Question Description
Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparked not by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie, or intellectual middle-class, a fact that is widely accepted in modern academia. The French Revolution of 1789 was also largely ignited by a rising middle class. The idea that political upheavals are initiated by the populist “peasant-class” is widely accepted as a fallacy today. Therefore, political commentators analyzing the “Arab Spring” movement in the past two years are inaccurate in suggesting that the movement is truly populist.Q. Which of the following best describes the flaw in the historian’s argument?a)It accepts that movements cannot be both populist and spurred by the middle class.b)The argument draws a conclusion based on a claim which may not be universally true.c)The historian’s argument is based on what is “widely accepted” by contemporary historians and not on established facts.d)The argument implies that the Arab Spring is relatively similar to historical revolutions with no concrete evidence.e)It overlooks the cultural and temporal differences between the Russian, French, and Arab political climates.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared
according to
the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparked not by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie, or intellectual middle-class, a fact that is widely accepted in modern academia. The French Revolution of 1789 was also largely ignited by a rising middle class. The idea that political upheavals are initiated by the populist “peasant-class” is widely accepted as a fallacy today. Therefore, political commentators analyzing the “Arab Spring” movement in the past two years are inaccurate in suggesting that the movement is truly populist.Q. Which of the following best describes the flaw in the historian’s argument?a)It accepts that movements cannot be both populist and spurred by the middle class.b)The argument draws a conclusion based on a claim which may not be universally true.c)The historian’s argument is based on what is “widely accepted” by contemporary historians and not on established facts.d)The argument implies that the Arab Spring is relatively similar to historical revolutions with no concrete evidence.e)It overlooks the cultural and temporal differences between the Russian, French, and Arab political climates.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam.
Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparked not by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie, or intellectual middle-class, a fact that is widely accepted in modern academia. The French Revolution of 1789 was also largely ignited by a rising middle class. The idea that political upheavals are initiated by the populist “peasant-class” is widely accepted as a fallacy today. Therefore, political commentators analyzing the “Arab Spring” movement in the past two years are inaccurate in suggesting that the movement is truly populist.Q. Which of the following best describes the flaw in the historian’s argument?a)It accepts that movements cannot be both populist and spurred by the middle class.b)The argument draws a conclusion based on a claim which may not be universally true.c)The historian’s argument is based on what is “widely accepted” by contemporary historians and not on established facts.d)The argument implies that the Arab Spring is relatively similar to historical revolutions with no concrete evidence.e)It overlooks the cultural and temporal differences between the Russian, French, and Arab political climates.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparked not by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie, or intellectual middle-class, a fact that is widely accepted in modern academia. The French Revolution of 1789 was also largely ignited by a rising middle class. The idea that political upheavals are initiated by the populist “peasant-class” is widely accepted as a fallacy today. Therefore, political commentators analyzing the “Arab Spring” movement in the past two years are inaccurate in suggesting that the movement is truly populist.Q. Which of the following best describes the flaw in the historian’s argument?a)It accepts that movements cannot be both populist and spurred by the middle class.b)The argument draws a conclusion based on a claim which may not be universally true.c)The historian’s argument is based on what is “widely accepted” by contemporary historians and not on established facts.d)The argument implies that the Arab Spring is relatively similar to historical revolutions with no concrete evidence.e)It overlooks the cultural and temporal differences between the Russian, French, and Arab political climates.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparked not by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie, or intellectual middle-class, a fact that is widely accepted in modern academia. The French Revolution of 1789 was also largely ignited by a rising middle class. The idea that political upheavals are initiated by the populist “peasant-class” is widely accepted as a fallacy today. Therefore, political commentators analyzing the “Arab Spring” movement in the past two years are inaccurate in suggesting that the movement is truly populist.Q. Which of the following best describes the flaw in the historian’s argument?a)It accepts that movements cannot be both populist and spurred by the middle class.b)The argument draws a conclusion based on a claim which may not be universally true.c)The historian’s argument is based on what is “widely accepted” by contemporary historians and not on established facts.d)The argument implies that the Arab Spring is relatively similar to historical revolutions with no concrete evidence.e)It overlooks the cultural and temporal differences between the Russian, French, and Arab political climates.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparked not by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie, or intellectual middle-class, a fact that is widely accepted in modern academia. The French Revolution of 1789 was also largely ignited by a rising middle class. The idea that political upheavals are initiated by the populist “peasant-class” is widely accepted as a fallacy today. Therefore, political commentators analyzing the “Arab Spring” movement in the past two years are inaccurate in suggesting that the movement is truly populist.Q. Which of the following best describes the flaw in the historian’s argument?a)It accepts that movements cannot be both populist and spurred by the middle class.b)The argument draws a conclusion based on a claim which may not be universally true.c)The historian’s argument is based on what is “widely accepted” by contemporary historians and not on established facts.d)The argument implies that the Arab Spring is relatively similar to historical revolutions with no concrete evidence.e)It overlooks the cultural and temporal differences between the Russian, French, and Arab political climates.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparked not by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie, or intellectual middle-class, a fact that is widely accepted in modern academia. The French Revolution of 1789 was also largely ignited by a rising middle class. The idea that political upheavals are initiated by the populist “peasant-class” is widely accepted as a fallacy today. Therefore, political commentators analyzing the “Arab Spring” movement in the past two years are inaccurate in suggesting that the movement is truly populist.Q. Which of the following best describes the flaw in the historian’s argument?a)It accepts that movements cannot be both populist and spurred by the middle class.b)The argument draws a conclusion based on a claim which may not be universally true.c)The historian’s argument is based on what is “widely accepted” by contemporary historians and not on established facts.d)The argument implies that the Arab Spring is relatively similar to historical revolutions with no concrete evidence.e)It overlooks the cultural and temporal differences between the Russian, French, and Arab political climates.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparked not by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie, or intellectual middle-class, a fact that is widely accepted in modern academia. The French Revolution of 1789 was also largely ignited by a rising middle class. The idea that political upheavals are initiated by the populist “peasant-class” is widely accepted as a fallacy today. Therefore, political commentators analyzing the “Arab Spring” movement in the past two years are inaccurate in suggesting that the movement is truly populist.Q. Which of the following best describes the flaw in the historian’s argument?a)It accepts that movements cannot be both populist and spurred by the middle class.b)The argument draws a conclusion based on a claim which may not be universally true.c)The historian’s argument is based on what is “widely accepted” by contemporary historians and not on established facts.d)The argument implies that the Arab Spring is relatively similar to historical revolutions with no concrete evidence.e)It overlooks the cultural and temporal differences between the Russian, French, and Arab political climates.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparked not by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie, or intellectual middle-class, a fact that is widely accepted in modern academia. The French Revolution of 1789 was also largely ignited by a rising middle class. The idea that political upheavals are initiated by the populist “peasant-class” is widely accepted as a fallacy today. Therefore, political commentators analyzing the “Arab Spring” movement in the past two years are inaccurate in suggesting that the movement is truly populist.Q. Which of the following best describes the flaw in the historian’s argument?a)It accepts that movements cannot be both populist and spurred by the middle class.b)The argument draws a conclusion based on a claim which may not be universally true.c)The historian’s argument is based on what is “widely accepted” by contemporary historians and not on established facts.d)The argument implies that the Arab Spring is relatively similar to historical revolutions with no concrete evidence.e)It overlooks the cultural and temporal differences between the Russian, French, and Arab political climates.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.