Question Description
There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Q. Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared
according to
the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Q. Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam.
Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Q. Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Q. Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Q. Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Q. Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Q. Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Q. Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Q. Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.