Question Description
Aid workers have worried that residents of the Eastern Gobi Refugee Camp might be at risk for beriberi, a severe deficiency of Thiamine, a B vitamin.Thiamine is found in high concentrations in cereal grains, and many of the residents have grain free diets because of allergies.Doctors and nutritionists assigned to investigate the situation have disagreed, noting that the residents grow sustenance amounts of potatoes, kale, and cauliflower on the surrounding farm lands, and these foods provide substantial sources of Thiamine as well. Because the residents of this refugee campdo not have any allergies to any of these latter foods, and crops have been good because of favorable weather conditions,their risk of beriberi is much lower than originally thought.In the argument given, the two portions in underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence that seems to contradict the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second calls the conclusion of the argument into question.d)The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second is an alternate interpretation of this conclusion.e)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence that contradicts the conclusion of the argument.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Aid workers have worried that residents of the Eastern Gobi Refugee Camp might be at risk for beriberi, a severe deficiency of Thiamine, a B vitamin.Thiamine is found in high concentrations in cereal grains, and many of the residents have grain free diets because of allergies.Doctors and nutritionists assigned to investigate the situation have disagreed, noting that the residents grow sustenance amounts of potatoes, kale, and cauliflower on the surrounding farm lands, and these foods provide substantial sources of Thiamine as well. Because the residents of this refugee campdo not have any allergies to any of these latter foods, and crops have been good because of favorable weather conditions,their risk of beriberi is much lower than originally thought.In the argument given, the two portions in underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence that seems to contradict the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second calls the conclusion of the argument into question.d)The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second is an alternate interpretation of this conclusion.e)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence that contradicts the conclusion of the argument.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Aid workers have worried that residents of the Eastern Gobi Refugee Camp might be at risk for beriberi, a severe deficiency of Thiamine, a B vitamin.Thiamine is found in high concentrations in cereal grains, and many of the residents have grain free diets because of allergies.Doctors and nutritionists assigned to investigate the situation have disagreed, noting that the residents grow sustenance amounts of potatoes, kale, and cauliflower on the surrounding farm lands, and these foods provide substantial sources of Thiamine as well. Because the residents of this refugee campdo not have any allergies to any of these latter foods, and crops have been good because of favorable weather conditions,their risk of beriberi is much lower than originally thought.In the argument given, the two portions in underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence that seems to contradict the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second calls the conclusion of the argument into question.d)The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second is an alternate interpretation of this conclusion.e)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence that contradicts the conclusion of the argument.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Aid workers have worried that residents of the Eastern Gobi Refugee Camp might be at risk for beriberi, a severe deficiency of Thiamine, a B vitamin.Thiamine is found in high concentrations in cereal grains, and many of the residents have grain free diets because of allergies.Doctors and nutritionists assigned to investigate the situation have disagreed, noting that the residents grow sustenance amounts of potatoes, kale, and cauliflower on the surrounding farm lands, and these foods provide substantial sources of Thiamine as well. Because the residents of this refugee campdo not have any allergies to any of these latter foods, and crops have been good because of favorable weather conditions,their risk of beriberi is much lower than originally thought.In the argument given, the two portions in underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence that seems to contradict the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second calls the conclusion of the argument into question.d)The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second is an alternate interpretation of this conclusion.e)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence that contradicts the conclusion of the argument.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Aid workers have worried that residents of the Eastern Gobi Refugee Camp might be at risk for beriberi, a severe deficiency of Thiamine, a B vitamin.Thiamine is found in high concentrations in cereal grains, and many of the residents have grain free diets because of allergies.Doctors and nutritionists assigned to investigate the situation have disagreed, noting that the residents grow sustenance amounts of potatoes, kale, and cauliflower on the surrounding farm lands, and these foods provide substantial sources of Thiamine as well. Because the residents of this refugee campdo not have any allergies to any of these latter foods, and crops have been good because of favorable weather conditions,their risk of beriberi is much lower than originally thought.In the argument given, the two portions in underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence that seems to contradict the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second calls the conclusion of the argument into question.d)The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second is an alternate interpretation of this conclusion.e)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence that contradicts the conclusion of the argument.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Aid workers have worried that residents of the Eastern Gobi Refugee Camp might be at risk for beriberi, a severe deficiency of Thiamine, a B vitamin.Thiamine is found in high concentrations in cereal grains, and many of the residents have grain free diets because of allergies.Doctors and nutritionists assigned to investigate the situation have disagreed, noting that the residents grow sustenance amounts of potatoes, kale, and cauliflower on the surrounding farm lands, and these foods provide substantial sources of Thiamine as well. Because the residents of this refugee campdo not have any allergies to any of these latter foods, and crops have been good because of favorable weather conditions,their risk of beriberi is much lower than originally thought.In the argument given, the two portions in underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence that seems to contradict the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second calls the conclusion of the argument into question.d)The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second is an alternate interpretation of this conclusion.e)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence that contradicts the conclusion of the argument.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Aid workers have worried that residents of the Eastern Gobi Refugee Camp might be at risk for beriberi, a severe deficiency of Thiamine, a B vitamin.Thiamine is found in high concentrations in cereal grains, and many of the residents have grain free diets because of allergies.Doctors and nutritionists assigned to investigate the situation have disagreed, noting that the residents grow sustenance amounts of potatoes, kale, and cauliflower on the surrounding farm lands, and these foods provide substantial sources of Thiamine as well. Because the residents of this refugee campdo not have any allergies to any of these latter foods, and crops have been good because of favorable weather conditions,their risk of beriberi is much lower than originally thought.In the argument given, the two portions in underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence that seems to contradict the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second calls the conclusion of the argument into question.d)The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second is an alternate interpretation of this conclusion.e)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence that contradicts the conclusion of the argument.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Aid workers have worried that residents of the Eastern Gobi Refugee Camp might be at risk for beriberi, a severe deficiency of Thiamine, a B vitamin.Thiamine is found in high concentrations in cereal grains, and many of the residents have grain free diets because of allergies.Doctors and nutritionists assigned to investigate the situation have disagreed, noting that the residents grow sustenance amounts of potatoes, kale, and cauliflower on the surrounding farm lands, and these foods provide substantial sources of Thiamine as well. Because the residents of this refugee campdo not have any allergies to any of these latter foods, and crops have been good because of favorable weather conditions,their risk of beriberi is much lower than originally thought.In the argument given, the two portions in underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence that seems to contradict the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second calls the conclusion of the argument into question.d)The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second is an alternate interpretation of this conclusion.e)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence that contradicts the conclusion of the argument.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Aid workers have worried that residents of the Eastern Gobi Refugee Camp might be at risk for beriberi, a severe deficiency of Thiamine, a B vitamin.Thiamine is found in high concentrations in cereal grains, and many of the residents have grain free diets because of allergies.Doctors and nutritionists assigned to investigate the situation have disagreed, noting that the residents grow sustenance amounts of potatoes, kale, and cauliflower on the surrounding farm lands, and these foods provide substantial sources of Thiamine as well. Because the residents of this refugee campdo not have any allergies to any of these latter foods, and crops have been good because of favorable weather conditions,their risk of beriberi is much lower than originally thought.In the argument given, the two portions in underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence that seems to contradict the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.c)The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second calls the conclusion of the argument into question.d)The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second is an alternate interpretation of this conclusion.e)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence that contradicts the conclusion of the argument.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.