GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > In research designed to investigate the possi...
Start Learning for Free
In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.
What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?
- a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.
- b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers' position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers' position.
- c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.
- d)The first is an observation that supports the critic's conclusion. The second is the critic's conclusion.
- e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals develop...
Explanation:
First Boldface:
The first boldface is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The researchers found that the chimpanzees were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor, leading them to conclude that the chimps had no concept of friendship.
Second Boldface:
The second boldface is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding. The critic suggested that the artificial environment in which the chimps were placed may have influenced their behavior and that the test should have involved the animals being able to touch each other.
Therefore, the first boldface presents the researchers' finding, while the second boldface introduces a suggestion that challenges the validity of that finding. This dynamic highlights a potential flaw in the research methodology and opens up the possibility for further investigation or interpretation.
First Boldface:
The first boldface is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The researchers found that the chimpanzees were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor, leading them to conclude that the chimps had no concept of friendship.
Second Boldface:
The second boldface is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding. The critic suggested that the artificial environment in which the chimps were placed may have influenced their behavior and that the test should have involved the animals being able to touch each other.
Therefore, the first boldface presents the researchers' finding, while the second boldface introduces a suggestion that challenges the validity of that finding. This dynamic highlights a potential flaw in the research methodology and opens up the possibility for further investigation or interpretation.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals develop...
The first part in boldface is a summary statement encapsulating the scientists' observations. The scientists' conclusion is in the next (non-bold) sentence. The critic doubts this conclusion and the second bold-face part is a statement of what he thinks the scientists ought to check. Hence the first part should be termed an observation/finding/ etc. Therefore A cannot be correct as it calls the statement a position (i.e. conclusion). The second part should be termed a suggestion or something similar; it cannot be termed a finding or a conclusion and so we eliminate B and D. E is incorrect as it suggests that the critic disputes the evidence, whereas we disputes the methods and conclusion. Answer C is best.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for GMATView all
In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice In research designed to investigate the possibility of animals developing friendship with other, unrelated, members of their species, a group of 29 chimpanzees were reared together for 15 years. At the end of that time the chimps were presented with two options for obtaining food: press a lever and feed themselves, or press another identical lever and feed themselves, and at the same time deliver food to the chimp next door. (The chimps were able to see each other). The researchers found that the chimps were no more likely to choose the lever that fed a neighbor. The researchers concluded that the chimps had no concept of friendship. However, one critic has suggested that the animals were in an artificial environment from which little can be concluded, and that, at the least, the test ought to have involved the animals being able to touch.What role do the parts in boldface play in the argument above?a)The first is a position that the critic opposes. The second is a position that the critic supports.b)The first is an observation that supports the researchers position. The second is an observation that opposes the researchers position.c)The first is a finding on which the researchers base their conclusion. The second is a suggestion that might cast doubt on that finding.d)The first is an observation that supports the critics conclusion. The second is the critics conclusion.e)The first is part of the evidence that the critic disputes. The second is a suggestion that the researchers do not accept.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup