Question Description
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.A Maxim refers to the established principles and prepositions. As law is a difficult subject having various interpretations, rules, and principles. It is therefore considered necessary to have these combinations of various Latin and French words to be used for much clearer understanding. However, the only difficult part of the use of these maxims is that they have to be applied with full precaution. The person using these maxims has to make sure that whether the case in which it is applied has its application in the same manner, or whether it is an exception to the general rule, as any alterations of any of these maxims would be dangerous.Injuria Sine Damno is a legal maxim, which means injury or loss or damage so caused to the plaintiff without suffering any physical injury or damage. It is a Latin term, where Injuria refers to injury, Sine refers to without and Damno refers to a property or any physical loss. Therefore, the term refers to injury suffered without actual loss. In this case, the plaintiff doesnt have to prove the damages suffered, he only has to prove that there is some legal damage suffered by him, that is the action so brought is actionable per se. For example, where A roams around Bs house without any justification then in that case, there is a violation of the legal right of B and in such cases, this maxim is applicable.Damnum Sine Injuria is a maxim, which refers to injury which is being suffered by the plaintiff but there is no violation of any legal right of a person. In such circumstances, where there is no violation of the legal right but the injury or damage is being suffered by the plaintiff, the plaintiff cant bring an action against the other for the same, as it is not actionable in law, unless there is some infringement of a legal right.The literal meaning of Damnum Sine Injuria refers to loss or damage in terms of money, property or any physical loss without the infringement of any legal right. It is not actionable in law even if the act so did was intentional and was done to cause injury to other but without infringing on the legal right of the person.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from injuria-sine-damno-damnum-sine-injuria, blog by lawtimesjournal]Q.Rakesh, a farmer, went to his nearby polling station to exercise his right to vote in an election. Manoj, a police officer assigned to election duty, unreasonably denied Rakesh the opportunity to cast his vote without providing any justification. Subsequently, Rakesh filed a lawsuit against Manoj for obstructing his voting right. Will the police officer be held legally accountable in this scenario?a)No, the police officer will not be held liable because he did not cause any physical harm or injury to Rakesh.b)No, the police officer will not be held liable because public officers have the authority to prohibit individuals from performing certain actions.c)Yes, the police officer will be held liable as he wrongfully prevented Rakesh from exercising his lawful right to vote.d)Yes, the police officer will be held liable because his actions resulted in financial loss to Rakesh, who had traveled from his village to cast his vote.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.A Maxim refers to the established principles and prepositions. As law is a difficult subject having various interpretations, rules, and principles. It is therefore considered necessary to have these combinations of various Latin and French words to be used for much clearer understanding. However, the only difficult part of the use of these maxims is that they have to be applied with full precaution. The person using these maxims has to make sure that whether the case in which it is applied has its application in the same manner, or whether it is an exception to the general rule, as any alterations of any of these maxims would be dangerous.Injuria Sine Damno is a legal maxim, which means injury or loss or damage so caused to the plaintiff without suffering any physical injury or damage. It is a Latin term, where Injuria refers to injury, Sine refers to without and Damno refers to a property or any physical loss. Therefore, the term refers to injury suffered without actual loss. In this case, the plaintiff doesnt have to prove the damages suffered, he only has to prove that there is some legal damage suffered by him, that is the action so brought is actionable per se. For example, where A roams around Bs house without any justification then in that case, there is a violation of the legal right of B and in such cases, this maxim is applicable.Damnum Sine Injuria is a maxim, which refers to injury which is being suffered by the plaintiff but there is no violation of any legal right of a person. In such circumstances, where there is no violation of the legal right but the injury or damage is being suffered by the plaintiff, the plaintiff cant bring an action against the other for the same, as it is not actionable in law, unless there is some infringement of a legal right.The literal meaning of Damnum Sine Injuria refers to loss or damage in terms of money, property or any physical loss without the infringement of any legal right. It is not actionable in law even if the act so did was intentional and was done to cause injury to other but without infringing on the legal right of the person.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from injuria-sine-damno-damnum-sine-injuria, blog by lawtimesjournal]Q.Rakesh, a farmer, went to his nearby polling station to exercise his right to vote in an election. Manoj, a police officer assigned to election duty, unreasonably denied Rakesh the opportunity to cast his vote without providing any justification. Subsequently, Rakesh filed a lawsuit against Manoj for obstructing his voting right. Will the police officer be held legally accountable in this scenario?a)No, the police officer will not be held liable because he did not cause any physical harm or injury to Rakesh.b)No, the police officer will not be held liable because public officers have the authority to prohibit individuals from performing certain actions.c)Yes, the police officer will be held liable as he wrongfully prevented Rakesh from exercising his lawful right to vote.d)Yes, the police officer will be held liable because his actions resulted in financial loss to Rakesh, who had traveled from his village to cast his vote.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.A Maxim refers to the established principles and prepositions. As law is a difficult subject having various interpretations, rules, and principles. It is therefore considered necessary to have these combinations of various Latin and French words to be used for much clearer understanding. However, the only difficult part of the use of these maxims is that they have to be applied with full precaution. The person using these maxims has to make sure that whether the case in which it is applied has its application in the same manner, or whether it is an exception to the general rule, as any alterations of any of these maxims would be dangerous.Injuria Sine Damno is a legal maxim, which means injury or loss or damage so caused to the plaintiff without suffering any physical injury or damage. It is a Latin term, where Injuria refers to injury, Sine refers to without and Damno refers to a property or any physical loss. Therefore, the term refers to injury suffered without actual loss. In this case, the plaintiff doesnt have to prove the damages suffered, he only has to prove that there is some legal damage suffered by him, that is the action so brought is actionable per se. For example, where A roams around Bs house without any justification then in that case, there is a violation of the legal right of B and in such cases, this maxim is applicable.Damnum Sine Injuria is a maxim, which refers to injury which is being suffered by the plaintiff but there is no violation of any legal right of a person. In such circumstances, where there is no violation of the legal right but the injury or damage is being suffered by the plaintiff, the plaintiff cant bring an action against the other for the same, as it is not actionable in law, unless there is some infringement of a legal right.The literal meaning of Damnum Sine Injuria refers to loss or damage in terms of money, property or any physical loss without the infringement of any legal right. It is not actionable in law even if the act so did was intentional and was done to cause injury to other but without infringing on the legal right of the person.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from injuria-sine-damno-damnum-sine-injuria, blog by lawtimesjournal]Q.Rakesh, a farmer, went to his nearby polling station to exercise his right to vote in an election. Manoj, a police officer assigned to election duty, unreasonably denied Rakesh the opportunity to cast his vote without providing any justification. Subsequently, Rakesh filed a lawsuit against Manoj for obstructing his voting right. Will the police officer be held legally accountable in this scenario?a)No, the police officer will not be held liable because he did not cause any physical harm or injury to Rakesh.b)No, the police officer will not be held liable because public officers have the authority to prohibit individuals from performing certain actions.c)Yes, the police officer will be held liable as he wrongfully prevented Rakesh from exercising his lawful right to vote.d)Yes, the police officer will be held liable because his actions resulted in financial loss to Rakesh, who had traveled from his village to cast his vote.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.A Maxim refers to the established principles and prepositions. As law is a difficult subject having various interpretations, rules, and principles. It is therefore considered necessary to have these combinations of various Latin and French words to be used for much clearer understanding. However, the only difficult part of the use of these maxims is that they have to be applied with full precaution. The person using these maxims has to make sure that whether the case in which it is applied has its application in the same manner, or whether it is an exception to the general rule, as any alterations of any of these maxims would be dangerous.Injuria Sine Damno is a legal maxim, which means injury or loss or damage so caused to the plaintiff without suffering any physical injury or damage. It is a Latin term, where Injuria refers to injury, Sine refers to without and Damno refers to a property or any physical loss. Therefore, the term refers to injury suffered without actual loss. In this case, the plaintiff doesnt have to prove the damages suffered, he only has to prove that there is some legal damage suffered by him, that is the action so brought is actionable per se. For example, where A roams around Bs house without any justification then in that case, there is a violation of the legal right of B and in such cases, this maxim is applicable.Damnum Sine Injuria is a maxim, which refers to injury which is being suffered by the plaintiff but there is no violation of any legal right of a person. In such circumstances, where there is no violation of the legal right but the injury or damage is being suffered by the plaintiff, the plaintiff cant bring an action against the other for the same, as it is not actionable in law, unless there is some infringement of a legal right.The literal meaning of Damnum Sine Injuria refers to loss or damage in terms of money, property or any physical loss without the infringement of any legal right. It is not actionable in law even if the act so did was intentional and was done to cause injury to other but without infringing on the legal right of the person.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from injuria-sine-damno-damnum-sine-injuria, blog by lawtimesjournal]Q.Rakesh, a farmer, went to his nearby polling station to exercise his right to vote in an election. Manoj, a police officer assigned to election duty, unreasonably denied Rakesh the opportunity to cast his vote without providing any justification. Subsequently, Rakesh filed a lawsuit against Manoj for obstructing his voting right. Will the police officer be held legally accountable in this scenario?a)No, the police officer will not be held liable because he did not cause any physical harm or injury to Rakesh.b)No, the police officer will not be held liable because public officers have the authority to prohibit individuals from performing certain actions.c)Yes, the police officer will be held liable as he wrongfully prevented Rakesh from exercising his lawful right to vote.d)Yes, the police officer will be held liable because his actions resulted in financial loss to Rakesh, who had traveled from his village to cast his vote.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.A Maxim refers to the established principles and prepositions. As law is a difficult subject having various interpretations, rules, and principles. It is therefore considered necessary to have these combinations of various Latin and French words to be used for much clearer understanding. However, the only difficult part of the use of these maxims is that they have to be applied with full precaution. The person using these maxims has to make sure that whether the case in which it is applied has its application in the same manner, or whether it is an exception to the general rule, as any alterations of any of these maxims would be dangerous.Injuria Sine Damno is a legal maxim, which means injury or loss or damage so caused to the plaintiff without suffering any physical injury or damage. It is a Latin term, where Injuria refers to injury, Sine refers to without and Damno refers to a property or any physical loss. Therefore, the term refers to injury suffered without actual loss. In this case, the plaintiff doesnt have to prove the damages suffered, he only has to prove that there is some legal damage suffered by him, that is the action so brought is actionable per se. For example, where A roams around Bs house without any justification then in that case, there is a violation of the legal right of B and in such cases, this maxim is applicable.Damnum Sine Injuria is a maxim, which refers to injury which is being suffered by the plaintiff but there is no violation of any legal right of a person. In such circumstances, where there is no violation of the legal right but the injury or damage is being suffered by the plaintiff, the plaintiff cant bring an action against the other for the same, as it is not actionable in law, unless there is some infringement of a legal right.The literal meaning of Damnum Sine Injuria refers to loss or damage in terms of money, property or any physical loss without the infringement of any legal right. It is not actionable in law even if the act so did was intentional and was done to cause injury to other but without infringing on the legal right of the person.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from injuria-sine-damno-damnum-sine-injuria, blog by lawtimesjournal]Q.Rakesh, a farmer, went to his nearby polling station to exercise his right to vote in an election. Manoj, a police officer assigned to election duty, unreasonably denied Rakesh the opportunity to cast his vote without providing any justification. Subsequently, Rakesh filed a lawsuit against Manoj for obstructing his voting right. Will the police officer be held legally accountable in this scenario?a)No, the police officer will not be held liable because he did not cause any physical harm or injury to Rakesh.b)No, the police officer will not be held liable because public officers have the authority to prohibit individuals from performing certain actions.c)Yes, the police officer will be held liable as he wrongfully prevented Rakesh from exercising his lawful right to vote.d)Yes, the police officer will be held liable because his actions resulted in financial loss to Rakesh, who had traveled from his village to cast his vote.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.A Maxim refers to the established principles and prepositions. As law is a difficult subject having various interpretations, rules, and principles. It is therefore considered necessary to have these combinations of various Latin and French words to be used for much clearer understanding. However, the only difficult part of the use of these maxims is that they have to be applied with full precaution. The person using these maxims has to make sure that whether the case in which it is applied has its application in the same manner, or whether it is an exception to the general rule, as any alterations of any of these maxims would be dangerous.Injuria Sine Damno is a legal maxim, which means injury or loss or damage so caused to the plaintiff without suffering any physical injury or damage. It is a Latin term, where Injuria refers to injury, Sine refers to without and Damno refers to a property or any physical loss. Therefore, the term refers to injury suffered without actual loss. In this case, the plaintiff doesnt have to prove the damages suffered, he only has to prove that there is some legal damage suffered by him, that is the action so brought is actionable per se. For example, where A roams around Bs house without any justification then in that case, there is a violation of the legal right of B and in such cases, this maxim is applicable.Damnum Sine Injuria is a maxim, which refers to injury which is being suffered by the plaintiff but there is no violation of any legal right of a person. In such circumstances, where there is no violation of the legal right but the injury or damage is being suffered by the plaintiff, the plaintiff cant bring an action against the other for the same, as it is not actionable in law, unless there is some infringement of a legal right.The literal meaning of Damnum Sine Injuria refers to loss or damage in terms of money, property or any physical loss without the infringement of any legal right. It is not actionable in law even if the act so did was intentional and was done to cause injury to other but without infringing on the legal right of the person.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from injuria-sine-damno-damnum-sine-injuria, blog by lawtimesjournal]Q.Rakesh, a farmer, went to his nearby polling station to exercise his right to vote in an election. Manoj, a police officer assigned to election duty, unreasonably denied Rakesh the opportunity to cast his vote without providing any justification. Subsequently, Rakesh filed a lawsuit against Manoj for obstructing his voting right. Will the police officer be held legally accountable in this scenario?a)No, the police officer will not be held liable because he did not cause any physical harm or injury to Rakesh.b)No, the police officer will not be held liable because public officers have the authority to prohibit individuals from performing certain actions.c)Yes, the police officer will be held liable as he wrongfully prevented Rakesh from exercising his lawful right to vote.d)Yes, the police officer will be held liable because his actions resulted in financial loss to Rakesh, who had traveled from his village to cast his vote.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.A Maxim refers to the established principles and prepositions. As law is a difficult subject having various interpretations, rules, and principles. It is therefore considered necessary to have these combinations of various Latin and French words to be used for much clearer understanding. However, the only difficult part of the use of these maxims is that they have to be applied with full precaution. The person using these maxims has to make sure that whether the case in which it is applied has its application in the same manner, or whether it is an exception to the general rule, as any alterations of any of these maxims would be dangerous.Injuria Sine Damno is a legal maxim, which means injury or loss or damage so caused to the plaintiff without suffering any physical injury or damage. It is a Latin term, where Injuria refers to injury, Sine refers to without and Damno refers to a property or any physical loss. Therefore, the term refers to injury suffered without actual loss. In this case, the plaintiff doesnt have to prove the damages suffered, he only has to prove that there is some legal damage suffered by him, that is the action so brought is actionable per se. For example, where A roams around Bs house without any justification then in that case, there is a violation of the legal right of B and in such cases, this maxim is applicable.Damnum Sine Injuria is a maxim, which refers to injury which is being suffered by the plaintiff but there is no violation of any legal right of a person. In such circumstances, where there is no violation of the legal right but the injury or damage is being suffered by the plaintiff, the plaintiff cant bring an action against the other for the same, as it is not actionable in law, unless there is some infringement of a legal right.The literal meaning of Damnum Sine Injuria refers to loss or damage in terms of money, property or any physical loss without the infringement of any legal right. It is not actionable in law even if the act so did was intentional and was done to cause injury to other but without infringing on the legal right of the person.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from injuria-sine-damno-damnum-sine-injuria, blog by lawtimesjournal]Q.Rakesh, a farmer, went to his nearby polling station to exercise his right to vote in an election. Manoj, a police officer assigned to election duty, unreasonably denied Rakesh the opportunity to cast his vote without providing any justification. Subsequently, Rakesh filed a lawsuit against Manoj for obstructing his voting right. Will the police officer be held legally accountable in this scenario?a)No, the police officer will not be held liable because he did not cause any physical harm or injury to Rakesh.b)No, the police officer will not be held liable because public officers have the authority to prohibit individuals from performing certain actions.c)Yes, the police officer will be held liable as he wrongfully prevented Rakesh from exercising his lawful right to vote.d)Yes, the police officer will be held liable because his actions resulted in financial loss to Rakesh, who had traveled from his village to cast his vote.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.A Maxim refers to the established principles and prepositions. As law is a difficult subject having various interpretations, rules, and principles. It is therefore considered necessary to have these combinations of various Latin and French words to be used for much clearer understanding. However, the only difficult part of the use of these maxims is that they have to be applied with full precaution. The person using these maxims has to make sure that whether the case in which it is applied has its application in the same manner, or whether it is an exception to the general rule, as any alterations of any of these maxims would be dangerous.Injuria Sine Damno is a legal maxim, which means injury or loss or damage so caused to the plaintiff without suffering any physical injury or damage. It is a Latin term, where Injuria refers to injury, Sine refers to without and Damno refers to a property or any physical loss. Therefore, the term refers to injury suffered without actual loss. In this case, the plaintiff doesnt have to prove the damages suffered, he only has to prove that there is some legal damage suffered by him, that is the action so brought is actionable per se. For example, where A roams around Bs house without any justification then in that case, there is a violation of the legal right of B and in such cases, this maxim is applicable.Damnum Sine Injuria is a maxim, which refers to injury which is being suffered by the plaintiff but there is no violation of any legal right of a person. In such circumstances, where there is no violation of the legal right but the injury or damage is being suffered by the plaintiff, the plaintiff cant bring an action against the other for the same, as it is not actionable in law, unless there is some infringement of a legal right.The literal meaning of Damnum Sine Injuria refers to loss or damage in terms of money, property or any physical loss without the infringement of any legal right. It is not actionable in law even if the act so did was intentional and was done to cause injury to other but without infringing on the legal right of the person.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from injuria-sine-damno-damnum-sine-injuria, blog by lawtimesjournal]Q.Rakesh, a farmer, went to his nearby polling station to exercise his right to vote in an election. Manoj, a police officer assigned to election duty, unreasonably denied Rakesh the opportunity to cast his vote without providing any justification. Subsequently, Rakesh filed a lawsuit against Manoj for obstructing his voting right. Will the police officer be held legally accountable in this scenario?a)No, the police officer will not be held liable because he did not cause any physical harm or injury to Rakesh.b)No, the police officer will not be held liable because public officers have the authority to prohibit individuals from performing certain actions.c)Yes, the police officer will be held liable as he wrongfully prevented Rakesh from exercising his lawful right to vote.d)Yes, the police officer will be held liable because his actions resulted in financial loss to Rakesh, who had traveled from his village to cast his vote.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.A Maxim refers to the established principles and prepositions. As law is a difficult subject having various interpretations, rules, and principles. It is therefore considered necessary to have these combinations of various Latin and French words to be used for much clearer understanding. However, the only difficult part of the use of these maxims is that they have to be applied with full precaution. The person using these maxims has to make sure that whether the case in which it is applied has its application in the same manner, or whether it is an exception to the general rule, as any alterations of any of these maxims would be dangerous.Injuria Sine Damno is a legal maxim, which means injury or loss or damage so caused to the plaintiff without suffering any physical injury or damage. It is a Latin term, where Injuria refers to injury, Sine refers to without and Damno refers to a property or any physical loss. Therefore, the term refers to injury suffered without actual loss. In this case, the plaintiff doesnt have to prove the damages suffered, he only has to prove that there is some legal damage suffered by him, that is the action so brought is actionable per se. For example, where A roams around Bs house without any justification then in that case, there is a violation of the legal right of B and in such cases, this maxim is applicable.Damnum Sine Injuria is a maxim, which refers to injury which is being suffered by the plaintiff but there is no violation of any legal right of a person. In such circumstances, where there is no violation of the legal right but the injury or damage is being suffered by the plaintiff, the plaintiff cant bring an action against the other for the same, as it is not actionable in law, unless there is some infringement of a legal right.The literal meaning of Damnum Sine Injuria refers to loss or damage in terms of money, property or any physical loss without the infringement of any legal right. It is not actionable in law even if the act so did was intentional and was done to cause injury to other but without infringing on the legal right of the person.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from injuria-sine-damno-damnum-sine-injuria, blog by lawtimesjournal]Q.Rakesh, a farmer, went to his nearby polling station to exercise his right to vote in an election. Manoj, a police officer assigned to election duty, unreasonably denied Rakesh the opportunity to cast his vote without providing any justification. Subsequently, Rakesh filed a lawsuit against Manoj for obstructing his voting right. Will the police officer be held legally accountable in this scenario?a)No, the police officer will not be held liable because he did not cause any physical harm or injury to Rakesh.b)No, the police officer will not be held liable because public officers have the authority to prohibit individuals from performing certain actions.c)Yes, the police officer will be held liable as he wrongfully prevented Rakesh from exercising his lawful right to vote.d)Yes, the police officer will be held liable because his actions resulted in financial loss to Rakesh, who had traveled from his village to cast his vote.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.