Question Description
Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.In the modern tapestry of human interaction, the threads of authority and obedience intertwine in a complex dance. Authority, by its very nature, wields a potent psychological influence. It can transform an otherwise resistant individual into a compliant one, altering the trajectory of their moral and ethical compass. This malleability of human will under the weight of authority is both a fascinating and disquieting aspect of social psychology.The concept of authority transcends mere power; it embodies a social contract where individuals relinquish a degree of autonomy in exchange for order and governance. Yet, this exchange can have unintended consequences, particularly when authority commands actions that clash with personal morals. Its not uncommon for individuals to carry out orders that, under normal circumstances, they would find reprehensible. The core of this phenomenon lies in the psychological shift experienced by individuals when they transition from acting autonomously to functioning as agents of authority.The dichotomy of obedience is such that it can be seen as both a virtue and a vice. On one hand, it is the glue that holds social structures together; on the other, it can lead to the perpetration of great injustices. The role of authority is central in this respect, as it has the capacity to diminish personal accountability, absolving individuals of the guilt normally associated with unethical actions. This dissociation of action and conscience is a key aspect of obedience that warrants thorough exploration.Exploring the dynamics of obedience necessitates a departure from theoretical discourse to empirical analysis. A controlled laboratory setting can yield invaluable insights into the conditions that foster obedience and those that precipitate defiance. These experiments, while conducted in an artificial environment, are not detached from reality. Instead, they represent an amplification of everyday interactions, distilled to their fundamental elements. The challenge lies in designing these experiments to reflect the essence of obedience, capturing the psychological transformation that occurs when an individual submits to authority.The implications of such studies extend far beyond the confines of the laboratory. The principles of obedience to authority are relevant in a myriad of contexts, from the military to the corporate world, from classrooms to government. Understanding how and why individuals obey is crucial to unraveling both the triumphs and tragedies of human history.Q. Based on the passage, which of the following best captures the authors stance on laboratory experiments studying obedience?a)They are irrelevant and cannot capture the complexities of real-life obedience.b)They are valuable, provided they accurately distill the essence of obedience.c)They are redundant because obedience is an innate human trait.d)They are unethical and should not be pursued.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.In the modern tapestry of human interaction, the threads of authority and obedience intertwine in a complex dance. Authority, by its very nature, wields a potent psychological influence. It can transform an otherwise resistant individual into a compliant one, altering the trajectory of their moral and ethical compass. This malleability of human will under the weight of authority is both a fascinating and disquieting aspect of social psychology.The concept of authority transcends mere power; it embodies a social contract where individuals relinquish a degree of autonomy in exchange for order and governance. Yet, this exchange can have unintended consequences, particularly when authority commands actions that clash with personal morals. Its not uncommon for individuals to carry out orders that, under normal circumstances, they would find reprehensible. The core of this phenomenon lies in the psychological shift experienced by individuals when they transition from acting autonomously to functioning as agents of authority.The dichotomy of obedience is such that it can be seen as both a virtue and a vice. On one hand, it is the glue that holds social structures together; on the other, it can lead to the perpetration of great injustices. The role of authority is central in this respect, as it has the capacity to diminish personal accountability, absolving individuals of the guilt normally associated with unethical actions. This dissociation of action and conscience is a key aspect of obedience that warrants thorough exploration.Exploring the dynamics of obedience necessitates a departure from theoretical discourse to empirical analysis. A controlled laboratory setting can yield invaluable insights into the conditions that foster obedience and those that precipitate defiance. These experiments, while conducted in an artificial environment, are not detached from reality. Instead, they represent an amplification of everyday interactions, distilled to their fundamental elements. The challenge lies in designing these experiments to reflect the essence of obedience, capturing the psychological transformation that occurs when an individual submits to authority.The implications of such studies extend far beyond the confines of the laboratory. The principles of obedience to authority are relevant in a myriad of contexts, from the military to the corporate world, from classrooms to government. Understanding how and why individuals obey is crucial to unraveling both the triumphs and tragedies of human history.Q. Based on the passage, which of the following best captures the authors stance on laboratory experiments studying obedience?a)They are irrelevant and cannot capture the complexities of real-life obedience.b)They are valuable, provided they accurately distill the essence of obedience.c)They are redundant because obedience is an innate human trait.d)They are unethical and should not be pursued.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.In the modern tapestry of human interaction, the threads of authority and obedience intertwine in a complex dance. Authority, by its very nature, wields a potent psychological influence. It can transform an otherwise resistant individual into a compliant one, altering the trajectory of their moral and ethical compass. This malleability of human will under the weight of authority is both a fascinating and disquieting aspect of social psychology.The concept of authority transcends mere power; it embodies a social contract where individuals relinquish a degree of autonomy in exchange for order and governance. Yet, this exchange can have unintended consequences, particularly when authority commands actions that clash with personal morals. Its not uncommon for individuals to carry out orders that, under normal circumstances, they would find reprehensible. The core of this phenomenon lies in the psychological shift experienced by individuals when they transition from acting autonomously to functioning as agents of authority.The dichotomy of obedience is such that it can be seen as both a virtue and a vice. On one hand, it is the glue that holds social structures together; on the other, it can lead to the perpetration of great injustices. The role of authority is central in this respect, as it has the capacity to diminish personal accountability, absolving individuals of the guilt normally associated with unethical actions. This dissociation of action and conscience is a key aspect of obedience that warrants thorough exploration.Exploring the dynamics of obedience necessitates a departure from theoretical discourse to empirical analysis. A controlled laboratory setting can yield invaluable insights into the conditions that foster obedience and those that precipitate defiance. These experiments, while conducted in an artificial environment, are not detached from reality. Instead, they represent an amplification of everyday interactions, distilled to their fundamental elements. The challenge lies in designing these experiments to reflect the essence of obedience, capturing the psychological transformation that occurs when an individual submits to authority.The implications of such studies extend far beyond the confines of the laboratory. The principles of obedience to authority are relevant in a myriad of contexts, from the military to the corporate world, from classrooms to government. Understanding how and why individuals obey is crucial to unraveling both the triumphs and tragedies of human history.Q. Based on the passage, which of the following best captures the authors stance on laboratory experiments studying obedience?a)They are irrelevant and cannot capture the complexities of real-life obedience.b)They are valuable, provided they accurately distill the essence of obedience.c)They are redundant because obedience is an innate human trait.d)They are unethical and should not be pursued.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.In the modern tapestry of human interaction, the threads of authority and obedience intertwine in a complex dance. Authority, by its very nature, wields a potent psychological influence. It can transform an otherwise resistant individual into a compliant one, altering the trajectory of their moral and ethical compass. This malleability of human will under the weight of authority is both a fascinating and disquieting aspect of social psychology.The concept of authority transcends mere power; it embodies a social contract where individuals relinquish a degree of autonomy in exchange for order and governance. Yet, this exchange can have unintended consequences, particularly when authority commands actions that clash with personal morals. Its not uncommon for individuals to carry out orders that, under normal circumstances, they would find reprehensible. The core of this phenomenon lies in the psychological shift experienced by individuals when they transition from acting autonomously to functioning as agents of authority.The dichotomy of obedience is such that it can be seen as both a virtue and a vice. On one hand, it is the glue that holds social structures together; on the other, it can lead to the perpetration of great injustices. The role of authority is central in this respect, as it has the capacity to diminish personal accountability, absolving individuals of the guilt normally associated with unethical actions. This dissociation of action and conscience is a key aspect of obedience that warrants thorough exploration.Exploring the dynamics of obedience necessitates a departure from theoretical discourse to empirical analysis. A controlled laboratory setting can yield invaluable insights into the conditions that foster obedience and those that precipitate defiance. These experiments, while conducted in an artificial environment, are not detached from reality. Instead, they represent an amplification of everyday interactions, distilled to their fundamental elements. The challenge lies in designing these experiments to reflect the essence of obedience, capturing the psychological transformation that occurs when an individual submits to authority.The implications of such studies extend far beyond the confines of the laboratory. The principles of obedience to authority are relevant in a myriad of contexts, from the military to the corporate world, from classrooms to government. Understanding how and why individuals obey is crucial to unraveling both the triumphs and tragedies of human history.Q. Based on the passage, which of the following best captures the authors stance on laboratory experiments studying obedience?a)They are irrelevant and cannot capture the complexities of real-life obedience.b)They are valuable, provided they accurately distill the essence of obedience.c)They are redundant because obedience is an innate human trait.d)They are unethical and should not be pursued.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.In the modern tapestry of human interaction, the threads of authority and obedience intertwine in a complex dance. Authority, by its very nature, wields a potent psychological influence. It can transform an otherwise resistant individual into a compliant one, altering the trajectory of their moral and ethical compass. This malleability of human will under the weight of authority is both a fascinating and disquieting aspect of social psychology.The concept of authority transcends mere power; it embodies a social contract where individuals relinquish a degree of autonomy in exchange for order and governance. Yet, this exchange can have unintended consequences, particularly when authority commands actions that clash with personal morals. Its not uncommon for individuals to carry out orders that, under normal circumstances, they would find reprehensible. The core of this phenomenon lies in the psychological shift experienced by individuals when they transition from acting autonomously to functioning as agents of authority.The dichotomy of obedience is such that it can be seen as both a virtue and a vice. On one hand, it is the glue that holds social structures together; on the other, it can lead to the perpetration of great injustices. The role of authority is central in this respect, as it has the capacity to diminish personal accountability, absolving individuals of the guilt normally associated with unethical actions. This dissociation of action and conscience is a key aspect of obedience that warrants thorough exploration.Exploring the dynamics of obedience necessitates a departure from theoretical discourse to empirical analysis. A controlled laboratory setting can yield invaluable insights into the conditions that foster obedience and those that precipitate defiance. These experiments, while conducted in an artificial environment, are not detached from reality. Instead, they represent an amplification of everyday interactions, distilled to their fundamental elements. The challenge lies in designing these experiments to reflect the essence of obedience, capturing the psychological transformation that occurs when an individual submits to authority.The implications of such studies extend far beyond the confines of the laboratory. The principles of obedience to authority are relevant in a myriad of contexts, from the military to the corporate world, from classrooms to government. Understanding how and why individuals obey is crucial to unraveling both the triumphs and tragedies of human history.Q. Based on the passage, which of the following best captures the authors stance on laboratory experiments studying obedience?a)They are irrelevant and cannot capture the complexities of real-life obedience.b)They are valuable, provided they accurately distill the essence of obedience.c)They are redundant because obedience is an innate human trait.d)They are unethical and should not be pursued.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.In the modern tapestry of human interaction, the threads of authority and obedience intertwine in a complex dance. Authority, by its very nature, wields a potent psychological influence. It can transform an otherwise resistant individual into a compliant one, altering the trajectory of their moral and ethical compass. This malleability of human will under the weight of authority is both a fascinating and disquieting aspect of social psychology.The concept of authority transcends mere power; it embodies a social contract where individuals relinquish a degree of autonomy in exchange for order and governance. Yet, this exchange can have unintended consequences, particularly when authority commands actions that clash with personal morals. Its not uncommon for individuals to carry out orders that, under normal circumstances, they would find reprehensible. The core of this phenomenon lies in the psychological shift experienced by individuals when they transition from acting autonomously to functioning as agents of authority.The dichotomy of obedience is such that it can be seen as both a virtue and a vice. On one hand, it is the glue that holds social structures together; on the other, it can lead to the perpetration of great injustices. The role of authority is central in this respect, as it has the capacity to diminish personal accountability, absolving individuals of the guilt normally associated with unethical actions. This dissociation of action and conscience is a key aspect of obedience that warrants thorough exploration.Exploring the dynamics of obedience necessitates a departure from theoretical discourse to empirical analysis. A controlled laboratory setting can yield invaluable insights into the conditions that foster obedience and those that precipitate defiance. These experiments, while conducted in an artificial environment, are not detached from reality. Instead, they represent an amplification of everyday interactions, distilled to their fundamental elements. The challenge lies in designing these experiments to reflect the essence of obedience, capturing the psychological transformation that occurs when an individual submits to authority.The implications of such studies extend far beyond the confines of the laboratory. The principles of obedience to authority are relevant in a myriad of contexts, from the military to the corporate world, from classrooms to government. Understanding how and why individuals obey is crucial to unraveling both the triumphs and tragedies of human history.Q. Based on the passage, which of the following best captures the authors stance on laboratory experiments studying obedience?a)They are irrelevant and cannot capture the complexities of real-life obedience.b)They are valuable, provided they accurately distill the essence of obedience.c)They are redundant because obedience is an innate human trait.d)They are unethical and should not be pursued.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.In the modern tapestry of human interaction, the threads of authority and obedience intertwine in a complex dance. Authority, by its very nature, wields a potent psychological influence. It can transform an otherwise resistant individual into a compliant one, altering the trajectory of their moral and ethical compass. This malleability of human will under the weight of authority is both a fascinating and disquieting aspect of social psychology.The concept of authority transcends mere power; it embodies a social contract where individuals relinquish a degree of autonomy in exchange for order and governance. Yet, this exchange can have unintended consequences, particularly when authority commands actions that clash with personal morals. Its not uncommon for individuals to carry out orders that, under normal circumstances, they would find reprehensible. The core of this phenomenon lies in the psychological shift experienced by individuals when they transition from acting autonomously to functioning as agents of authority.The dichotomy of obedience is such that it can be seen as both a virtue and a vice. On one hand, it is the glue that holds social structures together; on the other, it can lead to the perpetration of great injustices. The role of authority is central in this respect, as it has the capacity to diminish personal accountability, absolving individuals of the guilt normally associated with unethical actions. This dissociation of action and conscience is a key aspect of obedience that warrants thorough exploration.Exploring the dynamics of obedience necessitates a departure from theoretical discourse to empirical analysis. A controlled laboratory setting can yield invaluable insights into the conditions that foster obedience and those that precipitate defiance. These experiments, while conducted in an artificial environment, are not detached from reality. Instead, they represent an amplification of everyday interactions, distilled to their fundamental elements. The challenge lies in designing these experiments to reflect the essence of obedience, capturing the psychological transformation that occurs when an individual submits to authority.The implications of such studies extend far beyond the confines of the laboratory. The principles of obedience to authority are relevant in a myriad of contexts, from the military to the corporate world, from classrooms to government. Understanding how and why individuals obey is crucial to unraveling both the triumphs and tragedies of human history.Q. Based on the passage, which of the following best captures the authors stance on laboratory experiments studying obedience?a)They are irrelevant and cannot capture the complexities of real-life obedience.b)They are valuable, provided they accurately distill the essence of obedience.c)They are redundant because obedience is an innate human trait.d)They are unethical and should not be pursued.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.In the modern tapestry of human interaction, the threads of authority and obedience intertwine in a complex dance. Authority, by its very nature, wields a potent psychological influence. It can transform an otherwise resistant individual into a compliant one, altering the trajectory of their moral and ethical compass. This malleability of human will under the weight of authority is both a fascinating and disquieting aspect of social psychology.The concept of authority transcends mere power; it embodies a social contract where individuals relinquish a degree of autonomy in exchange for order and governance. Yet, this exchange can have unintended consequences, particularly when authority commands actions that clash with personal morals. Its not uncommon for individuals to carry out orders that, under normal circumstances, they would find reprehensible. The core of this phenomenon lies in the psychological shift experienced by individuals when they transition from acting autonomously to functioning as agents of authority.The dichotomy of obedience is such that it can be seen as both a virtue and a vice. On one hand, it is the glue that holds social structures together; on the other, it can lead to the perpetration of great injustices. The role of authority is central in this respect, as it has the capacity to diminish personal accountability, absolving individuals of the guilt normally associated with unethical actions. This dissociation of action and conscience is a key aspect of obedience that warrants thorough exploration.Exploring the dynamics of obedience necessitates a departure from theoretical discourse to empirical analysis. A controlled laboratory setting can yield invaluable insights into the conditions that foster obedience and those that precipitate defiance. These experiments, while conducted in an artificial environment, are not detached from reality. Instead, they represent an amplification of everyday interactions, distilled to their fundamental elements. The challenge lies in designing these experiments to reflect the essence of obedience, capturing the psychological transformation that occurs when an individual submits to authority.The implications of such studies extend far beyond the confines of the laboratory. The principles of obedience to authority are relevant in a myriad of contexts, from the military to the corporate world, from classrooms to government. Understanding how and why individuals obey is crucial to unraveling both the triumphs and tragedies of human history.Q. Based on the passage, which of the following best captures the authors stance on laboratory experiments studying obedience?a)They are irrelevant and cannot capture the complexities of real-life obedience.b)They are valuable, provided they accurately distill the essence of obedience.c)They are redundant because obedience is an innate human trait.d)They are unethical and should not be pursued.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.In the modern tapestry of human interaction, the threads of authority and obedience intertwine in a complex dance. Authority, by its very nature, wields a potent psychological influence. It can transform an otherwise resistant individual into a compliant one, altering the trajectory of their moral and ethical compass. This malleability of human will under the weight of authority is both a fascinating and disquieting aspect of social psychology.The concept of authority transcends mere power; it embodies a social contract where individuals relinquish a degree of autonomy in exchange for order and governance. Yet, this exchange can have unintended consequences, particularly when authority commands actions that clash with personal morals. Its not uncommon for individuals to carry out orders that, under normal circumstances, they would find reprehensible. The core of this phenomenon lies in the psychological shift experienced by individuals when they transition from acting autonomously to functioning as agents of authority.The dichotomy of obedience is such that it can be seen as both a virtue and a vice. On one hand, it is the glue that holds social structures together; on the other, it can lead to the perpetration of great injustices. The role of authority is central in this respect, as it has the capacity to diminish personal accountability, absolving individuals of the guilt normally associated with unethical actions. This dissociation of action and conscience is a key aspect of obedience that warrants thorough exploration.Exploring the dynamics of obedience necessitates a departure from theoretical discourse to empirical analysis. A controlled laboratory setting can yield invaluable insights into the conditions that foster obedience and those that precipitate defiance. These experiments, while conducted in an artificial environment, are not detached from reality. Instead, they represent an amplification of everyday interactions, distilled to their fundamental elements. The challenge lies in designing these experiments to reflect the essence of obedience, capturing the psychological transformation that occurs when an individual submits to authority.The implications of such studies extend far beyond the confines of the laboratory. The principles of obedience to authority are relevant in a myriad of contexts, from the military to the corporate world, from classrooms to government. Understanding how and why individuals obey is crucial to unraveling both the triumphs and tragedies of human history.Q. Based on the passage, which of the following best captures the authors stance on laboratory experiments studying obedience?a)They are irrelevant and cannot capture the complexities of real-life obedience.b)They are valuable, provided they accurately distill the essence of obedience.c)They are redundant because obedience is an innate human trait.d)They are unethical and should not be pursued.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.