CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Principle: A master is liable for the wrongfu...
Start Learning for Free
Principle: A master is liable for the wrongful act of his servants committed in the course of employment.
Facts: 'A' employed 'B' to drive his jeep. 'B' took the jeep from the workshop and thereafter, instead of taking the jeep to the garage, went on a spree, and on the way, he gave joy ride to some unauthorized persons. 'B's negligence caused an accident resulting in injuries to all the unauthorized persons in the vehicle. Can they claim damages from 'A'?
Facts: 'A' employed 'B' to drive his jeep. 'B' took the jeep from the workshop and thereafter, instead of taking the jeep to the garage, went on a spree, and on the way, he gave joy ride to some unauthorized persons. 'B's negligence caused an accident resulting in injuries to all the unauthorized persons in the vehicle. Can they claim damages from 'A'?
- a)Yes, bringing jeep from the workshop to the garage was within the course of employment.
- b)Yes. They were injured due to the negligence of 'A's servant.
- c)No, Act of going on a spree and giving lift to unauthorized persons was outside the course of employment.
- d)No. They were not authorized to use the vehicle.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
Principle: A master is liable for the wrongful act of his servants com...
The principle states that a master is liable for the wrongful acts of his servants committed in the course of employment. In this case, 'A' employed 'B' to drive his jeep. The issue at hand is whether 'A' can be held liable for the damages caused by 'B' when he went on a spree and gave a joy ride to unauthorized persons, resulting in an accident and injuries to those unauthorized persons.
The options provided are as follows:
A: Yes, bringing jeep from the workshop to the garage was within the course of employment.
B: Yes. They were injured due to the negligence of 'A's servant.
C: No, Act of going on a spree and giving lift to unauthorized persons was outside the course of employment.
D: No. They were not authorized to use the vehicle.
The correct answer is C: No, the act of going on a spree and giving lifts to unauthorized persons was outside the course of employment.
Reasoning:
To determine whether the master can be held liable for the actions of the servant, it is essential to establish whether the wrongful act occurred within the course of employment. In this case, 'B' was employed by 'A' to drive his jeep. Bringing the jeep from the workshop to the garage would generally be considered within the course of employment. However, in the given scenario, 'B' deviated from his duties and went on a spree, giving unauthorized persons joy rides.
Engaging in personal activities such as going on a spree and giving lifts to unauthorized persons is outside the course of employment. These actions cannot be considered as part of 'B's employment responsibilities or duties. Therefore, 'A' cannot be held liable for the damages caused by 'B' during this unauthorized act.
Additionally, the fact that the unauthorized persons were not authorized to use the vehicle further strengthens the argument that their injuries cannot be claimed as damages from 'A'.
The options provided are as follows:
A: Yes, bringing jeep from the workshop to the garage was within the course of employment.
B: Yes. They were injured due to the negligence of 'A's servant.
C: No, Act of going on a spree and giving lift to unauthorized persons was outside the course of employment.
D: No. They were not authorized to use the vehicle.
The correct answer is C: No, the act of going on a spree and giving lifts to unauthorized persons was outside the course of employment.
Reasoning:
To determine whether the master can be held liable for the actions of the servant, it is essential to establish whether the wrongful act occurred within the course of employment. In this case, 'B' was employed by 'A' to drive his jeep. Bringing the jeep from the workshop to the garage would generally be considered within the course of employment. However, in the given scenario, 'B' deviated from his duties and went on a spree, giving unauthorized persons joy rides.
Engaging in personal activities such as going on a spree and giving lifts to unauthorized persons is outside the course of employment. These actions cannot be considered as part of 'B's employment responsibilities or duties. Therefore, 'A' cannot be held liable for the damages caused by 'B' during this unauthorized act.
Additionally, the fact that the unauthorized persons were not authorized to use the vehicle further strengthens the argument that their injuries cannot be claimed as damages from 'A'.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for CLATView all
Principle: A master is liable for the wrongful act of his servants committed in the course of employment.Facts: A employed B to drive his jeep. B took the jeep from the workshop and thereafter, instead of taking the jeep to the garage, went on a spree, and on the way, he gave joy ride to some unauthorized persons. Bs negligence caused an accident resulting in injuries to all the unauthorized persons in the vehicle. Can they claim damages from A?a)Yes, bringing jeep from the workshop to the garage was within the course of employment.b)Yes. They were injured due to the negligence of As servant.c)No, Act of going on a spree and giving lift to unauthorized persons was outside the course of employment.d)No. They were not authorized to use the vehicle.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Principle: A master is liable for the wrongful act of his servants committed in the course of employment.Facts: A employed B to drive his jeep. B took the jeep from the workshop and thereafter, instead of taking the jeep to the garage, went on a spree, and on the way, he gave joy ride to some unauthorized persons. Bs negligence caused an accident resulting in injuries to all the unauthorized persons in the vehicle. Can they claim damages from A?a)Yes, bringing jeep from the workshop to the garage was within the course of employment.b)Yes. They were injured due to the negligence of As servant.c)No, Act of going on a spree and giving lift to unauthorized persons was outside the course of employment.d)No. They were not authorized to use the vehicle.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle: A master is liable for the wrongful act of his servants committed in the course of employment.Facts: A employed B to drive his jeep. B took the jeep from the workshop and thereafter, instead of taking the jeep to the garage, went on a spree, and on the way, he gave joy ride to some unauthorized persons. Bs negligence caused an accident resulting in injuries to all the unauthorized persons in the vehicle. Can they claim damages from A?a)Yes, bringing jeep from the workshop to the garage was within the course of employment.b)Yes. They were injured due to the negligence of As servant.c)No, Act of going on a spree and giving lift to unauthorized persons was outside the course of employment.d)No. They were not authorized to use the vehicle.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: A master is liable for the wrongful act of his servants committed in the course of employment.Facts: A employed B to drive his jeep. B took the jeep from the workshop and thereafter, instead of taking the jeep to the garage, went on a spree, and on the way, he gave joy ride to some unauthorized persons. Bs negligence caused an accident resulting in injuries to all the unauthorized persons in the vehicle. Can they claim damages from A?a)Yes, bringing jeep from the workshop to the garage was within the course of employment.b)Yes. They were injured due to the negligence of As servant.c)No, Act of going on a spree and giving lift to unauthorized persons was outside the course of employment.d)No. They were not authorized to use the vehicle.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Principle: A master is liable for the wrongful act of his servants committed in the course of employment.Facts: A employed B to drive his jeep. B took the jeep from the workshop and thereafter, instead of taking the jeep to the garage, went on a spree, and on the way, he gave joy ride to some unauthorized persons. Bs negligence caused an accident resulting in injuries to all the unauthorized persons in the vehicle. Can they claim damages from A?a)Yes, bringing jeep from the workshop to the garage was within the course of employment.b)Yes. They were injured due to the negligence of As servant.c)No, Act of going on a spree and giving lift to unauthorized persons was outside the course of employment.d)No. They were not authorized to use the vehicle.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle: A master is liable for the wrongful act of his servants committed in the course of employment.Facts: A employed B to drive his jeep. B took the jeep from the workshop and thereafter, instead of taking the jeep to the garage, went on a spree, and on the way, he gave joy ride to some unauthorized persons. Bs negligence caused an accident resulting in injuries to all the unauthorized persons in the vehicle. Can they claim damages from A?a)Yes, bringing jeep from the workshop to the garage was within the course of employment.b)Yes. They were injured due to the negligence of As servant.c)No, Act of going on a spree and giving lift to unauthorized persons was outside the course of employment.d)No. They were not authorized to use the vehicle.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: A master is liable for the wrongful act of his servants committed in the course of employment.Facts: A employed B to drive his jeep. B took the jeep from the workshop and thereafter, instead of taking the jeep to the garage, went on a spree, and on the way, he gave joy ride to some unauthorized persons. Bs negligence caused an accident resulting in injuries to all the unauthorized persons in the vehicle. Can they claim damages from A?a)Yes, bringing jeep from the workshop to the garage was within the course of employment.b)Yes. They were injured due to the negligence of As servant.c)No, Act of going on a spree and giving lift to unauthorized persons was outside the course of employment.d)No. They were not authorized to use the vehicle.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principle: A master is liable for the wrongful act of his servants committed in the course of employment.Facts: A employed B to drive his jeep. B took the jeep from the workshop and thereafter, instead of taking the jeep to the garage, went on a spree, and on the way, he gave joy ride to some unauthorized persons. Bs negligence caused an accident resulting in injuries to all the unauthorized persons in the vehicle. Can they claim damages from A?a)Yes, bringing jeep from the workshop to the garage was within the course of employment.b)Yes. They were injured due to the negligence of As servant.c)No, Act of going on a spree and giving lift to unauthorized persons was outside the course of employment.d)No. They were not authorized to use the vehicle.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principle: A master is liable for the wrongful act of his servants committed in the course of employment.Facts: A employed B to drive his jeep. B took the jeep from the workshop and thereafter, instead of taking the jeep to the garage, went on a spree, and on the way, he gave joy ride to some unauthorized persons. Bs negligence caused an accident resulting in injuries to all the unauthorized persons in the vehicle. Can they claim damages from A?a)Yes, bringing jeep from the workshop to the garage was within the course of employment.b)Yes. They were injured due to the negligence of As servant.c)No, Act of going on a spree and giving lift to unauthorized persons was outside the course of employment.d)No. They were not authorized to use the vehicle.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Principle: A master is liable for the wrongful act of his servants committed in the course of employment.Facts: A employed B to drive his jeep. B took the jeep from the workshop and thereafter, instead of taking the jeep to the garage, went on a spree, and on the way, he gave joy ride to some unauthorized persons. Bs negligence caused an accident resulting in injuries to all the unauthorized persons in the vehicle. Can they claim damages from A?a)Yes, bringing jeep from the workshop to the garage was within the course of employment.b)Yes. They were injured due to the negligence of As servant.c)No, Act of going on a spree and giving lift to unauthorized persons was outside the course of employment.d)No. They were not authorized to use the vehicle.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle: A master is liable for the wrongful act of his servants committed in the course of employment.Facts: A employed B to drive his jeep. B took the jeep from the workshop and thereafter, instead of taking the jeep to the garage, went on a spree, and on the way, he gave joy ride to some unauthorized persons. Bs negligence caused an accident resulting in injuries to all the unauthorized persons in the vehicle. Can they claim damages from A?a)Yes, bringing jeep from the workshop to the garage was within the course of employment.b)Yes. They were injured due to the negligence of As servant.c)No, Act of going on a spree and giving lift to unauthorized persons was outside the course of employment.d)No. They were not authorized to use the vehicle.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle: A master is liable for the wrongful act of his servants committed in the course of employment.Facts: A employed B to drive his jeep. B took the jeep from the workshop and thereafter, instead of taking the jeep to the garage, went on a spree, and on the way, he gave joy ride to some unauthorized persons. Bs negligence caused an accident resulting in injuries to all the unauthorized persons in the vehicle. Can they claim damages from A?a)Yes, bringing jeep from the workshop to the garage was within the course of employment.b)Yes. They were injured due to the negligence of As servant.c)No, Act of going on a spree and giving lift to unauthorized persons was outside the course of employment.d)No. They were not authorized to use the vehicle.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Principle: A master is liable for the wrongful act of his servants committed in the course of employment.Facts: A employed B to drive his jeep. B took the jeep from the workshop and thereafter, instead of taking the jeep to the garage, went on a spree, and on the way, he gave joy ride to some unauthorized persons. Bs negligence caused an accident resulting in injuries to all the unauthorized persons in the vehicle. Can they claim damages from A?a)Yes, bringing jeep from the workshop to the garage was within the course of employment.b)Yes. They were injured due to the negligence of As servant.c)No, Act of going on a spree and giving lift to unauthorized persons was outside the course of employment.d)No. They were not authorized to use the vehicle.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup