GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Recently, motorists have begun purchasing mor... Start Learning for Free
Recently, motorists have begun purchasing more and more fuel-efficient economy and hybrid cars that consume fewer gallons of gasoline per mile traveled. With that trend, there has been debate as to whether we can conclude that these purchases will actually lead to an overall reduction in the total consumption of gasoline across all motorists. The answer is no, since motorists with more fuel-efficient vehicles are likely to drive more total miles than they did before switching to a more fuel-efficient car, negating the gains from higher fuel-efficiency.
Q. Which of the following best describes the roles of the portions in underline?
  • a)
    The first is a premise that is later shown to be false; the second is a conclusion that is later shown to be false.
  • b)
    The first states a position taken by the argument; the second introduces a conclusion that is refuted by additional evidence.
  • c)
    The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence.
  • d)
    The first is a conclusion that is later shown to be false; the second is the evidence by which that conclusion is proven false.
  • e)
    The first describes a premise that is accepted as true; the second introduces a conclusion that is opposed by the argument as a whole.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Recently, motorists have begun purchasing more and more fuel-efficient...
As you deconstruct the argument in this Boldface question, recognize first that the first underlined sentence is a premise, stated as a fact. Further, the beginning of the next sentence states "with that trend...," establishing that the argument will build from that fact. From here you can eliminate choices "The first states a position taken by the argument; the second introduces a conclusion that is refuted by additional evidence." and "The first is a conclusion that is later shown to be false; the second is the evidence by which that conclusion is proven false." (each of which says that the first portion is a conclusion). You can also be very skeptical of choice "The first is a premise that is later shown to be false; the second is a conclusion that is later shown to be false.": even though it correctly says that the first portion is a premise, note that it goes on to say that the argument proves that premise false. As you will see from the rest of the paragraph, the argument is concerned with attacking a conclusion drawn from that premise, but never tries to disprove the fact itself. For this reason, "The first is a premise that is later shown to be false; the second is a conclusion that is later shown to be false." is also incorrect.
As you look at the second underlined portion, note that the phrase "there has been debate as to whether we can conclude" is also direct cause for eliminating "The first is a premise that is later shown to be false; the second is a conclusion that is later shown to be false.": the second underlined portion is not the conclusion itself, but rather the introduction of the conclusion. You should see that this language matches choice "The first describes a premise that is accepted as true; the second introduces a conclusion that is opposed by the argument as a whole." perfectly, so choice "The first describes a premise that is accepted as true; the second introduces a conclusion that is opposed by the argument as a whole." is correct.
Similarly "The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence." is incorrect, as the second underlined portion introduces a conclusion that could be drawn based on the first premise: it does not, as "The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence." says "undermine that evidence." To the contrary, it builds upon it.
Note that the conclusion of this argument is the phrase "the answer is no," which comes right next to the explanation for that conclusion, "since motorists with more fuel-efficient vehicles..." This allows you to eliminate choice "The first is a conclusion that is later shown to be false; the second is the evidence by which that conclusion is proven false.", as the evidence for the argument's conclusion is everything beginning with "since," not the second underlined portion. Choice "The first describes a premise that is accepted as true; the second introduces a conclusion that is opposed by the argument as a whole." is correct.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Window 1: Article about hardwood consumptionCurrently the global economy consumes roughly 15 billion cubic feet of hardwood per year. This is nearly 2.5 times the amount of hardwood consumed annually in the 1950s. This causes a number of environmental issues, including loss of watersheds, destruction of habitats, increased air pollution, and landfill crowding.Global hardwood consumption is expected to steadily increase, growing by roughly 20% in the 2010s and by more than 50% by 2050. The effects of the growth will be devastating to the world’s hardwood forest. It is estimated that currently 10 times more trees are lost annually to wood consumption than are replanted, resulting in a net destruction of 40 million forest acres annually.Window 2: Analysis of hardwood industrial pathsAll wood consumption flows through two industry paths: construction use and stationery consumption. Construction use wood begins at sawmills and becomes lumber, plywood, veneer, wood paneling, construction material, and furniture stock. Stationery wood goes to the paper mills and becomes paper, cardboard, and fiberboard.Generally, 50% of all cut hardwood goes to sawmills for wholewood projects; 20% goes to chip mills for fuel consumption, particleboard creation, and other semiwood products; and the remaining 30% goes to pulp mills. Unfortunately, roughly 25% of the wood that is cut never actually reaches consumers, because wasteful manufacturing practices render it useless and send it straight to landfills.Window 3: Article on tree useThe United States is the greatest global consumer of hardwood products, using more than 17% of the 15 billion cubic feet cut annually. This is roughly twice the consumption rate of other industrialized nations and three times that of developing countries.The average American consumes 886 pounds of paper per year. This is twice that of most European residents and more than 200 times that of Chinese persons, who consume only 3 pounds of paper per year.Q: Consider each of the items listed below. Select Yes if the item can be determined based on the information given in the three sources. Otherwise, select No.

Top Courses for GMAT

Recently, motorists have begun purchasing more and more fuel-efficient economy and hybrid cars that consume fewer gallons of gasoline per mile traveled.With that trend,there has been debate as to whether we can conclude that these purchases will actually lead to an overall reduction in the total consumption of gasoline across all motorists.The answer is no, since motorists with more fuel-efficient vehicles are likely to drive more total miles than they did before switching to a more fuel-efficient car, negating the gains from higher fuel-efficiency.Q. Which of the following best describes the roles of the portions in underline?a)The first is a premise that is later shown to be false; the second is a conclusion that is later shown to be false.b)The first states a position taken by the argument; the second introduces a conclusion that is refuted by additional evidence.c)The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence.d)The first is a conclusion that is later shown to be false; the second is the evidence by which that conclusion is proven false.e)The first describes a premise that is accepted as true; the second introduces a conclusion that is opposed by the argument as a whole.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Recently, motorists have begun purchasing more and more fuel-efficient economy and hybrid cars that consume fewer gallons of gasoline per mile traveled.With that trend,there has been debate as to whether we can conclude that these purchases will actually lead to an overall reduction in the total consumption of gasoline across all motorists.The answer is no, since motorists with more fuel-efficient vehicles are likely to drive more total miles than they did before switching to a more fuel-efficient car, negating the gains from higher fuel-efficiency.Q. Which of the following best describes the roles of the portions in underline?a)The first is a premise that is later shown to be false; the second is a conclusion that is later shown to be false.b)The first states a position taken by the argument; the second introduces a conclusion that is refuted by additional evidence.c)The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence.d)The first is a conclusion that is later shown to be false; the second is the evidence by which that conclusion is proven false.e)The first describes a premise that is accepted as true; the second introduces a conclusion that is opposed by the argument as a whole.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Recently, motorists have begun purchasing more and more fuel-efficient economy and hybrid cars that consume fewer gallons of gasoline per mile traveled.With that trend,there has been debate as to whether we can conclude that these purchases will actually lead to an overall reduction in the total consumption of gasoline across all motorists.The answer is no, since motorists with more fuel-efficient vehicles are likely to drive more total miles than they did before switching to a more fuel-efficient car, negating the gains from higher fuel-efficiency.Q. Which of the following best describes the roles of the portions in underline?a)The first is a premise that is later shown to be false; the second is a conclusion that is later shown to be false.b)The first states a position taken by the argument; the second introduces a conclusion that is refuted by additional evidence.c)The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence.d)The first is a conclusion that is later shown to be false; the second is the evidence by which that conclusion is proven false.e)The first describes a premise that is accepted as true; the second introduces a conclusion that is opposed by the argument as a whole.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Recently, motorists have begun purchasing more and more fuel-efficient economy and hybrid cars that consume fewer gallons of gasoline per mile traveled.With that trend,there has been debate as to whether we can conclude that these purchases will actually lead to an overall reduction in the total consumption of gasoline across all motorists.The answer is no, since motorists with more fuel-efficient vehicles are likely to drive more total miles than they did before switching to a more fuel-efficient car, negating the gains from higher fuel-efficiency.Q. Which of the following best describes the roles of the portions in underline?a)The first is a premise that is later shown to be false; the second is a conclusion that is later shown to be false.b)The first states a position taken by the argument; the second introduces a conclusion that is refuted by additional evidence.c)The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence.d)The first is a conclusion that is later shown to be false; the second is the evidence by which that conclusion is proven false.e)The first describes a premise that is accepted as true; the second introduces a conclusion that is opposed by the argument as a whole.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Recently, motorists have begun purchasing more and more fuel-efficient economy and hybrid cars that consume fewer gallons of gasoline per mile traveled.With that trend,there has been debate as to whether we can conclude that these purchases will actually lead to an overall reduction in the total consumption of gasoline across all motorists.The answer is no, since motorists with more fuel-efficient vehicles are likely to drive more total miles than they did before switching to a more fuel-efficient car, negating the gains from higher fuel-efficiency.Q. Which of the following best describes the roles of the portions in underline?a)The first is a premise that is later shown to be false; the second is a conclusion that is later shown to be false.b)The first states a position taken by the argument; the second introduces a conclusion that is refuted by additional evidence.c)The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence.d)The first is a conclusion that is later shown to be false; the second is the evidence by which that conclusion is proven false.e)The first describes a premise that is accepted as true; the second introduces a conclusion that is opposed by the argument as a whole.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Recently, motorists have begun purchasing more and more fuel-efficient economy and hybrid cars that consume fewer gallons of gasoline per mile traveled.With that trend,there has been debate as to whether we can conclude that these purchases will actually lead to an overall reduction in the total consumption of gasoline across all motorists.The answer is no, since motorists with more fuel-efficient vehicles are likely to drive more total miles than they did before switching to a more fuel-efficient car, negating the gains from higher fuel-efficiency.Q. Which of the following best describes the roles of the portions in underline?a)The first is a premise that is later shown to be false; the second is a conclusion that is later shown to be false.b)The first states a position taken by the argument; the second introduces a conclusion that is refuted by additional evidence.c)The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence.d)The first is a conclusion that is later shown to be false; the second is the evidence by which that conclusion is proven false.e)The first describes a premise that is accepted as true; the second introduces a conclusion that is opposed by the argument as a whole.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Recently, motorists have begun purchasing more and more fuel-efficient economy and hybrid cars that consume fewer gallons of gasoline per mile traveled.With that trend,there has been debate as to whether we can conclude that these purchases will actually lead to an overall reduction in the total consumption of gasoline across all motorists.The answer is no, since motorists with more fuel-efficient vehicles are likely to drive more total miles than they did before switching to a more fuel-efficient car, negating the gains from higher fuel-efficiency.Q. Which of the following best describes the roles of the portions in underline?a)The first is a premise that is later shown to be false; the second is a conclusion that is later shown to be false.b)The first states a position taken by the argument; the second introduces a conclusion that is refuted by additional evidence.c)The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence.d)The first is a conclusion that is later shown to be false; the second is the evidence by which that conclusion is proven false.e)The first describes a premise that is accepted as true; the second introduces a conclusion that is opposed by the argument as a whole.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Recently, motorists have begun purchasing more and more fuel-efficient economy and hybrid cars that consume fewer gallons of gasoline per mile traveled.With that trend,there has been debate as to whether we can conclude that these purchases will actually lead to an overall reduction in the total consumption of gasoline across all motorists.The answer is no, since motorists with more fuel-efficient vehicles are likely to drive more total miles than they did before switching to a more fuel-efficient car, negating the gains from higher fuel-efficiency.Q. Which of the following best describes the roles of the portions in underline?a)The first is a premise that is later shown to be false; the second is a conclusion that is later shown to be false.b)The first states a position taken by the argument; the second introduces a conclusion that is refuted by additional evidence.c)The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence.d)The first is a conclusion that is later shown to be false; the second is the evidence by which that conclusion is proven false.e)The first describes a premise that is accepted as true; the second introduces a conclusion that is opposed by the argument as a whole.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Recently, motorists have begun purchasing more and more fuel-efficient economy and hybrid cars that consume fewer gallons of gasoline per mile traveled.With that trend,there has been debate as to whether we can conclude that these purchases will actually lead to an overall reduction in the total consumption of gasoline across all motorists.The answer is no, since motorists with more fuel-efficient vehicles are likely to drive more total miles than they did before switching to a more fuel-efficient car, negating the gains from higher fuel-efficiency.Q. Which of the following best describes the roles of the portions in underline?a)The first is a premise that is later shown to be false; the second is a conclusion that is later shown to be false.b)The first states a position taken by the argument; the second introduces a conclusion that is refuted by additional evidence.c)The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence.d)The first is a conclusion that is later shown to be false; the second is the evidence by which that conclusion is proven false.e)The first describes a premise that is accepted as true; the second introduces a conclusion that is opposed by the argument as a whole.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Recently, motorists have begun purchasing more and more fuel-efficient economy and hybrid cars that consume fewer gallons of gasoline per mile traveled.With that trend,there has been debate as to whether we can conclude that these purchases will actually lead to an overall reduction in the total consumption of gasoline across all motorists.The answer is no, since motorists with more fuel-efficient vehicles are likely to drive more total miles than they did before switching to a more fuel-efficient car, negating the gains from higher fuel-efficiency.Q. Which of the following best describes the roles of the portions in underline?a)The first is a premise that is later shown to be false; the second is a conclusion that is later shown to be false.b)The first states a position taken by the argument; the second introduces a conclusion that is refuted by additional evidence.c)The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence.d)The first is a conclusion that is later shown to be false; the second is the evidence by which that conclusion is proven false.e)The first describes a premise that is accepted as true; the second introduces a conclusion that is opposed by the argument as a whole.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev