All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Anything founded on the basis of unity has s... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Anything founded on the basis of unity has scope for growth. When that unity moves towards integrality, the impetus for growth gets stronger. Mind operates by dividing reality into parts and regarding each as a whole in itself. It is an instrument of division. But its division is creative in that it expresses unity through division. In early civilizations, all life activities were centered on basic survival. Family, religion, production, festivals, trade, etc. were all closely interlinked. As society became more sophisticated, each sector acquired a life of its own and began to develop independently of the others. Thus, trade, commerce, banking and other sectors each developed a life of its own. Such a division eventually led to segregated specialization and fragmentation of knowledge, institutions and activities. These divisions appear real to the mind that accepts them, but social reality remains undivided and integrated.
Current theories regard economy as a separate and independent sphere of activity, ignoring its inextricable linkages with politics, law, ecology, culture and the underlying forces of social power. Economics generally ignores the impact of subjective psychological and cultural factors on economic and social outcomes or applies simplistic assumptions far removed from the real world.
This fragmentation has been stretched to the point of regarding finance as a field independent of the real economy.
Q. Which of the following is a generalized version of the arguments made in the passage?
  • a)
    Every field of knowledge is bound to become specific after some time.
  • b)
    Only those that reject specialization are bound to understand complex concepts in their entirety.
  • c)
    Sophistication and advancement tends to result in development of specialized institutions.
  • d)
    Taking cultural aspects into account could change the outcome of any action.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Anything founded on the basis of unity has scope for growth. When tha...
Option (c) is the correct answer as the author repeatedly argues that fragmentation of something leads to it developing a life of its own, i.e., becoming independent.
Option (a) is incorrect as no such period for the evolution has been stressed upon by the author.
Thus, this choice is a less accurate answer to the concerned question.
Option (b) is incorrect as it tries to establish a connection between specialization and understanding of concepts, which has not been addressed even remotely in the passage.
Option (d) is incorrect as it is not specific about the kind of changes in the outcome that can be induced through greater attention to cultural aspects of things.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Anything founded on the basis of unity has scope for growth. When tha...

Explanation:

  • Sophistication and advancement leads to development of specialized institutions: The passage discusses how as societies become more sophisticated, different sectors like trade, commerce, banking, etc. develop their own identities and functions, leading to the creation of specialized institutions in each sector.
  • Interlinked nature of early civilizations: Early civilizations were centered around basic survival and had interconnected life activities like family, religion, production, festivals, trade, etc. This interconnectedness highlights the unity and integrality of societal functions.
  • Fragmentation of knowledge and activities: The passage talks about how the mind divides reality into parts, leading to fragmented knowledge, institutions, and activities. This fragmentation, while appearing real to the mind, does not reflect the undivided and integrated nature of society.
  • Real economy versus finance: The passage criticizes the current view that regards finance as a field independent of the real economy. It emphasizes the need to understand the interlinkages between different sectors like politics, law, ecology, culture, etc., to grasp the holistic nature of economic and social outcomes.

Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Anything founded on the basis of unity has scope for growth. When that unity moves towards integrality, the impetus for growth gets stronger. Mind operates by dividing reality into parts and regarding each as a whole in itself. It is an instrument of division. But its division is creative in that it expresses unity through division. In early civilizations, all life activities were centered on basic survival. Family, religion, production, festivals, trade, etc. were all closely interlinked. As society became more sophisticated, each sector acquired a life of its own and began to develop independently of the others. Thus, trade, commerce, banking and other sectors each developed a life of its own. Such a division eventually led to segregated specialization and fragmentation of knowledge, institutions and activities. These divisions appear real to the mind that accepts them, but social reality remains undivided and integrated.Current theories regard economy as a separate and independent sphere of activity, ignoring its inextricable linkages with politics, law, ecology, culture and the underlying forces of social power. Economics generally ignores the impact of subjective psychological and cultural factors on economic and social outcomes or applies simplistic assumptions far removed from the real world.This fragmentation has been stretched to the point of regarding finance as a field independent of the real economy.Q. If the author's arguments in the given passage are true, which of the following must also be true?

Anything founded on the basis of unity has scope for growth. When that unity moves towards integrality, the impetus for growth gets stronger. Mind operates by dividing reality into parts and regarding each as a whole in itself. It is an instrument of division. But its division is creative in that it expresses unity through division. In early civilizations, all life activities were centered on basic survival. Family, religion, production, festivals, trade, etc. were all closely interlinked. As society became more sophisticated, each sector acquired a life of its own and began to develop independently of the others. Thus, trade, commerce, banking and other sectors each developed a life of its own. Such a division eventually led to segregated specialization and fragmentation of knowledge, institutions and activities. These divisions appear real to the mind that accepts them, but social reality remains undivided and integrated.Current theories regard economy as a separate and independent sphere of activity, ignoring its inextricable linkages with politics, law, ecology, culture and the underlying forces of social power. Economics generally ignores the impact of subjective psychological and cultural factors on economic and social outcomes or applies simplistic assumptions far removed from the real world.This fragmentation has been stretched to the point of regarding finance as a field independent of the real economy.Q. Which of the following best represents the author's opinion about the human brain?

Anything founded on the basis of unity has scope for growth. When that unity moves towards integrality, the impetus for growth gets stronger. Mind operates by dividing reality into parts and regarding each as a whole in itself. It is an instrument of division. But its division is creative in that it expresses unity through division. In early civilizations, all life activities were centered on basic survival. Family, religion, production, festivals, trade, etc. were all closely interlinked. As society became more sophisticated, each sector acquired a life of its own and began to develop independently of the others. Thus, trade, commerce, banking and other sectors each developed a life of its own. Such a division eventually led to segregated specialization and fragmentation of knowledge, institutions and activities. These divisions appear real to the mind that accepts them, but social reality remains undivided and integrated.Current theories regard economy as a separate and independent sphere of activity, ignoring its inextricable linkages with politics, law, ecology, culture and the underlying forces of social power. Economics generally ignores the impact of subjective psychological and cultural factors on economic and social outcomes or applies simplistic assumptions far removed from the real world.This fragmentation has been stretched to the point of regarding finance as a field independent of the real economy.Q. Which of the following does the author includes in his definition of "real economy"?

Anything founded on the basis of unity has scope for growth. When that unity moves towards integrality, the impetus for growth gets stronger. Mind operates by dividing reality into parts and regarding each as a whole in itself. It is an instrument of division. But its division is creative in that it expresses unity through division. In early civilizations, all life activities were centered on basic survival. Family, religion, production, festivals, trade, etc. were all closely interlinked. As society became more sophisticated, each sector acquired a life of its own and began to develop independently of the others. Thus, trade, commerce, banking and other sectors each developed a life of its own. Such a division eventually led to segregated specialization and fragmentation of knowledge, institutions and activities. These divisions appear real to the mind that accepts them, but social reality remains undivided and integrated.Current theories regard economy as a separate and independent sphere of activity, ignoring its inextricable linkages with politics, law, ecology, culture and the underlying forces of social power. Economics generally ignores the impact of subjective psychological and cultural factors on economic and social outcomes or applies simplistic assumptions far removed from the real world.This fragmentation has been stretched to the point of regarding finance as a field independent of the real economy.Q. Which of the following lines from the passage indicates that the mind can be deceived?

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Civilization is basically a vital kind of grouping. Without civilizations, the world as we know it would not be. Civilizations have different qualities than regular groups of people such as nomads. For example, a civilization develops surpluses of things which helps the people be a stable community. These surpluses also create the construction and growth of cities and helps develop secure, formal states. Government is also present in civilizations. One very important part of a civilization is an advanced writing method. A civilization can only be complete with all of these factors, or it will just fall apart. Nomads are nowhere close to being a civilization even though sometimes groups of nomads have good technology. The words 'culture' and 'civilization' have been often used synonymously, though they have clearly defined meanings differentiating them. 'Civilization' means the betterment of ways of living, making Nature bend to fulfil the needs of humankind. It includes also organizing societies into politically well defined groups working collectively for improved conditions of life in matters of food, dress, communication, and so on. Thus a group considers itself as civilized, while others were looked down upon as barbarians. This has led to wars and holocausts, resulting in mass destruction of human beings. What are the good parts of our civilization ? First and foremost there are order and safety. If today I have a quarrel with another man, I do not get beaten merely because I am physically weaker and he can kick me down. I go to law, and the law will decide as fairly as it can between the two of us. Thus in disputes between man and man right has taken the place of might. Moreover, the law protects me from robbery and violence. Nobody may come and break into my house, steal my goods or run off with my children. Of course, there are burglars, but they are very rare, and the law punishes them whenever it catches them. It is difficult for us to realize how much this safety means. Without safety these higher activities of mankind which make up civilization could not go on. The inventor could not invent, the scientist find out or the artist make beautiful things. Hence, order and safety, although they are not themselves civilization are things without which civilization would be impossible. They are as necessary to our civilization as the air we breathe is to us; and we have grown so used to them that we do not notice them any more than we notice the air.Another great achievement of our civilization is that today civilized men are largely free from the fear of pain. They still fall ill, but illness is no longer the terrible thing it used to be.... Not only do men and women enjoy better health; they live longer than they ever did before, and they have a much better chance of growing up.... Thirdly, our civilization is more secure than any that have gone before it. This is because it is much more widely spread.... Previous civilizations were specialized and limited, they were like oases in a desert.Q. What is the first merit of our civilization?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

Anything founded on the basis of unity has scope for growth. When that unity moves towards integrality, the impetus for growth gets stronger. Mind operates by dividing reality into parts and regarding each as a whole in itself. It is an instrument of division. But its division is creative in that it expresses unity through division. In early civilizations, all life activities were centered on basic survival. Family, religion, production, festivals, trade, etc. were all closely interlinked. As society became more sophisticated, each sector acquired a life of its own and began to develop independently of the others. Thus, trade, commerce, banking and other sectors each developed a life of its own. Such a division eventually led to segregated specialization and fragmentation of knowledge, institutions and activities. These divisions appear real to the mind that accepts them, but social reality remains undivided and integrated.Current theories regard economy as a separate and independent sphere of activity, ignoring its inextricable linkages with politics, law, ecology, culture and the underlying forces of social power. Economics generally ignores the impact of subjective psychological and cultural factors on economic and social outcomes or applies simplistic assumptions far removed from the real world.This fragmentation has been stretched to the point of regarding finance as a field independent of the real economy.Q. Which of the following is a generalized version of the arguments made in the passage?a)Every field of knowledge is bound to become specific after some time.b)Only those that reject specialization are bound to understand complex concepts in their entirety.c)Sophistication and advancement tends to result in development of specialized institutions.d)Taking cultural aspects into account could change the outcome of any action.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Anything founded on the basis of unity has scope for growth. When that unity moves towards integrality, the impetus for growth gets stronger. Mind operates by dividing reality into parts and regarding each as a whole in itself. It is an instrument of division. But its division is creative in that it expresses unity through division. In early civilizations, all life activities were centered on basic survival. Family, religion, production, festivals, trade, etc. were all closely interlinked. As society became more sophisticated, each sector acquired a life of its own and began to develop independently of the others. Thus, trade, commerce, banking and other sectors each developed a life of its own. Such a division eventually led to segregated specialization and fragmentation of knowledge, institutions and activities. These divisions appear real to the mind that accepts them, but social reality remains undivided and integrated.Current theories regard economy as a separate and independent sphere of activity, ignoring its inextricable linkages with politics, law, ecology, culture and the underlying forces of social power. Economics generally ignores the impact of subjective psychological and cultural factors on economic and social outcomes or applies simplistic assumptions far removed from the real world.This fragmentation has been stretched to the point of regarding finance as a field independent of the real economy.Q. Which of the following is a generalized version of the arguments made in the passage?a)Every field of knowledge is bound to become specific after some time.b)Only those that reject specialization are bound to understand complex concepts in their entirety.c)Sophistication and advancement tends to result in development of specialized institutions.d)Taking cultural aspects into account could change the outcome of any action.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Anything founded on the basis of unity has scope for growth. When that unity moves towards integrality, the impetus for growth gets stronger. Mind operates by dividing reality into parts and regarding each as a whole in itself. It is an instrument of division. But its division is creative in that it expresses unity through division. In early civilizations, all life activities were centered on basic survival. Family, religion, production, festivals, trade, etc. were all closely interlinked. As society became more sophisticated, each sector acquired a life of its own and began to develop independently of the others. Thus, trade, commerce, banking and other sectors each developed a life of its own. Such a division eventually led to segregated specialization and fragmentation of knowledge, institutions and activities. These divisions appear real to the mind that accepts them, but social reality remains undivided and integrated.Current theories regard economy as a separate and independent sphere of activity, ignoring its inextricable linkages with politics, law, ecology, culture and the underlying forces of social power. Economics generally ignores the impact of subjective psychological and cultural factors on economic and social outcomes or applies simplistic assumptions far removed from the real world.This fragmentation has been stretched to the point of regarding finance as a field independent of the real economy.Q. Which of the following is a generalized version of the arguments made in the passage?a)Every field of knowledge is bound to become specific after some time.b)Only those that reject specialization are bound to understand complex concepts in their entirety.c)Sophistication and advancement tends to result in development of specialized institutions.d)Taking cultural aspects into account could change the outcome of any action.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Anything founded on the basis of unity has scope for growth. When that unity moves towards integrality, the impetus for growth gets stronger. Mind operates by dividing reality into parts and regarding each as a whole in itself. It is an instrument of division. But its division is creative in that it expresses unity through division. In early civilizations, all life activities were centered on basic survival. Family, religion, production, festivals, trade, etc. were all closely interlinked. As society became more sophisticated, each sector acquired a life of its own and began to develop independently of the others. Thus, trade, commerce, banking and other sectors each developed a life of its own. Such a division eventually led to segregated specialization and fragmentation of knowledge, institutions and activities. These divisions appear real to the mind that accepts them, but social reality remains undivided and integrated.Current theories regard economy as a separate and independent sphere of activity, ignoring its inextricable linkages with politics, law, ecology, culture and the underlying forces of social power. Economics generally ignores the impact of subjective psychological and cultural factors on economic and social outcomes or applies simplistic assumptions far removed from the real world.This fragmentation has been stretched to the point of regarding finance as a field independent of the real economy.Q. Which of the following is a generalized version of the arguments made in the passage?a)Every field of knowledge is bound to become specific after some time.b)Only those that reject specialization are bound to understand complex concepts in their entirety.c)Sophistication and advancement tends to result in development of specialized institutions.d)Taking cultural aspects into account could change the outcome of any action.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Anything founded on the basis of unity has scope for growth. When that unity moves towards integrality, the impetus for growth gets stronger. Mind operates by dividing reality into parts and regarding each as a whole in itself. It is an instrument of division. But its division is creative in that it expresses unity through division. In early civilizations, all life activities were centered on basic survival. Family, religion, production, festivals, trade, etc. were all closely interlinked. As society became more sophisticated, each sector acquired a life of its own and began to develop independently of the others. Thus, trade, commerce, banking and other sectors each developed a life of its own. Such a division eventually led to segregated specialization and fragmentation of knowledge, institutions and activities. These divisions appear real to the mind that accepts them, but social reality remains undivided and integrated.Current theories regard economy as a separate and independent sphere of activity, ignoring its inextricable linkages with politics, law, ecology, culture and the underlying forces of social power. Economics generally ignores the impact of subjective psychological and cultural factors on economic and social outcomes or applies simplistic assumptions far removed from the real world.This fragmentation has been stretched to the point of regarding finance as a field independent of the real economy.Q. Which of the following is a generalized version of the arguments made in the passage?a)Every field of knowledge is bound to become specific after some time.b)Only those that reject specialization are bound to understand complex concepts in their entirety.c)Sophistication and advancement tends to result in development of specialized institutions.d)Taking cultural aspects into account could change the outcome of any action.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Anything founded on the basis of unity has scope for growth. When that unity moves towards integrality, the impetus for growth gets stronger. Mind operates by dividing reality into parts and regarding each as a whole in itself. It is an instrument of division. But its division is creative in that it expresses unity through division. In early civilizations, all life activities were centered on basic survival. Family, religion, production, festivals, trade, etc. were all closely interlinked. As society became more sophisticated, each sector acquired a life of its own and began to develop independently of the others. Thus, trade, commerce, banking and other sectors each developed a life of its own. Such a division eventually led to segregated specialization and fragmentation of knowledge, institutions and activities. These divisions appear real to the mind that accepts them, but social reality remains undivided and integrated.Current theories regard economy as a separate and independent sphere of activity, ignoring its inextricable linkages with politics, law, ecology, culture and the underlying forces of social power. Economics generally ignores the impact of subjective psychological and cultural factors on economic and social outcomes or applies simplistic assumptions far removed from the real world.This fragmentation has been stretched to the point of regarding finance as a field independent of the real economy.Q. Which of the following is a generalized version of the arguments made in the passage?a)Every field of knowledge is bound to become specific after some time.b)Only those that reject specialization are bound to understand complex concepts in their entirety.c)Sophistication and advancement tends to result in development of specialized institutions.d)Taking cultural aspects into account could change the outcome of any action.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Anything founded on the basis of unity has scope for growth. When that unity moves towards integrality, the impetus for growth gets stronger. Mind operates by dividing reality into parts and regarding each as a whole in itself. It is an instrument of division. But its division is creative in that it expresses unity through division. In early civilizations, all life activities were centered on basic survival. Family, religion, production, festivals, trade, etc. were all closely interlinked. As society became more sophisticated, each sector acquired a life of its own and began to develop independently of the others. Thus, trade, commerce, banking and other sectors each developed a life of its own. Such a division eventually led to segregated specialization and fragmentation of knowledge, institutions and activities. These divisions appear real to the mind that accepts them, but social reality remains undivided and integrated.Current theories regard economy as a separate and independent sphere of activity, ignoring its inextricable linkages with politics, law, ecology, culture and the underlying forces of social power. Economics generally ignores the impact of subjective psychological and cultural factors on economic and social outcomes or applies simplistic assumptions far removed from the real world.This fragmentation has been stretched to the point of regarding finance as a field independent of the real economy.Q. Which of the following is a generalized version of the arguments made in the passage?a)Every field of knowledge is bound to become specific after some time.b)Only those that reject specialization are bound to understand complex concepts in their entirety.c)Sophistication and advancement tends to result in development of specialized institutions.d)Taking cultural aspects into account could change the outcome of any action.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Anything founded on the basis of unity has scope for growth. When that unity moves towards integrality, the impetus for growth gets stronger. Mind operates by dividing reality into parts and regarding each as a whole in itself. It is an instrument of division. But its division is creative in that it expresses unity through division. In early civilizations, all life activities were centered on basic survival. Family, religion, production, festivals, trade, etc. were all closely interlinked. As society became more sophisticated, each sector acquired a life of its own and began to develop independently of the others. Thus, trade, commerce, banking and other sectors each developed a life of its own. Such a division eventually led to segregated specialization and fragmentation of knowledge, institutions and activities. These divisions appear real to the mind that accepts them, but social reality remains undivided and integrated.Current theories regard economy as a separate and independent sphere of activity, ignoring its inextricable linkages with politics, law, ecology, culture and the underlying forces of social power. Economics generally ignores the impact of subjective psychological and cultural factors on economic and social outcomes or applies simplistic assumptions far removed from the real world.This fragmentation has been stretched to the point of regarding finance as a field independent of the real economy.Q. Which of the following is a generalized version of the arguments made in the passage?a)Every field of knowledge is bound to become specific after some time.b)Only those that reject specialization are bound to understand complex concepts in their entirety.c)Sophistication and advancement tends to result in development of specialized institutions.d)Taking cultural aspects into account could change the outcome of any action.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Anything founded on the basis of unity has scope for growth. When that unity moves towards integrality, the impetus for growth gets stronger. Mind operates by dividing reality into parts and regarding each as a whole in itself. It is an instrument of division. But its division is creative in that it expresses unity through division. In early civilizations, all life activities were centered on basic survival. Family, religion, production, festivals, trade, etc. were all closely interlinked. As society became more sophisticated, each sector acquired a life of its own and began to develop independently of the others. Thus, trade, commerce, banking and other sectors each developed a life of its own. Such a division eventually led to segregated specialization and fragmentation of knowledge, institutions and activities. These divisions appear real to the mind that accepts them, but social reality remains undivided and integrated.Current theories regard economy as a separate and independent sphere of activity, ignoring its inextricable linkages with politics, law, ecology, culture and the underlying forces of social power. Economics generally ignores the impact of subjective psychological and cultural factors on economic and social outcomes or applies simplistic assumptions far removed from the real world.This fragmentation has been stretched to the point of regarding finance as a field independent of the real economy.Q. Which of the following is a generalized version of the arguments made in the passage?a)Every field of knowledge is bound to become specific after some time.b)Only those that reject specialization are bound to understand complex concepts in their entirety.c)Sophistication and advancement tends to result in development of specialized institutions.d)Taking cultural aspects into account could change the outcome of any action.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Anything founded on the basis of unity has scope for growth. When that unity moves towards integrality, the impetus for growth gets stronger. Mind operates by dividing reality into parts and regarding each as a whole in itself. It is an instrument of division. But its division is creative in that it expresses unity through division. In early civilizations, all life activities were centered on basic survival. Family, religion, production, festivals, trade, etc. were all closely interlinked. As society became more sophisticated, each sector acquired a life of its own and began to develop independently of the others. Thus, trade, commerce, banking and other sectors each developed a life of its own. Such a division eventually led to segregated specialization and fragmentation of knowledge, institutions and activities. These divisions appear real to the mind that accepts them, but social reality remains undivided and integrated.Current theories regard economy as a separate and independent sphere of activity, ignoring its inextricable linkages with politics, law, ecology, culture and the underlying forces of social power. Economics generally ignores the impact of subjective psychological and cultural factors on economic and social outcomes or applies simplistic assumptions far removed from the real world.This fragmentation has been stretched to the point of regarding finance as a field independent of the real economy.Q. Which of the following is a generalized version of the arguments made in the passage?a)Every field of knowledge is bound to become specific after some time.b)Only those that reject specialization are bound to understand complex concepts in their entirety.c)Sophistication and advancement tends to result in development of specialized institutions.d)Taking cultural aspects into account could change the outcome of any action.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup