Ranajit Guha, who passed away recently, was associated with which profession?a)Sports personb)Historianc)Business persond)PoliticianCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Bank Exams Exam > Bank Exams Questions > Ranajit Guha, who passed away recently, was a...

Ranajit Guha, who passed away recently, was associated with which profession?

a)
Sports person
b)
Historian
c)
Business person
d)
Politician

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

Ranajit Guha, who passed away recently, was associated with which prof...

Ranajit Guha, an eminent Indian historian, has passed away recently. He was one of the founders of the Subaltern School, which is one of the most influential post-colonial, post-Marxist schools in history.
He authored several books, the latest one being ‘the Small Voice of History’ in 2009. He was the editor of Subaltern School group’s early anthologies and wrote both in English and in Bengali.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

Ranajit Guha, who passed away recently, was associated with which prof...

Historian
Ranajit Guha was a renowned historian who made significant contributions to the field of South Asian history. Here are some key points about his life and work:

Early Life and Education
- Ranajit Guha was born in India in 1923 and went on to pursue his higher education in the United Kingdom.
- He completed his PhD in history at the University of London and later taught at various universities in India and abroad.

Contributions to History
- Guha is best known for his pioneering work on Subaltern Studies, a field of history that focuses on the experiences of marginalized groups in society.
- His influential book "Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India" challenged traditional historical narratives and emphasized the agency of subaltern groups.
- Guha's work has had a lasting impact on the study of colonialism, nationalism, and social movements in South Asia.

Legacy
- Ranajit Guha's scholarship continues to inspire historians and researchers around the world.
- His critical analysis of colonial power structures and emphasis on grassroots perspectives have shaped the way we think about history and society.
In conclusion, Ranajit Guha's legacy as a historian is marked by his groundbreaking contributions to the study of South Asian history, particularly in relation to subaltern perspectives and colonialism.

Answered by Notes Wala · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for Bank Exams exam

Similar Bank Exams Doubts

Direction: Read the passage given below and then answer the question that follow. Some words may be underline for your attention. The influence of the media is ever-present in British politics. With the decline of consensus, and rise in valence politics post-1970’s, the influence of an overtly partisan press has become more marked, as has its both symbiotic and antagonistic relationship with political parties. The effect of the media on voters is typically examined using three key frameworks; reinforcement theory, agenda-setting theory and direct effect theory. In Britain, both voters and politicians are directly and indirectly influenced by the mass media. However, politicians have been the group most affected by the rise in media coverage, to such a great extent that politicians are no longer free to air their honest opinions. This has had a detrimental effect on political discourse in Britain, and thus upon democracy. Furthermore, the British media is largely owned by a select group of individuals-‘media barons’, which, when combined with the media’s tendency to resist regulation, renders it largely unaccountable. Despite both voters and politicians being affected, the change in the behaviour of politicians and their parties, especially in candidate selection is the most notable difference in modern politics post-New Labour.In order to assess media influence upon UK voters, it is necessary to understand the academic analysis behind the evaluation of media influence on voting behaviour. Reinforcement theory suggests that the media has no great effect upon voting preference, and the primary role of the media is to reinforce the pre-existing belief of the reader and is in part derived from the observation of 'Selective perception'-wherein individuals internally filter out messages or information that conflicts with their political alignment. Furthermore, the theory suggests that the media is not responsible for dictating the national agenda, rather it reacts and changes in line with the perceived mood of the nation. Supporters of this theory suggest that in order for a media outlet to be economically viable, it must have a group of readers whose views align with the editorial line, and should this line shift, the core readership would disperse as would the revenue. Therefore, it is unlikely that the political alignment of organisations will shift as it would theoretically damage their revenue and influence.The second theory is the agenda-setting theory which is inclusive of the reinforcement theory, as it 'accepts that the media cannot change the way that people think on particular issues'. However, it suggests that the news media is responsible for dictating the important issues of the day. For example, if the right wing press decided to focus their efforts upon presenting law and order as the prevailing issue of the day, the Conservatives-a party traditionally considered strong in this area would have the electoral advantage. This is a plausible theory as newspapers have discretion over what they publish, and the amount of coverage granted to each issue.The third theory is that of direct effects, which is considered dated by modern academics. It posits that the media can have a direct, visible and calculable influence on voting behaviour. It suggests that many voters can be 'directed towards certain conclusions by means of selected reporting'. Furthermore, it proposes that the press is capable of utilising 'value-laden terminology' to shape the debate, and distort issues to the advantage of their political allies. This assumption of almost total naivete upon the part of the voter is largely held to be untrue, as there is little data to support the view that 'people switched parties as a result of reading a paper with a particular partisan bias'. While this theory has broadly fallen out of fashion, there remains a demonstrable moment in which intensive media coverage of an issue has provoked such a public response that it has prompted government action, most notably the Dangerous dogs act 1991, which was rushed through parliament in response to press coverage of the pre-existing issue. This ill-conceived legislation was hastily enacted in response to public pressure.The influence of the media upon politicians is profound in modern Britain. The main change which the rise in media influence has engendered is the increasing importance of candidates being marketable, rather than having significant political credibility. Politicians increasingly find themselves subject to and evaluated upon opinion polling, which is itself held to be closely associated with media coverage, with positive coverage resulting in an upturn in the opinion polls. The nature of the 24-hour news cycle shapes and dictates the political world, and there is increasing pressure upon politicians to be media savvy and to never say anything which could be misconstrued. This effect has been amplified due to the rise of the internet blog and Twitter-sphere, in which politicians are analysed and judged on a minute by minute, second by second basis. Politicians are no longer given the opportunity to properly articulate their thoughts and opinions, due to time-pressured and confrontational interviews. The primary consequence of this is that politicians increasingly are forced to rely on sound bites in order to feature on the nightly news and to gain publicity. Unfortunately, this has led to a situation in which politicians are averse to giving longer, more honest and articulated answers due to the potential weakness these answers pose to their media coverage and thus, public image.In conclusion, media influence on voter behaviour is highly variable, and all three theories have merits and weaknesses, with Reinforcement theory and the Agenda-setting theory being the most relevant to modern Britain, while empirical data is limited and inconclusive. However, it is certain that the media has a less direct influence upon voters than it does upon politicians. The changing nature of the British media has led to politicians being so constricted in their media appearances that it has negatively affected British politics, and those politicians who dare to express themselves are castigated and marginalised. The prominence of 24hour news, and the rise of TV debates had led to the rise of a new political class primarily comprised of career politicians, or those who have transitioned to politics directly from media-linked jobs, due to their ability to manipulate the media rather than their political beliefs, their character or significant contributions to their party or the nation.Q. What is the tone of the passage?

View answer

Direction: Read the passage given below and then answer the question that follow. Some words may be underline for your attention. The influence of the media is ever-present in British politics. With the decline of consensus, and rise in valence politics post-1970’s, the influence of an overtly partisan press has become more marked, as has its both symbiotic and antagonistic relationship with political parties. The effect of the media on voters is typically examined using three key frameworks; reinforcement theory, agenda-setting theory and direct effect theory. In Britain, both voters and politicians are directly and indirectly influenced by the mass media. However, politicians have been the group most affected by the rise in media coverage, to such a great extent that politicians are no longer free to air their honest opinions. This has had a detrimental effect on political discourse in Britain, and thus upon democracy. Furthermore, the British media is largely owned by a select group of individuals-‘media barons’, which, when combined with the media’s tendency to resist regulation, renders it largely unaccountable. Despite both voters and politicians being affected, the change in the behaviour of politicians and their parties, especially in candidate selection is the most notable difference in modern politics post-New Labour.In order to assess media influence upon UK voters, it is necessary to understand the academic analysis behind the evaluation of media influence on voting behaviour. Reinforcement theory suggests that the media has no great effect upon voting preference, and the primary role of the media is to reinforce the pre-existing belief of the reader and is in part derived from the observation of 'Selective perception'-wherein individuals internally filter out messages or information that conflicts with their political alignment. Furthermore, the theory suggests that the media is not responsible for dictating the national agenda, rather it reacts and changes in line with the perceived mood of the nation. Supporters of this theory suggest that in order for a media outlet to be economically viable, it must have a group of readers whose views align with the editorial line, and should this line shift, the core readership would disperse as would the revenue. Therefore, it is unlikely that the political alignment of organisations will shift as it would theoretically damage their revenue and influence.The second theory is the agenda-setting theory which is inclusive of the reinforcement theory, as it 'accepts that the media cannot change the way that people think on particular issues'. However, it suggests that the news media is responsible for dictating the important issues of the day. For example, if the right wing press decided to focus their efforts upon presenting law and order as the prevailing issue of the day, the Conservatives-a party traditionally considered strong in this area would have the electoral advantage. This is a plausible theory as newspapers have discretion over what they publish, and the amount of coverage granted to each issue.The third theory is that of direct effects, which is considered dated by modern academics. It posits that the media can have a direct, visible and calculable influence on voting behaviour. It suggests that many voters can be 'directed towards certain conclusions by means of selected reporting'. Furthermore, it proposes that the press is capable of utilising 'value-laden terminology' to shape the debate, and distort issues to the advantage of their political allies. This assumption of almost total naivete upon the part of the voter is largely held to be untrue, as there is little data to support the view that 'people switched parties as a result of reading a paper with a particular partisan bias'. While this theory has broadly fallen out of fashion, there remains a demonstrable moment in which intensive media coverage of an issue has provoked such a public response that it has prompted government action, most notably the Dangerous dogs act 1991, which was rushed through parliament in response to press coverage of the pre-existing issue. This ill-conceived legislation was hastily enacted in response to public pressure.The influence of the media upon politicians is profound in modern Britain. The main change which the rise in media influence has engendered is the increasing importance of candidates being marketable, rather than having significant political credibility. Politicians increasingly find themselves subject to and evaluated upon opinion polling, which is itself held to be closely associated with media coverage, with positive coverage resulting in an upturn in the opinion polls. The nature of the 24-hour news cycle shapes and dictates the political world, and there is increasing pressure upon politicians to be media savvy and to never say anything which could be misconstrued. This effect has been amplified due to the rise of the internet blog and Twitter-sphere, in which politicians are analysed and judged on a minute by minute, second by second basis. Politicians are no longer given the opportunity to properly articulate their thoughts and opinions, due to time-pressured and confrontational interviews. The primary consequence of this is that politicians increasingly are forced to rely on sound bites in order to feature on the nightly news and to gain publicity. Unfortunately, this has led to a situation in which politicians are averse to giving longer, more honest and articulated answers due to the potential weakness these answers pose to their media coverage and thus, public image.In conclusion, media influence on voter behaviour is highly variable, and all three theories have merits and weaknesses, with Reinforcement theory and the Agenda-setting theory being the most relevant to modern Britain, while empirical data is limited and inconclusive. However, it is certain that the media has a less direct influence upon voters than it does upon politicians. The changing nature of the British media has led to politicians being so constricted in their media appearances that it has negatively affected British politics, and those politicians who dare to express themselves are castigated and marginalised. The prominence of 24hour news, and the rise of TV debates had led to the rise of a new political class primarily comprised of career politicians, or those who have transitioned to politics directly from media-linked jobs, due to their ability to manipulate the media rather than their political beliefs, their character or significant contributions to their party or the nation.Q. Which of the statements is true according to the passage?

View answer

Directions : Study the following information carefully and answer the given questions.A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H are sitting around a circular table, facing the centre. Each of them has a different profession, viz doctor, engineer, architect, pilot, banker, teacher, businessman and politician.The politician sits third to the right of G. C is an immediate neighbour of G. The architect sits second to the right of C. B sits third to the right of H. H is neither a politician nor an architect. Only one person sits between C and the teacher. A and F are immediate neighbours of each other. Neither A nor F is a politician. The doctor sits second to the right of A. Two people sit between D and the engineer. D is not a politician. The pilot is not an immediate neighbour of the politician. The banker sits second to the left of A.Q. What is the profession of G?

View answer

Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow."Exhausted." "Lost." "Anxious." "Everythings a struggle." These are just some of the ways that 54 recent college grads we recently interviewed described their experience transitioning from college to the professional world. Despite being advised to hit the ground running, many young people we spoke with felt disoriented, confused, dissatisfied, and in many cases overwhelmed with the "real world." In addition to impacting the young people themselves and their wellbeing, this intense and challenging experience affects companies, which spend time and money recruiting and training young people to join their ranks and immediately contribute to the organization. Some have attributed these struggles to millennials - that young people of this generation are particularly prone to struggle because of how self-absorbed and entitled they are. However our sense, from interviewing recent graduates and working closely with them as they transition from college to the professional world, is that there is something else at play. In our view, the main reason young people struggle isnt generational - its cultural. In particular: the very significant, but typicallyunderemphasized,cultural transition between college to the professional world. We find in our research that this culture shift plays out along at least three key dimensions: feedback, relationships, and accountability.In college, feedback is clear and consistent. You have a syllabus, which details the requirements for the semester and the standards upon which youll be graded. And then, for each assignment you submit, you receive feedback from your professor. You dont need to ask for the feedback - its provided to you directly, and typically without much personal explanation. As you might imagine, the feedback paradigm shifts entirely once a student enters the professional world. For starters, the feedback you receive at work is often less consistent and less easily decipherable than in college. Depending on your manager and your organization, you might receive very clear, detailed and consistent feedback on assignments; or you might receive feedback in an intermittent and difficult-to-decipher manner. As a result of these cultural differences, young professionals can experience a feedback vacuum in the professional world - wondering how to improve, if they need to improve, and how they can develop the skills necessary to improve at their firm and in their career.Relationships in the professional world are also very different from in college. In college, you build relationships with people you want to - and for the most part with people around your same age. Relationships evolve naturally through interactions in class, from extracurricular activities on campus, through friends of friends. And theres typically very little pressure to keep up relationships you dont enjoy. However, once students enter the professional world, they find themselves enmeshed in a very different experience of relationship building. Its no longer only solely about creating a group of fun, nice people to ________ with; its now more strategic. Relationship building in a professional environment is about developing friendships, sure, but its also about building a robust network of colleagues who can help you succeed at your job and advance in your career.Q. What is the reason given by some people for the struggle of young college grads in the professional world?

View answer

Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow."Exhausted." "Lost." "Anxious." "Everythings a struggle." These are just some of the ways that 54 recent college grads we recently interviewed described their experience transitioning from college to the professional world. Despite being advised to hit the ground running, many young people we spoke with felt disoriented, confused, dissatisfied, and in many cases overwhelmed with the "real world." In addition to impacting the young people themselves and their wellbeing, this intense and challenging experience affects companies, which spend time and money recruiting and training young people to join their ranks and immediately contribute to the organization. Some have attributed these struggles to millennials - that young people of this generation are particularly prone to struggle because of how self-absorbed and entitled they are. However our sense, from interviewing recent graduates and working closely with them as they transition from college to the professional world, is that there is something else at play. In our view, the main reason young people struggle isnt generational - its cultural. In particular: the very significant, but typicallyunderemphasized, cultural transition between college to the professional world. We find in our research that this culture shift plays out along at least three key dimensions: feedback, relationships, and accountability.In college, feedback is clear and consistent. You have a syllabus, which details the requirements for the semester and the standards upon which youll be graded. And then, for each assignment you submit, you receive feedback from your professor. You dont need to ask for the feedback - its provided to you directly, and typically without much personal explanation. As you might imagine, the feedback paradigm shifts entirely once a student enters the professional world. For starters, the feedback you receive at work is often less consistent and less easily decipherable than in college. Depending on your manager and your organization, you might receive very clear, detailed and consistent feedback on assignments; or you might receive feedback in an intermittent and difficult-to-decipher manner. As a result of these cultural differences, young professionals can experience a feedback vacuum in the professional world - wondering how to improve, if they need to improve, and how they can develop the skills necessary to improve at their firm and in their career.Relationships in the professional world are also very different from in college. In college, you build relationships with people you want to - and for the most part with people around your same age. Relationships evolve naturally through interactions in class, from extracurricular activities on campus, through friends of friends. And theres typically very little pressure to keep up relationships you dont enjoy. However, once students enter the professional world, they find themselves enmeshed in a very different experience of relationship building. Its no longer only solely about creating a group of fun, nice people to ________ with; its now more strategic. Relationship building in a professional environment is about developing friendships, sure, but its also about building a robust network of colleagues who can help you succeed at your job and advance in your career.Q. How is relationship building in professional world different from that in college?

View answer

Top Courses for Bank ExamsView all

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

General Awareness & Knowledge

Tips & Tricks for Government Exams

Improve Your Calculations: Vedic Maths (English)