CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Parliament has made into law the Transgender... Start Learning for Free
Parliament has made into law the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019, which had been framed for the welfare of transgender persons. The community had organised protests across the country, urging changes to the Bill, claiming that in the form in which the Central government had conceived it, it showed a poor understanding of gender and sexual identity.
Activists had problems right from the beginning, starting with the name. 'Transgender' was restrictive, they argued, and it showed a lack of understanding of the complexities in people who do not conform to the gender binary, male/ female. Charging that the Bill had serious flaws, because of this basic lack of comprehension about gender, some activists also wrote an alternative wish Bill, outlining their demands.
Activists chastised the Union government for failing to live up to the opportunity to ensure that fundamental rights are guaranteed to all people regardless of their sex characteristics or gender identity. Rejecting 'Transgender' as the nomenclature, they suggested instead that the title should be a comprehensive "Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics (Protection of Rights) Bill", and in definition, sought to introduce the distinction between transgenders and intersex persons upfront. Members of the community perceive transgender as different from intersex, and were insistent that the distinction be made in the Bill.
While the community is miffed that the Bill has become an Act without any effort to make valid or relevant changes to its original composition, it worries about how implementation will address the pressing needs of the community. It only hopes that the National Council for Transgender Persons will allow for a more favourable implementation of the law, and thus provide more elbow room for genuine representations of the community that the Bill itself failed to accommodate.
Q. A legal principle says that Penal laws should be provided a strict interpretation. Bala, a trangender, while returning from office encountered some goons.
Goons subjected her to sexual assault, including molestation and rape. Bala immediately reports the said incident to a nearest Police Station. Officer Incharge of the station refused to register the information as the crime of rape can only be committed against a woman. Bala files the writ.
Based upon the principle of strict interpretation and author's argument which of the following represents the best recourse:
Simultaneously, rape laws must be made inclusive.
  • a)
    Officer in charge must be suspended immediately as he abdicated his responsibility to register the crime.
  • b)
    Officer in charge cannot be punished as he is upholding the strict interpretation of penal laws.
  • c)
    Officer in charge should be given training on the Human Rights concerning Transgenders.
  • d)
    Bala cannot do any thi ng but to suffer the consequence of being a transgender.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Parliament has made into law the Transgender Persons (Protection of R...
Correct Answer is (b)
Option (b) upholds the given strict interpretation principle as well as protects the interest of transgender by making law inclusive.
Incorrect Answers
  • Choice (a) - Officer has upheld the strict interpretation of principle. Therefore the suspension is an extreme step to adopt.
  • Choice (c) - Training or anything cannot be inferred from the passage.
  • Choice (d) - An extreme choice to choose which is contradictory to the essence of the passage.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Parliament has made into law the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019, which had been framed for the welfare of transgender persons. The community had organised protests across the country, urging changes to the Bill, claiming that in the form in which the Central government had conceived it, it showed a poor understanding of gender and sexual identity. Activists had problems right from the beginning, starting with the name. T ransgender was restrictive, they argued, and it showed a lack of understanding of the complexities in people who do not conform to the gender binary, male/ female. Charging that the Bill had serious flaws, because of this basic lack of comprehension about gender, some activists also wrote an alternative wish Bill, outlining their demands.Activists chastised the Union government for failing to live up to the opportunity to ensure that fundamental rights are guaranteed to all people regardless of their sex characteristics or gender identity. Rejecting Transgender as the nomenclature, they suggested instead that the title should be a comprehensive "Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics (Protection of Rights) Bill", and in definition, sought to introduce the distinction between transgenders and intersex persons upfront. Members of the community perceive transgender as different from intersex, and were insistent that the distinction be made in the Bill.While the community is miffed that the Bill has become an Act without any effort to make valid or relevant changes to its original composition, it worries about how implementation will address the pressing needs of the community. It only hopes that the National Council for Transgender Persons will allow for a more favourable implementation of the law, and thus provide more elbow room for genuine representations of the community that the Bill itself failed to accommodate.A legal principle says that Penal laws should be provided a strict interpretation. Bala, a trangender, while returning from office encountered some goons. Goons subjected her to sexual assault, including molestation and rape.Bala immediately reports the said incident to a nearest Police Station. Officer Incharge of the station refused toregister the information as the crime of rape can only be committed against a woman. Bala files the writ. Based upon the principle of strict interpretation and authors argument which of the following represents the best recourse

Parliament has made into law the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019, which had been framed for the welfare of transgender persons. The community had organised protests across the country, urging changes to the Bill, claiming that in the form in which the Central government had conceived it, it showed a poor understanding of gender and sexual identity.Activists had problems right from the beginning, starting with the name. 'Transgender' was restrictive, they argued, and it showed a lack of understanding of the complexities in people who do not conform to the gender binary, male/ female. Charging that the Bill had serious flaws, because of this basic lack of comprehension about gender, some activists also wrote an alternative wish Bill, outlining their demands.Activists chastised the Union government for failing to live up to the opportunity to ensure that fundamental rights are guaranteed to all people regardless of their sex characteristics or gender identity. Rejecting 'Transgender' as the nomenclature, they suggested instead that the title should be a comprehensive "Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics (Protection of Rights) Bill", and in definition, sought to introduce the distinction between transgenders and intersex persons upfront. Members of the community perceive transgender as different from intersex, and were insistent that the distinction be made in the Bill.While the community is miffed that the Bill has become an Act without any effort to make valid or relevant changes to its original composition, it worries about how implementation will address the pressing needs of the community. It only hopes that the National Council for Transgender Persons will allow for a more favourable implementation of the law, and thus provide more elbow room for genuine representations of the community that the Bill itself failed to accommodate.Q. Royappa got married to Srija. When the parties submitted a memorandum for registration of marriage, Registrar refused to register the same.Registrar had the opinion that a "Bride" can only refer to a "Woman". In the case on hand, Srija is a transgender and not a woman. Questioning the said decision, Srija filed a writ petition in the High Court.Based on the author's reasoning in the passage above, what kind of interpretation should the High Court give

Parliament has made into law the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019, which had been framed for the welfare of transgender persons. The community had organised protests across the country, urging changes to the Bill, claiming that in the form in which the Central government had conceived it, it showed a poor understanding of gender and sexual identity. Activists had problems right from the beginning, starting with the name. T ransgender was restrictive, they argued, and it showed a lack of understanding of the complexities in people who do not conform to the gender binary, male/ female. Charging that the Bill had serious flaws, because of this basic lack of comprehension about gender, some activists also wrote an alternative wish Bill, outlining their demands.Activists chastised the Union government for failing to live up to the opportunity to ensure that fundamental rights are guaranteed to all people regardless of their sex characteristics or gender identity. Rejecting Transgender as the nomenclature, they suggested instead that the title should be a comprehensive "Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics (Protection of Rights) Bill", and in definition, sought to introduce the distinction between transgenders and intersex persons upfront. Members of the community perceive transgender as different from intersex, and were insistent that the distinction be made in the Bill.While the community is miffed that the Bill has become an Act without any effort to make valid or relevant changes to its original composition, it worries about how implementation will address the pressing needs of the community. It only hopes that the National Council for Transgender Persons will allow for a more favourable implementation of the law, and thus provide more elbow room for genuine representations of the community that the Bill itself failed to accommodate.Royappa got married to Srija. When the parties submitted a memorandum for registration of marriage, Registrar refused to register the same. Registrar had the opinion that a "Bride" can only refer to a "Woman".In the case on hand, Srija is a transgender and not a woman. Questioning the said decision, Srija filed a writ petition in the High Court. Based on the authors reasoning in the passage above, what kind of interpretation should the High Court give

Parliament has made into law the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019, which had been framed for the welfare of transgender persons. The community had organised protests across the country, urging changes to the Bill, claiming that in the form in which the Central government had conceived it, it showed a poor understanding of gender and sexual identity.Activists had problems right from the beginning, starting with the name. 'Transgender' was restrictive, they argued, and it showed a lack of understanding of the complexities in people who do not conform to the gender binary, male/ female. Charging that the Bill had serious flaws, because of this basic lack of comprehension about gender, some activists also wrote an alternative wish Bill, outlining their demands.Activists chastised the Union government for failing to live up to the opportunity to ensure that fundamental rights are guaranteed to all people regardless of their sex characteristics or gender identity. Rejecting 'Transgender' as the nomenclature, they suggested instead that the title should be a comprehensive "Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics (Protection of Rights) Bill", and in definition, sought to introduce the distinction between transgenders and intersex persons upfront. Members of the community perceive transgender as different from intersex, and were insistent that the distinction be made in the Bill.While the community is miffed that the Bill has become an Act without any effort to make valid or relevant changes to its original composition, it worries about how implementation will address the pressing needs of the community. It only hopes that the National Council for Transgender Persons will allow for a more favourable implementation of the law, and thus provide more elbow room for genuine representations of the community that the Bill itself failed to accommodate.Q. Recently, there is a boom of Sex reassignm ent surgery (SRS). Intersex and transgender people are subjected to SRS during their infancy and childhood, to alter their bodies, particularly the sexual organs, to make them conform to gendered physical norms, including through repeated surgeries, hormonal interventions and other measures. Based on the author's reasoning should the consent of the Parents to conduct SRS over their children be considered as the consent of the child:They always take decisions in the best interest of the children.

Parliament has made into law the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019, which had been framed for the welfare of transgender persons. The community had organised protests across the country, urging changes to the Bill, claiming that in the form in which the Central government had conceived it, it showed a poor understanding of gender and sexual identity.Activists had problems right from the beginning, starting with the name. 'Transgender' was restrictive, they argued, and it showed a lack of understanding of the complexities in people who do not conform to the gender binary, male/ female. Charging that the Bill had serious flaws, because of this basic lack of comprehension about gender, some activists also wrote an alternative wish Bill, outlining their demands.Activists chastised the Union government for failing to live up to the opportunity to ensure that fundamental rights are guaranteed to all people regardless of their sex characteristics or gender identity. Rejecting 'Transgender' as the nomenclature, they suggested instead that the title should be a comprehensive "Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics (Protection of Rights) Bill", and in definition, sought to introduce the distinction between transgenders and intersex persons upfront. Members of the community perceive transgender as different from intersex, and were insistent that the distinction be made in the Bill.While the community is miffed that the Bill has become an Act without any effort to make valid or relevant changes to its original composition, it worries about how implementation will address the pressing needs of the community. It only hopes that the National Council for Transgender Persons will allow for a more favourable implementation of the law, and thus provide more elbow room for genuine representations of the community that the Bill itself failed to accommodate.Q. An Act is passed in the parliament amending the existing Transgender Act. The Amendment Act has the objective to confer the right to recognition as a person before the law. Act says Persons of diverse sexual orientations and gender identities shall enjoy legal capacity in all aspects of life. Right to each person to self-define sexual orientation and gender identity. In such a case, based on the author's reasoning, will the Amending Act allay the fear of the Activist and the transgender community

Top Courses for CLAT

Parliament has made into law the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019, which had been framed for the welfare of transgender persons. The community had organised protests across the country, urging changes to the Bill, claiming that in the form in which the Central government had conceived it, it showed a poor understanding of gender and sexual identity.Activists had problems right from the beginning, starting with the name. 'Transgender' was restrictive, they argued, and it showed a lack of understanding of the complexities in people who do not conform to the gender binary, male/ female. Charging that the Bill had serious flaws, because of this basic lack of comprehension about gender, some activists also wrote an alternative wish Bill, outlining their demands.Activists chastised the Union government for failing to live up to the opportunity to ensure that fundamental rights are guaranteed to all people regardless of their sex characteristics or gender identity. Rejecting 'Transgender' as the nomenclature, they suggested instead that the title should be a comprehensive "Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics (Protection of Rights) Bill", and in definition, sought to introduce the distinction between transgenders and intersex persons upfront. Members of the community perceive transgender as different from intersex, and were insistent that the distinction be made in the Bill.While the community is miffed that the Bill has become an Act without any effort to make valid or relevant changes to its original composition, it worries about how implementation will address the pressing needs of the community. It only hopes that the National Council for Transgender Persons will allow for a more favourable implementation of the law, and thus provide more elbow room for genuine representations of the community that the Bill itself failed to accommodate.Q. A legal principle says that Penal laws should be provided a strict interpretation. Bala, a trangender, while returning from office encountered some goons.Goons subjected her to sexual assault, including molestation and rape. Bala immediately reports the said incident to a nearest Police Station. Officer Incharge of the station refused to register the information as the crime of rape can only be committed against a woman. Bala files the writ.Based upon the principle of strict interpretation and author's argument which of the following represents the best recourse:Simultaneously, rape laws must be made inclusive.a)Officer in charge must be suspended immediately as he abdicated his responsibility to register the crime.b)Officer in charge cannot be punished as he is upholding the strict interpretation of penal laws.c)Officer in charge should be given training on the Human Rights concerning Transgenders.d)Bala cannot do any thi ng but to suffer the consequence of being a transgender.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Parliament has made into law the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019, which had been framed for the welfare of transgender persons. The community had organised protests across the country, urging changes to the Bill, claiming that in the form in which the Central government had conceived it, it showed a poor understanding of gender and sexual identity.Activists had problems right from the beginning, starting with the name. 'Transgender' was restrictive, they argued, and it showed a lack of understanding of the complexities in people who do not conform to the gender binary, male/ female. Charging that the Bill had serious flaws, because of this basic lack of comprehension about gender, some activists also wrote an alternative wish Bill, outlining their demands.Activists chastised the Union government for failing to live up to the opportunity to ensure that fundamental rights are guaranteed to all people regardless of their sex characteristics or gender identity. Rejecting 'Transgender' as the nomenclature, they suggested instead that the title should be a comprehensive "Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics (Protection of Rights) Bill", and in definition, sought to introduce the distinction between transgenders and intersex persons upfront. Members of the community perceive transgender as different from intersex, and were insistent that the distinction be made in the Bill.While the community is miffed that the Bill has become an Act without any effort to make valid or relevant changes to its original composition, it worries about how implementation will address the pressing needs of the community. It only hopes that the National Council for Transgender Persons will allow for a more favourable implementation of the law, and thus provide more elbow room for genuine representations of the community that the Bill itself failed to accommodate.Q. A legal principle says that Penal laws should be provided a strict interpretation. Bala, a trangender, while returning from office encountered some goons.Goons subjected her to sexual assault, including molestation and rape. Bala immediately reports the said incident to a nearest Police Station. Officer Incharge of the station refused to register the information as the crime of rape can only be committed against a woman. Bala files the writ.Based upon the principle of strict interpretation and author's argument which of the following represents the best recourse:Simultaneously, rape laws must be made inclusive.a)Officer in charge must be suspended immediately as he abdicated his responsibility to register the crime.b)Officer in charge cannot be punished as he is upholding the strict interpretation of penal laws.c)Officer in charge should be given training on the Human Rights concerning Transgenders.d)Bala cannot do any thi ng but to suffer the consequence of being a transgender.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Parliament has made into law the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019, which had been framed for the welfare of transgender persons. The community had organised protests across the country, urging changes to the Bill, claiming that in the form in which the Central government had conceived it, it showed a poor understanding of gender and sexual identity.Activists had problems right from the beginning, starting with the name. 'Transgender' was restrictive, they argued, and it showed a lack of understanding of the complexities in people who do not conform to the gender binary, male/ female. Charging that the Bill had serious flaws, because of this basic lack of comprehension about gender, some activists also wrote an alternative wish Bill, outlining their demands.Activists chastised the Union government for failing to live up to the opportunity to ensure that fundamental rights are guaranteed to all people regardless of their sex characteristics or gender identity. Rejecting 'Transgender' as the nomenclature, they suggested instead that the title should be a comprehensive "Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics (Protection of Rights) Bill", and in definition, sought to introduce the distinction between transgenders and intersex persons upfront. Members of the community perceive transgender as different from intersex, and were insistent that the distinction be made in the Bill.While the community is miffed that the Bill has become an Act without any effort to make valid or relevant changes to its original composition, it worries about how implementation will address the pressing needs of the community. It only hopes that the National Council for Transgender Persons will allow for a more favourable implementation of the law, and thus provide more elbow room for genuine representations of the community that the Bill itself failed to accommodate.Q. A legal principle says that Penal laws should be provided a strict interpretation. Bala, a trangender, while returning from office encountered some goons.Goons subjected her to sexual assault, including molestation and rape. Bala immediately reports the said incident to a nearest Police Station. Officer Incharge of the station refused to register the information as the crime of rape can only be committed against a woman. Bala files the writ.Based upon the principle of strict interpretation and author's argument which of the following represents the best recourse:Simultaneously, rape laws must be made inclusive.a)Officer in charge must be suspended immediately as he abdicated his responsibility to register the crime.b)Officer in charge cannot be punished as he is upholding the strict interpretation of penal laws.c)Officer in charge should be given training on the Human Rights concerning Transgenders.d)Bala cannot do any thi ng but to suffer the consequence of being a transgender.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Parliament has made into law the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019, which had been framed for the welfare of transgender persons. The community had organised protests across the country, urging changes to the Bill, claiming that in the form in which the Central government had conceived it, it showed a poor understanding of gender and sexual identity.Activists had problems right from the beginning, starting with the name. 'Transgender' was restrictive, they argued, and it showed a lack of understanding of the complexities in people who do not conform to the gender binary, male/ female. Charging that the Bill had serious flaws, because of this basic lack of comprehension about gender, some activists also wrote an alternative wish Bill, outlining their demands.Activists chastised the Union government for failing to live up to the opportunity to ensure that fundamental rights are guaranteed to all people regardless of their sex characteristics or gender identity. Rejecting 'Transgender' as the nomenclature, they suggested instead that the title should be a comprehensive "Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics (Protection of Rights) Bill", and in definition, sought to introduce the distinction between transgenders and intersex persons upfront. Members of the community perceive transgender as different from intersex, and were insistent that the distinction be made in the Bill.While the community is miffed that the Bill has become an Act without any effort to make valid or relevant changes to its original composition, it worries about how implementation will address the pressing needs of the community. It only hopes that the National Council for Transgender Persons will allow for a more favourable implementation of the law, and thus provide more elbow room for genuine representations of the community that the Bill itself failed to accommodate.Q. A legal principle says that Penal laws should be provided a strict interpretation. Bala, a trangender, while returning from office encountered some goons.Goons subjected her to sexual assault, including molestation and rape. Bala immediately reports the said incident to a nearest Police Station. Officer Incharge of the station refused to register the information as the crime of rape can only be committed against a woman. Bala files the writ.Based upon the principle of strict interpretation and author's argument which of the following represents the best recourse:Simultaneously, rape laws must be made inclusive.a)Officer in charge must be suspended immediately as he abdicated his responsibility to register the crime.b)Officer in charge cannot be punished as he is upholding the strict interpretation of penal laws.c)Officer in charge should be given training on the Human Rights concerning Transgenders.d)Bala cannot do any thi ng but to suffer the consequence of being a transgender.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Parliament has made into law the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019, which had been framed for the welfare of transgender persons. The community had organised protests across the country, urging changes to the Bill, claiming that in the form in which the Central government had conceived it, it showed a poor understanding of gender and sexual identity.Activists had problems right from the beginning, starting with the name. 'Transgender' was restrictive, they argued, and it showed a lack of understanding of the complexities in people who do not conform to the gender binary, male/ female. Charging that the Bill had serious flaws, because of this basic lack of comprehension about gender, some activists also wrote an alternative wish Bill, outlining their demands.Activists chastised the Union government for failing to live up to the opportunity to ensure that fundamental rights are guaranteed to all people regardless of their sex characteristics or gender identity. Rejecting 'Transgender' as the nomenclature, they suggested instead that the title should be a comprehensive "Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics (Protection of Rights) Bill", and in definition, sought to introduce the distinction between transgenders and intersex persons upfront. Members of the community perceive transgender as different from intersex, and were insistent that the distinction be made in the Bill.While the community is miffed that the Bill has become an Act without any effort to make valid or relevant changes to its original composition, it worries about how implementation will address the pressing needs of the community. It only hopes that the National Council for Transgender Persons will allow for a more favourable implementation of the law, and thus provide more elbow room for genuine representations of the community that the Bill itself failed to accommodate.Q. A legal principle says that Penal laws should be provided a strict interpretation. Bala, a trangender, while returning from office encountered some goons.Goons subjected her to sexual assault, including molestation and rape. Bala immediately reports the said incident to a nearest Police Station. Officer Incharge of the station refused to register the information as the crime of rape can only be committed against a woman. Bala files the writ.Based upon the principle of strict interpretation and author's argument which of the following represents the best recourse:Simultaneously, rape laws must be made inclusive.a)Officer in charge must be suspended immediately as he abdicated his responsibility to register the crime.b)Officer in charge cannot be punished as he is upholding the strict interpretation of penal laws.c)Officer in charge should be given training on the Human Rights concerning Transgenders.d)Bala cannot do any thi ng but to suffer the consequence of being a transgender.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Parliament has made into law the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019, which had been framed for the welfare of transgender persons. The community had organised protests across the country, urging changes to the Bill, claiming that in the form in which the Central government had conceived it, it showed a poor understanding of gender and sexual identity.Activists had problems right from the beginning, starting with the name. 'Transgender' was restrictive, they argued, and it showed a lack of understanding of the complexities in people who do not conform to the gender binary, male/ female. Charging that the Bill had serious flaws, because of this basic lack of comprehension about gender, some activists also wrote an alternative wish Bill, outlining their demands.Activists chastised the Union government for failing to live up to the opportunity to ensure that fundamental rights are guaranteed to all people regardless of their sex characteristics or gender identity. Rejecting 'Transgender' as the nomenclature, they suggested instead that the title should be a comprehensive "Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics (Protection of Rights) Bill", and in definition, sought to introduce the distinction between transgenders and intersex persons upfront. Members of the community perceive transgender as different from intersex, and were insistent that the distinction be made in the Bill.While the community is miffed that the Bill has become an Act without any effort to make valid or relevant changes to its original composition, it worries about how implementation will address the pressing needs of the community. It only hopes that the National Council for Transgender Persons will allow for a more favourable implementation of the law, and thus provide more elbow room for genuine representations of the community that the Bill itself failed to accommodate.Q. A legal principle says that Penal laws should be provided a strict interpretation. Bala, a trangender, while returning from office encountered some goons.Goons subjected her to sexual assault, including molestation and rape. Bala immediately reports the said incident to a nearest Police Station. Officer Incharge of the station refused to register the information as the crime of rape can only be committed against a woman. Bala files the writ.Based upon the principle of strict interpretation and author's argument which of the following represents the best recourse:Simultaneously, rape laws must be made inclusive.a)Officer in charge must be suspended immediately as he abdicated his responsibility to register the crime.b)Officer in charge cannot be punished as he is upholding the strict interpretation of penal laws.c)Officer in charge should be given training on the Human Rights concerning Transgenders.d)Bala cannot do any thi ng but to suffer the consequence of being a transgender.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Parliament has made into law the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019, which had been framed for the welfare of transgender persons. The community had organised protests across the country, urging changes to the Bill, claiming that in the form in which the Central government had conceived it, it showed a poor understanding of gender and sexual identity.Activists had problems right from the beginning, starting with the name. 'Transgender' was restrictive, they argued, and it showed a lack of understanding of the complexities in people who do not conform to the gender binary, male/ female. Charging that the Bill had serious flaws, because of this basic lack of comprehension about gender, some activists also wrote an alternative wish Bill, outlining their demands.Activists chastised the Union government for failing to live up to the opportunity to ensure that fundamental rights are guaranteed to all people regardless of their sex characteristics or gender identity. Rejecting 'Transgender' as the nomenclature, they suggested instead that the title should be a comprehensive "Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics (Protection of Rights) Bill", and in definition, sought to introduce the distinction between transgenders and intersex persons upfront. Members of the community perceive transgender as different from intersex, and were insistent that the distinction be made in the Bill.While the community is miffed that the Bill has become an Act without any effort to make valid or relevant changes to its original composition, it worries about how implementation will address the pressing needs of the community. It only hopes that the National Council for Transgender Persons will allow for a more favourable implementation of the law, and thus provide more elbow room for genuine representations of the community that the Bill itself failed to accommodate.Q. A legal principle says that Penal laws should be provided a strict interpretation. Bala, a trangender, while returning from office encountered some goons.Goons subjected her to sexual assault, including molestation and rape. Bala immediately reports the said incident to a nearest Police Station. Officer Incharge of the station refused to register the information as the crime of rape can only be committed against a woman. Bala files the writ.Based upon the principle of strict interpretation and author's argument which of the following represents the best recourse:Simultaneously, rape laws must be made inclusive.a)Officer in charge must be suspended immediately as he abdicated his responsibility to register the crime.b)Officer in charge cannot be punished as he is upholding the strict interpretation of penal laws.c)Officer in charge should be given training on the Human Rights concerning Transgenders.d)Bala cannot do any thi ng but to suffer the consequence of being a transgender.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Parliament has made into law the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019, which had been framed for the welfare of transgender persons. The community had organised protests across the country, urging changes to the Bill, claiming that in the form in which the Central government had conceived it, it showed a poor understanding of gender and sexual identity.Activists had problems right from the beginning, starting with the name. 'Transgender' was restrictive, they argued, and it showed a lack of understanding of the complexities in people who do not conform to the gender binary, male/ female. Charging that the Bill had serious flaws, because of this basic lack of comprehension about gender, some activists also wrote an alternative wish Bill, outlining their demands.Activists chastised the Union government for failing to live up to the opportunity to ensure that fundamental rights are guaranteed to all people regardless of their sex characteristics or gender identity. Rejecting 'Transgender' as the nomenclature, they suggested instead that the title should be a comprehensive "Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics (Protection of Rights) Bill", and in definition, sought to introduce the distinction between transgenders and intersex persons upfront. Members of the community perceive transgender as different from intersex, and were insistent that the distinction be made in the Bill.While the community is miffed that the Bill has become an Act without any effort to make valid or relevant changes to its original composition, it worries about how implementation will address the pressing needs of the community. It only hopes that the National Council for Transgender Persons will allow for a more favourable implementation of the law, and thus provide more elbow room for genuine representations of the community that the Bill itself failed to accommodate.Q. A legal principle says that Penal laws should be provided a strict interpretation. Bala, a trangender, while returning from office encountered some goons.Goons subjected her to sexual assault, including molestation and rape. Bala immediately reports the said incident to a nearest Police Station. Officer Incharge of the station refused to register the information as the crime of rape can only be committed against a woman. Bala files the writ.Based upon the principle of strict interpretation and author's argument which of the following represents the best recourse:Simultaneously, rape laws must be made inclusive.a)Officer in charge must be suspended immediately as he abdicated his responsibility to register the crime.b)Officer in charge cannot be punished as he is upholding the strict interpretation of penal laws.c)Officer in charge should be given training on the Human Rights concerning Transgenders.d)Bala cannot do any thi ng but to suffer the consequence of being a transgender.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Parliament has made into law the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019, which had been framed for the welfare of transgender persons. The community had organised protests across the country, urging changes to the Bill, claiming that in the form in which the Central government had conceived it, it showed a poor understanding of gender and sexual identity.Activists had problems right from the beginning, starting with the name. 'Transgender' was restrictive, they argued, and it showed a lack of understanding of the complexities in people who do not conform to the gender binary, male/ female. Charging that the Bill had serious flaws, because of this basic lack of comprehension about gender, some activists also wrote an alternative wish Bill, outlining their demands.Activists chastised the Union government for failing to live up to the opportunity to ensure that fundamental rights are guaranteed to all people regardless of their sex characteristics or gender identity. Rejecting 'Transgender' as the nomenclature, they suggested instead that the title should be a comprehensive "Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics (Protection of Rights) Bill", and in definition, sought to introduce the distinction between transgenders and intersex persons upfront. Members of the community perceive transgender as different from intersex, and were insistent that the distinction be made in the Bill.While the community is miffed that the Bill has become an Act without any effort to make valid or relevant changes to its original composition, it worries about how implementation will address the pressing needs of the community. It only hopes that the National Council for Transgender Persons will allow for a more favourable implementation of the law, and thus provide more elbow room for genuine representations of the community that the Bill itself failed to accommodate.Q. A legal principle says that Penal laws should be provided a strict interpretation. Bala, a trangender, while returning from office encountered some goons.Goons subjected her to sexual assault, including molestation and rape. Bala immediately reports the said incident to a nearest Police Station. Officer Incharge of the station refused to register the information as the crime of rape can only be committed against a woman. Bala files the writ.Based upon the principle of strict interpretation and author's argument which of the following represents the best recourse:Simultaneously, rape laws must be made inclusive.a)Officer in charge must be suspended immediately as he abdicated his responsibility to register the crime.b)Officer in charge cannot be punished as he is upholding the strict interpretation of penal laws.c)Officer in charge should be given training on the Human Rights concerning Transgenders.d)Bala cannot do any thi ng but to suffer the consequence of being a transgender.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Parliament has made into law the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019, which had been framed for the welfare of transgender persons. The community had organised protests across the country, urging changes to the Bill, claiming that in the form in which the Central government had conceived it, it showed a poor understanding of gender and sexual identity.Activists had problems right from the beginning, starting with the name. 'Transgender' was restrictive, they argued, and it showed a lack of understanding of the complexities in people who do not conform to the gender binary, male/ female. Charging that the Bill had serious flaws, because of this basic lack of comprehension about gender, some activists also wrote an alternative wish Bill, outlining their demands.Activists chastised the Union government for failing to live up to the opportunity to ensure that fundamental rights are guaranteed to all people regardless of their sex characteristics or gender identity. Rejecting 'Transgender' as the nomenclature, they suggested instead that the title should be a comprehensive "Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics (Protection of Rights) Bill", and in definition, sought to introduce the distinction between transgenders and intersex persons upfront. Members of the community perceive transgender as different from intersex, and were insistent that the distinction be made in the Bill.While the community is miffed that the Bill has become an Act without any effort to make valid or relevant changes to its original composition, it worries about how implementation will address the pressing needs of the community. It only hopes that the National Council for Transgender Persons will allow for a more favourable implementation of the law, and thus provide more elbow room for genuine representations of the community that the Bill itself failed to accommodate.Q. A legal principle says that Penal laws should be provided a strict interpretation. Bala, a trangender, while returning from office encountered some goons.Goons subjected her to sexual assault, including molestation and rape. Bala immediately reports the said incident to a nearest Police Station. Officer Incharge of the station refused to register the information as the crime of rape can only be committed against a woman. Bala files the writ.Based upon the principle of strict interpretation and author's argument which of the following represents the best recourse:Simultaneously, rape laws must be made inclusive.a)Officer in charge must be suspended immediately as he abdicated his responsibility to register the crime.b)Officer in charge cannot be punished as he is upholding the strict interpretation of penal laws.c)Officer in charge should be given training on the Human Rights concerning Transgenders.d)Bala cannot do any thi ng but to suffer the consequence of being a transgender.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev