Question Description
Consider the following statements:Statement-I:In 1950, the Supreme Court opined in the Gopalan vs. State of Madras Case that the Preamble is not enforceable in a court of law.Statement-II:In the 1994 S.R Bommai Case, the Supreme Court laid down new applications of the Preamble.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for DSSSB TGT/PGT/PRT 2025 is part of DSSSB TGT/PGT/PRT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the DSSSB TGT/PGT/PRT exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following statements:Statement-I:In 1950, the Supreme Court opined in the Gopalan vs. State of Madras Case that the Preamble is not enforceable in a court of law.Statement-II:In the 1994 S.R Bommai Case, the Supreme Court laid down new applications of the Preamble.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for DSSSB TGT/PGT/PRT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following statements:Statement-I:In 1950, the Supreme Court opined in the Gopalan vs. State of Madras Case that the Preamble is not enforceable in a court of law.Statement-II:In the 1994 S.R Bommai Case, the Supreme Court laid down new applications of the Preamble.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Consider the following statements:Statement-I:In 1950, the Supreme Court opined in the Gopalan vs. State of Madras Case that the Preamble is not enforceable in a court of law.Statement-II:In the 1994 S.R Bommai Case, the Supreme Court laid down new applications of the Preamble.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for DSSSB TGT/PGT/PRT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for DSSSB TGT/PGT/PRT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Consider the following statements:Statement-I:In 1950, the Supreme Court opined in the Gopalan vs. State of Madras Case that the Preamble is not enforceable in a court of law.Statement-II:In the 1994 S.R Bommai Case, the Supreme Court laid down new applications of the Preamble.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Consider the following statements:Statement-I:In 1950, the Supreme Court opined in the Gopalan vs. State of Madras Case that the Preamble is not enforceable in a court of law.Statement-II:In the 1994 S.R Bommai Case, the Supreme Court laid down new applications of the Preamble.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Consider the following statements:Statement-I:In 1950, the Supreme Court opined in the Gopalan vs. State of Madras Case that the Preamble is not enforceable in a court of law.Statement-II:In the 1994 S.R Bommai Case, the Supreme Court laid down new applications of the Preamble.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Consider the following statements:Statement-I:In 1950, the Supreme Court opined in the Gopalan vs. State of Madras Case that the Preamble is not enforceable in a court of law.Statement-II:In the 1994 S.R Bommai Case, the Supreme Court laid down new applications of the Preamble.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Consider the following statements:Statement-I:In 1950, the Supreme Court opined in the Gopalan vs. State of Madras Case that the Preamble is not enforceable in a court of law.Statement-II:In the 1994 S.R Bommai Case, the Supreme Court laid down new applications of the Preamble.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice DSSSB TGT/PGT/PRT tests.