GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Historian: The Russian Revolution in the earl... Start Learning for Free
Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparked not by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie, or intellectual middle-class, a fact that is widely accepted in modern academia. The French Revolution of 1789 was also largely ignited by a rising middle class. The idea that political upheavals are initiated by the populist “peasant-class” is widely accepted as a fallacy today. Therefore, political commentators analyzing the “Arab Spring” movement in the past two years are inaccurate in suggesting that the movement is truly populist.
Q. Which of the following best describes the flaw in the historian’s argument?
  • a)
    It accepts that movements cannot be both populist and spurred by the middle class.
  • b)
    The argument draws a conclusion based on a claim which may not be universally true.
  • c)
    The historian’s argument is based on what is “widely accepted” by contemporary historians and not on established facts.
  • d)
    The argument implies that the Arab Spring is relatively similar to historical revolutions with no concrete evidence.
  • e)
    It overlooks the cultural and temporal differences between the Russian, French, and Arab political climates.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparke...
The correct answer is (C). The historian is drawing a conclusion about a modern revolution (Arab Spring) based on what is accepted about historical revolutions (the Russian Revolution, and the French Revolution). The main problem with this argument is that if something is widely accepted, then it must be true. Argumentum ad Populum (popular appeal or appeal to the majority) is a well-known logical fallacy. Just because most people agree with a certain view does not mean that it is correct.
Answer (D) is an assumption that the political commentators had to make in order to arrive at the conclusion that the Arab Spring is truly populist, but this isn’t the main flaw in the historian’s argument.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Top Courses for GMAT

Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparked not by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie, or intellectual middle-class, a fact that is widely accepted in modern academia. The French Revolution of 1789 was also largely ignited by a rising middle class. The idea that political upheavals are initiated by the populist “peasant-class” is widely accepted as a fallacy today. Therefore, political commentators analyzing the “Arab Spring” movement in the past two years are inaccurate in suggesting that the movement is truly populist.Q. Which of the following best describes the flaw in the historian’s argument?a)It accepts that movements cannot be both populist and spurred by the middle class.b)The argument draws a conclusion based on a claim which may not be universally true.c)The historian’s argument is based on what is “widely accepted” by contemporary historians and not on established facts.d)The argument implies that the Arab Spring is relatively similar to historical revolutions with no concrete evidence.e)It overlooks the cultural and temporal differences between the Russian, French, and Arab political climates.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparked not by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie, or intellectual middle-class, a fact that is widely accepted in modern academia. The French Revolution of 1789 was also largely ignited by a rising middle class. The idea that political upheavals are initiated by the populist “peasant-class” is widely accepted as a fallacy today. Therefore, political commentators analyzing the “Arab Spring” movement in the past two years are inaccurate in suggesting that the movement is truly populist.Q. Which of the following best describes the flaw in the historian’s argument?a)It accepts that movements cannot be both populist and spurred by the middle class.b)The argument draws a conclusion based on a claim which may not be universally true.c)The historian’s argument is based on what is “widely accepted” by contemporary historians and not on established facts.d)The argument implies that the Arab Spring is relatively similar to historical revolutions with no concrete evidence.e)It overlooks the cultural and temporal differences between the Russian, French, and Arab political climates.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparked not by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie, or intellectual middle-class, a fact that is widely accepted in modern academia. The French Revolution of 1789 was also largely ignited by a rising middle class. The idea that political upheavals are initiated by the populist “peasant-class” is widely accepted as a fallacy today. Therefore, political commentators analyzing the “Arab Spring” movement in the past two years are inaccurate in suggesting that the movement is truly populist.Q. Which of the following best describes the flaw in the historian’s argument?a)It accepts that movements cannot be both populist and spurred by the middle class.b)The argument draws a conclusion based on a claim which may not be universally true.c)The historian’s argument is based on what is “widely accepted” by contemporary historians and not on established facts.d)The argument implies that the Arab Spring is relatively similar to historical revolutions with no concrete evidence.e)It overlooks the cultural and temporal differences between the Russian, French, and Arab political climates.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparked not by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie, or intellectual middle-class, a fact that is widely accepted in modern academia. The French Revolution of 1789 was also largely ignited by a rising middle class. The idea that political upheavals are initiated by the populist “peasant-class” is widely accepted as a fallacy today. Therefore, political commentators analyzing the “Arab Spring” movement in the past two years are inaccurate in suggesting that the movement is truly populist.Q. Which of the following best describes the flaw in the historian’s argument?a)It accepts that movements cannot be both populist and spurred by the middle class.b)The argument draws a conclusion based on a claim which may not be universally true.c)The historian’s argument is based on what is “widely accepted” by contemporary historians and not on established facts.d)The argument implies that the Arab Spring is relatively similar to historical revolutions with no concrete evidence.e)It overlooks the cultural and temporal differences between the Russian, French, and Arab political climates.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparked not by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie, or intellectual middle-class, a fact that is widely accepted in modern academia. The French Revolution of 1789 was also largely ignited by a rising middle class. The idea that political upheavals are initiated by the populist “peasant-class” is widely accepted as a fallacy today. Therefore, political commentators analyzing the “Arab Spring” movement in the past two years are inaccurate in suggesting that the movement is truly populist.Q. Which of the following best describes the flaw in the historian’s argument?a)It accepts that movements cannot be both populist and spurred by the middle class.b)The argument draws a conclusion based on a claim which may not be universally true.c)The historian’s argument is based on what is “widely accepted” by contemporary historians and not on established facts.d)The argument implies that the Arab Spring is relatively similar to historical revolutions with no concrete evidence.e)It overlooks the cultural and temporal differences between the Russian, French, and Arab political climates.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparked not by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie, or intellectual middle-class, a fact that is widely accepted in modern academia. The French Revolution of 1789 was also largely ignited by a rising middle class. The idea that political upheavals are initiated by the populist “peasant-class” is widely accepted as a fallacy today. Therefore, political commentators analyzing the “Arab Spring” movement in the past two years are inaccurate in suggesting that the movement is truly populist.Q. Which of the following best describes the flaw in the historian’s argument?a)It accepts that movements cannot be both populist and spurred by the middle class.b)The argument draws a conclusion based on a claim which may not be universally true.c)The historian’s argument is based on what is “widely accepted” by contemporary historians and not on established facts.d)The argument implies that the Arab Spring is relatively similar to historical revolutions with no concrete evidence.e)It overlooks the cultural and temporal differences between the Russian, French, and Arab political climates.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparked not by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie, or intellectual middle-class, a fact that is widely accepted in modern academia. The French Revolution of 1789 was also largely ignited by a rising middle class. The idea that political upheavals are initiated by the populist “peasant-class” is widely accepted as a fallacy today. Therefore, political commentators analyzing the “Arab Spring” movement in the past two years are inaccurate in suggesting that the movement is truly populist.Q. Which of the following best describes the flaw in the historian’s argument?a)It accepts that movements cannot be both populist and spurred by the middle class.b)The argument draws a conclusion based on a claim which may not be universally true.c)The historian’s argument is based on what is “widely accepted” by contemporary historians and not on established facts.d)The argument implies that the Arab Spring is relatively similar to historical revolutions with no concrete evidence.e)It overlooks the cultural and temporal differences between the Russian, French, and Arab political climates.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparked not by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie, or intellectual middle-class, a fact that is widely accepted in modern academia. The French Revolution of 1789 was also largely ignited by a rising middle class. The idea that political upheavals are initiated by the populist “peasant-class” is widely accepted as a fallacy today. Therefore, political commentators analyzing the “Arab Spring” movement in the past two years are inaccurate in suggesting that the movement is truly populist.Q. Which of the following best describes the flaw in the historian’s argument?a)It accepts that movements cannot be both populist and spurred by the middle class.b)The argument draws a conclusion based on a claim which may not be universally true.c)The historian’s argument is based on what is “widely accepted” by contemporary historians and not on established facts.d)The argument implies that the Arab Spring is relatively similar to historical revolutions with no concrete evidence.e)It overlooks the cultural and temporal differences between the Russian, French, and Arab political climates.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparked not by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie, or intellectual middle-class, a fact that is widely accepted in modern academia. The French Revolution of 1789 was also largely ignited by a rising middle class. The idea that political upheavals are initiated by the populist “peasant-class” is widely accepted as a fallacy today. Therefore, political commentators analyzing the “Arab Spring” movement in the past two years are inaccurate in suggesting that the movement is truly populist.Q. Which of the following best describes the flaw in the historian’s argument?a)It accepts that movements cannot be both populist and spurred by the middle class.b)The argument draws a conclusion based on a claim which may not be universally true.c)The historian’s argument is based on what is “widely accepted” by contemporary historians and not on established facts.d)The argument implies that the Arab Spring is relatively similar to historical revolutions with no concrete evidence.e)It overlooks the cultural and temporal differences between the Russian, French, and Arab political climates.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparked not by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie, or intellectual middle-class, a fact that is widely accepted in modern academia. The French Revolution of 1789 was also largely ignited by a rising middle class. The idea that political upheavals are initiated by the populist “peasant-class” is widely accepted as a fallacy today. Therefore, political commentators analyzing the “Arab Spring” movement in the past two years are inaccurate in suggesting that the movement is truly populist.Q. Which of the following best describes the flaw in the historian’s argument?a)It accepts that movements cannot be both populist and spurred by the middle class.b)The argument draws a conclusion based on a claim which may not be universally true.c)The historian’s argument is based on what is “widely accepted” by contemporary historians and not on established facts.d)The argument implies that the Arab Spring is relatively similar to historical revolutions with no concrete evidence.e)It overlooks the cultural and temporal differences between the Russian, French, and Arab political climates.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev