CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  Statement: Drinking water supply to many part... Start Learning for Free
Statement: Drinking water supply to many parts of town is disrupted due to loss of water because of leakage in pipes supplying water.
Courses of action:
I. The government should order an enquiry into the matter.
II. The civic body should set up a fact-finding team to assess the damage and take effective step.
  • a)
    Only I follows.
  • b)
    Only II follows.
  • c)
    Either I or II follows.
  • d)
    Neither I nor II follows.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Statement: Drinking water supply to many parts of town is disrupted du...
Explanation:
The statement presents a problem where the drinking water supply to many parts of town is disrupted due to leakage in water pipes. We need to evaluate the given courses of action to determine if they are appropriate responses to the problem.

I. The government should order an enquiry into the matter.
This course of action suggests that the government should initiate an investigation into the issue of water leakage in order to identify the causes and potential solutions. This action seems reasonable as it would help in understanding the extent of the problem and provide insights for corrective measures. However, it is important to note that ordering an enquiry alone may not immediately solve the issue of disrupted water supply. It is just the first step towards finding a solution.

II. The civic body should set up a fact-finding team to assess the damage and take effective steps.
This course of action proposes that the civic body should form a team to assess the damage caused by the water leakage and take appropriate steps to address the issue. This action is also logical as it would help in understanding the extent of the damage and enable the civic body to plan and implement effective measures to rectify the situation.

Evaluation:
Neither of the courses of action directly addresses the problem of disrupted water supply. While they both suggest appropriate steps to investigate and assess the issue, they do not provide immediate solutions to the problem at hand. The given courses of action are more focused on understanding the problem and identifying potential solutions rather than directly resolving the water supply disruption.

Therefore, neither course of action follows in the given scenario.

Conclusion:
Option D, "Neither I nor II follows," is the correct answer as neither of the courses of action directly addresses the problem of disrupted water supply.
Attention CAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Read the passage carefully and answer the following questions If you see police choking someone to death, you might choose to pepper-spray them and flee. You might even save an innocent life. But what ethical considerations justify such dangerous heroics? More important: do we have the right to defend ourselves and others from government injustice when government agents are following an unjust law? I think the answer is yes. But that view needs defending. Under what circumstances might active self-defence, including possible violence, be justified? Civil disobedience is a public act that aims to create social or legal change. Think of Henry David Thoreau’s arrest in 1846 for refusing to pay taxes to fund the colonial exploits of the United States. In such a case, disobedient citizens visibly break the law and accept punishment, so as to draw attention to a cause. But justifiable resistance need not have a civic character. It need not aim at changing the law, reforming dysfunctional institutions or replacing bad leaders. Sometimes, it is simply about stopping an immediate injustice. Some people say we may not defend ourselves against government injustice because governments and their agents have ‘authority’. But the authority argument doesn’t work. It’s one thing to say that you have a duty to pay your taxes or follow the speed limit. It is quite another to show that you are specifically bound to allow a government and its agents to use excessive violence and ignore your rights to due process. Others say that we should resist government injustice, but only through peaceful methods. Indeed, we should, but that doesn’t differentiate between self-defence against civilians or government. The common-law doctrine of self-defence is always governed by a necessity proviso: you may lie or use violence only if necessary, that is, only if peaceful actions are not as effective. But peaceful methods often fail to stop wrongdoing. Eric Garner peacefully complained: ‘I can’t breathe,’ until he drew his last breath. Another argument is that we shouldn’t act as vigilantes. But invoking this point here misunderstands the antivigilante principle, which says that when there exists a workable public system of justice, you should defer to public agents trying, in good faith, to administer justice. So if cops attempt to stop a mugging, you shouldn’t insert yourself. But if they ignore or can’t stop a mugging, you may intervene. If the police themselves are the muggers the antivigilante principle does not forbid you from defending yourself. It insists you defer to more competent government agents when they administer justice, not that you must let them commit injustice. Some people find my thesis too dangerous. They claim that it’s hard to know exactly when self-defence is justified; that people make mistakes, resisting when they should not. Perhaps. But that’s true of self-defence against civilians, too. No one says we lack a right of self-defence against each other because applying the principle is hard. Rather, some moral principles are hard to apply. However, this objection gets the problem exactly backwards. In real life, people are too deferential and conformist in the face of government authority and reluctant to stand up to political injustice. If anything, the dangerous thesis is that we should defer to government agents when they seem to act unjustly. Remember, self-defence against the state is about stopping an immediate injustice, not fixing broken rules. Q.All of the following statements are not true according to the passage except

Answer the following question based on the information given below.India ranks 4th in carbon emission among nations worldwide. For a developing nation like India, it seems impossible to bring a significant reduction in carbon emissions in near future. The Environment Protection Act, 1986, was one of the first legislations brought about by the legislature to protect the environment from degradation caused by the ever-increasing pollution. The next decade was a witness to economic liberalisation which in turn resulted in industrialisation and a revolutionary increase in automobiles on the road.The Delhi government recently applied the odd and even plan for automobiles. The odd and even scheme of the Delhi government is laudable for the sheer fact that it takes courage to take such an antipopulist measure. The scheme may not have had a drastic impact on the pollution, but it has indeed resulted in a reduction in both the traffic and the resultant pollution. There are certain sections of society who are still miffed with the government, but then constructive criticism is a sign of a healthy democracy.Taking a lesson from the successful implementation of odd and even rule, governments across the country should board the reform bandwagon. These days we see many advertisements making people aware of the ill-impact of various particulate matters from vehicles as well as from industry. The government should continue with them and should spread awareness among the masses.Every developing township is getting clogged with the ever increasing traffic on their roads. Cities which have already acquired a shape can be restructured through implementing metro rail-based mass rapid transit systems (MRTS). It has been observed that road- based MRTS is less effective in the urban centres in India. Most of the Indian cities have developed in a haphazard manner and there is no or little scope for implementation of road-based MRTS.The use of CNG vehicles should be increased and people should be encouraged to use more and more of it. It could be fuelled further by asking auto manufacturers to assign CNG fitting stations from where people can install CNG kits in their cars without losing their warranty. Conversion percentage of vehicles into CNG will get a shot in the arm with this initiative.However, it seems impossible for governments to act on their own because unlike the Delhi government, very few governments in the states enjoy such absolute majority. The reason for judicialintervention is the avaricious attitude of the people. The court should reassume its role and put its act together to save them from the self-destructive ways and should pave a way in which pollution could be curbed in India.Q.Which of the following can be definitely concluded from the above passage?

Top Courses for CAT

Statement: Drinking water supply to many parts of town is disrupted due to loss of water because of leakage in pipes supplying water.Courses of action:I. The government should order an enquiry into the matter.II. The civic body should set up a fact-finding team to assess the damage and take effective step.a)Only I follows.b)Only II follows.c)Either I or II follows.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Statement: Drinking water supply to many parts of town is disrupted due to loss of water because of leakage in pipes supplying water.Courses of action:I. The government should order an enquiry into the matter.II. The civic body should set up a fact-finding team to assess the damage and take effective step.a)Only I follows.b)Only II follows.c)Either I or II follows.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Statement: Drinking water supply to many parts of town is disrupted due to loss of water because of leakage in pipes supplying water.Courses of action:I. The government should order an enquiry into the matter.II. The civic body should set up a fact-finding team to assess the damage and take effective step.a)Only I follows.b)Only II follows.c)Either I or II follows.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Statement: Drinking water supply to many parts of town is disrupted due to loss of water because of leakage in pipes supplying water.Courses of action:I. The government should order an enquiry into the matter.II. The civic body should set up a fact-finding team to assess the damage and take effective step.a)Only I follows.b)Only II follows.c)Either I or II follows.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Statement: Drinking water supply to many parts of town is disrupted due to loss of water because of leakage in pipes supplying water.Courses of action:I. The government should order an enquiry into the matter.II. The civic body should set up a fact-finding team to assess the damage and take effective step.a)Only I follows.b)Only II follows.c)Either I or II follows.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Statement: Drinking water supply to many parts of town is disrupted due to loss of water because of leakage in pipes supplying water.Courses of action:I. The government should order an enquiry into the matter.II. The civic body should set up a fact-finding team to assess the damage and take effective step.a)Only I follows.b)Only II follows.c)Either I or II follows.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Statement: Drinking water supply to many parts of town is disrupted due to loss of water because of leakage in pipes supplying water.Courses of action:I. The government should order an enquiry into the matter.II. The civic body should set up a fact-finding team to assess the damage and take effective step.a)Only I follows.b)Only II follows.c)Either I or II follows.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Statement: Drinking water supply to many parts of town is disrupted due to loss of water because of leakage in pipes supplying water.Courses of action:I. The government should order an enquiry into the matter.II. The civic body should set up a fact-finding team to assess the damage and take effective step.a)Only I follows.b)Only II follows.c)Either I or II follows.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Statement: Drinking water supply to many parts of town is disrupted due to loss of water because of leakage in pipes supplying water.Courses of action:I. The government should order an enquiry into the matter.II. The civic body should set up a fact-finding team to assess the damage and take effective step.a)Only I follows.b)Only II follows.c)Either I or II follows.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Statement: Drinking water supply to many parts of town is disrupted due to loss of water because of leakage in pipes supplying water.Courses of action:I. The government should order an enquiry into the matter.II. The civic body should set up a fact-finding team to assess the damage and take effective step.a)Only I follows.b)Only II follows.c)Either I or II follows.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev