Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In one of the landmark decisions of the Supreme Court, which emphasized that even after the final disposition of a Special Leave Petition, the plea of juvenility may be brought in any court at any time. When the plea of juvenility is raised at a late stage, various medical tests are frequently used to make a determination in the absence of the necessary documentation. While considering the evidence presented on behalf of the accused to support his claim that he is a juvenile, the court shall err on the side of holding the accused to be a juvenile in circumstances where there is a question of fact. This is not a roving inquiry that is being considered. The Court may accept other proof of age, such as documents, certificates, etc. A simple statement that the accused appeared to be one or two years older than the age he claimed to be or that the accused stated his age to be higher than what he claims in the case while being arrested by the police officer would not be very persuasive. The age of a juvenile involved in a legal dispute is often determined by the documentation that has been made public. And the only instances in which the Court, the Juvenile Justice Board, or the Committee must order a medical examination to determine the accuseds age are those in which the documents or certificates submitted by the accused in support of his claim of juvenility are discovered to be falsified or manipulated.Q.A young man is facing criminal charges, and during the trial, he asserts that he is a minor. However, the prosecution contends that he is an adult, and there is no supporting documentation for his claim of being a minor. The defense requests a medical assessment to determine the defendants age. Should the court proceed with a medical examination to establish the defendants age?a)Yes, the court should always order a medical examination to ascertain the defendants age.b)No, the defendants assertion of being a minor should be accepted without the need for a medical examination.c)The court should only order a medical examination if the documents or certificates presented by the defendant are found to be falsified or manipulated.d)The court should only order a medical examination if there is a noticeable age discrepancy between the defendants appearance and claimed age.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In one of the landmark decisions of the Supreme Court, which emphasized that even after the final disposition of a Special Leave Petition, the plea of juvenility may be brought in any court at any time. When the plea of juvenility is raised at a late stage, various medical tests are frequently used to make a determination in the absence of the necessary documentation. While considering the evidence presented on behalf of the accused to support his claim that he is a juvenile, the court shall err on the side of holding the accused to be a juvenile in circumstances where there is a question of fact. This is not a roving inquiry that is being considered. The Court may accept other proof of age, such as documents, certificates, etc. A simple statement that the accused appeared to be one or two years older than the age he claimed to be or that the accused stated his age to be higher than what he claims in the case while being arrested by the police officer would not be very persuasive. The age of a juvenile involved in a legal dispute is often determined by the documentation that has been made public. And the only instances in which the Court, the Juvenile Justice Board, or the Committee must order a medical examination to determine the accuseds age are those in which the documents or certificates submitted by the accused in support of his claim of juvenility are discovered to be falsified or manipulated.Q.A young man is facing criminal charges, and during the trial, he asserts that he is a minor. However, the prosecution contends that he is an adult, and there is no supporting documentation for his claim of being a minor. The defense requests a medical assessment to determine the defendants age. Should the court proceed with a medical examination to establish the defendants age?a)Yes, the court should always order a medical examination to ascertain the defendants age.b)No, the defendants assertion of being a minor should be accepted without the need for a medical examination.c)The court should only order a medical examination if the documents or certificates presented by the defendant are found to be falsified or manipulated.d)The court should only order a medical examination if there is a noticeable age discrepancy between the defendants appearance and claimed age.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In one of the landmark decisions of the Supreme Court, which emphasized that even after the final disposition of a Special Leave Petition, the plea of juvenility may be brought in any court at any time. When the plea of juvenility is raised at a late stage, various medical tests are frequently used to make a determination in the absence of the necessary documentation. While considering the evidence presented on behalf of the accused to support his claim that he is a juvenile, the court shall err on the side of holding the accused to be a juvenile in circumstances where there is a question of fact. This is not a roving inquiry that is being considered. The Court may accept other proof of age, such as documents, certificates, etc. A simple statement that the accused appeared to be one or two years older than the age he claimed to be or that the accused stated his age to be higher than what he claims in the case while being arrested by the police officer would not be very persuasive. The age of a juvenile involved in a legal dispute is often determined by the documentation that has been made public. And the only instances in which the Court, the Juvenile Justice Board, or the Committee must order a medical examination to determine the accuseds age are those in which the documents or certificates submitted by the accused in support of his claim of juvenility are discovered to be falsified or manipulated.Q.A young man is facing criminal charges, and during the trial, he asserts that he is a minor. However, the prosecution contends that he is an adult, and there is no supporting documentation for his claim of being a minor. The defense requests a medical assessment to determine the defendants age. Should the court proceed with a medical examination to establish the defendants age?a)Yes, the court should always order a medical examination to ascertain the defendants age.b)No, the defendants assertion of being a minor should be accepted without the need for a medical examination.c)The court should only order a medical examination if the documents or certificates presented by the defendant are found to be falsified or manipulated.d)The court should only order a medical examination if there is a noticeable age discrepancy between the defendants appearance and claimed age.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In one of the landmark decisions of the Supreme Court, which emphasized that even after the final disposition of a Special Leave Petition, the plea of juvenility may be brought in any court at any time. When the plea of juvenility is raised at a late stage, various medical tests are frequently used to make a determination in the absence of the necessary documentation. While considering the evidence presented on behalf of the accused to support his claim that he is a juvenile, the court shall err on the side of holding the accused to be a juvenile in circumstances where there is a question of fact. This is not a roving inquiry that is being considered. The Court may accept other proof of age, such as documents, certificates, etc. A simple statement that the accused appeared to be one or two years older than the age he claimed to be or that the accused stated his age to be higher than what he claims in the case while being arrested by the police officer would not be very persuasive. The age of a juvenile involved in a legal dispute is often determined by the documentation that has been made public. And the only instances in which the Court, the Juvenile Justice Board, or the Committee must order a medical examination to determine the accuseds age are those in which the documents or certificates submitted by the accused in support of his claim of juvenility are discovered to be falsified or manipulated.Q.A young man is facing criminal charges, and during the trial, he asserts that he is a minor. However, the prosecution contends that he is an adult, and there is no supporting documentation for his claim of being a minor. The defense requests a medical assessment to determine the defendants age. Should the court proceed with a medical examination to establish the defendants age?a)Yes, the court should always order a medical examination to ascertain the defendants age.b)No, the defendants assertion of being a minor should be accepted without the need for a medical examination.c)The court should only order a medical examination if the documents or certificates presented by the defendant are found to be falsified or manipulated.d)The court should only order a medical examination if there is a noticeable age discrepancy between the defendants appearance and claimed age.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In one of the landmark decisions of the Supreme Court, which emphasized that even after the final disposition of a Special Leave Petition, the plea of juvenility may be brought in any court at any time. When the plea of juvenility is raised at a late stage, various medical tests are frequently used to make a determination in the absence of the necessary documentation. While considering the evidence presented on behalf of the accused to support his claim that he is a juvenile, the court shall err on the side of holding the accused to be a juvenile in circumstances where there is a question of fact. This is not a roving inquiry that is being considered. The Court may accept other proof of age, such as documents, certificates, etc. A simple statement that the accused appeared to be one or two years older than the age he claimed to be or that the accused stated his age to be higher than what he claims in the case while being arrested by the police officer would not be very persuasive. The age of a juvenile involved in a legal dispute is often determined by the documentation that has been made public. And the only instances in which the Court, the Juvenile Justice Board, or the Committee must order a medical examination to determine the accuseds age are those in which the documents or certificates submitted by the accused in support of his claim of juvenility are discovered to be falsified or manipulated.Q.A young man is facing criminal charges, and during the trial, he asserts that he is a minor. However, the prosecution contends that he is an adult, and there is no supporting documentation for his claim of being a minor. The defense requests a medical assessment to determine the defendants age. Should the court proceed with a medical examination to establish the defendants age?a)Yes, the court should always order a medical examination to ascertain the defendants age.b)No, the defendants assertion of being a minor should be accepted without the need for a medical examination.c)The court should only order a medical examination if the documents or certificates presented by the defendant are found to be falsified or manipulated.d)The court should only order a medical examination if there is a noticeable age discrepancy between the defendants appearance and claimed age.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In one of the landmark decisions of the Supreme Court, which emphasized that even after the final disposition of a Special Leave Petition, the plea of juvenility may be brought in any court at any time. When the plea of juvenility is raised at a late stage, various medical tests are frequently used to make a determination in the absence of the necessary documentation. While considering the evidence presented on behalf of the accused to support his claim that he is a juvenile, the court shall err on the side of holding the accused to be a juvenile in circumstances where there is a question of fact. This is not a roving inquiry that is being considered. The Court may accept other proof of age, such as documents, certificates, etc. A simple statement that the accused appeared to be one or two years older than the age he claimed to be or that the accused stated his age to be higher than what he claims in the case while being arrested by the police officer would not be very persuasive. The age of a juvenile involved in a legal dispute is often determined by the documentation that has been made public. And the only instances in which the Court, the Juvenile Justice Board, or the Committee must order a medical examination to determine the accuseds age are those in which the documents or certificates submitted by the accused in support of his claim of juvenility are discovered to be falsified or manipulated.Q.A young man is facing criminal charges, and during the trial, he asserts that he is a minor. However, the prosecution contends that he is an adult, and there is no supporting documentation for his claim of being a minor. The defense requests a medical assessment to determine the defendants age. Should the court proceed with a medical examination to establish the defendants age?a)Yes, the court should always order a medical examination to ascertain the defendants age.b)No, the defendants assertion of being a minor should be accepted without the need for a medical examination.c)The court should only order a medical examination if the documents or certificates presented by the defendant are found to be falsified or manipulated.d)The court should only order a medical examination if there is a noticeable age discrepancy between the defendants appearance and claimed age.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In one of the landmark decisions of the Supreme Court, which emphasized that even after the final disposition of a Special Leave Petition, the plea of juvenility may be brought in any court at any time. When the plea of juvenility is raised at a late stage, various medical tests are frequently used to make a determination in the absence of the necessary documentation. While considering the evidence presented on behalf of the accused to support his claim that he is a juvenile, the court shall err on the side of holding the accused to be a juvenile in circumstances where there is a question of fact. This is not a roving inquiry that is being considered. The Court may accept other proof of age, such as documents, certificates, etc. A simple statement that the accused appeared to be one or two years older than the age he claimed to be or that the accused stated his age to be higher than what he claims in the case while being arrested by the police officer would not be very persuasive. The age of a juvenile involved in a legal dispute is often determined by the documentation that has been made public. And the only instances in which the Court, the Juvenile Justice Board, or the Committee must order a medical examination to determine the accuseds age are those in which the documents or certificates submitted by the accused in support of his claim of juvenility are discovered to be falsified or manipulated.Q.A young man is facing criminal charges, and during the trial, he asserts that he is a minor. However, the prosecution contends that he is an adult, and there is no supporting documentation for his claim of being a minor. The defense requests a medical assessment to determine the defendants age. Should the court proceed with a medical examination to establish the defendants age?a)Yes, the court should always order a medical examination to ascertain the defendants age.b)No, the defendants assertion of being a minor should be accepted without the need for a medical examination.c)The court should only order a medical examination if the documents or certificates presented by the defendant are found to be falsified or manipulated.d)The court should only order a medical examination if there is a noticeable age discrepancy between the defendants appearance and claimed age.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In one of the landmark decisions of the Supreme Court, which emphasized that even after the final disposition of a Special Leave Petition, the plea of juvenility may be brought in any court at any time. When the plea of juvenility is raised at a late stage, various medical tests are frequently used to make a determination in the absence of the necessary documentation. While considering the evidence presented on behalf of the accused to support his claim that he is a juvenile, the court shall err on the side of holding the accused to be a juvenile in circumstances where there is a question of fact. This is not a roving inquiry that is being considered. The Court may accept other proof of age, such as documents, certificates, etc. A simple statement that the accused appeared to be one or two years older than the age he claimed to be or that the accused stated his age to be higher than what he claims in the case while being arrested by the police officer would not be very persuasive. The age of a juvenile involved in a legal dispute is often determined by the documentation that has been made public. And the only instances in which the Court, the Juvenile Justice Board, or the Committee must order a medical examination to determine the accuseds age are those in which the documents or certificates submitted by the accused in support of his claim of juvenility are discovered to be falsified or manipulated.Q.A young man is facing criminal charges, and during the trial, he asserts that he is a minor. However, the prosecution contends that he is an adult, and there is no supporting documentation for his claim of being a minor. The defense requests a medical assessment to determine the defendants age. Should the court proceed with a medical examination to establish the defendants age?a)Yes, the court should always order a medical examination to ascertain the defendants age.b)No, the defendants assertion of being a minor should be accepted without the need for a medical examination.c)The court should only order a medical examination if the documents or certificates presented by the defendant are found to be falsified or manipulated.d)The court should only order a medical examination if there is a noticeable age discrepancy between the defendants appearance and claimed age.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In one of the landmark decisions of the Supreme Court, which emphasized that even after the final disposition of a Special Leave Petition, the plea of juvenility may be brought in any court at any time. When the plea of juvenility is raised at a late stage, various medical tests are frequently used to make a determination in the absence of the necessary documentation. While considering the evidence presented on behalf of the accused to support his claim that he is a juvenile, the court shall err on the side of holding the accused to be a juvenile in circumstances where there is a question of fact. This is not a roving inquiry that is being considered. The Court may accept other proof of age, such as documents, certificates, etc. A simple statement that the accused appeared to be one or two years older than the age he claimed to be or that the accused stated his age to be higher than what he claims in the case while being arrested by the police officer would not be very persuasive. The age of a juvenile involved in a legal dispute is often determined by the documentation that has been made public. And the only instances in which the Court, the Juvenile Justice Board, or the Committee must order a medical examination to determine the accuseds age are those in which the documents or certificates submitted by the accused in support of his claim of juvenility are discovered to be falsified or manipulated.Q.A young man is facing criminal charges, and during the trial, he asserts that he is a minor. However, the prosecution contends that he is an adult, and there is no supporting documentation for his claim of being a minor. The defense requests a medical assessment to determine the defendants age. Should the court proceed with a medical examination to establish the defendants age?a)Yes, the court should always order a medical examination to ascertain the defendants age.b)No, the defendants assertion of being a minor should be accepted without the need for a medical examination.c)The court should only order a medical examination if the documents or certificates presented by the defendant are found to be falsified or manipulated.d)The court should only order a medical examination if there is a noticeable age discrepancy between the defendants appearance and claimed age.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.