Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Jay apparently believes thata)he has the best available hardwareb)the frequency of breakdowns in his office is above averagec)software specifications are not important in his officed)no other office has a similar ratio of computers to userse)he does not need more people working in his officeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Jay: We have too many people working on each ...

Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.

Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.

Jay apparently believes that

a)
he has the best available hardware
b)
the frequency of breakdowns in his office is above average
c)
software specifications are not important in his office
d)
no other office has a similar ratio of computers to users
e)
he does not need more people working in his office

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the o...

We cannot know that Jay thinks his computers are the best, and so A can be rejected. Similarly it is not possible to say whether he thinks he does not need more people, or thinks that software is not important, or even that no other office has a similar usage per computer. (Notice that these boldface strong words make us very suspicious.) The fact that Jay calls the frequency of breakdowns high, tells us immediately that he thinks the frequency is above average, and so B is correct.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the o...

Frequency of Breakdowns
Jay's statement suggests that the high frequency of breakdowns in his office is due to too many people working on each computer. This implies that the number of breakdowns in his office is above average compared to other offices.
Comparison with Ada's Office
Ada counters Jay's argument by stating that they have just as many people working in their office, yet they hardly need any repairs to their systems. This indicates that the frequency of breakdowns in Ada's office is significantly lower than in Jay's office.
Implication
Therefore, Jay's belief that the high frequency of breakdowns is a result of too many people handling the hardware in his office is validated. It is likely that the systems in Ada's office are more robust and resistant to breakdowns compared to those in Jay's office. Thus, the key difference between the two offices lies in the durability and quality of their systems rather than the number of users.

Answered by Talent Skill Learning · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Adas argument would be most strengthened by providing data on the

View answer

Directions: Read the sources below before answering the question that follows.E-mail 1—E-mail from division director to donations coordinator August 10, 9:37 a.m.Yesterday I spoke with the computer training lab administrator to update him on the status of donations for the school district’s computer donations drive. He extended the donations deadline for another week, until next Tuesday. Are we on track to receive enough donations from students’ families to meet our goal of computers for the new training lab? Do we need to extend our request to local businesses too?E-mail 2—E-mail from donations coordinator in response to the division director’s August 10, 9:37 a.m. messageAugust 10, 10:04 a.m.To date we have received 40 computers. We need 100 computers donated to meet our goal for the new training lab. We have requested help from all of the students’ families, so we should invite local businesses as well. In all of our past drives, including this one so far, we have received donations from about 20 percent of those who received requests. (Of course, we might always receive more or less than that average, so we should consider the possibilities of not meeting the goal or overspending the budget for the thank-you event.) Each individual or organization donating a computer will receive two invitations to our thank-you event to celebrate the opening of the lab. Refreshments and supplies for the event are expected to run $20 per person. What is the total budget for the thank-you event?E-mail 3—E-mail from division director to donations coordinator in response to the donation coordinator’s August 10, 10:04 a.m. messageAugust 10, 10:35 a.m.The budget for the thank-you event is ﬁ xed at $4,000. This would allow us to accommodate 2 attendees for each of the 100 computers donated. The budget is ﬁ rm, so we should take care to ensure that the event costs stay within this amount. Although we do not have resources to extend the budget, if necessary we could determine ways to reduce the cost per person if we receive more donations than the original goal amount.Q. Suppose that the donations coordinator requests computer donations from 400 local businesses. If all the information in the three e-mails is accurate, the number of attendees that will be invited to participate in the thank-you event is closest to

View answer

Direction:Read the following Passage and Answer the following Question.In the world of modern technology, the race to develop quantum computers has become the new gold rush. While classical computers have driven the digital age, quantum computers hold the promise of solving problems beyond the reach of classical systems. This race, however, is not just about technological superiority; its a strategic chess game involving national pride and potential economic supremacy.The United States and China have emerged as the front-runners in this race. The U.S., with its long history of technological innovation, has poured billions into research and development. Silicon Valley giants like Google and IBM are in a fierce competition to build the first fully functional quantum computer. On the other hand, Chinas ambitious national strategy has led to significant advancements, including the launch of the worlds first quantum satellite.At the heart of this competition lies the principle of quantum supremacy - the point at which a quantum computer can perform a calculation that is impossible for a classical computer. Achieving this would not only be a scientific breakthrough but also have profound implications for cybersecurity, as quantum computers can potentially break many of the encryption methods currently in use.Despite the excitement, there are skeptics who question the practicality of quantum computing. They argue that these computers are incredibly sensitive to environmental factors and require extreme conditions to function, such as near-absolute zero temperatures. Moreover, the technology is still in its infancy, and real-world applications are years, if not decades, away.As the race continues, one thing is certain: the arrival of quantum computing will mark a new era in the technological landscape, reshaping industries and possibly redefining global power dynamics.Q.Based on the passage, which of the following can be inferred about quantum computers compared to classical computers?

View answer

Direction:Read the following Passage and Answer the following Question.In the world of modern technology, the race to develop quantum computers has become the new gold rush. While classical computers have driven the digital age, quantum computers hold the promise of solving problems beyond the reach of classical systems. This race, however, is not just about technological superiority; its a strategic chess game involving national pride and potential economic supremacy.The United States and China have emerged as the front-runners in this race. The U.S., with its long history of technological innovation, has poured billions into research and development. Silicon Valley giants like Google and IBM are in a fierce competition to build the first fully functional quantum computer. On the other hand, Chinas ambitious national strategy has led to significant advancements, including the launch of the worlds first quantum satellite.At the heart of this competition lies the principle of quantum supremacy - the point at which a quantum computer can perform a calculation that is impossible for a classical computer. Achieving this would not only be a scientific breakthrough but also have profound implications for cybersecurity, as quantum computers can potentially break many of the encryption methods currently in use.Despite the excitement, there are skeptics who question the practicality of quantum computing. They argue that these computers are incredibly sensitive to environmental factors and require extreme conditions to function, such as near-absolute zero temperatures. Moreover, the technology is still in its infancy, and real-world applications are years, if not decades, away.As the race continues, one thing is certain: the arrival of quantum computing will mark a new era in the technological landscape, reshaping industries and possibly redefining global power dynamics.Q. Which of the following titles best encapsulates the main idea of the passage?

View answer

Direction:Read the following Passage and Answer the following Question.In the world of modern technology, the race to develop quantum computers has become the new gold rush. While classical computers have driven the digital age, quantum computers hold the promise of solving problems beyond the reach of classical systems. This race, however, is not just about technological superiority; its a strategic chess game involving national pride and potential economic supremacy.The United States and China have emerged as the front-runners in this race. The U.S., with its long history of technological innovation, has poured billions into research and development. Silicon Valley giants like Google and IBM are in a fierce competition to build the first fully functional quantum computer. On the other hand, Chinas ambitious national strategy has led to significant advancements, including the launch of the worlds first quantum satellite.At the heart of this competition lies the principle of quantum supremacy - the point at which a quantum computer can perform a calculation that is impossible for a classical computer. Achieving this would not only be a scientific breakthrough but also have profound implications for cybersecurity, as quantum computers can potentially break many of the encryption methods currently in use.Despite the excitement, there are skeptics who question the practicality of quantum computing. They argue that these computers are incredibly sensitive to environmental factors and require extreme conditions to function, such as near-absolute zero temperatures. Moreover, the technology is still in its infancy, and real-world applications are years, if not decades, away.As the race continues, one thing is certain: the arrival of quantum computing will mark a new era in the technological landscape, reshaping industries and possibly redefining global power dynamics.Q.According to the passage, which of the following is true about the current state of quantum computing?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2025

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Jay apparently believes thata)he has the best available hardwareb)the frequency of breakdowns in his office is above averagec)software specifications are not important in his officed)no other office has a similar ratio of computers to userse)he does not need more people working in his officeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Jay apparently believes thata)he has the best available hardwareb)the frequency of breakdowns in his office is above averagec)software specifications are not important in his officed)no other office has a similar ratio of computers to userse)he does not need more people working in his officeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Jay apparently believes thata)he has the best available hardwareb)the frequency of breakdowns in his office is above averagec)software specifications are not important in his officed)no other office has a similar ratio of computers to userse)he does not need more people working in his officeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Jay apparently believes thata)he has the best available hardwareb)the frequency of breakdowns in his office is above averagec)software specifications are not important in his officed)no other office has a similar ratio of computers to userse)he does not need more people working in his officeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Jay apparently believes thata)he has the best available hardwareb)the frequency of breakdowns in his office is above averagec)software specifications are not important in his officed)no other office has a similar ratio of computers to userse)he does not need more people working in his officeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Jay apparently believes thata)he has the best available hardwareb)the frequency of breakdowns in his office is above averagec)software specifications are not important in his officed)no other office has a similar ratio of computers to userse)he does not need more people working in his officeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Jay apparently believes thata)he has the best available hardwareb)the frequency of breakdowns in his office is above averagec)software specifications are not important in his officed)no other office has a similar ratio of computers to userse)he does not need more people working in his officeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Jay apparently believes thata)he has the best available hardwareb)the frequency of breakdowns in his office is above averagec)software specifications are not important in his officed)no other office has a similar ratio of computers to userse)he does not need more people working in his officeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Jay apparently believes thata)he has the best available hardwareb)the frequency of breakdowns in his office is above averagec)software specifications are not important in his officed)no other office has a similar ratio of computers to userse)he does not need more people working in his officeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Jay: We have too many people working on each of our computers in the office. The high frequency of breakdowns is due to too many people handling the same hardware.Ada: We have just as many people working in our office, yet we hardly need any repairs to our systems. Our systems must be more robust than yours.Jay apparently believes thata)he has the best available hardwareb)the frequency of breakdowns in his office is above averagec)software specifications are not important in his officed)no other office has a similar ratio of computers to userse)he does not need more people working in his officeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam