All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  In spite of discovering new sources of oil ex... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian oil sands and along the Norwegian coast, OPEC estimates oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have been in the past
  • a)
    oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have been
  • b)
    oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to set exploration targets more conservatively than they were
  • c)
    oil companies to conserve margins and to set exploration targets more conservatively than they have
  • d)
    that oil companies conserve margins, set exploration targets more conservatively than they have been
  • e)
    that oil companies, so that they conserve margins, will be more conservative than they have been in setting of exploration targets
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Verified Answer
In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian...
Meaning Analysis
  • In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian oil sands and along the Norwegian coast,
  • OPEC estimates oil companies,
    • in order to conserve margins,
  • to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than
  • they have been in the past.
The sentence presents a contrast. It states that even though new sources of oil have been discovered, OPEC estimates oil companies to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have been in the past.
Error Analysis
SV – The subject verb pairs have been indicated below:
  1. OPEC - estimates
  2. Oil companies - to be more conservative
  3. They - have been
All the SV pairs agree in number.
Verbs – The verb tenses have been used correctly to communicate the intended meaning.
Pronouns – The pronoun “they” unambiguously refers to “oil companies”.  Note that the meaning of the sentence is very clear.  The author compares two things:
  1. In the future – oil companies will be more conservative
  2. In the past – oil companies have not been this conservative
Note that it does not make logical sense for “they” to refer to targets.  Here is the sentence with “they” referring to “targets”.
  • OPEC estimates oil companies to be more conservative in setting targets than targets have been in the past.
    • In this version of the sentence, the comparison is no longer clear. 
      • The author intended to compare the oil companies action in the past and the estimated action in the future. 
      • This comparison structure instead compares action of oil companies in the future with the level of targets in the past.
  • Thus, logically, “they” cannot refer to “targets”.
Parallelism – The construction in this sentence is absolutely parallel.
  1. OPEC estimates
    1. oil companies to be more conservative in doing something
    2. than the oil companies have been in the past.
So essentially the state of oil companies has been compared.  What its state will be in the future with what its state was in the past.  Logically this comparison is absolutely parallel.  Note that different verb tenses have been used but that is acceptable to communicate the intended meaning since the comparison has two elements – one in the future and the other in the past. 
Idioms – This sentence uses a construction with the word “estimates”.  This word can be used in the following ways:
  1. A estimates B to do C
  2. A estimates that B does C
Note that this choice uses the first construction.
This choice is correct as is. 
Answer Choices
A
oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have been
Correct
B
oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to set exploration targets more conservatively than they were
The simplified version of this choice is as follows: (only including the comparison aspect)
OPEC estimates oil companies to set targets more conservatively than they were in the past.
Notice the comparison here.
  1. Oil companies to set targets
    1. more conservatively than
  2. They were in the past.
This choice has two errors:
  1. Verb Tense:
    1. Notice per the intended meaning, the state in the past time frame was expressed as “have been”, indicating a progressive action.
    2. Now notice in this choice, the action/state in the past time frame has been expressed using “were”, indicating a point in time action. 
      1. Thus, the verb tense does not communicate the intended meaning.
  2. Meaning - This choice communicates ambiguous meaning as explained below.
The construction of this choice is such that the pronoun “they” may refer to either of the two nouns, leading in both cases concrete errors.
“they” refers to “targets”:
  • Oil companies to set
    • Targets
      • More conservatively than
    • The targets were set in the past.
In this case, notice that the word “set” has been repeated. Now this reference while leads to logical meaning, changes the intended meaning.  Per the original choice, it was clear that it is the oil companies that set the targets in the past as well.  But per this choice, since the construction “the targets were set” has been used, we longer know who is the one who set these targets.  Thus, this reference of “they” leads to change in meaning of the intended sentence and hence is not correct.
“they” refers to “oil companies”:
  • Oil companies to set Targets
    • More conservatively than
  • The oil companies were set in the past.
In this case, notice that the word “set” has been repeated.  In fact, the only form of word “set” that can be repeated here is “set”.  We cannot repeat the word “setting” since this form does not appear anywhere in the sentence. 
And hence you can see that this sentence is grammatically as well as logically incorrect.  Per this choice “companies were set in the past”.  This is non-sensical.
Thus, choice B is incorrect. 
C
oil companies to conserve margins and to set exploration targets more conservatively than they have
  • In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian oil sands and along the Norwegian coast,
  • OPEC estimates oil companies
    • to conserve margins and
    • to set exploration targets
      • more conservatively than they have in the past.
 
This choice changes the intended meaning of the sentence by creating a list that is different from that in the original choice. Notice how the two elements in list per this choice are "to conserve margins", "to set exploration targets". This is not the intended meaning because per the original sentence, the exploration targets are to be set in order to conserve margins. This purpose is not expressed appropriately in this answer choice.
D
that oil companies conserve margins, set exploration targets more conservatively than they have been
 This choice has similar error as discussed in choice C.
E
that oil companies, so that they conserve margins, will be more conservative than they have been in setting of exploration targets
  • In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian oil sands and along the Norwegian coast,
  • OPEC estimates that oil companies,
    • so that they conserve margins,
  • will be more conservative
  • than they have been in setting of exploration targets in the past.
This choice has two errors.
  • Comparison Error:
Notice that the sentence seems to convey that the setting of exploration targets happened only in the past. This is not the case. Here are some possible ways to present the intended comparison:
  • By moving “in setting of exploration targets”
    • Oil companies will be more conservative in setting of exploration targets than they have been in the past.
      • In this case, the comparison became clear and unambiguous with the correct placement of "in setting of exploration targets”. 
  • By removing “in the past”
    • Oil companies will be more conservative than they have been in setting of exploration targets.
      • Notice that “have been” provides the needed context that this is the event that happened in the past.
      • “in setting of exploration” now unambiguously applies to both the items of comparison and is not restricted to just “in the past”.
 
  • Idiom Error
The usage "so that they conserve.." is awkward here. "so that..." is typically used to provide purpose of an action.  In this case, no such action has been stated.  Consider the following sentence which illustrates the usage of "so that".
Michael gave money to the hospital so that the hospital management could buy the equipment needed for lab tests.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian...
Meaning Analysis
  • In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian oil sands and along the Norwegian coast,
  • OPEC estimates oil companies,
    • in order to conserve margins,
  • to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than
  • they have been in the past.
The sentence presents a contrast. It states that even though new sources of oil have been discovered, OPEC estimates oil companies to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have been in the past.
Error Analysis
SV – The subject verb pairs have been indicated below:
  1. OPEC - estimates
  2. Oil companies - to be more conservative
  3. They - have been
All the SV pairs agree in number.
Verbs – The verb tenses have been used correctly to communicate the intended meaning.
Pronouns – The pronoun “they” unambiguously refers to “oil companies”.  Note that the meaning of the sentence is very clear.  The author compares two things:
  1. In the future – oil companies will be more conservative
  2. In the past – oil companies have not been this conservative
Note that it does not make logical sense for “they” to refer to targets.  Here is the sentence with “they” referring to “targets”.
  • OPEC estimates oil companies to be more conservative in setting targets than targets have been in the past.
    • In this version of the sentence, the comparison is no longer clear. 
      • The author intended to compare the oil companies action in the past and the estimated action in the future. 
      • This comparison structure instead compares action of oil companies in the future with the level of targets in the past.
  • Thus, logically, “they” cannot refer to “targets”.
Parallelism – The construction in this sentence is absolutely parallel.
  1. OPEC estimates
    1. oil companies to be more conservative in doing something
    2. than the oil companies have been in the past.
So essentially the state of oil companies has been compared.  What its state will be in the future with what its state was in the past.  Logically this comparison is absolutely parallel.  Note that different verb tenses have been used but that is acceptable to communicate the intended meaning since the comparison has two elements – one in the future and the other in the past. 
Idioms – This sentence uses a construction with the word “estimates”.  This word can be used in the following ways:
  1. A estimates B to do C
  2. A estimates that B does C
Note that this choice uses the first construction.
This choice is correct as is. 
Answer Choices
A
oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have been
Correct
B
oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to set exploration targets more conservatively than they were
The simplified version of this choice is as follows: (only including the comparison aspect)
OPEC estimates oil companies to set targets more conservatively than they were in the past.
Notice the comparison here.
  1. Oil companies to set targets
    1. more conservatively than
  2. They were in the past.
This choice has two errors:
  1. Verb Tense:
    1. Notice per the intended meaning, the state in the past time frame was expressed as “have been”, indicating a progressive action.
    2. Now notice in this choice, the action/state in the past time frame has been expressed using “were”, indicating a point in time action. 
      1. Thus, the verb tense does not communicate the intended meaning.
  2. Meaning - This choice communicates ambiguous meaning as explained below.
The construction of this choice is such that the pronoun “they” may refer to either of the two nouns, leading in both cases concrete errors.
“they” refers to “targets”:
  • Oil companies to set
    • Targets
      • More conservatively than
    • The targets were set in the past.
In this case, notice that the word “set” has been repeated. Now this reference while leads to logical meaning, changes the intended meaning.  Per the original choice, it was clear that it is the oil companies that set the targets in the past as well.  But per this choice, since the construction “the targets were set” has been used, we longer know who is the one who set these targets.  Thus, this reference of “they” leads to change in meaning of the intended sentence and hence is not correct.
“they” refers to “oil companies”:
  • Oil companies to set Targets
    • More conservatively than
  • The oil companies were set in the past.
In this case, notice that the word “set” has been repeated.  In fact, the only form of word “set” that can be repeated here is “set”.  We cannot repeat the word “setting” since this form does not appear anywhere in the sentence. 
And hence you can see that this sentence is grammatically as well as logically incorrect.  Per this choice “companies were set in the past”.  This is non-sensical.
Thus, choice B is incorrect. 
C
oil companies to conserve margins and to set exploration targets more conservatively than they have
  • In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian oil sands and along the Norwegian coast,
  • OPEC estimates oil companies
    • to conserve margins and
    • to set exploration targets
      • more conservatively than they have in the past.
 
This choice changes the intended meaning of the sentence by creating a list that is different from that in the original choice. Notice how the two elements in list per this choice are "to conserve margins", "to set exploration targets". This is not the intended meaning because per the original sentence, the exploration targets are to be set in order to conserve margins. This purpose is not expressed appropriately in this answer choice.
D
that oil companies conserve margins, set exploration targets more conservatively than they have been
 This choice has similar error as discussed in choice C.
E
that oil companies, so that they conserve margins, will be more conservative than they have been in setting of exploration targets
  • In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian oil sands and along the Norwegian coast,
  • OPEC estimates that oil companies,
    • so that they conserve margins,
  • will be more conservative
  • than they have been in setting of exploration targets in the past.
This choice has two errors.
  • Comparison Error:
Notice that the sentence seems to convey that the setting of exploration targets happened only in the past. This is not the case. Here are some possible ways to present the intended comparison:
  • By moving “in setting of exploration targets”
    • Oil companies will be more conservative in setting of exploration targets than they have been in the past.
      • In this case, the comparison became clear and unambiguous with the correct placement of "in setting of exploration targets”. 
  • By removing “in the past”
    • Oil companies will be more conservative than they have been in setting of exploration targets.
      • Notice that “have been” provides the needed context that this is the event that happened in the past.
      • “in setting of exploration” now unambiguously applies to both the items of comparison and is not restricted to just “in the past”.
 
  • Idiom Error
The usage "so that they conserve.." is awkward here. "so that..." is typically used to provide purpose of an action.  In this case, no such action has been stated.  Consider the following sentence which illustrates the usage of "so that".
Michael gave money to the hospital so that the hospital management could buy the equipment needed for lab tests.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian...
Meaning Analysis
  • In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian oil sands and along the Norwegian coast,
  • OPEC estimates oil companies,
    • in order to conserve margins,
  • to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than
  • they have been in the past.
The sentence presents a contrast. It states that even though new sources of oil have been discovered, OPEC estimates oil companies to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have been in the past.
Error Analysis
SV – The subject verb pairs have been indicated below:
  1. OPEC - estimates
  2. Oil companies - to be more conservative
  3. They - have been
All the SV pairs agree in number.
Verbs – The verb tenses have been used correctly to communicate the intended meaning.
Pronouns – The pronoun “they” unambiguously refers to “oil companies”.  Note that the meaning of the sentence is very clear.  The author compares two things:
  1. In the future – oil companies will be more conservative
  2. In the past – oil companies have not been this conservative
Note that it does not make logical sense for “they” to refer to targets.  Here is the sentence with “they” referring to “targets”.
  • OPEC estimates oil companies to be more conservative in setting targets than targets have been in the past.
    • In this version of the sentence, the comparison is no longer clear. 
      • The author intended to compare the oil companies action in the past and the estimated action in the future. 
      • This comparison structure instead compares action of oil companies in the future with the level of targets in the past.
  • Thus, logically, “they” cannot refer to “targets”.
Parallelism – The construction in this sentence is absolutely parallel.
  1. OPEC estimates
    1. oil companies to be more conservative in doing something
    2. than the oil companies have been in the past.
So essentially the state of oil companies has been compared.  What its state will be in the future with what its state was in the past.  Logically this comparison is absolutely parallel.  Note that different verb tenses have been used but that is acceptable to communicate the intended meaning since the comparison has two elements – one in the future and the other in the past. 
Idioms – This sentence uses a construction with the word “estimates”.  This word can be used in the following ways:
  1. A estimates B to do C
  2. A estimates that B does C
Note that this choice uses the first construction.
This choice is correct as is. 
Answer Choices
A
oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have been
Correct
B
oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to set exploration targets more conservatively than they were
The simplified version of this choice is as follows: (only including the comparison aspect)
OPEC estimates oil companies to set targets more conservatively than they were in the past.
Notice the comparison here.
  1. Oil companies to set targets
    1. more conservatively than
  2. They were in the past.
This choice has two errors:
  1. Verb Tense:
    1. Notice per the intended meaning, the state in the past time frame was expressed as “have been”, indicating a progressive action.
    2. Now notice in this choice, the action/state in the past time frame has been expressed using “were”, indicating a point in time action. 
      1. Thus, the verb tense does not communicate the intended meaning.
  2. Meaning - This choice communicates ambiguous meaning as explained below.
The construction of this choice is such that the pronoun “they” may refer to either of the two nouns, leading in both cases concrete errors.
“they” refers to “targets”:
  • Oil companies to set
    • Targets
      • More conservatively than
    • The targets were set in the past.
In this case, notice that the word “set” has been repeated. Now this reference while leads to logical meaning, changes the intended meaning.  Per the original choice, it was clear that it is the oil companies that set the targets in the past as well.  But per this choice, since the construction “the targets were set” has been used, we longer know who is the one who set these targets.  Thus, this reference of “they” leads to change in meaning of the intended sentence and hence is not correct.
“they” refers to “oil companies”:
  • Oil companies to set Targets
    • More conservatively than
  • The oil companies were set in the past.
In this case, notice that the word “set” has been repeated.  In fact, the only form of word “set” that can be repeated here is “set”.  We cannot repeat the word “setting” since this form does not appear anywhere in the sentence. 
And hence you can see that this sentence is grammatically as well as logically incorrect.  Per this choice “companies were set in the past”.  This is non-sensical.
Thus, choice B is incorrect. 
C
oil companies to conserve margins and to set exploration targets more conservatively than they have
  • In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian oil sands and along the Norwegian coast,
  • OPEC estimates oil companies
    • to conserve margins and
    • to set exploration targets
      • more conservatively than they have in the past.
 
This choice changes the intended meaning of the sentence by creating a list that is different from that in the original choice. Notice how the two elements in list per this choice are "to conserve margins", "to set exploration targets". This is not the intended meaning because per the original sentence, the exploration targets are to be set in order to conserve margins. This purpose is not expressed appropriately in this answer choice.
D
that oil companies conserve margins, set exploration targets more conservatively than they have been
 This choice has similar error as discussed in choice C.
E
that oil companies, so that they conserve margins, will be more conservative than they have been in setting of exploration targets
  • In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian oil sands and along the Norwegian coast,
  • OPEC estimates that oil companies,
    • so that they conserve margins,
  • will be more conservative
  • than they have been in setting of exploration targets in the past.
This choice has two errors.
  • Comparison Error:
Notice that the sentence seems to convey that the setting of exploration targets happened only in the past. This is not the case. Here are some possible ways to present the intended comparison:
  • By moving “in setting of exploration targets”
    • Oil companies will be more conservative in setting of exploration targets than they have been in the past.
      • In this case, the comparison became clear and unambiguous with the correct placement of "in setting of exploration targets”. 
  • By removing “in the past”
    • Oil companies will be more conservative than they have been in setting of exploration targets.
      • Notice that “have been” provides the needed context that this is the event that happened in the past.
      • “in setting of exploration” now unambiguously applies to both the items of comparison and is not restricted to just “in the past”.
 
  • Idiom Error
The usage "so that they conserve.." is awkward here. "so that..." is typically used to provide purpose of an action.  In this case, no such action has been stated.  Consider the following sentence which illustrates the usage of "so that".
Michael gave money to the hospital so that the hospital management could buy the equipment needed for lab tests.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question as follow:Nine days of state mourning at the passing away of Britain’s queen mother will mark a unique era because the racehorse loving, gin and tonic drinking ‘grand old mum’, as the Brits called her, literally lived through the entire 20th century. While TV channels put out some black and white archival footage from another age, the formerly reverential BBC attracted criticism from the people because its newscasters did not wear black ties and they discussed the event with a frankness that would have been unthinkable a few years ago.She was widowed 50 years ago. A relic I still have in my possession amongst my naval memorabilia is a black, mourning armband issued to us when King George VI died on February 6, 1952. It was dispatched by Messrs Gieves of Old Bond Street in London, the naval tailors ‘By appointment to the King’. I recall listening to the last Christmas day broadcast of King George VI, with his consort by his side, while having dinner with a friend in Surrey. Then, a few weeks later, we were to receive news of his death while we were at sea on board our training cruiser, HMS Devonshire, headed for the Caribbean. As we proceeded to drop anchor in Barbados harbour, we were struck first, by the magnificent sight of flying fish which kept darting across the placid blue waters, and then, by the great alacrity with which mourning bands were delivered to us for the funeral ceremonies. Inevitably, we were billed by ‘Messrs Thieves’ for five shillings, a princely sum then, because our pay was four shillings a day.Brought up, as I was, in a family known for thrift, I had put that piece of uniform safely away and which, as it happened, came in handy a year later following the death of the then queen mother, Mary. Our pay had doubled to eight shillings by then, we having been promoted as midshipmen, and the commander-in-chief in Malta was Louis Mountbatten. He was a close member of the royal family, a cousin of George VI and, of course, he and his wife Edwina flew to London for the funeral service in Westminster Abbey. But the formalities connected with a royal funeral were meticulously observed by all ships of the Mediterranean fleet and thus that black armband became an absolute necessity.Q.According to the information in the passage, the life style of the British ‘Grand mum’ can best be described as

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian oil sands and along the Norwegian coast, OPEC estimatesoil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have beenin the pasta)oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have beenb)oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to set exploration targets more conservatively than they werec)oil companies to conserve margins and to set exploration targets more conservatively than they haved)that oil companies conserve margins, set exploration targets more conservatively than they have beene)that oil companies, so that they conserve margins, will be more conservative than they have been in setting of exploration targetsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian oil sands and along the Norwegian coast, OPEC estimatesoil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have beenin the pasta)oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have beenb)oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to set exploration targets more conservatively than they werec)oil companies to conserve margins and to set exploration targets more conservatively than they haved)that oil companies conserve margins, set exploration targets more conservatively than they have beene)that oil companies, so that they conserve margins, will be more conservative than they have been in setting of exploration targetsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian oil sands and along the Norwegian coast, OPEC estimatesoil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have beenin the pasta)oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have beenb)oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to set exploration targets more conservatively than they werec)oil companies to conserve margins and to set exploration targets more conservatively than they haved)that oil companies conserve margins, set exploration targets more conservatively than they have beene)that oil companies, so that they conserve margins, will be more conservative than they have been in setting of exploration targetsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian oil sands and along the Norwegian coast, OPEC estimatesoil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have beenin the pasta)oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have beenb)oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to set exploration targets more conservatively than they werec)oil companies to conserve margins and to set exploration targets more conservatively than they haved)that oil companies conserve margins, set exploration targets more conservatively than they have beene)that oil companies, so that they conserve margins, will be more conservative than they have been in setting of exploration targetsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian oil sands and along the Norwegian coast, OPEC estimatesoil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have beenin the pasta)oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have beenb)oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to set exploration targets more conservatively than they werec)oil companies to conserve margins and to set exploration targets more conservatively than they haved)that oil companies conserve margins, set exploration targets more conservatively than they have beene)that oil companies, so that they conserve margins, will be more conservative than they have been in setting of exploration targetsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian oil sands and along the Norwegian coast, OPEC estimatesoil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have beenin the pasta)oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have beenb)oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to set exploration targets more conservatively than they werec)oil companies to conserve margins and to set exploration targets more conservatively than they haved)that oil companies conserve margins, set exploration targets more conservatively than they have beene)that oil companies, so that they conserve margins, will be more conservative than they have been in setting of exploration targetsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian oil sands and along the Norwegian coast, OPEC estimatesoil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have beenin the pasta)oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have beenb)oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to set exploration targets more conservatively than they werec)oil companies to conserve margins and to set exploration targets more conservatively than they haved)that oil companies conserve margins, set exploration targets more conservatively than they have beene)that oil companies, so that they conserve margins, will be more conservative than they have been in setting of exploration targetsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian oil sands and along the Norwegian coast, OPEC estimatesoil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have beenin the pasta)oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have beenb)oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to set exploration targets more conservatively than they werec)oil companies to conserve margins and to set exploration targets more conservatively than they haved)that oil companies conserve margins, set exploration targets more conservatively than they have beene)that oil companies, so that they conserve margins, will be more conservative than they have been in setting of exploration targetsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian oil sands and along the Norwegian coast, OPEC estimatesoil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have beenin the pasta)oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have beenb)oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to set exploration targets more conservatively than they werec)oil companies to conserve margins and to set exploration targets more conservatively than they haved)that oil companies conserve margins, set exploration targets more conservatively than they have beene)that oil companies, so that they conserve margins, will be more conservative than they have been in setting of exploration targetsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice In spite of discovering new sources of oil exploration in the Canadian oil sands and along the Norwegian coast, OPEC estimatesoil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have beenin the pasta)oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to be more conservative in setting exploration targets than they have beenb)oil companies, in order to conserve margins, to set exploration targets more conservatively than they werec)oil companies to conserve margins and to set exploration targets more conservatively than they haved)that oil companies conserve margins, set exploration targets more conservatively than they have beene)that oil companies, so that they conserve margins, will be more conservative than they have been in setting of exploration targetsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup