Question Description
M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CA Foundation 2025 is part of CA Foundation preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CA Foundation exam syllabus. Information about M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CA Foundation 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CA Foundation. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CA Foundation Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice M purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. The bottle burst and injured his wife. The chemist is liable on account of:a)Breach of express condition as to qualityb)Breach of implied condition as to qualityc)Personal injury caused to the Buyer’s wifed)Hot water bottle sales are illegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CA Foundation tests.