Question Description
Directions: Read the given passage and answer the question that follows."Fake News" is a real phenomenon. There are sleazy predators who cook up completely apocryphal news stories and try to get them circulated on social media and on the internet. But its a terrible pollution of the language for the president to call any article that criticizes him "fake news." If you compare the credibility of the presidents statement with those of the mainstream media, theres just no comparison. The presidents been called out on lie after lie after lie. And as someone whos often written for the so-called "mainstream media," for all their flaws, they got fact-checkers. They wont let me just write anything that comes into my head, Ive got to prove it. So thats the kind of standard that has established the credibility of many of the news media.And the basis of democracy is that everyone can be criticized, particularly the leaders. We dont have a monarch, a Supreme Leader, or a dictator for life. Weve got a person who is temporarily in charge of the government and when he makes an error, it is mandatory for the free press to call it out. To try to delegitimize the press whenever it criticizes the president, its really the reflex of an autocrat, of a tin-pot dictator in some banana republic and not worthy of a democracy like the United States where the president serves in our pleasure and can be criticized just like anyone else.Q.Why does the author claim that he is unable to write anything that "comes into his head" for the media?a)Because he thinks the president is sincere about everythingb)Since there are many who can refute him.c)Because of the presidents propensity to tell lies and break his wordd)Because in a democracy no one can be criticizedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the given passage and answer the question that follows."Fake News" is a real phenomenon. There are sleazy predators who cook up completely apocryphal news stories and try to get them circulated on social media and on the internet. But its a terrible pollution of the language for the president to call any article that criticizes him "fake news." If you compare the credibility of the presidents statement with those of the mainstream media, theres just no comparison. The presidents been called out on lie after lie after lie. And as someone whos often written for the so-called "mainstream media," for all their flaws, they got fact-checkers. They wont let me just write anything that comes into my head, Ive got to prove it. So thats the kind of standard that has established the credibility of many of the news media.And the basis of democracy is that everyone can be criticized, particularly the leaders. We dont have a monarch, a Supreme Leader, or a dictator for life. Weve got a person who is temporarily in charge of the government and when he makes an error, it is mandatory for the free press to call it out. To try to delegitimize the press whenever it criticizes the president, its really the reflex of an autocrat, of a tin-pot dictator in some banana republic and not worthy of a democracy like the United States where the president serves in our pleasure and can be criticized just like anyone else.Q.Why does the author claim that he is unable to write anything that "comes into his head" for the media?a)Because he thinks the president is sincere about everythingb)Since there are many who can refute him.c)Because of the presidents propensity to tell lies and break his wordd)Because in a democracy no one can be criticizedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the given passage and answer the question that follows."Fake News" is a real phenomenon. There are sleazy predators who cook up completely apocryphal news stories and try to get them circulated on social media and on the internet. But its a terrible pollution of the language for the president to call any article that criticizes him "fake news." If you compare the credibility of the presidents statement with those of the mainstream media, theres just no comparison. The presidents been called out on lie after lie after lie. And as someone whos often written for the so-called "mainstream media," for all their flaws, they got fact-checkers. They wont let me just write anything that comes into my head, Ive got to prove it. So thats the kind of standard that has established the credibility of many of the news media.And the basis of democracy is that everyone can be criticized, particularly the leaders. We dont have a monarch, a Supreme Leader, or a dictator for life. Weve got a person who is temporarily in charge of the government and when he makes an error, it is mandatory for the free press to call it out. To try to delegitimize the press whenever it criticizes the president, its really the reflex of an autocrat, of a tin-pot dictator in some banana republic and not worthy of a democracy like the United States where the president serves in our pleasure and can be criticized just like anyone else.Q.Why does the author claim that he is unable to write anything that "comes into his head" for the media?a)Because he thinks the president is sincere about everythingb)Since there are many who can refute him.c)Because of the presidents propensity to tell lies and break his wordd)Because in a democracy no one can be criticizedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Read the given passage and answer the question that follows."Fake News" is a real phenomenon. There are sleazy predators who cook up completely apocryphal news stories and try to get them circulated on social media and on the internet. But its a terrible pollution of the language for the president to call any article that criticizes him "fake news." If you compare the credibility of the presidents statement with those of the mainstream media, theres just no comparison. The presidents been called out on lie after lie after lie. And as someone whos often written for the so-called "mainstream media," for all their flaws, they got fact-checkers. They wont let me just write anything that comes into my head, Ive got to prove it. So thats the kind of standard that has established the credibility of many of the news media.And the basis of democracy is that everyone can be criticized, particularly the leaders. We dont have a monarch, a Supreme Leader, or a dictator for life. Weve got a person who is temporarily in charge of the government and when he makes an error, it is mandatory for the free press to call it out. To try to delegitimize the press whenever it criticizes the president, its really the reflex of an autocrat, of a tin-pot dictator in some banana republic and not worthy of a democracy like the United States where the president serves in our pleasure and can be criticized just like anyone else.Q.Why does the author claim that he is unable to write anything that "comes into his head" for the media?a)Because he thinks the president is sincere about everythingb)Since there are many who can refute him.c)Because of the presidents propensity to tell lies and break his wordd)Because in a democracy no one can be criticizedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the given passage and answer the question that follows."Fake News" is a real phenomenon. There are sleazy predators who cook up completely apocryphal news stories and try to get them circulated on social media and on the internet. But its a terrible pollution of the language for the president to call any article that criticizes him "fake news." If you compare the credibility of the presidents statement with those of the mainstream media, theres just no comparison. The presidents been called out on lie after lie after lie. And as someone whos often written for the so-called "mainstream media," for all their flaws, they got fact-checkers. They wont let me just write anything that comes into my head, Ive got to prove it. So thats the kind of standard that has established the credibility of many of the news media.And the basis of democracy is that everyone can be criticized, particularly the leaders. We dont have a monarch, a Supreme Leader, or a dictator for life. Weve got a person who is temporarily in charge of the government and when he makes an error, it is mandatory for the free press to call it out. To try to delegitimize the press whenever it criticizes the president, its really the reflex of an autocrat, of a tin-pot dictator in some banana republic and not worthy of a democracy like the United States where the president serves in our pleasure and can be criticized just like anyone else.Q.Why does the author claim that he is unable to write anything that "comes into his head" for the media?a)Because he thinks the president is sincere about everythingb)Since there are many who can refute him.c)Because of the presidents propensity to tell lies and break his wordd)Because in a democracy no one can be criticizedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the given passage and answer the question that follows."Fake News" is a real phenomenon. There are sleazy predators who cook up completely apocryphal news stories and try to get them circulated on social media and on the internet. But its a terrible pollution of the language for the president to call any article that criticizes him "fake news." If you compare the credibility of the presidents statement with those of the mainstream media, theres just no comparison. The presidents been called out on lie after lie after lie. And as someone whos often written for the so-called "mainstream media," for all their flaws, they got fact-checkers. They wont let me just write anything that comes into my head, Ive got to prove it. So thats the kind of standard that has established the credibility of many of the news media.And the basis of democracy is that everyone can be criticized, particularly the leaders. We dont have a monarch, a Supreme Leader, or a dictator for life. Weve got a person who is temporarily in charge of the government and when he makes an error, it is mandatory for the free press to call it out. To try to delegitimize the press whenever it criticizes the president, its really the reflex of an autocrat, of a tin-pot dictator in some banana republic and not worthy of a democracy like the United States where the president serves in our pleasure and can be criticized just like anyone else.Q.Why does the author claim that he is unable to write anything that "comes into his head" for the media?a)Because he thinks the president is sincere about everythingb)Since there are many who can refute him.c)Because of the presidents propensity to tell lies and break his wordd)Because in a democracy no one can be criticizedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the given passage and answer the question that follows."Fake News" is a real phenomenon. There are sleazy predators who cook up completely apocryphal news stories and try to get them circulated on social media and on the internet. But its a terrible pollution of the language for the president to call any article that criticizes him "fake news." If you compare the credibility of the presidents statement with those of the mainstream media, theres just no comparison. The presidents been called out on lie after lie after lie. And as someone whos often written for the so-called "mainstream media," for all their flaws, they got fact-checkers. They wont let me just write anything that comes into my head, Ive got to prove it. So thats the kind of standard that has established the credibility of many of the news media.And the basis of democracy is that everyone can be criticized, particularly the leaders. We dont have a monarch, a Supreme Leader, or a dictator for life. Weve got a person who is temporarily in charge of the government and when he makes an error, it is mandatory for the free press to call it out. To try to delegitimize the press whenever it criticizes the president, its really the reflex of an autocrat, of a tin-pot dictator in some banana republic and not worthy of a democracy like the United States where the president serves in our pleasure and can be criticized just like anyone else.Q.Why does the author claim that he is unable to write anything that "comes into his head" for the media?a)Because he thinks the president is sincere about everythingb)Since there are many who can refute him.c)Because of the presidents propensity to tell lies and break his wordd)Because in a democracy no one can be criticizedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the given passage and answer the question that follows."Fake News" is a real phenomenon. There are sleazy predators who cook up completely apocryphal news stories and try to get them circulated on social media and on the internet. But its a terrible pollution of the language for the president to call any article that criticizes him "fake news." If you compare the credibility of the presidents statement with those of the mainstream media, theres just no comparison. The presidents been called out on lie after lie after lie. And as someone whos often written for the so-called "mainstream media," for all their flaws, they got fact-checkers. They wont let me just write anything that comes into my head, Ive got to prove it. So thats the kind of standard that has established the credibility of many of the news media.And the basis of democracy is that everyone can be criticized, particularly the leaders. We dont have a monarch, a Supreme Leader, or a dictator for life. Weve got a person who is temporarily in charge of the government and when he makes an error, it is mandatory for the free press to call it out. To try to delegitimize the press whenever it criticizes the president, its really the reflex of an autocrat, of a tin-pot dictator in some banana republic and not worthy of a democracy like the United States where the president serves in our pleasure and can be criticized just like anyone else.Q.Why does the author claim that he is unable to write anything that "comes into his head" for the media?a)Because he thinks the president is sincere about everythingb)Since there are many who can refute him.c)Because of the presidents propensity to tell lies and break his wordd)Because in a democracy no one can be criticizedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the given passage and answer the question that follows."Fake News" is a real phenomenon. There are sleazy predators who cook up completely apocryphal news stories and try to get them circulated on social media and on the internet. But its a terrible pollution of the language for the president to call any article that criticizes him "fake news." If you compare the credibility of the presidents statement with those of the mainstream media, theres just no comparison. The presidents been called out on lie after lie after lie. And as someone whos often written for the so-called "mainstream media," for all their flaws, they got fact-checkers. They wont let me just write anything that comes into my head, Ive got to prove it. So thats the kind of standard that has established the credibility of many of the news media.And the basis of democracy is that everyone can be criticized, particularly the leaders. We dont have a monarch, a Supreme Leader, or a dictator for life. Weve got a person who is temporarily in charge of the government and when he makes an error, it is mandatory for the free press to call it out. To try to delegitimize the press whenever it criticizes the president, its really the reflex of an autocrat, of a tin-pot dictator in some banana republic and not worthy of a democracy like the United States where the president serves in our pleasure and can be criticized just like anyone else.Q.Why does the author claim that he is unable to write anything that "comes into his head" for the media?a)Because he thinks the president is sincere about everythingb)Since there are many who can refute him.c)Because of the presidents propensity to tell lies and break his wordd)Because in a democracy no one can be criticizedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.