Question Description
Directios: Questions 4 – 7 are based on the same set of Principles. Answer accordingly.Principle 1 – The Principal is liable for all acts of the agent done in the course of employment.Principle 2 – When a servant commits a mistake while acting on behalf of his master, causing loss to the plaintiff thereby, the master will be liable for the same.Principle 3 – Generally, the employer is not liable for torts committed by an independent contractor working for him.Exception – The employer will be held liable for the acts of an independent contractor if he authorizes the doing of an illegal act.Explanation – An independent contractor is one who is not under the complete direction and control of the employer.Principle 4 – If the servant acts negligently in the performance of his duties or displays reckless behaviour, thereby causing loss to the plaintiff, the master will be held liable.Principle 5 – If the servant does an act in defiance of an express prohibition, and the act is outside the course of employment, then the master cannot be held liable for harm arising out of such an act.Facts – The South Western Railway Boardappointed porters to assist passengers inboarding the right trains, as the crowds werelarge and the railway schedules were packedduring the holiday season. Manu, a vagabondtraveler had got into the right train bound forKochi. However, the porter erroneouslythought that he had boarded the wrong trainand pulled him out and ensured that he takesanother train leaving around the same time,which stopped at Kochi, but was actuallybound for Kanyakumari. When the ticketswere being checked, Manu was caught andfined for ticketless travelling, as the ticket hepossessed was for a different train. Manuseeks to claim damages from the SouthWestern Railway Board. Would they be heldliable for the porter’s act?a)Yes, the Railway Board would be liable, as theporter is employed by the Board, and hascommitted a mistake.b)No, only the porter can be held liable. Themistake is entirely his.c)The Railway Board cannot be held liable, asthe porter was honestly doing his job. Themistake was a mere accident on the part ofthe porter.d)The State should be held liable, as railwaysare managed by the state, usually.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directios: Questions 4 – 7 are based on the same set of Principles. Answer accordingly.Principle 1 – The Principal is liable for all acts of the agent done in the course of employment.Principle 2 – When a servant commits a mistake while acting on behalf of his master, causing loss to the plaintiff thereby, the master will be liable for the same.Principle 3 – Generally, the employer is not liable for torts committed by an independent contractor working for him.Exception – The employer will be held liable for the acts of an independent contractor if he authorizes the doing of an illegal act.Explanation – An independent contractor is one who is not under the complete direction and control of the employer.Principle 4 – If the servant acts negligently in the performance of his duties or displays reckless behaviour, thereby causing loss to the plaintiff, the master will be held liable.Principle 5 – If the servant does an act in defiance of an express prohibition, and the act is outside the course of employment, then the master cannot be held liable for harm arising out of such an act.Facts – The South Western Railway Boardappointed porters to assist passengers inboarding the right trains, as the crowds werelarge and the railway schedules were packedduring the holiday season. Manu, a vagabondtraveler had got into the right train bound forKochi. However, the porter erroneouslythought that he had boarded the wrong trainand pulled him out and ensured that he takesanother train leaving around the same time,which stopped at Kochi, but was actuallybound for Kanyakumari. When the ticketswere being checked, Manu was caught andfined for ticketless travelling, as the ticket hepossessed was for a different train. Manuseeks to claim damages from the SouthWestern Railway Board. Would they be heldliable for the porter’s act?a)Yes, the Railway Board would be liable, as theporter is employed by the Board, and hascommitted a mistake.b)No, only the porter can be held liable. Themistake is entirely his.c)The Railway Board cannot be held liable, asthe porter was honestly doing his job. Themistake was a mere accident on the part ofthe porter.d)The State should be held liable, as railwaysare managed by the state, usually.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directios: Questions 4 – 7 are based on the same set of Principles. Answer accordingly.Principle 1 – The Principal is liable for all acts of the agent done in the course of employment.Principle 2 – When a servant commits a mistake while acting on behalf of his master, causing loss to the plaintiff thereby, the master will be liable for the same.Principle 3 – Generally, the employer is not liable for torts committed by an independent contractor working for him.Exception – The employer will be held liable for the acts of an independent contractor if he authorizes the doing of an illegal act.Explanation – An independent contractor is one who is not under the complete direction and control of the employer.Principle 4 – If the servant acts negligently in the performance of his duties or displays reckless behaviour, thereby causing loss to the plaintiff, the master will be held liable.Principle 5 – If the servant does an act in defiance of an express prohibition, and the act is outside the course of employment, then the master cannot be held liable for harm arising out of such an act.Facts – The South Western Railway Boardappointed porters to assist passengers inboarding the right trains, as the crowds werelarge and the railway schedules were packedduring the holiday season. Manu, a vagabondtraveler had got into the right train bound forKochi. However, the porter erroneouslythought that he had boarded the wrong trainand pulled him out and ensured that he takesanother train leaving around the same time,which stopped at Kochi, but was actuallybound for Kanyakumari. When the ticketswere being checked, Manu was caught andfined for ticketless travelling, as the ticket hepossessed was for a different train. Manuseeks to claim damages from the SouthWestern Railway Board. Would they be heldliable for the porter’s act?a)Yes, the Railway Board would be liable, as theporter is employed by the Board, and hascommitted a mistake.b)No, only the porter can be held liable. Themistake is entirely his.c)The Railway Board cannot be held liable, asthe porter was honestly doing his job. Themistake was a mere accident on the part ofthe porter.d)The State should be held liable, as railwaysare managed by the state, usually.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directios: Questions 4 – 7 are based on the same set of Principles. Answer accordingly.Principle 1 – The Principal is liable for all acts of the agent done in the course of employment.Principle 2 – When a servant commits a mistake while acting on behalf of his master, causing loss to the plaintiff thereby, the master will be liable for the same.Principle 3 – Generally, the employer is not liable for torts committed by an independent contractor working for him.Exception – The employer will be held liable for the acts of an independent contractor if he authorizes the doing of an illegal act.Explanation – An independent contractor is one who is not under the complete direction and control of the employer.Principle 4 – If the servant acts negligently in the performance of his duties or displays reckless behaviour, thereby causing loss to the plaintiff, the master will be held liable.Principle 5 – If the servant does an act in defiance of an express prohibition, and the act is outside the course of employment, then the master cannot be held liable for harm arising out of such an act.Facts – The South Western Railway Boardappointed porters to assist passengers inboarding the right trains, as the crowds werelarge and the railway schedules were packedduring the holiday season. Manu, a vagabondtraveler had got into the right train bound forKochi. However, the porter erroneouslythought that he had boarded the wrong trainand pulled him out and ensured that he takesanother train leaving around the same time,which stopped at Kochi, but was actuallybound for Kanyakumari. When the ticketswere being checked, Manu was caught andfined for ticketless travelling, as the ticket hepossessed was for a different train. Manuseeks to claim damages from the SouthWestern Railway Board. Would they be heldliable for the porter’s act?a)Yes, the Railway Board would be liable, as theporter is employed by the Board, and hascommitted a mistake.b)No, only the porter can be held liable. Themistake is entirely his.c)The Railway Board cannot be held liable, asthe porter was honestly doing his job. Themistake was a mere accident on the part ofthe porter.d)The State should be held liable, as railwaysare managed by the state, usually.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directios: Questions 4 – 7 are based on the same set of Principles. Answer accordingly.Principle 1 – The Principal is liable for all acts of the agent done in the course of employment.Principle 2 – When a servant commits a mistake while acting on behalf of his master, causing loss to the plaintiff thereby, the master will be liable for the same.Principle 3 – Generally, the employer is not liable for torts committed by an independent contractor working for him.Exception – The employer will be held liable for the acts of an independent contractor if he authorizes the doing of an illegal act.Explanation – An independent contractor is one who is not under the complete direction and control of the employer.Principle 4 – If the servant acts negligently in the performance of his duties or displays reckless behaviour, thereby causing loss to the plaintiff, the master will be held liable.Principle 5 – If the servant does an act in defiance of an express prohibition, and the act is outside the course of employment, then the master cannot be held liable for harm arising out of such an act.Facts – The South Western Railway Boardappointed porters to assist passengers inboarding the right trains, as the crowds werelarge and the railway schedules were packedduring the holiday season. Manu, a vagabondtraveler had got into the right train bound forKochi. However, the porter erroneouslythought that he had boarded the wrong trainand pulled him out and ensured that he takesanother train leaving around the same time,which stopped at Kochi, but was actuallybound for Kanyakumari. When the ticketswere being checked, Manu was caught andfined for ticketless travelling, as the ticket hepossessed was for a different train. Manuseeks to claim damages from the SouthWestern Railway Board. Would they be heldliable for the porter’s act?a)Yes, the Railway Board would be liable, as theporter is employed by the Board, and hascommitted a mistake.b)No, only the porter can be held liable. Themistake is entirely his.c)The Railway Board cannot be held liable, asthe porter was honestly doing his job. Themistake was a mere accident on the part ofthe porter.d)The State should be held liable, as railwaysare managed by the state, usually.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directios: Questions 4 – 7 are based on the same set of Principles. Answer accordingly.Principle 1 – The Principal is liable for all acts of the agent done in the course of employment.Principle 2 – When a servant commits a mistake while acting on behalf of his master, causing loss to the plaintiff thereby, the master will be liable for the same.Principle 3 – Generally, the employer is not liable for torts committed by an independent contractor working for him.Exception – The employer will be held liable for the acts of an independent contractor if he authorizes the doing of an illegal act.Explanation – An independent contractor is one who is not under the complete direction and control of the employer.Principle 4 – If the servant acts negligently in the performance of his duties or displays reckless behaviour, thereby causing loss to the plaintiff, the master will be held liable.Principle 5 – If the servant does an act in defiance of an express prohibition, and the act is outside the course of employment, then the master cannot be held liable for harm arising out of such an act.Facts – The South Western Railway Boardappointed porters to assist passengers inboarding the right trains, as the crowds werelarge and the railway schedules were packedduring the holiday season. Manu, a vagabondtraveler had got into the right train bound forKochi. However, the porter erroneouslythought that he had boarded the wrong trainand pulled him out and ensured that he takesanother train leaving around the same time,which stopped at Kochi, but was actuallybound for Kanyakumari. When the ticketswere being checked, Manu was caught andfined for ticketless travelling, as the ticket hepossessed was for a different train. Manuseeks to claim damages from the SouthWestern Railway Board. Would they be heldliable for the porter’s act?a)Yes, the Railway Board would be liable, as theporter is employed by the Board, and hascommitted a mistake.b)No, only the porter can be held liable. Themistake is entirely his.c)The Railway Board cannot be held liable, asthe porter was honestly doing his job. Themistake was a mere accident on the part ofthe porter.d)The State should be held liable, as railwaysare managed by the state, usually.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directios: Questions 4 – 7 are based on the same set of Principles. Answer accordingly.Principle 1 – The Principal is liable for all acts of the agent done in the course of employment.Principle 2 – When a servant commits a mistake while acting on behalf of his master, causing loss to the plaintiff thereby, the master will be liable for the same.Principle 3 – Generally, the employer is not liable for torts committed by an independent contractor working for him.Exception – The employer will be held liable for the acts of an independent contractor if he authorizes the doing of an illegal act.Explanation – An independent contractor is one who is not under the complete direction and control of the employer.Principle 4 – If the servant acts negligently in the performance of his duties or displays reckless behaviour, thereby causing loss to the plaintiff, the master will be held liable.Principle 5 – If the servant does an act in defiance of an express prohibition, and the act is outside the course of employment, then the master cannot be held liable for harm arising out of such an act.Facts – The South Western Railway Boardappointed porters to assist passengers inboarding the right trains, as the crowds werelarge and the railway schedules were packedduring the holiday season. Manu, a vagabondtraveler had got into the right train bound forKochi. However, the porter erroneouslythought that he had boarded the wrong trainand pulled him out and ensured that he takesanother train leaving around the same time,which stopped at Kochi, but was actuallybound for Kanyakumari. When the ticketswere being checked, Manu was caught andfined for ticketless travelling, as the ticket hepossessed was for a different train. Manuseeks to claim damages from the SouthWestern Railway Board. Would they be heldliable for the porter’s act?a)Yes, the Railway Board would be liable, as theporter is employed by the Board, and hascommitted a mistake.b)No, only the porter can be held liable. Themistake is entirely his.c)The Railway Board cannot be held liable, asthe porter was honestly doing his job. Themistake was a mere accident on the part ofthe porter.d)The State should be held liable, as railwaysare managed by the state, usually.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directios: Questions 4 – 7 are based on the same set of Principles. Answer accordingly.Principle 1 – The Principal is liable for all acts of the agent done in the course of employment.Principle 2 – When a servant commits a mistake while acting on behalf of his master, causing loss to the plaintiff thereby, the master will be liable for the same.Principle 3 – Generally, the employer is not liable for torts committed by an independent contractor working for him.Exception – The employer will be held liable for the acts of an independent contractor if he authorizes the doing of an illegal act.Explanation – An independent contractor is one who is not under the complete direction and control of the employer.Principle 4 – If the servant acts negligently in the performance of his duties or displays reckless behaviour, thereby causing loss to the plaintiff, the master will be held liable.Principle 5 – If the servant does an act in defiance of an express prohibition, and the act is outside the course of employment, then the master cannot be held liable for harm arising out of such an act.Facts – The South Western Railway Boardappointed porters to assist passengers inboarding the right trains, as the crowds werelarge and the railway schedules were packedduring the holiday season. Manu, a vagabondtraveler had got into the right train bound forKochi. However, the porter erroneouslythought that he had boarded the wrong trainand pulled him out and ensured that he takesanother train leaving around the same time,which stopped at Kochi, but was actuallybound for Kanyakumari. When the ticketswere being checked, Manu was caught andfined for ticketless travelling, as the ticket hepossessed was for a different train. Manuseeks to claim damages from the SouthWestern Railway Board. Would they be heldliable for the porter’s act?a)Yes, the Railway Board would be liable, as theporter is employed by the Board, and hascommitted a mistake.b)No, only the porter can be held liable. Themistake is entirely his.c)The Railway Board cannot be held liable, asthe porter was honestly doing his job. Themistake was a mere accident on the part ofthe porter.d)The State should be held liable, as railwaysare managed by the state, usually.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directios: Questions 4 – 7 are based on the same set of Principles. Answer accordingly.Principle 1 – The Principal is liable for all acts of the agent done in the course of employment.Principle 2 – When a servant commits a mistake while acting on behalf of his master, causing loss to the plaintiff thereby, the master will be liable for the same.Principle 3 – Generally, the employer is not liable for torts committed by an independent contractor working for him.Exception – The employer will be held liable for the acts of an independent contractor if he authorizes the doing of an illegal act.Explanation – An independent contractor is one who is not under the complete direction and control of the employer.Principle 4 – If the servant acts negligently in the performance of his duties or displays reckless behaviour, thereby causing loss to the plaintiff, the master will be held liable.Principle 5 – If the servant does an act in defiance of an express prohibition, and the act is outside the course of employment, then the master cannot be held liable for harm arising out of such an act.Facts – The South Western Railway Boardappointed porters to assist passengers inboarding the right trains, as the crowds werelarge and the railway schedules were packedduring the holiday season. Manu, a vagabondtraveler had got into the right train bound forKochi. However, the porter erroneouslythought that he had boarded the wrong trainand pulled him out and ensured that he takesanother train leaving around the same time,which stopped at Kochi, but was actuallybound for Kanyakumari. When the ticketswere being checked, Manu was caught andfined for ticketless travelling, as the ticket hepossessed was for a different train. Manuseeks to claim damages from the SouthWestern Railway Board. Would they be heldliable for the porter’s act?a)Yes, the Railway Board would be liable, as theporter is employed by the Board, and hascommitted a mistake.b)No, only the porter can be held liable. Themistake is entirely his.c)The Railway Board cannot be held liable, asthe porter was honestly doing his job. Themistake was a mere accident on the part ofthe porter.d)The State should be held liable, as railwaysare managed by the state, usually.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.