What is a major reason for the repeal of the Assam Muslim Marriage and...
The Assam Muslim Marriage and Divorce Registration Act of 1935 was repealed primarily because it supported outdated practices, such as allowing child marriages and not requiring mutual consent for marriages. The new bill aims to address these issues by introducing stricter regulations that protect individuals, particularly women and children, from harmful practices and ensure that marriages are consensual and legally sound.
View all questions of this test
What is a major reason for the repeal of the Assam Muslim Marriage and...
Major Reason for Repeal of the Assam Muslim Marriage and Divorce Registration Act of 1935
The repeal of the Assam Muslim Marriage and Divorce Registration Act of 1935 primarily stemmed from its support of outdated practices.
Outdated Practices
- The Act was criticized for endorsing practices that were no longer acceptable in contemporary society.
- One significant issue was its tacit allowance of child marriage, which contradicted modern legal standards and societal norms.
Lack of Mutual Consent
- The Act did not sufficiently emphasize the necessity of mutual consent in marriage and divorce.
- This omission led to situations where individuals, particularly women, might be coerced into marriage or divorce without their genuine agreement.
Impact on Women
- The lack of mutual consent provisions disproportionately affected women, leaving them vulnerable to exploitation and oppression.
- Modern legal frameworks prioritize equality and consent, which were not adequately addressed in the 1935 Act.
Legal Reforms
- The repeal reflects a broader movement towards legal reforms that uphold human rights and gender equality.
- By abolishing outdated laws, the government aims to foster a legal environment that protects the rights of all individuals, regardless of gender.
In summary, the Assam Muslim Marriage and Divorce Registration Act of 1935 was repealed largely because it supported outdated practices such as child marriage and lacked essential provisions for mutual consent, which are crucial in contemporary legal and social contexts.