Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Adas argument would be most strengthened by providing data on thea)actual number of people in the two officesb)type of computers that are in both officesc)ratio of computers to users in her officed)number of visits by computer engineers to service the computers in Jays officee)number of computers in Jays officeCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Jay: We have too many people working on each ...

Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.

Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.

Ada's argument would be most strengthened by providing data on the

a)
actual number of people in the two offices
b)
type of computers that are in both offices
c)
ratio of computers to users in her office
d)
number of visits by computer engineers to service the computers in Jay's office
e)
number of computers in Jay's office

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the o...

Ada tells Jay that there are as many people in her office as in his, but fails to mention how many computers there are. If there is one computer to each person in her office, her argument is be invalid. To strengthen her argument she should show a similar ratio of computers to users. Thus C is the best answer. The actual number of people, computers or breakdowns is not really important as it is the usage that is in dispute. Thus answers A, D and E are not suitable. The type of computers is, no doubt, important in robustness, but the point that Ada is answering is whether there are too many people handling the same computer, and so we cannot choose B.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the o...

Introduction:
In this argument, Jay claims that the high frequency of breakdowns in their office computers is due to too many people handling the same hardware. Ada counters this by stating that their office, which has just as many people, experiences fewer system repairs, suggesting that their systems must be more robust. To strengthen her argument, Ada needs to provide data on a specific factor that differentiates their office from Jay's office.

Explanation:
To strengthen Ada's argument, we need to identify a factor that could explain the difference in repair frequency between the two offices. Let's examine each option:

A) Actual number of people in the two offices:
The actual number of people in each office does not provide any information about the robustness of the systems or the frequency of repairs. This information is irrelevant to the argument.

B) Type of computers that are in both offices:
The type of computers in each office may play a role in the frequency of repairs. However, this information alone does not address the difference in repair frequency and does not specifically strengthen Ada's argument.

C) Ratio of computers to users in her office:
This is the correct answer. The ratio of computers to users in Ada's office is relevant because it provides a potential explanation for the lower repair frequency. If there is a lower ratio of computers to users in Ada's office compared to Jay's office, it means that each computer in Ada's office is being used by fewer people, reducing the wear and tear on the hardware. This would support Ada's claim that their systems are more robust.

D) Number of visits by computer engineers to service the computers in Jay's office:
The number of visits by computer engineers to repair the computers in Jay's office may indicate the frequency of breakdowns. However, this information does not directly strengthen Ada's argument about the robustness of their systems.

E) Number of computers in Jay's office:
The number of computers in Jay's office does not provide any information about the robustness of the systems or the frequency of repairs. This information is irrelevant to the argument.

Conclusion:
The correct answer is option C. By providing data on the ratio of computers to users in her office, Ada strengthens her argument by suggesting that the lower repair frequency is due to the reduced strain on the hardware caused by fewer people using each computer.

Answered by Talent Skill Learning · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Jay apparently believes that

View answer

Directions: Read the sources below before answering the question that follows.E-mail 1—E-mail from division director to donations coordinator August 10, 9:37 a.m.Yesterday I spoke with the computer training lab administrator to update him on the status of donations for the school district’s computer donations drive. He extended the donations deadline for another week, until next Tuesday. Are we on track to receive enough donations from students’ families to meet our goal of computers for the new training lab? Do we need to extend our request to local businesses too?E-mail 2—E-mail from donations coordinator in response to the division director’s August 10, 9:37 a.m. messageAugust 10, 10:04 a.m.To date we have received 40 computers. We need 100 computers donated to meet our goal for the new training lab. We have requested help from all of the students’ families, so we should invite local businesses as well. In all of our past drives, including this one so far, we have received donations from about 20 percent of those who received requests. (Of course, we might always receive more or less than that average, so we should consider the possibilities of not meeting the goal or overspending the budget for the thank-you event.) Each individual or organization donating a computer will receive two invitations to our thank-you event to celebrate the opening of the lab. Refreshments and supplies for the event are expected to run $20 per person. What is the total budget for the thank-you event?E-mail 3—E-mail from division director to donations coordinator in response to the donation coordinator’s August 10, 10:04 a.m. messageAugust 10, 10:35 a.m.The budget for the thank-you event is ﬁ xed at $4,000. This would allow us to accommodate 2 attendees for each of the 100 computers donated. The budget is ﬁ rm, so we should take care to ensure that the event costs stay within this amount. Although we do not have resources to extend the budget, if necessary we could determine ways to reduce the cost per person if we receive more donations than the original goal amount.Q. Suppose that the donations coordinator requests computer donations from 400 local businesses. If all the information in the three e-mails is accurate, the number of attendees that will be invited to participate in the thank-you event is closest to

View answer

It now seems clear that the significant role initially predicted for personal computers in the classroom has not become fact. One need only look to the dramatic decline in sales of computers for classroom use in the past year for proof that the fad has passed.Which one of the following arguments contains flawed reasoning parallel to that in the argument above?

View answer

Direction:Read the following Passage and Answer the following Question.In the world of modern technology, the race to develop quantum computers has become the new gold rush. While classical computers have driven the digital age, quantum computers hold the promise of solving problems beyond the reach of classical systems. This race, however, is not just about technological superiority; its a strategic chess game involving national pride and potential economic supremacy.The United States and China have emerged as the front-runners in this race. The U.S., with its long history of technological innovation, has poured billions into research and development. Silicon Valley giants like Google and IBM are in a fierce competition to build the first fully functional quantum computer. On the other hand, Chinas ambitious national strategy has led to significant advancements, including the launch of the worlds first quantum satellite.At the heart of this competition lies the principle of quantum supremacy - the point at which a quantum computer can perform a calculation that is impossible for a classical computer. Achieving this would not only be a scientific breakthrough but also have profound implications for cybersecurity, as quantum computers can potentially break many of the encryption methods currently in use.Despite the excitement, there are skeptics who question the practicality of quantum computing. They argue that these computers are incredibly sensitive to environmental factors and require extreme conditions to function, such as near-absolute zero temperatures. Moreover, the technology is still in its infancy, and real-world applications are years, if not decades, away.As the race continues, one thing is certain: the arrival of quantum computing will mark a new era in the technological landscape, reshaping industries and possibly redefining global power dynamics.Q.Based on the passage, which of the following can be inferred about quantum computers compared to classical computers?

View answer

Direction:Read the following Passage and Answer the following Question.In the world of modern technology, the race to develop quantum computers has become the new gold rush. While classical computers have driven the digital age, quantum computers hold the promise of solving problems beyond the reach of classical systems. This race, however, is not just about technological superiority; its a strategic chess game involving national pride and potential economic supremacy.The United States and China have emerged as the front-runners in this race. The U.S., with its long history of technological innovation, has poured billions into research and development. Silicon Valley giants like Google and IBM are in a fierce competition to build the first fully functional quantum computer. On the other hand, Chinas ambitious national strategy has led to significant advancements, including the launch of the worlds first quantum satellite.At the heart of this competition lies the principle of quantum supremacy - the point at which a quantum computer can perform a calculation that is impossible for a classical computer. Achieving this would not only be a scientific breakthrough but also have profound implications for cybersecurity, as quantum computers can potentially break many of the encryption methods currently in use.Despite the excitement, there are skeptics who question the practicality of quantum computing. They argue that these computers are incredibly sensitive to environmental factors and require extreme conditions to function, such as near-absolute zero temperatures. Moreover, the technology is still in its infancy, and real-world applications are years, if not decades, away.As the race continues, one thing is certain: the arrival of quantum computing will mark a new era in the technological landscape, reshaping industries and possibly redefining global power dynamics.Q.According to the passage, which of the following is true about the current state of quantum computing?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2025

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Adas argument would be most strengthened by providing data on thea)actual number of people in the two officesb)type of computers that are in both officesc)ratio of computers to users in her officed)number of visits by computer engineers to service the computers in Jays officee)number of computers in Jays officeCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Adas argument would be most strengthened by providing data on thea)actual number of people in the two officesb)type of computers that are in both officesc)ratio of computers to users in her officed)number of visits by computer engineers to service the computers in Jays officee)number of computers in Jays officeCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Adas argument would be most strengthened by providing data on thea)actual number of people in the two officesb)type of computers that are in both officesc)ratio of computers to users in her officed)number of visits by computer engineers to service the computers in Jays officee)number of computers in Jays officeCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Adas argument would be most strengthened by providing data on thea)actual number of people in the two officesb)type of computers that are in both officesc)ratio of computers to users in her officed)number of visits by computer engineers to service the computers in Jays officee)number of computers in Jays officeCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Adas argument would be most strengthened by providing data on thea)actual number of people in the two officesb)type of computers that are in both officesc)ratio of computers to users in her officed)number of visits by computer engineers to service the computers in Jays officee)number of computers in Jays officeCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Adas argument would be most strengthened by providing data on thea)actual number of people in the two officesb)type of computers that are in both officesc)ratio of computers to users in her officed)number of visits by computer engineers to service the computers in Jays officee)number of computers in Jays officeCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Adas argument would be most strengthened by providing data on thea)actual number of people in the two officesb)type of computers that are in both officesc)ratio of computers to users in her officed)number of visits by computer engineers to service the computers in Jays officee)number of computers in Jays officeCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Adas argument would be most strengthened by providing data on thea)actual number of people in the two officesb)type of computers that are in both officesc)ratio of computers to users in her officed)number of visits by computer engineers to service the computers in Jays officee)number of computers in Jays officeCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Adas argument would be most strengthened by providing data on thea)actual number of people in the two officesb)type of computers that are in both officesc)ratio of computers to users in her officed)number of visits by computer engineers to service the computers in Jays officee)number of computers in Jays officeCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Adas argument would be most strengthened by providing data on thea)actual number of people in the two officesb)type of computers that are in both officesc)ratio of computers to users in her officed)number of visits by computer engineers to service the computers in Jays officee)number of computers in Jays officeCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam