part of the Tokyo Round of the 1970s, since negotiation was an attempt at a constitutional reform of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Or it could have been put off to the future, as the US government wanted. What factors led to the creation of the WTO in the early 1990s? One factor was the pattern of multilateral bargaining that developed late in the Uruguay Round. Like all complex international agreements, the WTO was a product of a series of trade-offs between principal actors and groups. For the United States, which did not want a new organization, the disputed settlement part of the WTO package achieved its longstanding goal of a more effective and more legal dispute settlement system. For the Europeans, who by the 1990s had come to view GATT dispute settlement less in political terms add more as a regime of legal obligations, the WTO package was acceptable as a means to discipline the resort to unilateral measures by the United States. Countries like Canada and other middle and smaller trading partners were attracted by the expansion of a rule-based system and by the symbolic value of a trade organization, both of which inherently support the weak against the strong. The developing countries were attracted due to the provisions banning unilateral measures. Finally, and perhaps most important, many countries at the Uruguay Round came to put a higher priority on the export gains than on the import losses that the negotiation would produce, and they came to associate the WTO and a rule-based system with those gains. This reasoning replicated in many countries was contained in U. S. Ambassador Kantors defence of the WTO, and it announced to a recognition that international trade and its benefits cannot be enjoyed unless trading nations accept the discipline of a negotiated rule-based environment. A second factor in the creation of the WTO was pressure from lawyers and the legal process. The dispute settlement system of the WTO was seen as a victory of legalists but the matter went deeper thanthat. The GATT, and the WTO, are contract organizations based on rules, and it is inevitable that an organization creating a further rule will in turn be influenced by legal process. Robert Hudee has written of the momentum of legal development, but what is this precisely? Legal development can be defined as promotion of the technical legal values of consistency, clarity (or certainty) and effectiveness; these are values that those responsible for administering any legal system will seek to maximize. As it played out in the WTO, consistency meant integrating under one roof the whole lot of separate agreements signed under GATT auspices; clarity meant removing ambiguities about the powers of contracting parties to make certain decisions or to undertake waivers; and effectiveness meant eliminating exceptions arising out of grandfather-rights and resolving defects in dispute settlement procedures and institutional provisions. Concern for these values is inherent in any rule-based system of co-operation, since without these value rules would be meaningless in the first place, therefore, create their own incentive for fulfilment. The moment of legal development has occurred in other institutions besides the GATT, most notably in the European Union (EU). Over the past two decades the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has consistently rendered decisions that have expanded incrementally the EUs internal market, in which the doctrine of mutual recognition handed down in Cassis de Dijon case in 1979 was a key turning point. The court is now widely recognized as a major player in European integration, even though arguably such a strong role was not originally envisaged in the Treaty of Rome, which initiated the current European Union. One means the Court used to expand integration was the teleological method of interpretation, whereby the actions of member states were evaluated against the accomplishment of the most elementary goals set forth in the Preamble to the (Rom e) treaty. The teleological method represents an effort to keep current policies consistent with slated goals, and it is analogous to the effort in GATT to keep contracting party trade practices consistent with slated rules. In both cases legal concerns and procedures are an independent force for further co-operation.In the large part the WTO was an exercise in consolidation. In the context of a trade negotiation that created a near-revolutionary expansion of international trade rules, the formation of the WTO was a deeply conservative act needed to ensure that the benefits of the new rules would not be lost. The WTO was all about institutional structure and dispute settlement: these are the concerns of conservatives and not revolutionaries, that is why lawyers and legalists took the lead on these issues. The WTO codified the GATT institutional practice that had developed by custom over three decades, and it incorporated a new dispute settlement system that was necessary to keep both old and new rules from becoming a sham. Both the international structure and the dispute settlement system were necessary to preserve and enhance the integrity of the multilateral trade regime that had been built incrementally from the 1940s to the 1990s.Q.What would be the closest reason why WTO was not formed in 1970s?

Most large corporations in the United States were once run by individual capitalists who owned enough stock to dominate the board of directors and dictate company policy. Because putting such large amounts of stock on the market would only depress its value, they could not sell out for a quick profit and instead had to concentrate on improving the long-term productivity of their companies. Today, with few exceptions, the stock of large United States corporations is held by large institutions—pension funds, for example—and because these institutions are prohibited by antitrust laws from owning a majority of a company’s stock and from actively influencing a company’s decision-making, they can enhance their wealth only by buying and selling stock in anticipation of fluctuations in its value. A minority shareholder is necessarily a short term trader. As a result, United States productivity is unlikely to improve unless shareholders and the managers of the companies in which they invest are encouraged to enhance long-term productivity (and hence long-term profitability), rather than simply to maximize short-term profits.Since the return of the old-style capitalist is unlikely, today’s short-term traders must be remade into tomorrow’s long-term capitalistic investors. The legal limits that now prevent financial institutions from acquiring a dominant shareholding position in a corporation should be removed, and such institutions should be encouraged to take a more active role in the operations of the companies in which they invest. In addition, any institution that holds twenty percent or more of a company’s stock should be forced to give the public one day’s notice of the intent to sell those shares. Unless the announced sale could be explained to the public on grounds other than anticipated future losses, the value of the stock would plummet and, like the old-time capitalists, major investors could cut their losses only by helping to restore their companies’ productivity. Such measures would force financial institutions to become capitalists whose success depends not on trading shares at the propitious moment, but on increasing the productivity of the companies in which they invest.Q. According to the passage, the purpose of the requirement suggested in lines "In addition, any institution that holds twenty percent or more of a company’s stock should be forced to give the public one day’s notice of the intent to sell those shares." would be which of the following?

Top Courses for CLAT

Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The scathing report by Hindenburg Research on the Adani Group has put the spotlight on short selling, a practice nearly as old as the stock market. Regulators around the world, the courts, investing masses...everybody has once again started taking notice of short sellers aka the misfits in the investing world. Why? Because, in the conventional investing world, the buy and hold philosophy is heavily marketed as the cure for all investment maladies, and everybody expects asset prices to only rise. So, swimming against the tide by selling something first, contrary to buying first, brings its share of controversies. This could be why short sellers are seen as outcasts as they bet on asset prices going down! But for every Warren Buffett, or Rakesh Jhunjhunwala in the long only investment world, there would be a Jim Chanos or George Soros — like a true bear smacking its lips — as they seek out yet another security whose shares, they believe to be overvalued, whether by exuberance or fraud or simply based on technical. Here is a lowdown on short selling, how and why investors do it, the pros and cons, local and global perspective, and much more. Short selling, or shorting, is a tricky concept primarily because we are not used to shorting in our day-to-day transactions. Be it groceries, apparel, real estate, eating out, travel et c., we buy it first. The current price, subconsciously, is held out to be right. So, buying first is a highly intuitive transaction. To generate profit in investments, buying first means the entry price has to be lower than the exit price. However, in a short sale, the transactions are carried out in the exact opposite direction i.e., to sell first and buy later. For instance, you first sell a security for 100 and then buy it for 80, pocketing 20 profit (pre-tax and charges).Equity short sellers typically use one or more of the following approaches to identify targets they feel trade at higher prices than they should. Fundamental analysis: Analysing a company’s financials helps them determine if its stock may be a candidate for a decline in price. An impactful change in fundamentals warrants such a stance. Technical analysis: Patterns in a stock’s price movement help determine if the stock is on the cusp of a downtrend. Technical based shorting is practised every day by traders in the spot market or by using derivative instruments. Typically, technical short sellers use scenarios such as selling a pullback in a downtrend, entering within a trading range and waiting for a breakdown, or selling into an active decline. Thematic research: This approach involves betting against companies whose business models or technologies are outdated and thus face implosion. A popular example here is the large institutional short selling of the shares of GameStop, which backfired in 2021. Forensic short selling: Spotting cooked up Balance sheets or outright frauds comes under this category. Some of the world’s most astonishing frauds have come to light, thanks to such short sellers. Such frauds usually took place in companies involved in the hottest sectors of those times.Regulated short selling is legal practice. Securities market regulators in most countries, in particular, in all developed securities markets, recognise it. The International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) reviewed short selling and recommended transparency, rather than prohibiting it. Short selling can be effective under a few scenarios but the sword can cut both ways and be counterproductive too.Q.Which of the following provides additional support for the case in favor of short selling as outlined in the passage?a)Highlighting that short selling is a contentious practice opposing the buy and hold philosophy.b)Noting that short sellers employ various methods, including fundamental and technical analysis, thematic research, and forensic analysis, to pinpoint shorting opportunities.c)Confirming that short selling is legally acknowledged as a valid practice by securities market regulators in many nations.d)Emphasizing that while short selling can yield positive results in specific circumstances, it can also have adverse consequences.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The scathing report by Hindenburg Research on the Adani Group has put the spotlight on short selling, a practice nearly as old as the stock market. Regulators around the world, the courts, investing masses...everybody has once again started taking notice of short sellers aka the misfits in the investing world. Why? Because, in the conventional investing world, the buy and hold philosophy is heavily marketed as the cure for all investment maladies, and everybody expects asset prices to only rise. So, swimming against the tide by selling something first, contrary to buying first, brings its share of controversies. This could be why short sellers are seen as outcasts as they bet on asset prices going down! But for every Warren Buffett, or Rakesh Jhunjhunwala in the long only investment world, there would be a Jim Chanos or George Soros — like a true bear smacking its lips — as they seek out yet another security whose shares, they believe to be overvalued, whether by exuberance or fraud or simply based on technical. Here is a lowdown on short selling, how and why investors do it, the pros and cons, local and global perspective, and much more. Short selling, or shorting, is a tricky concept primarily because we are not used to shorting in our day-to-day transactions. Be it groceries, apparel, real estate, eating out, travel et c., we buy it first. The current price, subconsciously, is held out to be right. So, buying first is a highly intuitive transaction. To generate profit in investments, buying first means the entry price has to be lower than the exit price. However, in a short sale, the transactions are carried out in the exact opposite direction i.e., to sell first and buy later. For instance, you first sell a security for 100 and then buy it for 80, pocketing 20 profit (pre-tax and charges).Equity short sellers typically use one or more of the following approaches to identify targets they feel trade at higher prices than they should. Fundamental analysis: Analysing a company’s financials helps them determine if its stock may be a candidate for a decline in price. An impactful change in fundamentals warrants such a stance. Technical analysis: Patterns in a stock’s price movement help determine if the stock is on the cusp of a downtrend. Technical based shorting is practised every day by traders in the spot market or by using derivative instruments. Typically, technical short sellers use scenarios such as selling a pullback in a downtrend, entering within a trading range and waiting for a breakdown, or selling into an active decline. Thematic research: This approach involves betting against companies whose business models or technologies are outdated and thus face implosion. A popular example here is the large institutional short selling of the shares of GameStop, which backfired in 2021. Forensic short selling: Spotting cooked up Balance sheets or outright frauds comes under this category. Some of the world’s most astonishing frauds have come to light, thanks to such short sellers. Such frauds usually took place in companies involved in the hottest sectors of those times.Regulated short selling is legal practice. Securities market regulators in most countries, in particular, in all developed securities markets, recognise it. The International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) reviewed short selling and recommended transparency, rather than prohibiting it. Short selling can be effective under a few scenarios but the sword can cut both ways and be counterproductive too.Q.Which of the following provides additional support for the case in favor of short selling as outlined in the passage?a)Highlighting that short selling is a contentious practice opposing the buy and hold philosophy.b)Noting that short sellers employ various methods, including fundamental and technical analysis, thematic research, and forensic analysis, to pinpoint shorting opportunities.c)Confirming that short selling is legally acknowledged as a valid practice by securities market regulators in many nations.d)Emphasizing that while short selling can yield positive results in specific circumstances, it can also have adverse consequences.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The scathing report by Hindenburg Research on the Adani Group has put the spotlight on short selling, a practice nearly as old as the stock market. Regulators around the world, the courts, investing masses...everybody has once again started taking notice of short sellers aka the misfits in the investing world. Why? Because, in the conventional investing world, the buy and hold philosophy is heavily marketed as the cure for all investment maladies, and everybody expects asset prices to only rise. So, swimming against the tide by selling something first, contrary to buying first, brings its share of controversies. This could be why short sellers are seen as outcasts as they bet on asset prices going down! But for every Warren Buffett, or Rakesh Jhunjhunwala in the long only investment world, there would be a Jim Chanos or George Soros — like a true bear smacking its lips — as they seek out yet another security whose shares, they believe to be overvalued, whether by exuberance or fraud or simply based on technical. Here is a lowdown on short selling, how and why investors do it, the pros and cons, local and global perspective, and much more. Short selling, or shorting, is a tricky concept primarily because we are not used to shorting in our day-to-day transactions. Be it groceries, apparel, real estate, eating out, travel et c., we buy it first. The current price, subconsciously, is held out to be right. So, buying first is a highly intuitive transaction. To generate profit in investments, buying first means the entry price has to be lower than the exit price. However, in a short sale, the transactions are carried out in the exact opposite direction i.e., to sell first and buy later. For instance, you first sell a security for 100 and then buy it for 80, pocketing 20 profit (pre-tax and charges).Equity short sellers typically use one or more of the following approaches to identify targets they feel trade at higher prices than they should. Fundamental analysis: Analysing a company’s financials helps them determine if its stock may be a candidate for a decline in price. An impactful change in fundamentals warrants such a stance. Technical analysis: Patterns in a stock’s price movement help determine if the stock is on the cusp of a downtrend. Technical based shorting is practised every day by traders in the spot market or by using derivative instruments. Typically, technical short sellers use scenarios such as selling a pullback in a downtrend, entering within a trading range and waiting for a breakdown, or selling into an active decline. Thematic research: This approach involves betting against companies whose business models or technologies are outdated and thus face implosion. A popular example here is the large institutional short selling of the shares of GameStop, which backfired in 2021. Forensic short selling: Spotting cooked up Balance sheets or outright frauds comes under this category. Some of the world’s most astonishing frauds have come to light, thanks to such short sellers. Such frauds usually took place in companies involved in the hottest sectors of those times.Regulated short selling is legal practice. Securities market regulators in most countries, in particular, in all developed securities markets, recognise it. The International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) reviewed short selling and recommended transparency, rather than prohibiting it. Short selling can be effective under a few scenarios but the sword can cut both ways and be counterproductive too.Q.Which of the following provides additional support for the case in favor of short selling as outlined in the passage?a)Highlighting that short selling is a contentious practice opposing the buy and hold philosophy.b)Noting that short sellers employ various methods, including fundamental and technical analysis, thematic research, and forensic analysis, to pinpoint shorting opportunities.c)Confirming that short selling is legally acknowledged as a valid practice by securities market regulators in many nations.d)Emphasizing that while short selling can yield positive results in specific circumstances, it can also have adverse consequences.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The scathing report by Hindenburg Research on the Adani Group has put the spotlight on short selling, a practice nearly as old as the stock market. Regulators around the world, the courts, investing masses...everybody has once again started taking notice of short sellers aka the misfits in the investing world. Why? Because, in the conventional investing world, the buy and hold philosophy is heavily marketed as the cure for all investment maladies, and everybody expects asset prices to only rise. So, swimming against the tide by selling something first, contrary to buying first, brings its share of controversies. This could be why short sellers are seen as outcasts as they bet on asset prices going down! But for every Warren Buffett, or Rakesh Jhunjhunwala in the long only investment world, there would be a Jim Chanos or George Soros — like a true bear smacking its lips — as they seek out yet another security whose shares, they believe to be overvalued, whether by exuberance or fraud or simply based on technical. Here is a lowdown on short selling, how and why investors do it, the pros and cons, local and global perspective, and much more. Short selling, or shorting, is a tricky concept primarily because we are not used to shorting in our day-to-day transactions. Be it groceries, apparel, real estate, eating out, travel et c., we buy it first. The current price, subconsciously, is held out to be right. So, buying first is a highly intuitive transaction. To generate profit in investments, buying first means the entry price has to be lower than the exit price. However, in a short sale, the transactions are carried out in the exact opposite direction i.e., to sell first and buy later. For instance, you first sell a security for 100 and then buy it for 80, pocketing 20 profit (pre-tax and charges).Equity short sellers typically use one or more of the following approaches to identify targets they feel trade at higher prices than they should. Fundamental analysis: Analysing a company’s financials helps them determine if its stock may be a candidate for a decline in price. An impactful change in fundamentals warrants such a stance. Technical analysis: Patterns in a stock’s price movement help determine if the stock is on the cusp of a downtrend. Technical based shorting is practised every day by traders in the spot market or by using derivative instruments. Typically, technical short sellers use scenarios such as selling a pullback in a downtrend, entering within a trading range and waiting for a breakdown, or selling into an active decline. Thematic research: This approach involves betting against companies whose business models or technologies are outdated and thus face implosion. A popular example here is the large institutional short selling of the shares of GameStop, which backfired in 2021. Forensic short selling: Spotting cooked up Balance sheets or outright frauds comes under this category. Some of the world’s most astonishing frauds have come to light, thanks to such short sellers. Such frauds usually took place in companies involved in the hottest sectors of those times.Regulated short selling is legal practice. Securities market regulators in most countries, in particular, in all developed securities markets, recognise it. The International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) reviewed short selling and recommended transparency, rather than prohibiting it. Short selling can be effective under a few scenarios but the sword can cut both ways and be counterproductive too.Q.Which of the following provides additional support for the case in favor of short selling as outlined in the passage?a)Highlighting that short selling is a contentious practice opposing the buy and hold philosophy.b)Noting that short sellers employ various methods, including fundamental and technical analysis, thematic research, and forensic analysis, to pinpoint shorting opportunities.c)Confirming that short selling is legally acknowledged as a valid practice by securities market regulators in many nations.d)Emphasizing that while short selling can yield positive results in specific circumstances, it can also have adverse consequences.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The scathing report by Hindenburg Research on the Adani Group has put the spotlight on short selling, a practice nearly as old as the stock market. Regulators around the world, the courts, investing masses...everybody has once again started taking notice of short sellers aka the misfits in the investing world. Why? Because, in the conventional investing world, the buy and hold philosophy is heavily marketed as the cure for all investment maladies, and everybody expects asset prices to only rise. So, swimming against the tide by selling something first, contrary to buying first, brings its share of controversies. This could be why short sellers are seen as outcasts as they bet on asset prices going down! But for every Warren Buffett, or Rakesh Jhunjhunwala in the long only investment world, there would be a Jim Chanos or George Soros — like a true bear smacking its lips — as they seek out yet another security whose shares, they believe to be overvalued, whether by exuberance or fraud or simply based on technical. Here is a lowdown on short selling, how and why investors do it, the pros and cons, local and global perspective, and much more. Short selling, or shorting, is a tricky concept primarily because we are not used to shorting in our day-to-day transactions. Be it groceries, apparel, real estate, eating out, travel et c., we buy it first. The current price, subconsciously, is held out to be right. So, buying first is a highly intuitive transaction. To generate profit in investments, buying first means the entry price has to be lower than the exit price. However, in a short sale, the transactions are carried out in the exact opposite direction i.e., to sell first and buy later. For instance, you first sell a security for 100 and then buy it for 80, pocketing 20 profit (pre-tax and charges).Equity short sellers typically use one or more of the following approaches to identify targets they feel trade at higher prices than they should. Fundamental analysis: Analysing a company’s financials helps them determine if its stock may be a candidate for a decline in price. An impactful change in fundamentals warrants such a stance. Technical analysis: Patterns in a stock’s price movement help determine if the stock is on the cusp of a downtrend. Technical based shorting is practised every day by traders in the spot market or by using derivative instruments. Typically, technical short sellers use scenarios such as selling a pullback in a downtrend, entering within a trading range and waiting for a breakdown, or selling into an active decline. Thematic research: This approach involves betting against companies whose business models or technologies are outdated and thus face implosion. A popular example here is the large institutional short selling of the shares of GameStop, which backfired in 2021. Forensic short selling: Spotting cooked up Balance sheets or outright frauds comes under this category. Some of the world’s most astonishing frauds have come to light, thanks to such short sellers. Such frauds usually took place in companies involved in the hottest sectors of those times.Regulated short selling is legal practice. Securities market regulators in most countries, in particular, in all developed securities markets, recognise it. The International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) reviewed short selling and recommended transparency, rather than prohibiting it. Short selling can be effective under a few scenarios but the sword can cut both ways and be counterproductive too.Q.Which of the following provides additional support for the case in favor of short selling as outlined in the passage?a)Highlighting that short selling is a contentious practice opposing the buy and hold philosophy.b)Noting that short sellers employ various methods, including fundamental and technical analysis, thematic research, and forensic analysis, to pinpoint shorting opportunities.c)Confirming that short selling is legally acknowledged as a valid practice by securities market regulators in many nations.d)Emphasizing that while short selling can yield positive results in specific circumstances, it can also have adverse consequences.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The scathing report by Hindenburg Research on the Adani Group has put the spotlight on short selling, a practice nearly as old as the stock market. Regulators around the world, the courts, investing masses...everybody has once again started taking notice of short sellers aka the misfits in the investing world. Why? Because, in the conventional investing world, the buy and hold philosophy is heavily marketed as the cure for all investment maladies, and everybody expects asset prices to only rise. So, swimming against the tide by selling something first, contrary to buying first, brings its share of controversies. This could be why short sellers are seen as outcasts as they bet on asset prices going down! But for every Warren Buffett, or Rakesh Jhunjhunwala in the long only investment world, there would be a Jim Chanos or George Soros — like a true bear smacking its lips — as they seek out yet another security whose shares, they believe to be overvalued, whether by exuberance or fraud or simply based on technical. Here is a lowdown on short selling, how and why investors do it, the pros and cons, local and global perspective, and much more. Short selling, or shorting, is a tricky concept primarily because we are not used to shorting in our day-to-day transactions. Be it groceries, apparel, real estate, eating out, travel et c., we buy it first. The current price, subconsciously, is held out to be right. So, buying first is a highly intuitive transaction. To generate profit in investments, buying first means the entry price has to be lower than the exit price. However, in a short sale, the transactions are carried out in the exact opposite direction i.e., to sell first and buy later. For instance, you first sell a security for 100 and then buy it for 80, pocketing 20 profit (pre-tax and charges).Equity short sellers typically use one or more of the following approaches to identify targets they feel trade at higher prices than they should. Fundamental analysis: Analysing a company’s financials helps them determine if its stock may be a candidate for a decline in price. An impactful change in fundamentals warrants such a stance. Technical analysis: Patterns in a stock’s price movement help determine if the stock is on the cusp of a downtrend. Technical based shorting is practised every day by traders in the spot market or by using derivative instruments. Typically, technical short sellers use scenarios such as selling a pullback in a downtrend, entering within a trading range and waiting for a breakdown, or selling into an active decline. Thematic research: This approach involves betting against companies whose business models or technologies are outdated and thus face implosion. A popular example here is the large institutional short selling of the shares of GameStop, which backfired in 2021. Forensic short selling: Spotting cooked up Balance sheets or outright frauds comes under this category. Some of the world’s most astonishing frauds have come to light, thanks to such short sellers. Such frauds usually took place in companies involved in the hottest sectors of those times.Regulated short selling is legal practice. Securities market regulators in most countries, in particular, in all developed securities markets, recognise it. The International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) reviewed short selling and recommended transparency, rather than prohibiting it. Short selling can be effective under a few scenarios but the sword can cut both ways and be counterproductive too.Q.Which of the following provides additional support for the case in favor of short selling as outlined in the passage?a)Highlighting that short selling is a contentious practice opposing the buy and hold philosophy.b)Noting that short sellers employ various methods, including fundamental and technical analysis, thematic research, and forensic analysis, to pinpoint shorting opportunities.c)Confirming that short selling is legally acknowledged as a valid practice by securities market regulators in many nations.d)Emphasizing that while short selling can yield positive results in specific circumstances, it can also have adverse consequences.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The scathing report by Hindenburg Research on the Adani Group has put the spotlight on short selling, a practice nearly as old as the stock market. Regulators around the world, the courts, investing masses...everybody has once again started taking notice of short sellers aka the misfits in the investing world. Why? Because, in the conventional investing world, the buy and hold philosophy is heavily marketed as the cure for all investment maladies, and everybody expects asset prices to only rise. So, swimming against the tide by selling something first, contrary to buying first, brings its share of controversies. This could be why short sellers are seen as outcasts as they bet on asset prices going down! But for every Warren Buffett, or Rakesh Jhunjhunwala in the long only investment world, there would be a Jim Chanos or George Soros — like a true bear smacking its lips — as they seek out yet another security whose shares, they believe to be overvalued, whether by exuberance or fraud or simply based on technical. Here is a lowdown on short selling, how and why investors do it, the pros and cons, local and global perspective, and much more. Short selling, or shorting, is a tricky concept primarily because we are not used to shorting in our day-to-day transactions. Be it groceries, apparel, real estate, eating out, travel et c., we buy it first. The current price, subconsciously, is held out to be right. So, buying first is a highly intuitive transaction. To generate profit in investments, buying first means the entry price has to be lower than the exit price. However, in a short sale, the transactions are carried out in the exact opposite direction i.e., to sell first and buy later. For instance, you first sell a security for 100 and then buy it for 80, pocketing 20 profit (pre-tax and charges).Equity short sellers typically use one or more of the following approaches to identify targets they feel trade at higher prices than they should. Fundamental analysis: Analysing a company’s financials helps them determine if its stock may be a candidate for a decline in price. An impactful change in fundamentals warrants such a stance. Technical analysis: Patterns in a stock’s price movement help determine if the stock is on the cusp of a downtrend. Technical based shorting is practised every day by traders in the spot market or by using derivative instruments. Typically, technical short sellers use scenarios such as selling a pullback in a downtrend, entering within a trading range and waiting for a breakdown, or selling into an active decline. Thematic research: This approach involves betting against companies whose business models or technologies are outdated and thus face implosion. A popular example here is the large institutional short selling of the shares of GameStop, which backfired in 2021. Forensic short selling: Spotting cooked up Balance sheets or outright frauds comes under this category. Some of the world’s most astonishing frauds have come to light, thanks to such short sellers. Such frauds usually took place in companies involved in the hottest sectors of those times.Regulated short selling is legal practice. Securities market regulators in most countries, in particular, in all developed securities markets, recognise it. The International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) reviewed short selling and recommended transparency, rather than prohibiting it. Short selling can be effective under a few scenarios but the sword can cut both ways and be counterproductive too.Q.Which of the following provides additional support for the case in favor of short selling as outlined in the passage?a)Highlighting that short selling is a contentious practice opposing the buy and hold philosophy.b)Noting that short sellers employ various methods, including fundamental and technical analysis, thematic research, and forensic analysis, to pinpoint shorting opportunities.c)Confirming that short selling is legally acknowledged as a valid practice by securities market regulators in many nations.d)Emphasizing that while short selling can yield positive results in specific circumstances, it can also have adverse consequences.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The scathing report by Hindenburg Research on the Adani Group has put the spotlight on short selling, a practice nearly as old as the stock market. Regulators around the world, the courts, investing masses...everybody has once again started taking notice of short sellers aka the misfits in the investing world. Why? Because, in the conventional investing world, the buy and hold philosophy is heavily marketed as the cure for all investment maladies, and everybody expects asset prices to only rise. So, swimming against the tide by selling something first, contrary to buying first, brings its share of controversies. This could be why short sellers are seen as outcasts as they bet on asset prices going down! But for every Warren Buffett, or Rakesh Jhunjhunwala in the long only investment world, there would be a Jim Chanos or George Soros — like a true bear smacking its lips — as they seek out yet another security whose shares, they believe to be overvalued, whether by exuberance or fraud or simply based on technical. Here is a lowdown on short selling, how and why investors do it, the pros and cons, local and global perspective, and much more. Short selling, or shorting, is a tricky concept primarily because we are not used to shorting in our day-to-day transactions. Be it groceries, apparel, real estate, eating out, travel et c., we buy it first. The current price, subconsciously, is held out to be right. So, buying first is a highly intuitive transaction. To generate profit in investments, buying first means the entry price has to be lower than the exit price. However, in a short sale, the transactions are carried out in the exact opposite direction i.e., to sell first and buy later. For instance, you first sell a security for 100 and then buy it for 80, pocketing 20 profit (pre-tax and charges).Equity short sellers typically use one or more of the following approaches to identify targets they feel trade at higher prices than they should. Fundamental analysis: Analysing a company’s financials helps them determine if its stock may be a candidate for a decline in price. An impactful change in fundamentals warrants such a stance. Technical analysis: Patterns in a stock’s price movement help determine if the stock is on the cusp of a downtrend. Technical based shorting is practised every day by traders in the spot market or by using derivative instruments. Typically, technical short sellers use scenarios such as selling a pullback in a downtrend, entering within a trading range and waiting for a breakdown, or selling into an active decline. Thematic research: This approach involves betting against companies whose business models or technologies are outdated and thus face implosion. A popular example here is the large institutional short selling of the shares of GameStop, which backfired in 2021. Forensic short selling: Spotting cooked up Balance sheets or outright frauds comes under this category. Some of the world’s most astonishing frauds have come to light, thanks to such short sellers. Such frauds usually took place in companies involved in the hottest sectors of those times.Regulated short selling is legal practice. Securities market regulators in most countries, in particular, in all developed securities markets, recognise it. The International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) reviewed short selling and recommended transparency, rather than prohibiting it. Short selling can be effective under a few scenarios but the sword can cut both ways and be counterproductive too.Q.Which of the following provides additional support for the case in favor of short selling as outlined in the passage?a)Highlighting that short selling is a contentious practice opposing the buy and hold philosophy.b)Noting that short sellers employ various methods, including fundamental and technical analysis, thematic research, and forensic analysis, to pinpoint shorting opportunities.c)Confirming that short selling is legally acknowledged as a valid practice by securities market regulators in many nations.d)Emphasizing that while short selling can yield positive results in specific circumstances, it can also have adverse consequences.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The scathing report by Hindenburg Research on the Adani Group has put the spotlight on short selling, a practice nearly as old as the stock market. Regulators around the world, the courts, investing masses...everybody has once again started taking notice of short sellers aka the misfits in the investing world. Why? Because, in the conventional investing world, the buy and hold philosophy is heavily marketed as the cure for all investment maladies, and everybody expects asset prices to only rise. So, swimming against the tide by selling something first, contrary to buying first, brings its share of controversies. This could be why short sellers are seen as outcasts as they bet on asset prices going down! But for every Warren Buffett, or Rakesh Jhunjhunwala in the long only investment world, there would be a Jim Chanos or George Soros — like a true bear smacking its lips — as they seek out yet another security whose shares, they believe to be overvalued, whether by exuberance or fraud or simply based on technical. Here is a lowdown on short selling, how and why investors do it, the pros and cons, local and global perspective, and much more. Short selling, or shorting, is a tricky concept primarily because we are not used to shorting in our day-to-day transactions. Be it groceries, apparel, real estate, eating out, travel et c., we buy it first. The current price, subconsciously, is held out to be right. So, buying first is a highly intuitive transaction. To generate profit in investments, buying first means the entry price has to be lower than the exit price. However, in a short sale, the transactions are carried out in the exact opposite direction i.e., to sell first and buy later. For instance, you first sell a security for 100 and then buy it for 80, pocketing 20 profit (pre-tax and charges).Equity short sellers typically use one or more of the following approaches to identify targets they feel trade at higher prices than they should. Fundamental analysis: Analysing a company’s financials helps them determine if its stock may be a candidate for a decline in price. An impactful change in fundamentals warrants such a stance. Technical analysis: Patterns in a stock’s price movement help determine if the stock is on the cusp of a downtrend. Technical based shorting is practised every day by traders in the spot market or by using derivative instruments. Typically, technical short sellers use scenarios such as selling a pullback in a downtrend, entering within a trading range and waiting for a breakdown, or selling into an active decline. Thematic research: This approach involves betting against companies whose business models or technologies are outdated and thus face implosion. A popular example here is the large institutional short selling of the shares of GameStop, which backfired in 2021. Forensic short selling: Spotting cooked up Balance sheets or outright frauds comes under this category. Some of the world’s most astonishing frauds have come to light, thanks to such short sellers. Such frauds usually took place in companies involved in the hottest sectors of those times.Regulated short selling is legal practice. Securities market regulators in most countries, in particular, in all developed securities markets, recognise it. The International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) reviewed short selling and recommended transparency, rather than prohibiting it. Short selling can be effective under a few scenarios but the sword can cut both ways and be counterproductive too.Q.Which of the following provides additional support for the case in favor of short selling as outlined in the passage?a)Highlighting that short selling is a contentious practice opposing the buy and hold philosophy.b)Noting that short sellers employ various methods, including fundamental and technical analysis, thematic research, and forensic analysis, to pinpoint shorting opportunities.c)Confirming that short selling is legally acknowledged as a valid practice by securities market regulators in many nations.d)Emphasizing that while short selling can yield positive results in specific circumstances, it can also have adverse consequences.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The scathing report by Hindenburg Research on the Adani Group has put the spotlight on short selling, a practice nearly as old as the stock market. Regulators around the world, the courts, investing masses...everybody has once again started taking notice of short sellers aka the misfits in the investing world. Why? Because, in the conventional investing world, the buy and hold philosophy is heavily marketed as the cure for all investment maladies, and everybody expects asset prices to only rise. So, swimming against the tide by selling something first, contrary to buying first, brings its share of controversies. This could be why short sellers are seen as outcasts as they bet on asset prices going down! But for every Warren Buffett, or Rakesh Jhunjhunwala in the long only investment world, there would be a Jim Chanos or George Soros — like a true bear smacking its lips — as they seek out yet another security whose shares, they believe to be overvalued, whether by exuberance or fraud or simply based on technical. Here is a lowdown on short selling, how and why investors do it, the pros and cons, local and global perspective, and much more. Short selling, or shorting, is a tricky concept primarily because we are not used to shorting in our day-to-day transactions. Be it groceries, apparel, real estate, eating out, travel et c., we buy it first. The current price, subconsciously, is held out to be right. So, buying first is a highly intuitive transaction. To generate profit in investments, buying first means the entry price has to be lower than the exit price. However, in a short sale, the transactions are carried out in the exact opposite direction i.e., to sell first and buy later. For instance, you first sell a security for 100 and then buy it for 80, pocketing 20 profit (pre-tax and charges).Equity short sellers typically use one or more of the following approaches to identify targets they feel trade at higher prices than they should. Fundamental analysis: Analysing a company’s financials helps them determine if its stock may be a candidate for a decline in price. An impactful change in fundamentals warrants such a stance. Technical analysis: Patterns in a stock’s price movement help determine if the stock is on the cusp of a downtrend. Technical based shorting is practised every day by traders in the spot market or by using derivative instruments. Typically, technical short sellers use scenarios such as selling a pullback in a downtrend, entering within a trading range and waiting for a breakdown, or selling into an active decline. Thematic research: This approach involves betting against companies whose business models or technologies are outdated and thus face implosion. A popular example here is the large institutional short selling of the shares of GameStop, which backfired in 2021. Forensic short selling: Spotting cooked up Balance sheets or outright frauds comes under this category. Some of the world’s most astonishing frauds have come to light, thanks to such short sellers. Such frauds usually took place in companies involved in the hottest sectors of those times.Regulated short selling is legal practice. Securities market regulators in most countries, in particular, in all developed securities markets, recognise it. The International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) reviewed short selling and recommended transparency, rather than prohibiting it. Short selling can be effective under a few scenarios but the sword can cut both ways and be counterproductive too.Q.Which of the following provides additional support for the case in favor of short selling as outlined in the passage?a)Highlighting that short selling is a contentious practice opposing the buy and hold philosophy.b)Noting that short sellers employ various methods, including fundamental and technical analysis, thematic research, and forensic analysis, to pinpoint shorting opportunities.c)Confirming that short selling is legally acknowledged as a valid practice by securities market regulators in many nations.d)Emphasizing that while short selling can yield positive results in specific circumstances, it can also have adverse consequences.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev