Question Description
In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.