GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > In countries where healthcare is universal an...
Start Learning for Free
In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer. Presently, governments do not have a reliable way of determining whether the symptoms for which these patients were treated for would have otherwise subsided without medical attention. However, this information does not warrant the conclusion by some universal healthcare critics that in the countries with a higher frequency of doctor visits, about half of them are unnecessary. Alternatively, in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.
Q. In the argument above, the two underline portions play which of the following roles?
- a)The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise.
- b)The first is a premise that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.
- c)The first is a premise that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that premise.
- d)The first is a conclusion that rests upon further evidence within the argument; the second supports that conclusion.
- e)The first is a finding, the accuracy of which is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish the accuracy of the finding.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge...
Explanation:
Premise vs. Conclusion
The first underlined portion in the argument serves as a premise. It states a fact that in countries with free universal healthcare, visits to the doctor are more frequent than in countries where healthcare is not free. This premise sets the foundation for the argument.
The second underlined portion is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from the premise. It challenges the conclusion that about half of the doctor visits in countries with free healthcare are unnecessary, which is a common criticism of universal healthcare systems.
Therefore, the first underline is a premise, while the second underline is a claim used to counter certain implications drawn from that premise.
Overall Relationship
The argument as a whole is structured in a way that presents a premise about the frequency of doctor visits in different healthcare systems and then challenges a common conclusion drawn from that premise. It aims to highlight the complexity of the issue and caution against oversimplified interpretations.
By analyzing the roles of the underlined portions, we can better understand how the argument is constructed and how it aims to persuade the reader. This analysis is important in critically evaluating the argument and its implications regarding universal healthcare systems.
Premise vs. Conclusion
The first underlined portion in the argument serves as a premise. It states a fact that in countries with free universal healthcare, visits to the doctor are more frequent than in countries where healthcare is not free. This premise sets the foundation for the argument.
The second underlined portion is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from the premise. It challenges the conclusion that about half of the doctor visits in countries with free healthcare are unnecessary, which is a common criticism of universal healthcare systems.
Therefore, the first underline is a premise, while the second underline is a claim used to counter certain implications drawn from that premise.
Overall Relationship
The argument as a whole is structured in a way that presents a premise about the frequency of doctor visits in different healthcare systems and then challenges a common conclusion drawn from that premise. It aims to highlight the complexity of the issue and caution against oversimplified interpretations.
By analyzing the roles of the underlined portions, we can better understand how the argument is constructed and how it aims to persuade the reader. This analysis is important in critically evaluating the argument and its implications regarding universal healthcare systems.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge...
Remember that for all Method of Reasoning questions you must first deconstruct the argument before you go through process of elimination to find which answer choice best describes it. The first underlined information gives that the frequency of visits to the doctor is twice as high in those countries with free healthcare as it is in those without free healthcare. This piece of information is presented without an explanation as to why and is therefore a premise that describes the frequency of visits to the doctors between countries that do and do not have universal healthcare.
After the first underlined portion, the next portion gives a second premise, that there is no way of determining the severity of the patients’ symptoms and no way of determining whether these trips to the doctor were unnecessary. The second sentence of not-underlined information continues this by stating that the conclusion that half of the visits in countries with universal health care are unnecessary is not necessarily valid.
The second set of underlined text then gives an alternative explanation: that consumers in countries without universal health care instead avoid going to the doctor when they need to. Notice that this isn’t a conclusion, but is instead an argument against a certain conclusion.
With the argument deconstructed, you can then take a look at the answer choices. Be wary of wordplay and be very picky!
Choice "The first is a premise that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that premise." may seem close to your initial analysis of the underlined portions. The first underlined portion is a premise, but it is not the premise that the argument disputes, but the conclusions that can be drawn from that premise. Additionally, the second portion is reasoning that the conclusion in the previous sentence isn’t justified rather than a conclusion in and of itself. Choice "The first is a premise that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that premise." can therefore be eliminated.
Choice "The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise." matches the deconstruction of the argument. The first underlined portion is a premise whose implications (whether or not the extra doctor’s visits are warranted) are indeed under attack. The second underlined portion is a claim, arguing against the conclusion in the previous sentence. Choice "The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise." is correct.
Choice "The first is a finding, the accuracy of which is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish the accuracy of the finding." can be eliminated since the first underlined portion is not a finding, but a premise. Its accuracy is also not in question, so you can confidently eliminate choice "The first is a finding, the accuracy of which is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish the accuracy of the finding.".
Choice "The first is a premise that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion." is correct in that the first portion is a premise. However, the first conclusion reached is not accepted by the argument – it is disputed. Choice "The first is a premise that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion." can be eliminated.
Choice "The first is a conclusion that rests upon further evidence within the argument; the second supports that conclusion." can be eliminated since the first underlined portion is a premise, not a conclusion, since it does not pass the “why” test.
The correct answer is "The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise.".
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for GMATView all
In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer. Presently, governments do not have a reliable way of determining whether the symptoms for which these patients were treated for would have otherwise subsided without medical attention. However, this information does not warrant the conclusion by some universal healthcare critics that in the countries with a higher frequency of doctor visits, about half of them are unnecessary.Alternatively, in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.Q. In the argument above, the two underline portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise.b)The first is a premise that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is a premise that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that premise.d)The first is a conclusion that rests upon further evidence within the argument; the second supports that conclusion.e)The first is a finding, the accuracy of which is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish the accuracy of the finding.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer. Presently, governments do not have a reliable way of determining whether the symptoms for which these patients were treated for would have otherwise subsided without medical attention. However, this information does not warrant the conclusion by some universal healthcare critics that in the countries with a higher frequency of doctor visits, about half of them are unnecessary.Alternatively, in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.Q. In the argument above, the two underline portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise.b)The first is a premise that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is a premise that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that premise.d)The first is a conclusion that rests upon further evidence within the argument; the second supports that conclusion.e)The first is a finding, the accuracy of which is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish the accuracy of the finding.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer. Presently, governments do not have a reliable way of determining whether the symptoms for which these patients were treated for would have otherwise subsided without medical attention. However, this information does not warrant the conclusion by some universal healthcare critics that in the countries with a higher frequency of doctor visits, about half of them are unnecessary.Alternatively, in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.Q. In the argument above, the two underline portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise.b)The first is a premise that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is a premise that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that premise.d)The first is a conclusion that rests upon further evidence within the argument; the second supports that conclusion.e)The first is a finding, the accuracy of which is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish the accuracy of the finding.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer. Presently, governments do not have a reliable way of determining whether the symptoms for which these patients were treated for would have otherwise subsided without medical attention. However, this information does not warrant the conclusion by some universal healthcare critics that in the countries with a higher frequency of doctor visits, about half of them are unnecessary.Alternatively, in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.Q. In the argument above, the two underline portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise.b)The first is a premise that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is a premise that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that premise.d)The first is a conclusion that rests upon further evidence within the argument; the second supports that conclusion.e)The first is a finding, the accuracy of which is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish the accuracy of the finding.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer. Presently, governments do not have a reliable way of determining whether the symptoms for which these patients were treated for would have otherwise subsided without medical attention. However, this information does not warrant the conclusion by some universal healthcare critics that in the countries with a higher frequency of doctor visits, about half of them are unnecessary.Alternatively, in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.Q. In the argument above, the two underline portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise.b)The first is a premise that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is a premise that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that premise.d)The first is a conclusion that rests upon further evidence within the argument; the second supports that conclusion.e)The first is a finding, the accuracy of which is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish the accuracy of the finding.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer. Presently, governments do not have a reliable way of determining whether the symptoms for which these patients were treated for would have otherwise subsided without medical attention. However, this information does not warrant the conclusion by some universal healthcare critics that in the countries with a higher frequency of doctor visits, about half of them are unnecessary.Alternatively, in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.Q. In the argument above, the two underline portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise.b)The first is a premise that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is a premise that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that premise.d)The first is a conclusion that rests upon further evidence within the argument; the second supports that conclusion.e)The first is a finding, the accuracy of which is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish the accuracy of the finding.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer. Presently, governments do not have a reliable way of determining whether the symptoms for which these patients were treated for would have otherwise subsided without medical attention. However, this information does not warrant the conclusion by some universal healthcare critics that in the countries with a higher frequency of doctor visits, about half of them are unnecessary.Alternatively, in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.Q. In the argument above, the two underline portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise.b)The first is a premise that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is a premise that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that premise.d)The first is a conclusion that rests upon further evidence within the argument; the second supports that conclusion.e)The first is a finding, the accuracy of which is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish the accuracy of the finding.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer. Presently, governments do not have a reliable way of determining whether the symptoms for which these patients were treated for would have otherwise subsided without medical attention. However, this information does not warrant the conclusion by some universal healthcare critics that in the countries with a higher frequency of doctor visits, about half of them are unnecessary.Alternatively, in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.Q. In the argument above, the two underline portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise.b)The first is a premise that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is a premise that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that premise.d)The first is a conclusion that rests upon further evidence within the argument; the second supports that conclusion.e)The first is a finding, the accuracy of which is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish the accuracy of the finding.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer. Presently, governments do not have a reliable way of determining whether the symptoms for which these patients were treated for would have otherwise subsided without medical attention. However, this information does not warrant the conclusion by some universal healthcare critics that in the countries with a higher frequency of doctor visits, about half of them are unnecessary.Alternatively, in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.Q. In the argument above, the two underline portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise.b)The first is a premise that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is a premise that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that premise.d)The first is a conclusion that rests upon further evidence within the argument; the second supports that conclusion.e)The first is a finding, the accuracy of which is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish the accuracy of the finding.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer. Presently, governments do not have a reliable way of determining whether the symptoms for which these patients were treated for would have otherwise subsided without medical attention. However, this information does not warrant the conclusion by some universal healthcare critics that in the countries with a higher frequency of doctor visits, about half of them are unnecessary.Alternatively, in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.Q. In the argument above, the two underline portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise.b)The first is a premise that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is a premise that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that premise.d)The first is a conclusion that rests upon further evidence within the argument; the second supports that conclusion.e)The first is a finding, the accuracy of which is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish the accuracy of the finding.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer. Presently, governments do not have a reliable way of determining whether the symptoms for which these patients were treated for would have otherwise subsided without medical attention. However, this information does not warrant the conclusion by some universal healthcare critics that in the countries with a higher frequency of doctor visits, about half of them are unnecessary.Alternatively, in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.Q. In the argument above, the two underline portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise.b)The first is a premise that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is a premise that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that premise.d)The first is a conclusion that rests upon further evidence within the argument; the second supports that conclusion.e)The first is a finding, the accuracy of which is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish the accuracy of the finding.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer. Presently, governments do not have a reliable way of determining whether the symptoms for which these patients were treated for would have otherwise subsided without medical attention. However, this information does not warrant the conclusion by some universal healthcare critics that in the countries with a higher frequency of doctor visits, about half of them are unnecessary.Alternatively, in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.Q. In the argument above, the two underline portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise.b)The first is a premise that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is a premise that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that premise.d)The first is a conclusion that rests upon further evidence within the argument; the second supports that conclusion.e)The first is a finding, the accuracy of which is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish the accuracy of the finding.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer. Presently, governments do not have a reliable way of determining whether the symptoms for which these patients were treated for would have otherwise subsided without medical attention. However, this information does not warrant the conclusion by some universal healthcare critics that in the countries with a higher frequency of doctor visits, about half of them are unnecessary.Alternatively, in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.Q. In the argument above, the two underline portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise.b)The first is a premise that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is a premise that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that premise.d)The first is a conclusion that rests upon further evidence within the argument; the second supports that conclusion.e)The first is a finding, the accuracy of which is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish the accuracy of the finding.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup