Question Description
Read the following passages and answer the items that follow. Your answer to the items should be based on the passage only. PASSAGEThe recent order of India’s competition regulator against Google for abusing its dominant position in the Android mobile device ecosystem is significant not just for the amount of penalty imposed but also for the drastic changes in business practices that it requires the IT giant to undertake. On Thursday, the Competition Commission of India imposed a penalty of about 1,337 crore, said to be a provisional amount, on Google, while coming down heavily on it for having such restrictive clauses in its agreements with original equipment manufacturers (who use its Android platform) that it can keep competition at bay. And because of such agreements, the order said, “Google ensured that users continue to use its search services on mobile devices which facilitated un-interrupted growth of advertisement revenue for Google.” It, therefore, concluded that the whole idea of Google imposing such restrictions on its device partners was to “protect and strengthen itsdominant position in general search services and thus, its revenues via search advertisements”. This decision, both the penalty and the regulator’s direction Google “to modify its conduct”, will be welcomed by anyone who realizes the power of the big IT platforms to shut out competition and, therefore, choice for the users. From the above passage what are/is not the significant fallout(s) of the recent order of Competition Commission of India? a)Hiccups in the advertisement revenue flow to Google. b)Reign of Google in search services challenged. c)Increased competition of users of big IT platforms. d)Google will have to tweak its business model in India. Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Read the following passages and answer the items that follow. Your answer to the items should be based on the passage only. PASSAGEThe recent order of India’s competition regulator against Google for abusing its dominant position in the Android mobile device ecosystem is significant not just for the amount of penalty imposed but also for the drastic changes in business practices that it requires the IT giant to undertake. On Thursday, the Competition Commission of India imposed a penalty of about 1,337 crore, said to be a provisional amount, on Google, while coming down heavily on it for having such restrictive clauses in its agreements with original equipment manufacturers (who use its Android platform) that it can keep competition at bay. And because of such agreements, the order said, “Google ensured that users continue to use its search services on mobile devices which facilitated un-interrupted growth of advertisement revenue for Google.” It, therefore, concluded that the whole idea of Google imposing such restrictions on its device partners was to “protect and strengthen itsdominant position in general search services and thus, its revenues via search advertisements”. This decision, both the penalty and the regulator’s direction Google “to modify its conduct”, will be welcomed by anyone who realizes the power of the big IT platforms to shut out competition and, therefore, choice for the users. From the above passage what are/is not the significant fallout(s) of the recent order of Competition Commission of India? a)Hiccups in the advertisement revenue flow to Google. b)Reign of Google in search services challenged. c)Increased competition of users of big IT platforms. d)Google will have to tweak its business model in India. Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Read the following passages and answer the items that follow. Your answer to the items should be based on the passage only. PASSAGEThe recent order of India’s competition regulator against Google for abusing its dominant position in the Android mobile device ecosystem is significant not just for the amount of penalty imposed but also for the drastic changes in business practices that it requires the IT giant to undertake. On Thursday, the Competition Commission of India imposed a penalty of about 1,337 crore, said to be a provisional amount, on Google, while coming down heavily on it for having such restrictive clauses in its agreements with original equipment manufacturers (who use its Android platform) that it can keep competition at bay. And because of such agreements, the order said, “Google ensured that users continue to use its search services on mobile devices which facilitated un-interrupted growth of advertisement revenue for Google.” It, therefore, concluded that the whole idea of Google imposing such restrictions on its device partners was to “protect and strengthen itsdominant position in general search services and thus, its revenues via search advertisements”. This decision, both the penalty and the regulator’s direction Google “to modify its conduct”, will be welcomed by anyone who realizes the power of the big IT platforms to shut out competition and, therefore, choice for the users. From the above passage what are/is not the significant fallout(s) of the recent order of Competition Commission of India? a)Hiccups in the advertisement revenue flow to Google. b)Reign of Google in search services challenged. c)Increased competition of users of big IT platforms. d)Google will have to tweak its business model in India. Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Read the following passages and answer the items that follow. Your answer to the items should be based on the passage only. PASSAGEThe recent order of India’s competition regulator against Google for abusing its dominant position in the Android mobile device ecosystem is significant not just for the amount of penalty imposed but also for the drastic changes in business practices that it requires the IT giant to undertake. On Thursday, the Competition Commission of India imposed a penalty of about 1,337 crore, said to be a provisional amount, on Google, while coming down heavily on it for having such restrictive clauses in its agreements with original equipment manufacturers (who use its Android platform) that it can keep competition at bay. And because of such agreements, the order said, “Google ensured that users continue to use its search services on mobile devices which facilitated un-interrupted growth of advertisement revenue for Google.” It, therefore, concluded that the whole idea of Google imposing such restrictions on its device partners was to “protect and strengthen itsdominant position in general search services and thus, its revenues via search advertisements”. This decision, both the penalty and the regulator’s direction Google “to modify its conduct”, will be welcomed by anyone who realizes the power of the big IT platforms to shut out competition and, therefore, choice for the users. From the above passage what are/is not the significant fallout(s) of the recent order of Competition Commission of India? a)Hiccups in the advertisement revenue flow to Google. b)Reign of Google in search services challenged. c)Increased competition of users of big IT platforms. d)Google will have to tweak its business model in India. Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Read the following passages and answer the items that follow. Your answer to the items should be based on the passage only. PASSAGEThe recent order of India’s competition regulator against Google for abusing its dominant position in the Android mobile device ecosystem is significant not just for the amount of penalty imposed but also for the drastic changes in business practices that it requires the IT giant to undertake. On Thursday, the Competition Commission of India imposed a penalty of about 1,337 crore, said to be a provisional amount, on Google, while coming down heavily on it for having such restrictive clauses in its agreements with original equipment manufacturers (who use its Android platform) that it can keep competition at bay. And because of such agreements, the order said, “Google ensured that users continue to use its search services on mobile devices which facilitated un-interrupted growth of advertisement revenue for Google.” It, therefore, concluded that the whole idea of Google imposing such restrictions on its device partners was to “protect and strengthen itsdominant position in general search services and thus, its revenues via search advertisements”. This decision, both the penalty and the regulator’s direction Google “to modify its conduct”, will be welcomed by anyone who realizes the power of the big IT platforms to shut out competition and, therefore, choice for the users. From the above passage what are/is not the significant fallout(s) of the recent order of Competition Commission of India? a)Hiccups in the advertisement revenue flow to Google. b)Reign of Google in search services challenged. c)Increased competition of users of big IT platforms. d)Google will have to tweak its business model in India. Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Read the following passages and answer the items that follow. Your answer to the items should be based on the passage only. PASSAGEThe recent order of India’s competition regulator against Google for abusing its dominant position in the Android mobile device ecosystem is significant not just for the amount of penalty imposed but also for the drastic changes in business practices that it requires the IT giant to undertake. On Thursday, the Competition Commission of India imposed a penalty of about 1,337 crore, said to be a provisional amount, on Google, while coming down heavily on it for having such restrictive clauses in its agreements with original equipment manufacturers (who use its Android platform) that it can keep competition at bay. And because of such agreements, the order said, “Google ensured that users continue to use its search services on mobile devices which facilitated un-interrupted growth of advertisement revenue for Google.” It, therefore, concluded that the whole idea of Google imposing such restrictions on its device partners was to “protect and strengthen itsdominant position in general search services and thus, its revenues via search advertisements”. This decision, both the penalty and the regulator’s direction Google “to modify its conduct”, will be welcomed by anyone who realizes the power of the big IT platforms to shut out competition and, therefore, choice for the users. From the above passage what are/is not the significant fallout(s) of the recent order of Competition Commission of India? a)Hiccups in the advertisement revenue flow to Google. b)Reign of Google in search services challenged. c)Increased competition of users of big IT platforms. d)Google will have to tweak its business model in India. Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Read the following passages and answer the items that follow. Your answer to the items should be based on the passage only. PASSAGEThe recent order of India’s competition regulator against Google for abusing its dominant position in the Android mobile device ecosystem is significant not just for the amount of penalty imposed but also for the drastic changes in business practices that it requires the IT giant to undertake. On Thursday, the Competition Commission of India imposed a penalty of about 1,337 crore, said to be a provisional amount, on Google, while coming down heavily on it for having such restrictive clauses in its agreements with original equipment manufacturers (who use its Android platform) that it can keep competition at bay. And because of such agreements, the order said, “Google ensured that users continue to use its search services on mobile devices which facilitated un-interrupted growth of advertisement revenue for Google.” It, therefore, concluded that the whole idea of Google imposing such restrictions on its device partners was to “protect and strengthen itsdominant position in general search services and thus, its revenues via search advertisements”. This decision, both the penalty and the regulator’s direction Google “to modify its conduct”, will be welcomed by anyone who realizes the power of the big IT platforms to shut out competition and, therefore, choice for the users. From the above passage what are/is not the significant fallout(s) of the recent order of Competition Commission of India? a)Hiccups in the advertisement revenue flow to Google. b)Reign of Google in search services challenged. c)Increased competition of users of big IT platforms. d)Google will have to tweak its business model in India. Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Read the following passages and answer the items that follow. Your answer to the items should be based on the passage only. PASSAGEThe recent order of India’s competition regulator against Google for abusing its dominant position in the Android mobile device ecosystem is significant not just for the amount of penalty imposed but also for the drastic changes in business practices that it requires the IT giant to undertake. On Thursday, the Competition Commission of India imposed a penalty of about 1,337 crore, said to be a provisional amount, on Google, while coming down heavily on it for having such restrictive clauses in its agreements with original equipment manufacturers (who use its Android platform) that it can keep competition at bay. And because of such agreements, the order said, “Google ensured that users continue to use its search services on mobile devices which facilitated un-interrupted growth of advertisement revenue for Google.” It, therefore, concluded that the whole idea of Google imposing such restrictions on its device partners was to “protect and strengthen itsdominant position in general search services and thus, its revenues via search advertisements”. This decision, both the penalty and the regulator’s direction Google “to modify its conduct”, will be welcomed by anyone who realizes the power of the big IT platforms to shut out competition and, therefore, choice for the users. From the above passage what are/is not the significant fallout(s) of the recent order of Competition Commission of India? a)Hiccups in the advertisement revenue flow to Google. b)Reign of Google in search services challenged. c)Increased competition of users of big IT platforms. d)Google will have to tweak its business model in India. Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Read the following passages and answer the items that follow. Your answer to the items should be based on the passage only. PASSAGEThe recent order of India’s competition regulator against Google for abusing its dominant position in the Android mobile device ecosystem is significant not just for the amount of penalty imposed but also for the drastic changes in business practices that it requires the IT giant to undertake. On Thursday, the Competition Commission of India imposed a penalty of about 1,337 crore, said to be a provisional amount, on Google, while coming down heavily on it for having such restrictive clauses in its agreements with original equipment manufacturers (who use its Android platform) that it can keep competition at bay. And because of such agreements, the order said, “Google ensured that users continue to use its search services on mobile devices which facilitated un-interrupted growth of advertisement revenue for Google.” It, therefore, concluded that the whole idea of Google imposing such restrictions on its device partners was to “protect and strengthen itsdominant position in general search services and thus, its revenues via search advertisements”. This decision, both the penalty and the regulator’s direction Google “to modify its conduct”, will be welcomed by anyone who realizes the power of the big IT platforms to shut out competition and, therefore, choice for the users. From the above passage what are/is not the significant fallout(s) of the recent order of Competition Commission of India? a)Hiccups in the advertisement revenue flow to Google. b)Reign of Google in search services challenged. c)Increased competition of users of big IT platforms. d)Google will have to tweak its business model in India. Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.