Class 1 Exam  >  Class 1 Questions  >  Which was the first established Universityin ... Start Learning for Free
Which was the first established Universityin India and is still considered for re-establishment?
  • a)
    University of Calcutta
  • b)
    University of Mumbai
  • c)
    University of Madras
  • d)
    Nalanda University
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Which was the first established Universityin India and is still consid...
First Established University in India:
- The first established university in India was the University of Calcutta, founded on January 24, 1857.
- It was established as a result of the efforts of Lord Canning, the then Governor-General of India, and Sir Charles Wood, the then President of the Board of Control of the East India Company.
- The University of Calcutta was established to meet the growing demand for higher education in the country during that time.
Considered for Re-establishment:
- Nalanda University, which was established in the 5th century AD, is considered for re-establishment.
- The ancient Nalanda University was one of the world's first residential universities and a renowned center for Buddhist learning.
- The idea of re-establishing Nalanda University was initiated by the Government of India in 2006.
- The new Nalanda University aims to revive the rich academic and cultural legacy of the ancient university and promote international cooperation in education and research.
Conclusion:
- The University of Calcutta was the first established university in India, founded in 1857.
- Nalanda University, an ancient university, is considered for re-establishment in order to revive its academic and cultural legacy.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for Class 1 exam

Similar Class 1 Doubts

Directions: The passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Choose the best answer to each question.What good is vaccination? Obviously it is good for the person receiving the vaccine, if he is thus prevented from suffering from a nasty disease. More subtly, it can be good for an entire population since, if enough of its members are vaccinated, even those who are not will receive a measure of protection. That is because, with only a few susceptible individuals, the transmission of the infection cannot be maintained and the disease spread is checked. But in the case of many vaccines, there are non-medical benefits, too, in the form of costs avoided and the generation of income that would otherwise have been lost. These goods are economic. Quantifying these more general benefits is hard. But a pair of researchers from Harvard University has just tried. David Bloom and David Canning, together with Mark Weston, an independent policy consultant, have looked at two vaccination programmes and attempted to calculate the wider benefits. Their conclusions have just been published in the World Economics.Dr. Bloom and Dr. Canning believed that previous attempts to quantify the non-medical benefits of vaccination had been too narrow. These had looked at such data as the cost of a programme per life saved, but had failed to take account of recent work on the effects of health on incomes. For their study, they and Mr Weston identified how vaccination, in particular, might increase wealth.The first benefit was that healthy children are more likely to attend school and better able to learn. The second was that healthy workers are more productive. Both of these seem fairly obvious. Two other benefits, however, are less so. One being that good health promotes savings and investments. This is because healthy people both expect to live longer and actually do live longer. The other being that good health—and particularly, expectations about the good health of one’s offspring – promote the so-called demographic transition from large to small families that usually accompanies economic development. None of these factors, the researchers thought, had been properly taken account of in previous estimates of the cost-effectiveness of vaccination.To demonstrate that at least one of their ideas was correct, they turned to the Phillipines. Here, a study called the Cebu Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Survey has been going on since 1983. It follows the lives of Filipina mothers and those of their children born in 1983 and 1984. Among the data collected were the records of the vaccinations these children received as infants and also their scores in language, maths and IQ tests at the age of ten. The three researchers organized children whose social circumstances were similar into groups, depending on whether or not the children had been vaccinated against a range of diseases including measles, polio and tuberculosis. They then compared test scores between groups. They found a statistically significant difference in the language and IQ scores between otherwise comparable vaccinated and unvaccinated children. In both cases, those of the unvaccinated were lower. Since it is known for the other studies that these scores are good predictors of adult income, the researchers concluded that childhood vaccination would have significant economic benefits.In order to predict those benefits, they turned to vaccination campaign that is just beginning. The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (GAVI) is a collaboration of governments, international organizations, vaccine-makers and charities. It is embarking on a 15-year programme to vaccinate children in 75 of the world’s poorest countries against a range of childhood diseases. The programme is scheduled to cost 13 bn dollars. First, the researchers used data from previous vaccination programmes to estimate both the reduction in mortality and the improvement in the health of the living that might be expected to flow from the new GAVI programme. Then they combined these estimates with existing data about the economic effects of health improvement in these programmes in poor countries, in particular their effects on future income. Using standard accounting methodsthey calculate that the new GAVI programme can be expected to generate an immediate rate of return of 12.4%, rising to 18% by the end of the programme. And that does not include any benefits that might come from the demographic transition. The dispassionate economic case for vaccination, therefore, looks at least as strong as the compassionate medical one. If the figures produced by Dr Bloom, Dr Canning and Mr Weston are right, it truly is an investment for the future.Q. Which of the following can be considered as the appropriate links to establish the stated fact that “good health promotes saving and investment?”

Top Courses for Class 1

Which was the first established Universityin India and is still considered for re-establishment?a)University of Calcutta b)University of Mumbai c)University of Madras d)Nalanda UniversityCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Which was the first established Universityin India and is still considered for re-establishment?a)University of Calcutta b)University of Mumbai c)University of Madras d)Nalanda UniversityCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for Class 1 2025 is part of Class 1 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 1 exam syllabus. Information about Which was the first established Universityin India and is still considered for re-establishment?a)University of Calcutta b)University of Mumbai c)University of Madras d)Nalanda UniversityCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Class 1 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which was the first established Universityin India and is still considered for re-establishment?a)University of Calcutta b)University of Mumbai c)University of Madras d)Nalanda UniversityCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Which was the first established Universityin India and is still considered for re-establishment?a)University of Calcutta b)University of Mumbai c)University of Madras d)Nalanda UniversityCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 1. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 1 Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Which was the first established Universityin India and is still considered for re-establishment?a)University of Calcutta b)University of Mumbai c)University of Madras d)Nalanda UniversityCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Which was the first established Universityin India and is still considered for re-establishment?a)University of Calcutta b)University of Mumbai c)University of Madras d)Nalanda UniversityCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which was the first established Universityin India and is still considered for re-establishment?a)University of Calcutta b)University of Mumbai c)University of Madras d)Nalanda UniversityCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which was the first established Universityin India and is still considered for re-establishment?a)University of Calcutta b)University of Mumbai c)University of Madras d)Nalanda UniversityCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Which was the first established Universityin India and is still considered for re-establishment?a)University of Calcutta b)University of Mumbai c)University of Madras d)Nalanda UniversityCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Class 1 tests.
Explore Courses for Class 1 exam

Top Courses for Class 1

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev