CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   The judiciary is considered as the guardian ... Start Learning for Free
The judiciary is considered as the guardian and protector of Indian Constitution and supervises the implementation of fundamental rights and duties in the country. In the case of L. Chandra Kumar V. Union of India it has been held that the power of judicial review is a part of basic structure of the Indian Constitution.
The emergence of judicial review gave birth to a new movement which is called Judicial Activism. Judicial Activism refers to a philosophy of judicial decision-making whereby judges allow their personal views about public policy to guide their decisions. The Constitution of India divides the powers of government into three branches i.e. legislature, executive and judiciary and has defined their roles clearly.
Legislature and executive are responsible for making the law of the land and judiciary is responsible for interpreting these laws and also has the power to review the law i.e. whether it is made in consonance with the basic principles of constitution or not. So, it is when the judiciary steps into the shoes of the executive and legislature and embarks on the work of lawmaking rather than interpreting laws, it is deemed to be judicial activism.
Q. Which of the following is similar to the line of reasoning of the author in the last paragraph?
Otherwise he lets us manage the administration and office. He takes on our tasks too if we falter anywhere which helps to keep a check.
  • a)
    Obstacles will be faced by anyone and everyone on the way. It's about dealing with them in a manner that makes them a great experience.
  • b)
    My boss only makes important decisions.
  • c)
    Sheila, the mother of two kids hates babysitting, so she kept this condition in front of her husband before marrying him. They hired a babysitter as soon as their first child was born as expected.
  • d)
    The politicians in the country are towards a greater mission that anybody can imagine - this statement can be interpreted positively as well as negatively, it's about how you think.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
The judiciary is considered as the guardian and protector of Indian C...
This is a parallel reasoning question - you are asked to identify the answer choice which has a similar reasoning to that of the argument presented in the last paragraph. The author explains judicial activism in the last passage and mentions how the judiciary steps in if the laws made by the legislature and executive branches are not in consonance with the Constitution.
This can be represented as - Entities (A) and (B) have certain functions, (C) has another primary function but (C) steps in if needed.
This reasoning can be found in answer choice (b).
My boss (C) only makes important decisions.
Otherwise he lets us (A and B) manage the administration and office. He (C) takes on our tasks too if we falter anywhere which helps to keep a check.
Incorrect answers:
(a), (c) and (d) - These do not evaluate the relationship of one entity interfering in the decision of two other entities, so It is not in line with the last paragraph.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The judiciary is considered as the guardian and protector of Indian Constitution and supervises the implementation of fundamental rights and duties in the country. In the case of L.Chandra Kumar V. Union of India it has been held that the power of judicial review is a part of basic structure of the Indian Constitution.The emergence of judicial review gave birth to a new movement which is called Judicial Activism. Judicial Activism refers to a philosophy of judicial decision-making whereby judges allow their personal views about public policy to guide their decisions. The Constitution of India divides the powers of government into three branches i.e. legislature, executive and judiciary and has defined their roles clearly.Legislature and executive are responsible for making the law of the land and judiciary is responsible for interpreting these laws and also has the power to review the law i.e. whether it is made in consonance with the basic principles of constitution or not. So, it is when the judiciary steps into the shoes of the executive and legislature and embarks on the work of lawmaking rather than interpreting laws, it is deemed to be judicial activism.Which of the following, if true, strengthens the authors argument?

Top Courses for CLAT

The judiciary is considered as the guardian and protector of Indian Constitution and supervises the implementation of fundamental rights and duties in the country. In the case of L. Chandra Kumar V. Union of India it has been held that the power of judicial review is a part of basic structure of the Indian Constitution.The emergence of judicial review gave birth to a new movement which is called Judicial Activism. Judicial Activism refers to a philosophy of judicial decision-making whereby judges allow their personal views about public policy to guide their decisions. The Constitution of India divides the powers of government into three branches i.e. legislature, executive and judiciary and has defined their roles clearly.Legislature and executive are responsible for making the law of the land and judiciary is responsible for interpreting these laws and also has the power to review the law i.e. whether it is made in consonance with the basic principles of constitution or not. So, it is when the judiciary steps into the shoes of the executive and legislature and embarks on the work of lawmaking rather than interpreting laws, it is deemed to be judicial activism.Q. Which of the following is similar to the line of reasoning of the author in the last paragraph?Otherwise he lets us manage the administration and office. He takes on our tasks too if we falter anywhere which helps to keep a check.a)Obstacles will be faced by anyone and everyone on the way. It's about dealing with them in a manner that makes them a great experience.b)My boss only makes important decisions.c)Sheila, the mother of two kids hates babysitting, so she kept this condition in front of her husband before marrying him. They hired a babysitter as soon as their first child was born as expected.d)The politicians in the country are towards a greater mission that anybody can imagine - this statement can be interpreted positively as well as negatively, it's about how you think.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The judiciary is considered as the guardian and protector of Indian Constitution and supervises the implementation of fundamental rights and duties in the country. In the case of L. Chandra Kumar V. Union of India it has been held that the power of judicial review is a part of basic structure of the Indian Constitution.The emergence of judicial review gave birth to a new movement which is called Judicial Activism. Judicial Activism refers to a philosophy of judicial decision-making whereby judges allow their personal views about public policy to guide their decisions. The Constitution of India divides the powers of government into three branches i.e. legislature, executive and judiciary and has defined their roles clearly.Legislature and executive are responsible for making the law of the land and judiciary is responsible for interpreting these laws and also has the power to review the law i.e. whether it is made in consonance with the basic principles of constitution or not. So, it is when the judiciary steps into the shoes of the executive and legislature and embarks on the work of lawmaking rather than interpreting laws, it is deemed to be judicial activism.Q. Which of the following is similar to the line of reasoning of the author in the last paragraph?Otherwise he lets us manage the administration and office. He takes on our tasks too if we falter anywhere which helps to keep a check.a)Obstacles will be faced by anyone and everyone on the way. It's about dealing with them in a manner that makes them a great experience.b)My boss only makes important decisions.c)Sheila, the mother of two kids hates babysitting, so she kept this condition in front of her husband before marrying him. They hired a babysitter as soon as their first child was born as expected.d)The politicians in the country are towards a greater mission that anybody can imagine - this statement can be interpreted positively as well as negatively, it's about how you think.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The judiciary is considered as the guardian and protector of Indian Constitution and supervises the implementation of fundamental rights and duties in the country. In the case of L. Chandra Kumar V. Union of India it has been held that the power of judicial review is a part of basic structure of the Indian Constitution.The emergence of judicial review gave birth to a new movement which is called Judicial Activism. Judicial Activism refers to a philosophy of judicial decision-making whereby judges allow their personal views about public policy to guide their decisions. The Constitution of India divides the powers of government into three branches i.e. legislature, executive and judiciary and has defined their roles clearly.Legislature and executive are responsible for making the law of the land and judiciary is responsible for interpreting these laws and also has the power to review the law i.e. whether it is made in consonance with the basic principles of constitution or not. So, it is when the judiciary steps into the shoes of the executive and legislature and embarks on the work of lawmaking rather than interpreting laws, it is deemed to be judicial activism.Q. Which of the following is similar to the line of reasoning of the author in the last paragraph?Otherwise he lets us manage the administration and office. He takes on our tasks too if we falter anywhere which helps to keep a check.a)Obstacles will be faced by anyone and everyone on the way. It's about dealing with them in a manner that makes them a great experience.b)My boss only makes important decisions.c)Sheila, the mother of two kids hates babysitting, so she kept this condition in front of her husband before marrying him. They hired a babysitter as soon as their first child was born as expected.d)The politicians in the country are towards a greater mission that anybody can imagine - this statement can be interpreted positively as well as negatively, it's about how you think.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The judiciary is considered as the guardian and protector of Indian Constitution and supervises the implementation of fundamental rights and duties in the country. In the case of L. Chandra Kumar V. Union of India it has been held that the power of judicial review is a part of basic structure of the Indian Constitution.The emergence of judicial review gave birth to a new movement which is called Judicial Activism. Judicial Activism refers to a philosophy of judicial decision-making whereby judges allow their personal views about public policy to guide their decisions. The Constitution of India divides the powers of government into three branches i.e. legislature, executive and judiciary and has defined their roles clearly.Legislature and executive are responsible for making the law of the land and judiciary is responsible for interpreting these laws and also has the power to review the law i.e. whether it is made in consonance with the basic principles of constitution or not. So, it is when the judiciary steps into the shoes of the executive and legislature and embarks on the work of lawmaking rather than interpreting laws, it is deemed to be judicial activism.Q. Which of the following is similar to the line of reasoning of the author in the last paragraph?Otherwise he lets us manage the administration and office. He takes on our tasks too if we falter anywhere which helps to keep a check.a)Obstacles will be faced by anyone and everyone on the way. It's about dealing with them in a manner that makes them a great experience.b)My boss only makes important decisions.c)Sheila, the mother of two kids hates babysitting, so she kept this condition in front of her husband before marrying him. They hired a babysitter as soon as their first child was born as expected.d)The politicians in the country are towards a greater mission that anybody can imagine - this statement can be interpreted positively as well as negatively, it's about how you think.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The judiciary is considered as the guardian and protector of Indian Constitution and supervises the implementation of fundamental rights and duties in the country. In the case of L. Chandra Kumar V. Union of India it has been held that the power of judicial review is a part of basic structure of the Indian Constitution.The emergence of judicial review gave birth to a new movement which is called Judicial Activism. Judicial Activism refers to a philosophy of judicial decision-making whereby judges allow their personal views about public policy to guide their decisions. The Constitution of India divides the powers of government into three branches i.e. legislature, executive and judiciary and has defined their roles clearly.Legislature and executive are responsible for making the law of the land and judiciary is responsible for interpreting these laws and also has the power to review the law i.e. whether it is made in consonance with the basic principles of constitution or not. So, it is when the judiciary steps into the shoes of the executive and legislature and embarks on the work of lawmaking rather than interpreting laws, it is deemed to be judicial activism.Q. Which of the following is similar to the line of reasoning of the author in the last paragraph?Otherwise he lets us manage the administration and office. He takes on our tasks too if we falter anywhere which helps to keep a check.a)Obstacles will be faced by anyone and everyone on the way. It's about dealing with them in a manner that makes them a great experience.b)My boss only makes important decisions.c)Sheila, the mother of two kids hates babysitting, so she kept this condition in front of her husband before marrying him. They hired a babysitter as soon as their first child was born as expected.d)The politicians in the country are towards a greater mission that anybody can imagine - this statement can be interpreted positively as well as negatively, it's about how you think.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The judiciary is considered as the guardian and protector of Indian Constitution and supervises the implementation of fundamental rights and duties in the country. In the case of L. Chandra Kumar V. Union of India it has been held that the power of judicial review is a part of basic structure of the Indian Constitution.The emergence of judicial review gave birth to a new movement which is called Judicial Activism. Judicial Activism refers to a philosophy of judicial decision-making whereby judges allow their personal views about public policy to guide their decisions. The Constitution of India divides the powers of government into three branches i.e. legislature, executive and judiciary and has defined their roles clearly.Legislature and executive are responsible for making the law of the land and judiciary is responsible for interpreting these laws and also has the power to review the law i.e. whether it is made in consonance with the basic principles of constitution or not. So, it is when the judiciary steps into the shoes of the executive and legislature and embarks on the work of lawmaking rather than interpreting laws, it is deemed to be judicial activism.Q. Which of the following is similar to the line of reasoning of the author in the last paragraph?Otherwise he lets us manage the administration and office. He takes on our tasks too if we falter anywhere which helps to keep a check.a)Obstacles will be faced by anyone and everyone on the way. It's about dealing with them in a manner that makes them a great experience.b)My boss only makes important decisions.c)Sheila, the mother of two kids hates babysitting, so she kept this condition in front of her husband before marrying him. They hired a babysitter as soon as their first child was born as expected.d)The politicians in the country are towards a greater mission that anybody can imagine - this statement can be interpreted positively as well as negatively, it's about how you think.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The judiciary is considered as the guardian and protector of Indian Constitution and supervises the implementation of fundamental rights and duties in the country. In the case of L. Chandra Kumar V. Union of India it has been held that the power of judicial review is a part of basic structure of the Indian Constitution.The emergence of judicial review gave birth to a new movement which is called Judicial Activism. Judicial Activism refers to a philosophy of judicial decision-making whereby judges allow their personal views about public policy to guide their decisions. The Constitution of India divides the powers of government into three branches i.e. legislature, executive and judiciary and has defined their roles clearly.Legislature and executive are responsible for making the law of the land and judiciary is responsible for interpreting these laws and also has the power to review the law i.e. whether it is made in consonance with the basic principles of constitution or not. So, it is when the judiciary steps into the shoes of the executive and legislature and embarks on the work of lawmaking rather than interpreting laws, it is deemed to be judicial activism.Q. Which of the following is similar to the line of reasoning of the author in the last paragraph?Otherwise he lets us manage the administration and office. He takes on our tasks too if we falter anywhere which helps to keep a check.a)Obstacles will be faced by anyone and everyone on the way. It's about dealing with them in a manner that makes them a great experience.b)My boss only makes important decisions.c)Sheila, the mother of two kids hates babysitting, so she kept this condition in front of her husband before marrying him. They hired a babysitter as soon as their first child was born as expected.d)The politicians in the country are towards a greater mission that anybody can imagine - this statement can be interpreted positively as well as negatively, it's about how you think.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The judiciary is considered as the guardian and protector of Indian Constitution and supervises the implementation of fundamental rights and duties in the country. In the case of L. Chandra Kumar V. Union of India it has been held that the power of judicial review is a part of basic structure of the Indian Constitution.The emergence of judicial review gave birth to a new movement which is called Judicial Activism. Judicial Activism refers to a philosophy of judicial decision-making whereby judges allow their personal views about public policy to guide their decisions. The Constitution of India divides the powers of government into three branches i.e. legislature, executive and judiciary and has defined their roles clearly.Legislature and executive are responsible for making the law of the land and judiciary is responsible for interpreting these laws and also has the power to review the law i.e. whether it is made in consonance with the basic principles of constitution or not. So, it is when the judiciary steps into the shoes of the executive and legislature and embarks on the work of lawmaking rather than interpreting laws, it is deemed to be judicial activism.Q. Which of the following is similar to the line of reasoning of the author in the last paragraph?Otherwise he lets us manage the administration and office. He takes on our tasks too if we falter anywhere which helps to keep a check.a)Obstacles will be faced by anyone and everyone on the way. It's about dealing with them in a manner that makes them a great experience.b)My boss only makes important decisions.c)Sheila, the mother of two kids hates babysitting, so she kept this condition in front of her husband before marrying him. They hired a babysitter as soon as their first child was born as expected.d)The politicians in the country are towards a greater mission that anybody can imagine - this statement can be interpreted positively as well as negatively, it's about how you think.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The judiciary is considered as the guardian and protector of Indian Constitution and supervises the implementation of fundamental rights and duties in the country. In the case of L. Chandra Kumar V. Union of India it has been held that the power of judicial review is a part of basic structure of the Indian Constitution.The emergence of judicial review gave birth to a new movement which is called Judicial Activism. Judicial Activism refers to a philosophy of judicial decision-making whereby judges allow their personal views about public policy to guide their decisions. The Constitution of India divides the powers of government into three branches i.e. legislature, executive and judiciary and has defined their roles clearly.Legislature and executive are responsible for making the law of the land and judiciary is responsible for interpreting these laws and also has the power to review the law i.e. whether it is made in consonance with the basic principles of constitution or not. So, it is when the judiciary steps into the shoes of the executive and legislature and embarks on the work of lawmaking rather than interpreting laws, it is deemed to be judicial activism.Q. Which of the following is similar to the line of reasoning of the author in the last paragraph?Otherwise he lets us manage the administration and office. He takes on our tasks too if we falter anywhere which helps to keep a check.a)Obstacles will be faced by anyone and everyone on the way. It's about dealing with them in a manner that makes them a great experience.b)My boss only makes important decisions.c)Sheila, the mother of two kids hates babysitting, so she kept this condition in front of her husband before marrying him. They hired a babysitter as soon as their first child was born as expected.d)The politicians in the country are towards a greater mission that anybody can imagine - this statement can be interpreted positively as well as negatively, it's about how you think.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The judiciary is considered as the guardian and protector of Indian Constitution and supervises the implementation of fundamental rights and duties in the country. In the case of L. Chandra Kumar V. Union of India it has been held that the power of judicial review is a part of basic structure of the Indian Constitution.The emergence of judicial review gave birth to a new movement which is called Judicial Activism. Judicial Activism refers to a philosophy of judicial decision-making whereby judges allow their personal views about public policy to guide their decisions. The Constitution of India divides the powers of government into three branches i.e. legislature, executive and judiciary and has defined their roles clearly.Legislature and executive are responsible for making the law of the land and judiciary is responsible for interpreting these laws and also has the power to review the law i.e. whether it is made in consonance with the basic principles of constitution or not. So, it is when the judiciary steps into the shoes of the executive and legislature and embarks on the work of lawmaking rather than interpreting laws, it is deemed to be judicial activism.Q. Which of the following is similar to the line of reasoning of the author in the last paragraph?Otherwise he lets us manage the administration and office. He takes on our tasks too if we falter anywhere which helps to keep a check.a)Obstacles will be faced by anyone and everyone on the way. It's about dealing with them in a manner that makes them a great experience.b)My boss only makes important decisions.c)Sheila, the mother of two kids hates babysitting, so she kept this condition in front of her husband before marrying him. They hired a babysitter as soon as their first child was born as expected.d)The politicians in the country are towards a greater mission that anybody can imagine - this statement can be interpreted positively as well as negatively, it's about how you think.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev