Question Description
Most scientists agree that new lines of interdisciplinary research are the need of the hour. Even government committees on science have stressed the need for more interdisciplinary projects. Yet, of ten proposals for new interdisciplinary projects last year, only one was successfully funded. Some have suggested that this means that as yet researchers are not coming up with sufficiently persuasive projects, or that their proposals are not of high enough quality, or even that the reputations of these researchers is not high enough. However, the real reason probably lies in the way funding is organized. Funding is still allocated according to the old categories and there are no funds specifically for research that overlaps different subject areas.The two parts in bold-face are related to each other in which of the following ways?a)The first is a finding that the author finds unacceptable; the second is the authors own positionb)The first is a finding that the author attempts to account for; the second is a finding that contradicts the authors main conclusion.c)The first is a fact that the author attempts to account for. The second is data that explicitly supports the authors main conclusion.d)The first is a position that the author opposes; the second is the authors main position.e)The first is a situation that the author finds paradoxical; the second is an assumption that the author uses to reinforce the paradox.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Most scientists agree that new lines of interdisciplinary research are the need of the hour. Even government committees on science have stressed the need for more interdisciplinary projects. Yet, of ten proposals for new interdisciplinary projects last year, only one was successfully funded. Some have suggested that this means that as yet researchers are not coming up with sufficiently persuasive projects, or that their proposals are not of high enough quality, or even that the reputations of these researchers is not high enough. However, the real reason probably lies in the way funding is organized. Funding is still allocated according to the old categories and there are no funds specifically for research that overlaps different subject areas.The two parts in bold-face are related to each other in which of the following ways?a)The first is a finding that the author finds unacceptable; the second is the authors own positionb)The first is a finding that the author attempts to account for; the second is a finding that contradicts the authors main conclusion.c)The first is a fact that the author attempts to account for. The second is data that explicitly supports the authors main conclusion.d)The first is a position that the author opposes; the second is the authors main position.e)The first is a situation that the author finds paradoxical; the second is an assumption that the author uses to reinforce the paradox.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Most scientists agree that new lines of interdisciplinary research are the need of the hour. Even government committees on science have stressed the need for more interdisciplinary projects. Yet, of ten proposals for new interdisciplinary projects last year, only one was successfully funded. Some have suggested that this means that as yet researchers are not coming up with sufficiently persuasive projects, or that their proposals are not of high enough quality, or even that the reputations of these researchers is not high enough. However, the real reason probably lies in the way funding is organized. Funding is still allocated according to the old categories and there are no funds specifically for research that overlaps different subject areas.The two parts in bold-face are related to each other in which of the following ways?a)The first is a finding that the author finds unacceptable; the second is the authors own positionb)The first is a finding that the author attempts to account for; the second is a finding that contradicts the authors main conclusion.c)The first is a fact that the author attempts to account for. The second is data that explicitly supports the authors main conclusion.d)The first is a position that the author opposes; the second is the authors main position.e)The first is a situation that the author finds paradoxical; the second is an assumption that the author uses to reinforce the paradox.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Most scientists agree that new lines of interdisciplinary research are the need of the hour. Even government committees on science have stressed the need for more interdisciplinary projects. Yet, of ten proposals for new interdisciplinary projects last year, only one was successfully funded. Some have suggested that this means that as yet researchers are not coming up with sufficiently persuasive projects, or that their proposals are not of high enough quality, or even that the reputations of these researchers is not high enough. However, the real reason probably lies in the way funding is organized. Funding is still allocated according to the old categories and there are no funds specifically for research that overlaps different subject areas.The two parts in bold-face are related to each other in which of the following ways?a)The first is a finding that the author finds unacceptable; the second is the authors own positionb)The first is a finding that the author attempts to account for; the second is a finding that contradicts the authors main conclusion.c)The first is a fact that the author attempts to account for. The second is data that explicitly supports the authors main conclusion.d)The first is a position that the author opposes; the second is the authors main position.e)The first is a situation that the author finds paradoxical; the second is an assumption that the author uses to reinforce the paradox.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Most scientists agree that new lines of interdisciplinary research are the need of the hour. Even government committees on science have stressed the need for more interdisciplinary projects. Yet, of ten proposals for new interdisciplinary projects last year, only one was successfully funded. Some have suggested that this means that as yet researchers are not coming up with sufficiently persuasive projects, or that their proposals are not of high enough quality, or even that the reputations of these researchers is not high enough. However, the real reason probably lies in the way funding is organized. Funding is still allocated according to the old categories and there are no funds specifically for research that overlaps different subject areas.The two parts in bold-face are related to each other in which of the following ways?a)The first is a finding that the author finds unacceptable; the second is the authors own positionb)The first is a finding that the author attempts to account for; the second is a finding that contradicts the authors main conclusion.c)The first is a fact that the author attempts to account for. The second is data that explicitly supports the authors main conclusion.d)The first is a position that the author opposes; the second is the authors main position.e)The first is a situation that the author finds paradoxical; the second is an assumption that the author uses to reinforce the paradox.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Most scientists agree that new lines of interdisciplinary research are the need of the hour. Even government committees on science have stressed the need for more interdisciplinary projects. Yet, of ten proposals for new interdisciplinary projects last year, only one was successfully funded. Some have suggested that this means that as yet researchers are not coming up with sufficiently persuasive projects, or that their proposals are not of high enough quality, or even that the reputations of these researchers is not high enough. However, the real reason probably lies in the way funding is organized. Funding is still allocated according to the old categories and there are no funds specifically for research that overlaps different subject areas.The two parts in bold-face are related to each other in which of the following ways?a)The first is a finding that the author finds unacceptable; the second is the authors own positionb)The first is a finding that the author attempts to account for; the second is a finding that contradicts the authors main conclusion.c)The first is a fact that the author attempts to account for. The second is data that explicitly supports the authors main conclusion.d)The first is a position that the author opposes; the second is the authors main position.e)The first is a situation that the author finds paradoxical; the second is an assumption that the author uses to reinforce the paradox.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Most scientists agree that new lines of interdisciplinary research are the need of the hour. Even government committees on science have stressed the need for more interdisciplinary projects. Yet, of ten proposals for new interdisciplinary projects last year, only one was successfully funded. Some have suggested that this means that as yet researchers are not coming up with sufficiently persuasive projects, or that their proposals are not of high enough quality, or even that the reputations of these researchers is not high enough. However, the real reason probably lies in the way funding is organized. Funding is still allocated according to the old categories and there are no funds specifically for research that overlaps different subject areas.The two parts in bold-face are related to each other in which of the following ways?a)The first is a finding that the author finds unacceptable; the second is the authors own positionb)The first is a finding that the author attempts to account for; the second is a finding that contradicts the authors main conclusion.c)The first is a fact that the author attempts to account for. The second is data that explicitly supports the authors main conclusion.d)The first is a position that the author opposes; the second is the authors main position.e)The first is a situation that the author finds paradoxical; the second is an assumption that the author uses to reinforce the paradox.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Most scientists agree that new lines of interdisciplinary research are the need of the hour. Even government committees on science have stressed the need for more interdisciplinary projects. Yet, of ten proposals for new interdisciplinary projects last year, only one was successfully funded. Some have suggested that this means that as yet researchers are not coming up with sufficiently persuasive projects, or that their proposals are not of high enough quality, or even that the reputations of these researchers is not high enough. However, the real reason probably lies in the way funding is organized. Funding is still allocated according to the old categories and there are no funds specifically for research that overlaps different subject areas.The two parts in bold-face are related to each other in which of the following ways?a)The first is a finding that the author finds unacceptable; the second is the authors own positionb)The first is a finding that the author attempts to account for; the second is a finding that contradicts the authors main conclusion.c)The first is a fact that the author attempts to account for. The second is data that explicitly supports the authors main conclusion.d)The first is a position that the author opposes; the second is the authors main position.e)The first is a situation that the author finds paradoxical; the second is an assumption that the author uses to reinforce the paradox.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Most scientists agree that new lines of interdisciplinary research are the need of the hour. Even government committees on science have stressed the need for more interdisciplinary projects. Yet, of ten proposals for new interdisciplinary projects last year, only one was successfully funded. Some have suggested that this means that as yet researchers are not coming up with sufficiently persuasive projects, or that their proposals are not of high enough quality, or even that the reputations of these researchers is not high enough. However, the real reason probably lies in the way funding is organized. Funding is still allocated according to the old categories and there are no funds specifically for research that overlaps different subject areas.The two parts in bold-face are related to each other in which of the following ways?a)The first is a finding that the author finds unacceptable; the second is the authors own positionb)The first is a finding that the author attempts to account for; the second is a finding that contradicts the authors main conclusion.c)The first is a fact that the author attempts to account for. The second is data that explicitly supports the authors main conclusion.d)The first is a position that the author opposes; the second is the authors main position.e)The first is a situation that the author finds paradoxical; the second is an assumption that the author uses to reinforce the paradox.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.