One night there was a meteor shower and scientists in four different regions, A, B, C and D, observed and counted the number of meteors seen. The scientists noted the duration of the meteor shower and the visibility of the stars.How does the visibility of the night sky impact the number of meteors observed?a)There is no relationshipb)The less clear the stars, the more meteors were seenc)The better the visibility of the stars led to a higher number of meteors seend)The more clear the stars, the less meteors were seenCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

ACT Exam > ACT Questions > One night there was a meteor shower and scien...

How does the visibility of the night sky impact the number of meteors observed?

a)
There is no relationship
b)
The less clear the stars, the more meteors were seen
c)
The better the visibility of the stars led to a higher number of meteors seen
d)
The more clear the stars, the less meteors were seen

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

One night there was a meteor shower and scientists in four different r...

Regions A and B saw more meteors than the other regions. These two regions also had the be visibility of the night sky. Region C had no visibility of the night sky and saw no meteors. Region C could somewhat see the night sky and saw the second lowest number of meteors. This means as the visibility increased so did the number of meteors seen.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for ACT exam

Similar ACT Doubts

Before modern technologies and experiments allowed scientists to understand different organisms mechanisms of reproduction, numerous theories existed about how populations came to exist. Two scientists from the 1800s describe their theories. Here are their arguments.Scientist IJust like some plants come from seeds and others are capable of vegetative (asexual) reproduction, some animal organisms come from non-sexual reproduction as well. Maggots, for example, appear on rotting carcasses. It is clearly illogical to suggest that the dead animal created or gave birth to the maggots, as it is no longer alive and is therefore incapable of sexual reproduction. The only rational conclusion for the appearance of maggots is a spontaneous generation. This is similar to how, if one were to leave a bowl of broth in the open air for a week, it would turn cloudy from bacteria appearing in the liquid.Scientist IIAnimate objects cannot arise from inanimate objects. Even when plants perform asexual reproduction, daughter plants are still coming from parent plants. There is no other example in nature of a living organism spontaneously coming into being. It is true that we observe maggots on rotting carcasses, but that does not necessarily mean that the maggots came from the rotting carcass. Similarly, bacteria growing in broth do not necessarily come directly from the broth. If a living organism appears, then it must have come from another animate object, even if we did not witness it. It is more likely that these invisible organisms have come in through the air and we simply do not see them until they have had a chance to replicate in these locations.An experiment is performed in which a bowl of broth containing bacteria is boiled and then left in the open air. After a day, the broth is observed to be cloudy. How might Scientist I explain this result?

View answer

Magnets and electric charges show certain similarities. For example, both magnets and electric charges can exert a force on their surroundings. This force, when produced by a magnet, is called a magnetic field. When it is produced by an electric charge, the force is called an electric field. It has been observed that the strength of both magnetic fields and electric fields is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between a magnet or an electric charge and the objects that they affect.Below, three scientists debate the relationship between electricity and magnetism.Scientist 1:Electricity and magnetism are two different phenomena. Materials such as iron, cobalt, and nickel contain magnetic domains: tiny regions of magnetism, each with two poles. Normally, the domains have a random orientation and are not aligned, so the magnetism of some domains cancels out that of other domains; however, in magnets, domains line up in the same direction, creating the two poles of the magnet and causing magnetic behavior.In contrast, electricity is a moving electric charge which is caused by the flow of electrons through a material. Electrons flow through a material from a region of higher potential (more negative charg e) to a region of lower potential (more positive charge). We can measure this flow of electrons as current, which refers to the amount of charge transferred over a period of time.Scientist 2:Electricity and magnetism are similar phenomena; however, one cannot be reduced to the other. Electricity involves two types of charges: positive and negative charge. Though electricity can occur in a moving form (in the form of current, or an electric charge moving through a wire), it can also occur in a static form. Static electricity involves no moving charge. Instead, objects can have a net excess of positive charge or a net excess of negative charge—because of having lost or gained electrons, respectively. When two static positive electric charges or two static negative electric charges are brought close together, they repel each other. However, when a positive and a negative static charge are brought together, they attract each other.Similarly, all magnets have two poles. Magnetic poles that are alike repel each other, while dissimilar magnetic poles attract each other. Magnets and static electric charges are alike in that they both show attraction and repulsion in similar circumstances. However, while isolated static electric charges occur in nature, there are no single, isolated magnetic poles. All magnets have two poles, which cannot be dissociated from each other.Scientist 3:Electricity and magnetism are two aspects of the same phenomenon. A moving flow of electrons creates a magnetic field around it. Thus, wherever an electric current exists, a magnetic field will also exist. The magnetic field created by an electric current is perpendicular to the electric currents direction of flow.Additionally, a magnetic field can induce an electric current. This can happen when a wire is moved across a magnetic field, or when a magnetic field is moved near a conductive wire. Because magnetic fields can produce electric fields and electric fields can produce magnetic fields, we can understand electricity and magnetism as parts of one phenomenon: electromagnetism.Q.In a compass, a needle spins to align North-South, following the Earths magnetic field. Suppose that a compass is placed near wire through which an electric current flows, and it is observed that the needle of the compass no longer aligns to North-South. How would this affect the arguments of Scientist 2 and Scientist 3?

View answer

Magnets and electric charges show certain similarities. For example, both magnets and electric charges can exert a force on their surroundings. This force, when produced by a magnet, is called a magnetic field. When it is produced by an electric charge, the force is called an electric field. It has been observed that the strength of both magnetic fields and electric fields is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between a magnet or an electric charge and the objects that they affect.Below, three scientists debate the relationship between electricity and magnetism.Scientist 1:Electricity and magnetism are two different phenomena. Materials such as iron, cobalt, and nickel contain magnetic domains: tiny regions of magnetism, each with two poles. Normally, the domains have a random orientation and are not aligned, so the magnetism of some domains cancels out that of other domains; however, in magnets, domains line up in the same direction, creating the two poles of the magnet and causing magnetic behavior.In contrast, electricity is a moving electric charge which is caused by the flow of electrons through a material. Electrons flow through a material from a region of higher potential (more negative charg e) to a region of lower potential (more positive charge). We can measure this flow of electrons as current, which refers to the amount of charge transferred over a period of time.Scientist 2:Electricity and magnetism are similar phenomena; however, one cannot be reduced to the other. Electricity involves two types of charges: positive and negative charge. Though electricity can occur in a moving form (in the form of current, or an electric charge moving through a wire), it can also occur in a static form. Static electricity involves no moving charge. Instead, objects can have a net excess of positive charge or a net excess of negative charge—because of having lost or gained electrons, respectively. When two static positive electric charges or two static negative electric charges are brought close together, they repel each other. However, when a positive and a negative static charge are brought together, they attract each other.Similarly, all magnets have two poles. Magnetic poles that are alike repel each other, while dissimilar magnetic poles attract each other. Magnets and static electric charges are alike in that they both show attraction and repulsion in similar circumstances. However, while isolated static electric charges occur in nature, there are no single, isolated magnetic poles. All magnets have two poles, which cannot be dissociated from each other.Scientist 3:Electricity and magnetism are two aspects of the same phenomenon. A moving flow of electrons creates a magnetic field around it. Thus, wherever an electric current exists, a magnetic field will also exist. The magnetic field created by an electric current is perpendicular to the electric currents direction of flow.Additionally, a magnetic field can induce an electric current. This can happen when a wire is moved across a magnetic field, or when a magnetic field is moved near a conductive wire. Because magnetic fields can produce electric fields and electric fields can produce magnetic fields, we can understand electricity and magnetism as parts of one phenomenon: electromagnetism.Q. Which of the following would be an example of electricity according to Scientist 2, but not according to Scientist 1?

View answer

Before modern technologies and experiments allowed scientists to understand different organisms mechanisms of reproduction, numerous theories existed about how populations came to exist. Two scientists from the 1800s describe their theories. Here are their arguments.Scientist IJust like some plants come from seeds and others are capable of vegetative (asexual) reproduction, some animal organisms come from non-sexual reproduction as well. Maggots, for example, appear on rotting carcasses. It is clearly illogical to suggest that the dead animal created or gave birth to the maggots, as it is no longer alive and is therefore incapable of sexual reproduction. The only rational conclusion for the appearance of maggots is a spontaneous generation. This is similar to how, if one were to leave a bowl of broth in the open air for a week, it would turn cloudy from bacteria appearing in the liquid.Scientist IIAnimate objects cannot arise from inanimate objects. Even when plants perform asexual reproduction, daughter plants are still coming from parent plants. There is no other example in nature of a living organism spontaneously coming into being. It is true that we observe maggots on rotting carcasses, but that does not necessarily mean that the maggots came from the rotting carcass. Similarly, bacteria growing in broth do not necessarily come directly from the broth. If a living organism appears, then it must have come from another animate object, even if we did not witness it. It is more likely that these invisible organisms have come in through the air and we simply do not see them until they have had a chance to replicate in these locations.Q. An experiment is performed in which a rotting carcass is vacuum sealed. After several weeks, no maggots are observed. The rotting carcass is removed from the vacuum seal, and several days later maggots are observed. Which theory does this best support?

View answer

Before modern technologies and experiments allowed scientists to understand different organisms mechanisms of reproduction, numerous theories existed about how populations came to exist. Two scientists from the 1800s describe their theories. Here are their arguments.Scientist IJust like some plants come from seeds and others are capable of vegetative (asexual) reproduction, some animal organisms come from non-sexual reproduction as well. Maggots, for example, appear on rotting carcasses. It is clearly illogical to suggest that the dead animal created or gave birth to the maggots, as it is no longer alive and is therefore incapable of sexual reproduction. The only rational conclusion for the appearance of maggots is a spontaneous generation. This is similar to how, if one were to leave a bowl of broth in the open air for a week, it would turn cloudy from bacteria appearing in the liquid.Scientist IIAnimate objects cannot arise from inanimate objects. Even when plants perform asexual reproduction, daughter plants are still coming from parent plants. There is no other example in nature of a living organism spontaneously coming into being. It is true that we observe maggots on rotting carcasses, but that does not necessarily mean that the maggots came from the rotting carcass. Similarly, bacteria growing in broth do not necessarily come directly from the broth. If a living organism appears, then it must have come from another animate object, even if we did not witness it. It is more likely that these invisible organisms have come in through the air and we simply do not see them until they have had a chance to replicate in these locations.Which of the following is a valid summary of Scientist IIs argument against Scientist I?

View answer

Top Courses for ACTView all

ACT Mock Test Series 2025

Biology for ACT

How to Prepare for ACT

Mathematics for ACT

Chemistry for ACT

Top Courses for ACT

View all

One night there was a meteor shower and scientists in four different regions, A, B, C and D, observed and counted the number of meteors seen. The scientists noted the duration of the meteor shower and the visibility of the stars.How does the visibility of the night sky impact the number of meteors observed?a)There is no relationshipb)The less clear the stars, the more meteors were seenc)The better the visibility of the stars led to a higher number of meteors seend)The more clear the stars, the less meteors were seenCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
One night there was a meteor shower and scientists in four different regions, A, B, C and D, observed and counted the number of meteors seen. The scientists noted the duration of the meteor shower and the visibility of the stars.How does the visibility of the night sky impact the number of meteors observed?a)There is no relationshipb)The less clear the stars, the more meteors were seenc)The better the visibility of the stars led to a higher number of meteors seend)The more clear the stars, the less meteors were seenCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for ACT 2025 is part of ACT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the ACT exam syllabus. Information about One night there was a meteor shower and scientists in four different regions, A, B, C and D, observed and counted the number of meteors seen. The scientists noted the duration of the meteor shower and the visibility of the stars.How does the visibility of the night sky impact the number of meteors observed?a)There is no relationshipb)The less clear the stars, the more meteors were seenc)The better the visibility of the stars led to a higher number of meteors seend)The more clear the stars, the less meteors were seenCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for ACT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for One night there was a meteor shower and scientists in four different regions, A, B, C and D, observed and counted the number of meteors seen. The scientists noted the duration of the meteor shower and the visibility of the stars.How does the visibility of the night sky impact the number of meteors observed?a)There is no relationshipb)The less clear the stars, the more meteors were seenc)The better the visibility of the stars led to a higher number of meteors seend)The more clear the stars, the less meteors were seenCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for One night there was a meteor shower and scientists in four different regions, A, B, C and D, observed and counted the number of meteors seen. The scientists noted the duration of the meteor shower and the visibility of the stars.How does the visibility of the night sky impact the number of meteors observed?a)There is no relationshipb)The less clear the stars, the more meteors were seenc)The better the visibility of the stars led to a higher number of meteors seend)The more clear the stars, the less meteors were seenCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for ACT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for ACT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of One night there was a meteor shower and scientists in four different regions, A, B, C and D, observed and counted the number of meteors seen. The scientists noted the duration of the meteor shower and the visibility of the stars.How does the visibility of the night sky impact the number of meteors observed?a)There is no relationshipb)The less clear the stars, the more meteors were seenc)The better the visibility of the stars led to a higher number of meteors seend)The more clear the stars, the less meteors were seenCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of One night there was a meteor shower and scientists in four different regions, A, B, C and D, observed and counted the number of meteors seen. The scientists noted the duration of the meteor shower and the visibility of the stars.How does the visibility of the night sky impact the number of meteors observed?a)There is no relationshipb)The less clear the stars, the more meteors were seenc)The better the visibility of the stars led to a higher number of meteors seend)The more clear the stars, the less meteors were seenCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for One night there was a meteor shower and scientists in four different regions, A, B, C and D, observed and counted the number of meteors seen. The scientists noted the duration of the meteor shower and the visibility of the stars.How does the visibility of the night sky impact the number of meteors observed?a)There is no relationshipb)The less clear the stars, the more meteors were seenc)The better the visibility of the stars led to a higher number of meteors seend)The more clear the stars, the less meteors were seenCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of One night there was a meteor shower and scientists in four different regions, A, B, C and D, observed and counted the number of meteors seen. The scientists noted the duration of the meteor shower and the visibility of the stars.How does the visibility of the night sky impact the number of meteors observed?a)There is no relationshipb)The less clear the stars, the more meteors were seenc)The better the visibility of the stars led to a higher number of meteors seend)The more clear the stars, the less meteors were seenCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice One night there was a meteor shower and scientists in four different regions, A, B, C and D, observed and counted the number of meteors seen. The scientists noted the duration of the meteor shower and the visibility of the stars.How does the visibility of the night sky impact the number of meteors observed?a)There is no relationshipb)The less clear the stars, the more meteors were seenc)The better the visibility of the stars led to a higher number of meteors seend)The more clear the stars, the less meteors were seenCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice ACT tests.

Explore Courses for ACT exam