Question Description
The Interstate Bridge over the Apache River, built in the 1950s, shows a substantial amount of rust: as much as 45% of its surface is coated in rust. Community activists have argued thatthe bridge presents a hazard: it is likely to collapse in places where it has rusted through. Professors of mechanical engineering at the local university did an extensive analysis of the bridge. These professors and their graduate students determined that 98% of the rust on the bridge exists on the surface only, and actually seals the underlying steel from the corrosive influence of the elements. The results of this academic study suggest thatthe bridge is safe for continued use.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence that calls this conclusion into question.c)The first is evidence taken to support one conclusion; the second provides evidence that calls this conclusion into question.d)The first is a position that the argument opposes; the second is the conclusion of the argument.e)The first is an interpretation of evidence; the second calls that evidence into question.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The Interstate Bridge over the Apache River, built in the 1950s, shows a substantial amount of rust: as much as 45% of its surface is coated in rust. Community activists have argued thatthe bridge presents a hazard: it is likely to collapse in places where it has rusted through. Professors of mechanical engineering at the local university did an extensive analysis of the bridge. These professors and their graduate students determined that 98% of the rust on the bridge exists on the surface only, and actually seals the underlying steel from the corrosive influence of the elements. The results of this academic study suggest thatthe bridge is safe for continued use.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence that calls this conclusion into question.c)The first is evidence taken to support one conclusion; the second provides evidence that calls this conclusion into question.d)The first is a position that the argument opposes; the second is the conclusion of the argument.e)The first is an interpretation of evidence; the second calls that evidence into question.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The Interstate Bridge over the Apache River, built in the 1950s, shows a substantial amount of rust: as much as 45% of its surface is coated in rust. Community activists have argued thatthe bridge presents a hazard: it is likely to collapse in places where it has rusted through. Professors of mechanical engineering at the local university did an extensive analysis of the bridge. These professors and their graduate students determined that 98% of the rust on the bridge exists on the surface only, and actually seals the underlying steel from the corrosive influence of the elements. The results of this academic study suggest thatthe bridge is safe for continued use.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence that calls this conclusion into question.c)The first is evidence taken to support one conclusion; the second provides evidence that calls this conclusion into question.d)The first is a position that the argument opposes; the second is the conclusion of the argument.e)The first is an interpretation of evidence; the second calls that evidence into question.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The Interstate Bridge over the Apache River, built in the 1950s, shows a substantial amount of rust: as much as 45% of its surface is coated in rust. Community activists have argued thatthe bridge presents a hazard: it is likely to collapse in places where it has rusted through. Professors of mechanical engineering at the local university did an extensive analysis of the bridge. These professors and their graduate students determined that 98% of the rust on the bridge exists on the surface only, and actually seals the underlying steel from the corrosive influence of the elements. The results of this academic study suggest thatthe bridge is safe for continued use.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence that calls this conclusion into question.c)The first is evidence taken to support one conclusion; the second provides evidence that calls this conclusion into question.d)The first is a position that the argument opposes; the second is the conclusion of the argument.e)The first is an interpretation of evidence; the second calls that evidence into question.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The Interstate Bridge over the Apache River, built in the 1950s, shows a substantial amount of rust: as much as 45% of its surface is coated in rust. Community activists have argued thatthe bridge presents a hazard: it is likely to collapse in places where it has rusted through. Professors of mechanical engineering at the local university did an extensive analysis of the bridge. These professors and their graduate students determined that 98% of the rust on the bridge exists on the surface only, and actually seals the underlying steel from the corrosive influence of the elements. The results of this academic study suggest thatthe bridge is safe for continued use.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence that calls this conclusion into question.c)The first is evidence taken to support one conclusion; the second provides evidence that calls this conclusion into question.d)The first is a position that the argument opposes; the second is the conclusion of the argument.e)The first is an interpretation of evidence; the second calls that evidence into question.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The Interstate Bridge over the Apache River, built in the 1950s, shows a substantial amount of rust: as much as 45% of its surface is coated in rust. Community activists have argued thatthe bridge presents a hazard: it is likely to collapse in places where it has rusted through. Professors of mechanical engineering at the local university did an extensive analysis of the bridge. These professors and their graduate students determined that 98% of the rust on the bridge exists on the surface only, and actually seals the underlying steel from the corrosive influence of the elements. The results of this academic study suggest thatthe bridge is safe for continued use.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence that calls this conclusion into question.c)The first is evidence taken to support one conclusion; the second provides evidence that calls this conclusion into question.d)The first is a position that the argument opposes; the second is the conclusion of the argument.e)The first is an interpretation of evidence; the second calls that evidence into question.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The Interstate Bridge over the Apache River, built in the 1950s, shows a substantial amount of rust: as much as 45% of its surface is coated in rust. Community activists have argued thatthe bridge presents a hazard: it is likely to collapse in places where it has rusted through. Professors of mechanical engineering at the local university did an extensive analysis of the bridge. These professors and their graduate students determined that 98% of the rust on the bridge exists on the surface only, and actually seals the underlying steel from the corrosive influence of the elements. The results of this academic study suggest thatthe bridge is safe for continued use.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence that calls this conclusion into question.c)The first is evidence taken to support one conclusion; the second provides evidence that calls this conclusion into question.d)The first is a position that the argument opposes; the second is the conclusion of the argument.e)The first is an interpretation of evidence; the second calls that evidence into question.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The Interstate Bridge over the Apache River, built in the 1950s, shows a substantial amount of rust: as much as 45% of its surface is coated in rust. Community activists have argued thatthe bridge presents a hazard: it is likely to collapse in places where it has rusted through. Professors of mechanical engineering at the local university did an extensive analysis of the bridge. These professors and their graduate students determined that 98% of the rust on the bridge exists on the surface only, and actually seals the underlying steel from the corrosive influence of the elements. The results of this academic study suggest thatthe bridge is safe for continued use.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence that calls this conclusion into question.c)The first is evidence taken to support one conclusion; the second provides evidence that calls this conclusion into question.d)The first is a position that the argument opposes; the second is the conclusion of the argument.e)The first is an interpretation of evidence; the second calls that evidence into question.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The Interstate Bridge over the Apache River, built in the 1950s, shows a substantial amount of rust: as much as 45% of its surface is coated in rust. Community activists have argued thatthe bridge presents a hazard: it is likely to collapse in places where it has rusted through. Professors of mechanical engineering at the local university did an extensive analysis of the bridge. These professors and their graduate students determined that 98% of the rust on the bridge exists on the surface only, and actually seals the underlying steel from the corrosive influence of the elements. The results of this academic study suggest thatthe bridge is safe for continued use.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence that calls this conclusion into question.c)The first is evidence taken to support one conclusion; the second provides evidence that calls this conclusion into question.d)The first is a position that the argument opposes; the second is the conclusion of the argument.e)The first is an interpretation of evidence; the second calls that evidence into question.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.