CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Directions: Read the following passage and an... Start Learning for Free
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.
In recent times, there has been a great euphoria about investing in cryptocurrencies. For any instrument to classify as a currency, it must have the following features: One, it is a promissory note wherein the issuer is promising the bearer or the holder a value. Two, it is backed by a sovereign nation and, therefore, there is never a question of any default in executing the promise. Three, the printing of currency in either physical or digital form is always based on some tangible asset, like gold or a basket of goods. From the above, it's clear that cryptocurrency can never be a currency. Can crypto then be considered an asset? An asset is something that has a tangible value. Even if its immediate utility is intangible, an asset should have some tangible benefits. The cryptocurrencies being promoted currently — bitcoin, litecoin, ethereum — are nothing but gaming points. Whenever a discussion on cryptos takes place, promoters talk of blockchain technology. This technology is just a technique to account for transactions.
Many frauds like multi-marketing schemes, chit funds or deposit frauds were disguised as timeshare schemes, gold and land investments, and promised hefty returns. These pyramid schemes were carried out over a long period to evade the law. Nevertheless, fraud could still be established, the trail of funds could be traced and the perpetrators identified. Crypto promoters have taken fraud to another level with little scope of their getting caught.
The recent aggressive promotion of cryptocurrencies on print and visual media would perhaps prove to be the undoing of their promoters. It is only a matter of time before financial fraud prevention enforcement agencies like the CBI and ED catch up with them. But millions may lose their hard-earned money by then.
[Extracted with edits and revisions, from Opinion, The Indian Express]
Q. What function does the statement 'An asset is something that has a tangible value' serve within the passage?
  • a)
    It contradicts the author's assertion that intangible assets can also possess utility.
  • b)
    It reinforces the author's assertion that currencies can exist in either physical or digital forms.
  • c)
    It constitutes a foundational point for the author's conclusion that cryptocurrencies are not assets. (Correct Answer)
  • d)
    It reinforces the author's argument that cryptocurrency can never qualify as a currency.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.In rece...
The author's ultimate assertion is that cryptocurrencies do not fall into the category of either currency or investment/asset. This conclusion is drawn from the underlying premise that assets inherently possess tangible value, and the author goes on to describe cryptocurrencies as mere gaming points. 
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.In rece...
Understanding the Function of the Statement
The statement "An asset is something that has a tangible value" plays a crucial role in supporting the author's argument regarding cryptocurrencies. Here's a breakdown of its function within the passage:
Foundation for the Argument
- The author argues that cryptocurrencies do not meet the criteria for being classified as a currency.
- By defining an asset as something with tangible value, the author establishes a clear distinction between currencies and cryptocurrencies.
Supporting the Conclusion
- The assertion serves as a foundational point leading to the conclusion that cryptocurrencies cannot be categorized as assets.
- The author suggests that while cryptocurrencies may have perceived value, they lack the tangible backing that traditional assets possess.
Contrast with Traditional Definitions
- The definition highlights the contrast between traditional assets (like gold or property) and cryptocurrencies, which are often seen as intangible.
- This contrast reinforces the author's point that cryptocurrencies are closer to "gaming points," lacking any real-world value.
Implications for Investors
- By emphasizing the tangible value requirement, the author warns readers that investing in cryptocurrencies may not be prudent.
- The statement ultimately underlines the potential risks involved in investing in something that does not hold tangible value, thus supporting the author's cautionary stance.
In summary, the statement about assets is pivotal to the author's argument, providing a clear definition that leads to the conclusion that cryptocurrencies do not qualify as genuine assets.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.In recent times, there has been a great euphoria about investing in cryptocurrencies. For any instrument to classify as a currency, it must have the following features: One, it is a promissory note wherein the issuer is promising the bearer or the holder a value. Two, it is backed by a sovereign nation and, therefore, there is never a question of any default in executing the promise. Three, the printing of currency in either physical or digital form is always based on some tangible asset, like gold or a basket of goods. From the above, its clear that cryptocurrency can never be a currency. Can crypto then be considered an asset? An asset is something that has a tangible value. Even if its immediate utility is intangible, an asset should have some tangible benefits. The cryptocurrencies being promoted currently — bitcoin, litecoin, ethereum — are nothing but gaming points. Whenever a discussion on cryptos takes place, promoters talk of blockchain technology. This technology is just a technique to account for transactions.Many frauds like multi-marketing schemes, chit funds or deposit frauds were disguised as timeshare schemes, gold and land investments, and promised hefty returns. These pyramid schemes were carried out over a long period to evade the law. Nevertheless, fraud could still be established, the trail of funds could be traced and the perpetrators identified. Crypto promoters have taken fraud to another level with little scope of their getting caught.The recent aggressive promotion of cryptocurrencies on print and visual media would perhaps prove to be the undoing of their promoters. It is only a matter of time before financial fraud prevention enforcement agencies like the CBI and ED catch up with them. But millions may lose their hard-earned money by then.[Extracted with edits and revisions, from Opinion, The Indian Express]Q.Which statement undermines the authors notion that "this technology is simply a method for tracking transactions"?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.In recent times, there has been a great euphoria about investing in cryptocurrencies. For any instrument to classify as a currency, it must have the following features: One, it is a promissory note wherein the issuer is promising the bearer or the holder a value. Two, it is backed by a sovereign nation and, therefore, there is never a question of any default in executing the promise. Three, the printing of currency in either physical or digital form is always based on some tangible asset, like gold or a basket of goods. From the above, its clear that cryptocurrency can never be a currency. Can crypto then be considered an asset? An asset is something that has a tangible value. Even if its immediate utility is intangible, an asset should have some tangible benefits. The cryptocurrencies being promoted currently — bitcoin, litecoin, ethereum — are nothing but gaming points. Whenever a discussion on cryptos takes place, promoters talk of blockchain technology. This technology is just a technique to account for transactions.Many frauds like multi-marketing schemes, chit funds or deposit frauds were disguised as timeshare schemes, gold and land investments, and promised hefty returns. These pyramid schemes were carried out over a long period to evade the law. Nevertheless, fraud could still be established, the trail of funds could be traced and the perpetrators identified. Crypto promoters have taken fraud to another level with little scope of their getting caught.The recent aggressive promotion of cryptocurrencies on print and visual media would perhaps prove to be the undoing of their promoters. It is only a matter of time before financial fraud prevention enforcement agencies like the CBI and ED catch up with them. But millions may lose their hard-earned money by then.[Extracted with edits and revisions, from Opinion, The Indian Express]Q.What is the primary focus of the passage?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.In recent times, there has been a great euphoria about investing in cryptocurrencies. For any instrument to classify as a currency, it must have the following features: One, it is a promissory note wherein the issuer is promising the bearer or the holder a value. Two, it is backed by a sovereign nation and, therefore, there is never a question of any default in executing the promise. Three, the printing of currency in either physical or digital form is always based on some tangible asset, like gold or a basket of goods. From the above, its clear that cryptocurrency can never be a currency. Can crypto then be considered an asset? An asset is something that has a tangible value. Even if its immediate utility is intangible, an asset should have some tangible benefits. The cryptocurrencies being promoted currently — bitcoin, litecoin, ethereum — are nothing but gaming points. Whenever a discussion on cryptos takes place, promoters talk of blockchain technology. This technology is just a technique to account for transactions.Many frauds like multi-marketing schemes, chit funds or deposit frauds were disguised as timeshare schemes, gold and land investments, and promised hefty returns. These pyramid schemes were carried out over a long period to evade the law. Nevertheless, fraud could still be established, the trail of funds could be traced and the perpetrators identified. Crypto promoters have taken fraud to another level with little scope of their getting caught.The recent aggressive promotion of cryptocurrencies on print and visual media would perhaps prove to be the undoing of their promoters. It is only a matter of time before financial fraud prevention enforcement agencies like the CBI and ED catch up with them. But millions may lose their hard-earned money by then.[Extracted with edits and revisions, from Opinion, The Indian Express]Q.While highlighting that crypto promoters have elevated fraud to a higher level with minimal risk of being apprehended, the author contends that

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.In recent times, there has been a great euphoria about investing in cryptocurrencies. For any instrument to classify as a currency, it must have the following features: One, it is a promissory note wherein the issuer is promising the bearer or the holder a value. Two, it is backed by a sovereign nation and, therefore, there is never a question of any default in executing the promise. Three, the printing of currency in either physical or digital form is always based on some tangible asset, like gold or a basket of goods. From the above, its clear that cryptocurrency can never be a currency. Can crypto then be considered an asset? An asset is something that has a tangible value. Even if its immediate utility is intangible, an asset should have some tangible benefits. The cryptocurrencies being promoted currently — bitcoin, litecoin, ethereum — are nothing but gaming points. Whenever a discussion on cryptos takes place, promoters talk of blockchain technology. This technology is just a technique to account for transactions.Many frauds like multi-marketing schemes, chit funds or deposit frauds were disguised as timeshare schemes, gold and land investments, and promised hefty returns. These pyramid schemes were carried out over a long period to evade the law. Nevertheless, fraud could still be established, the trail of funds could be traced and the perpetrators identified. Crypto promoters have taken fraud to another level with little scope of their getting caught.The recent aggressive promotion of cryptocurrencies on print and visual media would perhaps prove to be the undoing of their promoters. It is only a matter of time before financial fraud prevention enforcement agencies like the CBI and ED catch up with them. But millions may lose their hard-earned money by then.[Extracted with edits and revisions, from Opinion, The Indian Express]Q.What can be deduced from the passage?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Cryptocurrencies are a terrible thing. They are the essence of a Ponzi scheme whose value is based entirely on a greater fool prepared to buy it. The promise of alchemy-turning lead into gold has bewitched humanity throughout the ages and cryptocurrencies are just the latest alchemy. Do not get me wrong, if rich people want to lose their money, in this or any other way, they should be allowed to do so. The rich should be the vanguards of new things in case something unforeseen and good falls out of them. But we need to protect those vulnerable consumers whose lives are such that almost any get-rich-quick schemes will be seductive, and seven out of 10 times, they will lose their life savings. Cryptocurrencies are todays South Sea Bubble – one of the earliest recorded financial bubbles that took place in the 1720s Britain. Meme-based currencies like Dogecoin, Dogelon Mars and Doge Dash remind me of the infamous plan of one company during the South Sea Bubble to raise money for carrying on an undertaking of great advantage but nobody to know what it is.The cryptocurrency bubble is worse than tulip mania. Through the veil of technology, cryptocurrency enthusiasts are leaning on policy-makers to permit them to be exempt from regulation, privatize money, and make money so disconnected from the economy that it would reap financial disaster. There are many reasons to avoid financial disasters, but one of them is that they ratchet up poverty and inequality. The current money-credit system is not perfect, but like democracy, it is the worst system barring all the others. It has evolved from the ashes of the system cryptocurrency enthusiasts are trying to resurrect.The current system is vulnerable to attack because money is little understood. Cryptocurrency enthusiasts have attracted a following based on the fiction that the central bank or government creates money and are busy debasing it in their self-interest. This is not the case, but then again, there is some overlap between cryptocurrency advocates, conspiracy theorists, and anti-vaxxers. The time has come for someone to stand up for the current fiat money system and explain that while it could be better still, it has been associated with far more growth, much more distributed, and has responded better to economic crisis than what came before.In todays money-credit system, banks create money when they issue a loan and place the loans proceeds into the account of their customers, creating a deposit. Money is, in fact, a tradable debt. The banks deposit can be used as cash because the bank is a regulated issuer of loans and deposit-taker, which gives the deposit credibility and convertibility. The central bank only influences the creation of money indirectly by its regulatory requirement that a proportion of the loans need to be funded by shareholders profits. They need to have skin in the game. Money creation then is based on thousands of separate decisions by loan officers and is more distributed than a centralized algorithm like Bitcoin. And its supply is determined by the private demand for loans, which means it is closely aligned to the economy.Q.Which of the following is true in the context of the passage?

Top Courses for CLAT

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.In recent times, there has been a great euphoria about investing in cryptocurrencies. For any instrument to classify as a currency, it must have the following features: One, it is a promissory note wherein the issuer is promising the bearer or the holder a value. Two, it is backed by a sovereign nation and, therefore, there is never a question of any default in executing the promise. Three, the printing of currency in either physical or digital form is always based on some tangible asset, like gold or a basket of goods. From the above, its clear that cryptocurrency can never be a currency. Can crypto then be considered an asset? An asset is something that has a tangible value. Even if its immediate utility is intangible, an asset should have some tangible benefits. The cryptocurrencies being promoted currently — bitcoin, litecoin, ethereum — are nothing but gaming points. Whenever a discussion on cryptos takes place, promoters talk of blockchain technology. This technology is just a technique to account for transactions.Many frauds like multi-marketing schemes, chit funds or deposit frauds were disguised as timeshare schemes, gold and land investments, and promised hefty returns. These pyramid schemes were carried out over a long period to evade the law. Nevertheless, fraud could still be established, the trail of funds could be traced and the perpetrators identified. Crypto promoters have taken fraud to another level with little scope of their getting caught.The recent aggressive promotion of cryptocurrencies on print and visual media would perhaps prove to be the undoing of their promoters. It is only a matter of time before financial fraud prevention enforcement agencies like the CBI and ED catch up with them. But millions may lose their hard-earned money by then.[Extracted with edits and revisions, from Opinion, The Indian Express]Q.What function does the statement An asset is something that has a tangible value serve within the passage?a)It contradicts the authors assertion that intangible assets can also possess utility.b)It reinforces the authors assertion that currencies can exist in either physical or digital forms.c)It constitutes a foundational point for the authors conclusion that cryptocurrencies are not assets. (Correct Answer)d)It reinforces the authors argument that cryptocurrency can never qualify as a currency.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.In recent times, there has been a great euphoria about investing in cryptocurrencies. For any instrument to classify as a currency, it must have the following features: One, it is a promissory note wherein the issuer is promising the bearer or the holder a value. Two, it is backed by a sovereign nation and, therefore, there is never a question of any default in executing the promise. Three, the printing of currency in either physical or digital form is always based on some tangible asset, like gold or a basket of goods. From the above, its clear that cryptocurrency can never be a currency. Can crypto then be considered an asset? An asset is something that has a tangible value. Even if its immediate utility is intangible, an asset should have some tangible benefits. The cryptocurrencies being promoted currently — bitcoin, litecoin, ethereum — are nothing but gaming points. Whenever a discussion on cryptos takes place, promoters talk of blockchain technology. This technology is just a technique to account for transactions.Many frauds like multi-marketing schemes, chit funds or deposit frauds were disguised as timeshare schemes, gold and land investments, and promised hefty returns. These pyramid schemes were carried out over a long period to evade the law. Nevertheless, fraud could still be established, the trail of funds could be traced and the perpetrators identified. Crypto promoters have taken fraud to another level with little scope of their getting caught.The recent aggressive promotion of cryptocurrencies on print and visual media would perhaps prove to be the undoing of their promoters. It is only a matter of time before financial fraud prevention enforcement agencies like the CBI and ED catch up with them. But millions may lose their hard-earned money by then.[Extracted with edits and revisions, from Opinion, The Indian Express]Q.What function does the statement An asset is something that has a tangible value serve within the passage?a)It contradicts the authors assertion that intangible assets can also possess utility.b)It reinforces the authors assertion that currencies can exist in either physical or digital forms.c)It constitutes a foundational point for the authors conclusion that cryptocurrencies are not assets. (Correct Answer)d)It reinforces the authors argument that cryptocurrency can never qualify as a currency.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.In recent times, there has been a great euphoria about investing in cryptocurrencies. For any instrument to classify as a currency, it must have the following features: One, it is a promissory note wherein the issuer is promising the bearer or the holder a value. Two, it is backed by a sovereign nation and, therefore, there is never a question of any default in executing the promise. Three, the printing of currency in either physical or digital form is always based on some tangible asset, like gold or a basket of goods. From the above, its clear that cryptocurrency can never be a currency. Can crypto then be considered an asset? An asset is something that has a tangible value. Even if its immediate utility is intangible, an asset should have some tangible benefits. The cryptocurrencies being promoted currently — bitcoin, litecoin, ethereum — are nothing but gaming points. Whenever a discussion on cryptos takes place, promoters talk of blockchain technology. This technology is just a technique to account for transactions.Many frauds like multi-marketing schemes, chit funds or deposit frauds were disguised as timeshare schemes, gold and land investments, and promised hefty returns. These pyramid schemes were carried out over a long period to evade the law. Nevertheless, fraud could still be established, the trail of funds could be traced and the perpetrators identified. Crypto promoters have taken fraud to another level with little scope of their getting caught.The recent aggressive promotion of cryptocurrencies on print and visual media would perhaps prove to be the undoing of their promoters. It is only a matter of time before financial fraud prevention enforcement agencies like the CBI and ED catch up with them. But millions may lose their hard-earned money by then.[Extracted with edits and revisions, from Opinion, The Indian Express]Q.What function does the statement An asset is something that has a tangible value serve within the passage?a)It contradicts the authors assertion that intangible assets can also possess utility.b)It reinforces the authors assertion that currencies can exist in either physical or digital forms.c)It constitutes a foundational point for the authors conclusion that cryptocurrencies are not assets. (Correct Answer)d)It reinforces the authors argument that cryptocurrency can never qualify as a currency.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.In recent times, there has been a great euphoria about investing in cryptocurrencies. For any instrument to classify as a currency, it must have the following features: One, it is a promissory note wherein the issuer is promising the bearer or the holder a value. Two, it is backed by a sovereign nation and, therefore, there is never a question of any default in executing the promise. Three, the printing of currency in either physical or digital form is always based on some tangible asset, like gold or a basket of goods. From the above, its clear that cryptocurrency can never be a currency. Can crypto then be considered an asset? An asset is something that has a tangible value. Even if its immediate utility is intangible, an asset should have some tangible benefits. The cryptocurrencies being promoted currently — bitcoin, litecoin, ethereum — are nothing but gaming points. Whenever a discussion on cryptos takes place, promoters talk of blockchain technology. This technology is just a technique to account for transactions.Many frauds like multi-marketing schemes, chit funds or deposit frauds were disguised as timeshare schemes, gold and land investments, and promised hefty returns. These pyramid schemes were carried out over a long period to evade the law. Nevertheless, fraud could still be established, the trail of funds could be traced and the perpetrators identified. Crypto promoters have taken fraud to another level with little scope of their getting caught.The recent aggressive promotion of cryptocurrencies on print and visual media would perhaps prove to be the undoing of their promoters. It is only a matter of time before financial fraud prevention enforcement agencies like the CBI and ED catch up with them. But millions may lose their hard-earned money by then.[Extracted with edits and revisions, from Opinion, The Indian Express]Q.What function does the statement An asset is something that has a tangible value serve within the passage?a)It contradicts the authors assertion that intangible assets can also possess utility.b)It reinforces the authors assertion that currencies can exist in either physical or digital forms.c)It constitutes a foundational point for the authors conclusion that cryptocurrencies are not assets. (Correct Answer)d)It reinforces the authors argument that cryptocurrency can never qualify as a currency.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.In recent times, there has been a great euphoria about investing in cryptocurrencies. For any instrument to classify as a currency, it must have the following features: One, it is a promissory note wherein the issuer is promising the bearer or the holder a value. Two, it is backed by a sovereign nation and, therefore, there is never a question of any default in executing the promise. Three, the printing of currency in either physical or digital form is always based on some tangible asset, like gold or a basket of goods. From the above, its clear that cryptocurrency can never be a currency. Can crypto then be considered an asset? An asset is something that has a tangible value. Even if its immediate utility is intangible, an asset should have some tangible benefits. The cryptocurrencies being promoted currently — bitcoin, litecoin, ethereum — are nothing but gaming points. Whenever a discussion on cryptos takes place, promoters talk of blockchain technology. This technology is just a technique to account for transactions.Many frauds like multi-marketing schemes, chit funds or deposit frauds were disguised as timeshare schemes, gold and land investments, and promised hefty returns. These pyramid schemes were carried out over a long period to evade the law. Nevertheless, fraud could still be established, the trail of funds could be traced and the perpetrators identified. Crypto promoters have taken fraud to another level with little scope of their getting caught.The recent aggressive promotion of cryptocurrencies on print and visual media would perhaps prove to be the undoing of their promoters. It is only a matter of time before financial fraud prevention enforcement agencies like the CBI and ED catch up with them. But millions may lose their hard-earned money by then.[Extracted with edits and revisions, from Opinion, The Indian Express]Q.What function does the statement An asset is something that has a tangible value serve within the passage?a)It contradicts the authors assertion that intangible assets can also possess utility.b)It reinforces the authors assertion that currencies can exist in either physical or digital forms.c)It constitutes a foundational point for the authors conclusion that cryptocurrencies are not assets. (Correct Answer)d)It reinforces the authors argument that cryptocurrency can never qualify as a currency.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.In recent times, there has been a great euphoria about investing in cryptocurrencies. For any instrument to classify as a currency, it must have the following features: One, it is a promissory note wherein the issuer is promising the bearer or the holder a value. Two, it is backed by a sovereign nation and, therefore, there is never a question of any default in executing the promise. Three, the printing of currency in either physical or digital form is always based on some tangible asset, like gold or a basket of goods. From the above, its clear that cryptocurrency can never be a currency. Can crypto then be considered an asset? An asset is something that has a tangible value. Even if its immediate utility is intangible, an asset should have some tangible benefits. The cryptocurrencies being promoted currently — bitcoin, litecoin, ethereum — are nothing but gaming points. Whenever a discussion on cryptos takes place, promoters talk of blockchain technology. This technology is just a technique to account for transactions.Many frauds like multi-marketing schemes, chit funds or deposit frauds were disguised as timeshare schemes, gold and land investments, and promised hefty returns. These pyramid schemes were carried out over a long period to evade the law. Nevertheless, fraud could still be established, the trail of funds could be traced and the perpetrators identified. Crypto promoters have taken fraud to another level with little scope of their getting caught.The recent aggressive promotion of cryptocurrencies on print and visual media would perhaps prove to be the undoing of their promoters. It is only a matter of time before financial fraud prevention enforcement agencies like the CBI and ED catch up with them. But millions may lose their hard-earned money by then.[Extracted with edits and revisions, from Opinion, The Indian Express]Q.What function does the statement An asset is something that has a tangible value serve within the passage?a)It contradicts the authors assertion that intangible assets can also possess utility.b)It reinforces the authors assertion that currencies can exist in either physical or digital forms.c)It constitutes a foundational point for the authors conclusion that cryptocurrencies are not assets. (Correct Answer)d)It reinforces the authors argument that cryptocurrency can never qualify as a currency.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.In recent times, there has been a great euphoria about investing in cryptocurrencies. For any instrument to classify as a currency, it must have the following features: One, it is a promissory note wherein the issuer is promising the bearer or the holder a value. Two, it is backed by a sovereign nation and, therefore, there is never a question of any default in executing the promise. Three, the printing of currency in either physical or digital form is always based on some tangible asset, like gold or a basket of goods. From the above, its clear that cryptocurrency can never be a currency. Can crypto then be considered an asset? An asset is something that has a tangible value. Even if its immediate utility is intangible, an asset should have some tangible benefits. The cryptocurrencies being promoted currently — bitcoin, litecoin, ethereum — are nothing but gaming points. Whenever a discussion on cryptos takes place, promoters talk of blockchain technology. This technology is just a technique to account for transactions.Many frauds like multi-marketing schemes, chit funds or deposit frauds were disguised as timeshare schemes, gold and land investments, and promised hefty returns. These pyramid schemes were carried out over a long period to evade the law. Nevertheless, fraud could still be established, the trail of funds could be traced and the perpetrators identified. Crypto promoters have taken fraud to another level with little scope of their getting caught.The recent aggressive promotion of cryptocurrencies on print and visual media would perhaps prove to be the undoing of their promoters. It is only a matter of time before financial fraud prevention enforcement agencies like the CBI and ED catch up with them. But millions may lose their hard-earned money by then.[Extracted with edits and revisions, from Opinion, The Indian Express]Q.What function does the statement An asset is something that has a tangible value serve within the passage?a)It contradicts the authors assertion that intangible assets can also possess utility.b)It reinforces the authors assertion that currencies can exist in either physical or digital forms.c)It constitutes a foundational point for the authors conclusion that cryptocurrencies are not assets. (Correct Answer)d)It reinforces the authors argument that cryptocurrency can never qualify as a currency.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.In recent times, there has been a great euphoria about investing in cryptocurrencies. For any instrument to classify as a currency, it must have the following features: One, it is a promissory note wherein the issuer is promising the bearer or the holder a value. Two, it is backed by a sovereign nation and, therefore, there is never a question of any default in executing the promise. Three, the printing of currency in either physical or digital form is always based on some tangible asset, like gold or a basket of goods. From the above, its clear that cryptocurrency can never be a currency. Can crypto then be considered an asset? An asset is something that has a tangible value. Even if its immediate utility is intangible, an asset should have some tangible benefits. The cryptocurrencies being promoted currently — bitcoin, litecoin, ethereum — are nothing but gaming points. Whenever a discussion on cryptos takes place, promoters talk of blockchain technology. This technology is just a technique to account for transactions.Many frauds like multi-marketing schemes, chit funds or deposit frauds were disguised as timeshare schemes, gold and land investments, and promised hefty returns. These pyramid schemes were carried out over a long period to evade the law. Nevertheless, fraud could still be established, the trail of funds could be traced and the perpetrators identified. Crypto promoters have taken fraud to another level with little scope of their getting caught.The recent aggressive promotion of cryptocurrencies on print and visual media would perhaps prove to be the undoing of their promoters. It is only a matter of time before financial fraud prevention enforcement agencies like the CBI and ED catch up with them. But millions may lose their hard-earned money by then.[Extracted with edits and revisions, from Opinion, The Indian Express]Q.What function does the statement An asset is something that has a tangible value serve within the passage?a)It contradicts the authors assertion that intangible assets can also possess utility.b)It reinforces the authors assertion that currencies can exist in either physical or digital forms.c)It constitutes a foundational point for the authors conclusion that cryptocurrencies are not assets. (Correct Answer)d)It reinforces the authors argument that cryptocurrency can never qualify as a currency.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.In recent times, there has been a great euphoria about investing in cryptocurrencies. For any instrument to classify as a currency, it must have the following features: One, it is a promissory note wherein the issuer is promising the bearer or the holder a value. Two, it is backed by a sovereign nation and, therefore, there is never a question of any default in executing the promise. Three, the printing of currency in either physical or digital form is always based on some tangible asset, like gold or a basket of goods. From the above, its clear that cryptocurrency can never be a currency. Can crypto then be considered an asset? An asset is something that has a tangible value. Even if its immediate utility is intangible, an asset should have some tangible benefits. The cryptocurrencies being promoted currently — bitcoin, litecoin, ethereum — are nothing but gaming points. Whenever a discussion on cryptos takes place, promoters talk of blockchain technology. This technology is just a technique to account for transactions.Many frauds like multi-marketing schemes, chit funds or deposit frauds were disguised as timeshare schemes, gold and land investments, and promised hefty returns. These pyramid schemes were carried out over a long period to evade the law. Nevertheless, fraud could still be established, the trail of funds could be traced and the perpetrators identified. Crypto promoters have taken fraud to another level with little scope of their getting caught.The recent aggressive promotion of cryptocurrencies on print and visual media would perhaps prove to be the undoing of their promoters. It is only a matter of time before financial fraud prevention enforcement agencies like the CBI and ED catch up with them. But millions may lose their hard-earned money by then.[Extracted with edits and revisions, from Opinion, The Indian Express]Q.What function does the statement An asset is something that has a tangible value serve within the passage?a)It contradicts the authors assertion that intangible assets can also possess utility.b)It reinforces the authors assertion that currencies can exist in either physical or digital forms.c)It constitutes a foundational point for the authors conclusion that cryptocurrencies are not assets. (Correct Answer)d)It reinforces the authors argument that cryptocurrency can never qualify as a currency.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.In recent times, there has been a great euphoria about investing in cryptocurrencies. For any instrument to classify as a currency, it must have the following features: One, it is a promissory note wherein the issuer is promising the bearer or the holder a value. Two, it is backed by a sovereign nation and, therefore, there is never a question of any default in executing the promise. Three, the printing of currency in either physical or digital form is always based on some tangible asset, like gold or a basket of goods. From the above, its clear that cryptocurrency can never be a currency. Can crypto then be considered an asset? An asset is something that has a tangible value. Even if its immediate utility is intangible, an asset should have some tangible benefits. The cryptocurrencies being promoted currently — bitcoin, litecoin, ethereum — are nothing but gaming points. Whenever a discussion on cryptos takes place, promoters talk of blockchain technology. This technology is just a technique to account for transactions.Many frauds like multi-marketing schemes, chit funds or deposit frauds were disguised as timeshare schemes, gold and land investments, and promised hefty returns. These pyramid schemes were carried out over a long period to evade the law. Nevertheless, fraud could still be established, the trail of funds could be traced and the perpetrators identified. Crypto promoters have taken fraud to another level with little scope of their getting caught.The recent aggressive promotion of cryptocurrencies on print and visual media would perhaps prove to be the undoing of their promoters. It is only a matter of time before financial fraud prevention enforcement agencies like the CBI and ED catch up with them. But millions may lose their hard-earned money by then.[Extracted with edits and revisions, from Opinion, The Indian Express]Q.What function does the statement An asset is something that has a tangible value serve within the passage?a)It contradicts the authors assertion that intangible assets can also possess utility.b)It reinforces the authors assertion that currencies can exist in either physical or digital forms.c)It constitutes a foundational point for the authors conclusion that cryptocurrencies are not assets. (Correct Answer)d)It reinforces the authors argument that cryptocurrency can never qualify as a currency.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev