CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Directions: Read the following passage and an... Start Learning for Free
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) seems to have been overzealous in registering a case against environmental lawyer Ritwick Dutta and his organisation, Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment, for violating Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) provisions. The gist of the allegations is their using foreign funds to encourage litigation that will stall existing and prospective coal-fired plants in India. While the sourcing of foreign funds and use is certainly something to keep an eye on, any criminalising of the act of opposition to coal plants, when pursued via legal means, is an absurd stance for a government to adopt. As a signatory to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and various key agreements, India has undertaken to gradually reduce its reliance on fossil fuel sources and be 'net zero', or source almost all power from non-fossil fuel sources by 2070. India has also consistently endorsed reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that speak of the urgency of ensuring global temperatures do not exceed 1.5°C of pre-industrial times, necessitating that global net anthropogenic CO2 emissions decline by about 45% from 2010 levels by 2030. However, under principles of 'Common and Differentiated Responsibility', India has maintained its right to rely on coal plants in the interim as it is still a developing economy.
(Extracted with edits and reviews from "The right to litigate: On limiting the industrial exploitation of nature" The Hindu, April 26, 2023)
Q. What is the significance of the "Common and Differentiated Responsibility" principle mentioned in the passage?
  • a)
    It allows India to rely on coal plants without any restrictions.
  • b)
    It requires India to eliminate all coal plants immediately.
  • c)
    It acknowledges that developing economies like India may still rely on coal plants temporarily.
  • d)
    It imposes stricter regulations on developed countries.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Cen...
The "Common and Differentiated Responsibility" principle is significant because it acknowledges that different countries may have varying responsibilities when it comes to addressing climate change. In the context of the passage, this principle recognizes that developing economies like India may still rely on coal plants temporarily as they work towards reducing their dependence on fossil fuels. It implies that while all countries share a common responsibility to combat climate change, they may do so in different ways based on their developmental status and capabilities. This principle allows for a more nuanced approach to international climate agreements.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Cen...
Understanding "Common and Differentiated Responsibility"
The principle of "Common and Differentiated Responsibility" (CDR) is pivotal in international environmental law, especially in the context of climate change. It recognizes the varying contributions of countries to environmental degradation and their differing capacities to address these issues.
Key Aspects of CDR
- Recognition of Development Status: CDR acknowledges that developing nations, like India, have historically contributed less to global emissions compared to developed countries. Thus, they are afforded some leeway in their development choices, including the use of fossil fuels such as coal.
- Temporary Reliance on Coal: Under CDR, India maintains the right to continue using coal plants as it is still in the process of economic development. This is crucial for meeting energy demands and supporting economic growth.
- Responsibility Allocation: While all countries are responsible for combating climate change, CDR emphasizes that developed nations should take the lead in reducing emissions and providing support to developing countries in their transition to greener energy sources.
Implications for India
- Balanced Approach: The principle allows India to balance its immediate energy needs with long-term environmental goals, reflecting its status as a developing economy.
- Commitment to Global Goals: Although India can rely on coal temporarily, it still upholds its commitments under international agreements to transition to non-fossil fuel sources by 2070.
In summary, the principle of Common and Differentiated Responsibility is significant as it provides India the necessary framework to temporarily use coal while striving towards a sustainable and environmentally-friendly future.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.It has been repeatedly held that the PMLA (Prevention of Money Laundering Act) is a sui generis legislation, enacted to tackle money laundering through white-collar crimes. According to Section 3 of the PMLA, the act of projecting or claiming proceeds of crime to be untainted property constitutes the offense of money laundering. Under the Schedule to the PMLA, a number of offenses under the Indian Penal Code and other special statutes have been included, which serve as the basis for the offense of money laundering. In other words, the existence of predicate offense is sine qua non to charge someone with money laundering. It is crucial to note that the investigation and prosecution of the predicate offense are done typically by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) or the State Police.Section 50 of the PMLA provides powers of a civil court to the ED authorities for summoning persons suspected of money laundering and recording statements. However, the Supreme Court held that ED authorities are not police officers. It observed in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary v. Union of India (2022) that “the process envisaged by Section 50 of the PMLA is in the nature of an inquiry against the proceeds of crime and is not ‘investigation’ in strict sense of the term for initiating prosecution.” There are other dissimilarities between ED authorities and the police. While the police are required to register a First Information Report (FIR) for a cognizable offense before conducting an investigation, ED authorities begin with search procedures and undertake their investigation for the purpose of gathering materials and tracing the ‘proceeds of crime’ by issuing summons. Any statement made by an accused to the police is inadmissible as evidence in court, whereas a statement made to an ED authority is admissible. A copy of the FIR is accessible to the accused, whereas the Enforcement Case Information Report is seldom available.While the police investigating the predicate offense are empowered to arrest and seek custody of the accused, the ED is meant to focus on recovering the proceeds of crime in order to redistribute the same to victims. It is not clear whether the ED has managed to do this. Per contra, the Proceeds of Crime Act, 2002, the analogous legislation in the U.K., almost entirely concentrates on the confiscation of assets through dedicated civil proceedings. Unfortunately, of late, much of the ED’s powers have been discharged in effecting pretrial arrests, which used to be the prerogative of the police investigating the predicate offence. In the past, the CBI was used to impart fear among political opponents. In the process, the agency received the condemnation of various courts and earned the nickname “caged parrot”. Whether the ED will go down the same path or reorient its approach will entirely depend on the intervention of the country’s constitutional courts.Q.Which of the following is not the appropriate cause-and-effect relationship in the passages context?

Top Courses for CLAT

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) seems to have been overzealous in registering a case against environmental lawyer Ritwick Dutta and his organisation, Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment, for violating Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) provisions. The gist of the allegations is their using foreign funds to encourage litigation that will stall existing and prospective coal-fired plants in India. While the sourcing of foreign funds and use is certainly something to keep an eye on, any criminalising of the act of opposition to coal plants, when pursued via legal means, is an absurd stance for a government to adopt. As a signatory to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and various key agreements, India has undertaken to gradually reduce its reliance on fossil fuel sources and be net zero, or source almost all power from non-fossil fuel sources by 2070. India has also consistently endorsed reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that speak of the urgency of ensuring global temperatures do not exceed 1.5°C of pre-industrial times, necessitating that global net anthropogenic CO2 emissions decline by about 45% from 2010 levels by 2030. However, under principles of Common and Differentiated Responsibility, India has maintained its right to rely on coal plants in the interim as it is still a developing economy.(Extracted with edits and reviews from "The right to litigate: On limiting the industrial exploitation of nature" The Hindu, April 26, 2023)Q.What is the significance of the "Common and Differentiated Responsibility" principle mentioned in the passage?a)It allows India to rely on coal plants without any restrictions.b)It requires India to eliminate all coal plants immediately.c)It acknowledges that developing economies like India may still rely on coal plants temporarily.d)It imposes stricter regulations on developed countries.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) seems to have been overzealous in registering a case against environmental lawyer Ritwick Dutta and his organisation, Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment, for violating Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) provisions. The gist of the allegations is their using foreign funds to encourage litigation that will stall existing and prospective coal-fired plants in India. While the sourcing of foreign funds and use is certainly something to keep an eye on, any criminalising of the act of opposition to coal plants, when pursued via legal means, is an absurd stance for a government to adopt. As a signatory to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and various key agreements, India has undertaken to gradually reduce its reliance on fossil fuel sources and be net zero, or source almost all power from non-fossil fuel sources by 2070. India has also consistently endorsed reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that speak of the urgency of ensuring global temperatures do not exceed 1.5°C of pre-industrial times, necessitating that global net anthropogenic CO2 emissions decline by about 45% from 2010 levels by 2030. However, under principles of Common and Differentiated Responsibility, India has maintained its right to rely on coal plants in the interim as it is still a developing economy.(Extracted with edits and reviews from "The right to litigate: On limiting the industrial exploitation of nature" The Hindu, April 26, 2023)Q.What is the significance of the "Common and Differentiated Responsibility" principle mentioned in the passage?a)It allows India to rely on coal plants without any restrictions.b)It requires India to eliminate all coal plants immediately.c)It acknowledges that developing economies like India may still rely on coal plants temporarily.d)It imposes stricter regulations on developed countries.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) seems to have been overzealous in registering a case against environmental lawyer Ritwick Dutta and his organisation, Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment, for violating Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) provisions. The gist of the allegations is their using foreign funds to encourage litigation that will stall existing and prospective coal-fired plants in India. While the sourcing of foreign funds and use is certainly something to keep an eye on, any criminalising of the act of opposition to coal plants, when pursued via legal means, is an absurd stance for a government to adopt. As a signatory to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and various key agreements, India has undertaken to gradually reduce its reliance on fossil fuel sources and be net zero, or source almost all power from non-fossil fuel sources by 2070. India has also consistently endorsed reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that speak of the urgency of ensuring global temperatures do not exceed 1.5°C of pre-industrial times, necessitating that global net anthropogenic CO2 emissions decline by about 45% from 2010 levels by 2030. However, under principles of Common and Differentiated Responsibility, India has maintained its right to rely on coal plants in the interim as it is still a developing economy.(Extracted with edits and reviews from "The right to litigate: On limiting the industrial exploitation of nature" The Hindu, April 26, 2023)Q.What is the significance of the "Common and Differentiated Responsibility" principle mentioned in the passage?a)It allows India to rely on coal plants without any restrictions.b)It requires India to eliminate all coal plants immediately.c)It acknowledges that developing economies like India may still rely on coal plants temporarily.d)It imposes stricter regulations on developed countries.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) seems to have been overzealous in registering a case against environmental lawyer Ritwick Dutta and his organisation, Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment, for violating Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) provisions. The gist of the allegations is their using foreign funds to encourage litigation that will stall existing and prospective coal-fired plants in India. While the sourcing of foreign funds and use is certainly something to keep an eye on, any criminalising of the act of opposition to coal plants, when pursued via legal means, is an absurd stance for a government to adopt. As a signatory to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and various key agreements, India has undertaken to gradually reduce its reliance on fossil fuel sources and be net zero, or source almost all power from non-fossil fuel sources by 2070. India has also consistently endorsed reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that speak of the urgency of ensuring global temperatures do not exceed 1.5°C of pre-industrial times, necessitating that global net anthropogenic CO2 emissions decline by about 45% from 2010 levels by 2030. However, under principles of Common and Differentiated Responsibility, India has maintained its right to rely on coal plants in the interim as it is still a developing economy.(Extracted with edits and reviews from "The right to litigate: On limiting the industrial exploitation of nature" The Hindu, April 26, 2023)Q.What is the significance of the "Common and Differentiated Responsibility" principle mentioned in the passage?a)It allows India to rely on coal plants without any restrictions.b)It requires India to eliminate all coal plants immediately.c)It acknowledges that developing economies like India may still rely on coal plants temporarily.d)It imposes stricter regulations on developed countries.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) seems to have been overzealous in registering a case against environmental lawyer Ritwick Dutta and his organisation, Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment, for violating Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) provisions. The gist of the allegations is their using foreign funds to encourage litigation that will stall existing and prospective coal-fired plants in India. While the sourcing of foreign funds and use is certainly something to keep an eye on, any criminalising of the act of opposition to coal plants, when pursued via legal means, is an absurd stance for a government to adopt. As a signatory to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and various key agreements, India has undertaken to gradually reduce its reliance on fossil fuel sources and be net zero, or source almost all power from non-fossil fuel sources by 2070. India has also consistently endorsed reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that speak of the urgency of ensuring global temperatures do not exceed 1.5°C of pre-industrial times, necessitating that global net anthropogenic CO2 emissions decline by about 45% from 2010 levels by 2030. However, under principles of Common and Differentiated Responsibility, India has maintained its right to rely on coal plants in the interim as it is still a developing economy.(Extracted with edits and reviews from "The right to litigate: On limiting the industrial exploitation of nature" The Hindu, April 26, 2023)Q.What is the significance of the "Common and Differentiated Responsibility" principle mentioned in the passage?a)It allows India to rely on coal plants without any restrictions.b)It requires India to eliminate all coal plants immediately.c)It acknowledges that developing economies like India may still rely on coal plants temporarily.d)It imposes stricter regulations on developed countries.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) seems to have been overzealous in registering a case against environmental lawyer Ritwick Dutta and his organisation, Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment, for violating Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) provisions. The gist of the allegations is their using foreign funds to encourage litigation that will stall existing and prospective coal-fired plants in India. While the sourcing of foreign funds and use is certainly something to keep an eye on, any criminalising of the act of opposition to coal plants, when pursued via legal means, is an absurd stance for a government to adopt. As a signatory to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and various key agreements, India has undertaken to gradually reduce its reliance on fossil fuel sources and be net zero, or source almost all power from non-fossil fuel sources by 2070. India has also consistently endorsed reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that speak of the urgency of ensuring global temperatures do not exceed 1.5°C of pre-industrial times, necessitating that global net anthropogenic CO2 emissions decline by about 45% from 2010 levels by 2030. However, under principles of Common and Differentiated Responsibility, India has maintained its right to rely on coal plants in the interim as it is still a developing economy.(Extracted with edits and reviews from "The right to litigate: On limiting the industrial exploitation of nature" The Hindu, April 26, 2023)Q.What is the significance of the "Common and Differentiated Responsibility" principle mentioned in the passage?a)It allows India to rely on coal plants without any restrictions.b)It requires India to eliminate all coal plants immediately.c)It acknowledges that developing economies like India may still rely on coal plants temporarily.d)It imposes stricter regulations on developed countries.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) seems to have been overzealous in registering a case against environmental lawyer Ritwick Dutta and his organisation, Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment, for violating Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) provisions. The gist of the allegations is their using foreign funds to encourage litigation that will stall existing and prospective coal-fired plants in India. While the sourcing of foreign funds and use is certainly something to keep an eye on, any criminalising of the act of opposition to coal plants, when pursued via legal means, is an absurd stance for a government to adopt. As a signatory to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and various key agreements, India has undertaken to gradually reduce its reliance on fossil fuel sources and be net zero, or source almost all power from non-fossil fuel sources by 2070. India has also consistently endorsed reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that speak of the urgency of ensuring global temperatures do not exceed 1.5°C of pre-industrial times, necessitating that global net anthropogenic CO2 emissions decline by about 45% from 2010 levels by 2030. However, under principles of Common and Differentiated Responsibility, India has maintained its right to rely on coal plants in the interim as it is still a developing economy.(Extracted with edits and reviews from "The right to litigate: On limiting the industrial exploitation of nature" The Hindu, April 26, 2023)Q.What is the significance of the "Common and Differentiated Responsibility" principle mentioned in the passage?a)It allows India to rely on coal plants without any restrictions.b)It requires India to eliminate all coal plants immediately.c)It acknowledges that developing economies like India may still rely on coal plants temporarily.d)It imposes stricter regulations on developed countries.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) seems to have been overzealous in registering a case against environmental lawyer Ritwick Dutta and his organisation, Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment, for violating Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) provisions. The gist of the allegations is their using foreign funds to encourage litigation that will stall existing and prospective coal-fired plants in India. While the sourcing of foreign funds and use is certainly something to keep an eye on, any criminalising of the act of opposition to coal plants, when pursued via legal means, is an absurd stance for a government to adopt. As a signatory to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and various key agreements, India has undertaken to gradually reduce its reliance on fossil fuel sources and be net zero, or source almost all power from non-fossil fuel sources by 2070. India has also consistently endorsed reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that speak of the urgency of ensuring global temperatures do not exceed 1.5°C of pre-industrial times, necessitating that global net anthropogenic CO2 emissions decline by about 45% from 2010 levels by 2030. However, under principles of Common and Differentiated Responsibility, India has maintained its right to rely on coal plants in the interim as it is still a developing economy.(Extracted with edits and reviews from "The right to litigate: On limiting the industrial exploitation of nature" The Hindu, April 26, 2023)Q.What is the significance of the "Common and Differentiated Responsibility" principle mentioned in the passage?a)It allows India to rely on coal plants without any restrictions.b)It requires India to eliminate all coal plants immediately.c)It acknowledges that developing economies like India may still rely on coal plants temporarily.d)It imposes stricter regulations on developed countries.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) seems to have been overzealous in registering a case against environmental lawyer Ritwick Dutta and his organisation, Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment, for violating Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) provisions. The gist of the allegations is their using foreign funds to encourage litigation that will stall existing and prospective coal-fired plants in India. While the sourcing of foreign funds and use is certainly something to keep an eye on, any criminalising of the act of opposition to coal plants, when pursued via legal means, is an absurd stance for a government to adopt. As a signatory to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and various key agreements, India has undertaken to gradually reduce its reliance on fossil fuel sources and be net zero, or source almost all power from non-fossil fuel sources by 2070. India has also consistently endorsed reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that speak of the urgency of ensuring global temperatures do not exceed 1.5°C of pre-industrial times, necessitating that global net anthropogenic CO2 emissions decline by about 45% from 2010 levels by 2030. However, under principles of Common and Differentiated Responsibility, India has maintained its right to rely on coal plants in the interim as it is still a developing economy.(Extracted with edits and reviews from "The right to litigate: On limiting the industrial exploitation of nature" The Hindu, April 26, 2023)Q.What is the significance of the "Common and Differentiated Responsibility" principle mentioned in the passage?a)It allows India to rely on coal plants without any restrictions.b)It requires India to eliminate all coal plants immediately.c)It acknowledges that developing economies like India may still rely on coal plants temporarily.d)It imposes stricter regulations on developed countries.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) seems to have been overzealous in registering a case against environmental lawyer Ritwick Dutta and his organisation, Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment, for violating Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) provisions. The gist of the allegations is their using foreign funds to encourage litigation that will stall existing and prospective coal-fired plants in India. While the sourcing of foreign funds and use is certainly something to keep an eye on, any criminalising of the act of opposition to coal plants, when pursued via legal means, is an absurd stance for a government to adopt. As a signatory to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and various key agreements, India has undertaken to gradually reduce its reliance on fossil fuel sources and be net zero, or source almost all power from non-fossil fuel sources by 2070. India has also consistently endorsed reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that speak of the urgency of ensuring global temperatures do not exceed 1.5°C of pre-industrial times, necessitating that global net anthropogenic CO2 emissions decline by about 45% from 2010 levels by 2030. However, under principles of Common and Differentiated Responsibility, India has maintained its right to rely on coal plants in the interim as it is still a developing economy.(Extracted with edits and reviews from "The right to litigate: On limiting the industrial exploitation of nature" The Hindu, April 26, 2023)Q.What is the significance of the "Common and Differentiated Responsibility" principle mentioned in the passage?a)It allows India to rely on coal plants without any restrictions.b)It requires India to eliminate all coal plants immediately.c)It acknowledges that developing economies like India may still rely on coal plants temporarily.d)It imposes stricter regulations on developed countries.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev