A _______ noun is the name of some particular person, place, or thing.a)Properb)Commonc)Abstractd)CountableCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > A _______ noun is the name of some particular...

A _______ noun is the name of some particular person, place, or thing.

a)
Proper
b)
Common
c)
Abstract
d)
Countable

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

A _______ noun is the name of some particular person, place, or thing....

A proper noun is a specific name given to an individual person, a particular place, or a unique thing. It typically begins with a capital letter. Examples include names of people (e.g., John, Mary), specific places (e.g., Paris, Mount Everest), and unique things (e.g., The Eiffel Tower, The Mona Lisa).

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

A _______ noun is the name of some particular person, place, or thing....

Proper Noun
Proper nouns are specific names given to particular people, places, or things. They always begin with a capital letter, regardless of where they appear in a sentence. Proper nouns are used to differentiate between individuals or specific entities. They can be names of people (e.g. John, Mary), places (e.g. Paris, Mount Everest), organizations (e.g. Google, Red Cross), or titles (e.g. "Lord of the Rings").
Proper nouns help in providing clarity and specificity in communication. For example, if we say "I visited a park," it is unclear which park is being referred to. However, if we say "I visited Central Park," the proper noun "Central Park" specifies the exact location.
In writing and grammar, proper nouns play a crucial role in sentence structure and understanding. They help in creating a strong connection between the noun and its referent, making the communication more precise.
Overall, proper nouns are essential in language as they help in identifying and distinguishing unique entities from others. They add richness and depth to our vocabulary and allow for clear and effective communication.

Answered by Talent Skill Learning · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows. A study shows that consumers who become fixated onhowto achieve a goal probably face more difficulty in achieving their aims than people who think abstractly aboutwhythey want to do something. The authors of the study conducted four experiments to examine consumer behavior when it came to the goal of saving money. In one such experiment, some people were asked to make a specific plan to save money, whereas others were not asked to plan. Then some people were asked to focus on why they wanted to save money. Later on all participants were given the opportunity to buy candy. Subjects who were thinking concretely and formed a specific plan were less able to avoid the candy purchase than those who had not formed a plan at all.To elucidate the results, the authors cite the instance of person who wants to save money and hence makes a plan for achieving this goal. This person plans to save money by purchasing fewer clothing items at the mall. On investigating how this plan influences the persons response to other money-saving opportunities, for example, would the person be more likely to order a cheaper meal at a restaurant, avoid making an impulse purchase, or combine errands to save money on gas etc., the authors found that when people focus on concrete aspects of how they want to achieve goals, they become more closed-minded and consequently less likely to take advantage of opportunities that fall outside their plans. In contrast, people who focus on the why aspect are more likely to consider out-of-plan opportunities to achieve their goals.Furthermore, in the same experiment, the group that performed the best was the one that was asked to focus on the why and had formed a plan implicitly. Accordingly the authors conclude that planning is more effective when people plan with the complete understanding of why. They suggest that this strategy is particularly effective when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or when other goal-directed activities become available.Each of the following is a statement that is mentioned with respect to the study described in the passage EXCEPT

View answer

For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows. A study shows that consumers who become fixated onhowto achieve a goal probably face more difficulty in achieving their aims than people who think abstractly aboutwhythey want to do something. The authors of the study conducted four experiments to examine consumer behavior when it came to the goal of saving money. In one such experiment, some people were asked to make a specific plan to save money, whereas others were not asked to plan. Then some people were asked to focus on why they wanted to save money. Later on all participants were given the opportunity to buy candy. Subjects who were thinking concretely and formed a specific plan were less able to avoid the candy purchase than those who had not formed a plan at all.To elucidate the results, the authors cite the instance of person who wants to save money and hence makes a plan for achieving this goal. This person plans to save money by purchasing fewer clothing items at the mall. On investigating how this plan influences the persons response to other money-saving opportunities, for example, would the person be more likely to order a cheaper meal at a restaurant, avoid making an impulse purchase, or combine errands to save money on gas etc., the authors found that when people focus on concrete aspects of how they want to achieve goals, they become more closed-minded and consequently less likely to take advantage of opportunities that fall outside their plans. In contrast, people who focus on the why aspect are more likely to consider out-of-plan opportunities to achieve their goals.Furthermore, in the same experiment, the group that performed the best was the one that was asked to focus on the why and had formed a plan implicitly. Accordingly the authors conclude that planning is more effective when people plan with the complete understanding of why. They suggest that this strategy is particularly effective when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or when other goal-directed activities become available.Through the second paragraph, the author of the passage intends to

View answer

For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows. A study shows that consumers who become fixated onhowto achieve a goal probably face more difficulty in achieving their aims than people who think abstractly aboutwhythey want to do something. The authors of the study conducted four experiments to examine consumer behavior when it came to the goal of saving money. In one such experiment, some people were asked to make a specific plan to save money, whereas others were not asked to plan. Then some people were asked to focus on why they wanted to save money. Later on all participants were given the opportunity to buy candy. Subjects who were thinking concretely and formed a specific plan were less able to avoid the candy purchase than those who had not formed a plan at all.To elucidate the results, the authors cite the instance of person who wants to save money and hence makes a plan for achieving this goal. This person plans to save money by purchasing fewer clothing items at the mall. On investigating how this plan influences the persons response to other money-saving opportunities, for example, would the person be more likely to order a cheaper meal at a restaurant, avoid making an impulse purchase, or combine errands to save money on gas etc., the authors found that when people focus on concrete aspects of how they want to achieve goals, they become more closed-minded and consequently less likely to take advantage of opportunities that fall outside their plans. In contrast, people who focus on the why aspect are more likely to consider out-of-plan opportunities to achieve their goals.Furthermore, in the same experiment, the group that performed the best was the one that was asked to focus on the why and had formed a plan implicitly. Accordingly the authors conclude that planning is more effective when people plan with the complete understanding of why. They suggest that this strategy is particularly effective when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or when other goal-directed activities become available.The author is primarily concerned with

View answer

One often hears that biographies are autobiographies, that the biographer is always writing about himself. On the contrary, serious biographers seek and welcome the unfamiliar, however troublesome to account for. Ron Chernow, the author of rich biographies of the American businessmen J.P. Morgan and John D. Rockefeller, remarks that biographers “like to stub their toes on hard, uncomfortable facts strewn in their paths.” Such encounters with the unaccountable are opportunities for breaking out and breaking through, in new directions, to fresh understanding.One also often hears that biographers must like their subjects. That would of course rule out such vastly important subjects as Hitler or Stalin. In practice, the biographer must like the subject not as a person but as a subject. Some are good subjects for the author, some bad. And what makes one subject better than another for any particular biographer varies dramatically. Some of the reasons are purely practical. Does the subject need a biography? Are the materials available? How much time is needed? A biographer’s knowledge and ability also determine the choice. Great scientists are great subjects, but can one write about their achievements with insight and authority? Personal idiosyncrasies matter, too.Biographers tend to be attracted to subjects who display particular personality traits, whether they be ambition, cruelty, ingenuity, or any other characteristic that separates a potential subject from the multitudes.In choosing a subject, the biographer’s main question should be, “Can an effective book be made out of this person’s life?” Day after day for years, the biographer will try to untangle chronology, compress relationships without distorting them, and keep the main narrative clear while carrying forward several intricate strands of the subject’s life. What pushes most biographers on in this endeavor is not necessarily affection for the subject but the feeling that they are writing a good book.Q.The author is primarily concerned with

View answer

For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows. A study shows that consumers who become fixated onhowto achieve a goal probably face more difficulty in achieving their aims than people who think abstractly aboutwhythey want to do something. The authors of the study conducted four experiments to examine consumer behavior when it came to the goal of saving money. In one such experiment, some people were asked to make a specific plan to save money, whereas others were not asked to plan. Then some people were asked to focus on why they wanted to save money. Later on all participants were given the opportunity to buy candy. Subjects who were thinking concretely and formed a specific plan were less able to avoid the candy purchase than those who had not formed a plan at all.To elucidate the results, the authors cite the instance of person who wants to save money and hence makes a plan for achieving this goal. This person plans to save money by purchasing fewer clothing items at the mall. On investigating how this plan influences the persons response to other money-saving opportunities, for example, would the person be more likely to order a cheaper meal at a restaurant, avoid making an impulse purchase, or combine errands to save money on gas etc., the authors found that when people focus on concrete aspects of how they want to achieve goals, they become more closed-minded and consequently less likely to take advantage of opportunities that fall outside their plans. In contrast, people who focus on the why aspect are more likely to consider out-of-plan opportunities to achieve their goals.Furthermore, in the same experiment, the group that performed the best was the one that was asked to focus on the why and had formed a plan implicitly. Accordingly the authors conclude that planning is more effective when people plan with the complete understanding of why. They suggest that this strategy is particularly effective when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or when other goal-directed activities become available.Which of the following statement can be derived on the basis of the analysis done by the study authors?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2025

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Verbal for GMAT