What is a key concern raised by the Government regarding the introduction of Zero Hour in the Himachal Assembly?a) It will reduce the number of assembly sessionsb) It was implemented without consulting the governmentc) It will lead to longer discussions on non-urgent mattersd) It will be a waste of legislative timeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses CLAT Exam CLAT Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > What is a key concern raised by the Governmen...

What is a key concern raised by the Government regarding the introduction of Zero Hour in the Himachal Assembly?

a)
It will reduce the number of assembly sessions
b)
It was implemented without consulting the government
c)
It will lead to longer discussions on non-urgent matters
d)
It will be a waste of legislative time

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

What is a key concern raised by the Government regarding the introduct...

The government's primary concern about the introduction of Zero Hour is that it was established without prior consultation with them. This lack of consultation could lead to issues regarding the management and effectiveness of the discussions, emphasizing the need for clear procedures to ensure that all members can participate fairly.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

What is a key concern raised by the Government regarding the introduct...

Key Concern Regarding Zero Hour in Himachal Assembly
The introduction of Zero Hour in the Himachal Assembly has sparked significant debate, particularly concerning the government's stance on its implementation.
Implementation Without Consultation
One of the primary concerns raised by the Government is that Zero Hour was implemented without adequate consultation with them. This lack of dialogue can lead to several issues:

Disruption of Legislative Processes: The government believes that introducing such measures without their input may disrupt the established legislative processes and protocols.
Potential Overreach: The government fears that Zero Hour could lead to an overreach of powers by the opposition, allowing them to raise issues that may not align with the government's agenda.
Impact on Governance: Implementing Zero Hour without consultation may hinder effective governance, as it may divert attention from critical matters that require legislative focus.

Importance of Collaboration
The government emphasizes the need for collaboration between different parties in the assembly:

Constructive Dialogue: Ensuring that all parties discuss and agree on procedural matters can lead to a more effective legislative environment.
Balanced Decision-Making: By consulting with all stakeholders, the assembly can make balanced decisions that consider the interests of various groups.

In summary, the government's key concern regarding Zero Hour in the Himachal Assembly revolves around its introduction without prior consultation, which they believe could lead to disruptions and inefficiencies in legislative governance.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Answer this doubt

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.Part IV of the Constitution contains Directive Principles of State Policy which provide guidelines for the government to govern the country. These Directives are different from the Fundamental Rights contained in Part III of the Constitution and the ordinary laws of the land in several respects. They are not enforceable in courts and do not create any justiciable rights in favor of individuals. They require implementation by legislation and do not confer or take away any legislative power from the appropriate legislature. The courts cannot declare any law as void on the ground that it contravenes any of the Directive Principles, nor can they compel the government to carry out any Directives or to make any law for that purpose. However, it is the duty of the state to implement the Directives subject to the limitations imposed by different provisions of the Constitution upon the exercise of legislative and executive power by the state The Sub-committee on Fundamental Rights constituted by the Constituent Assembly suggested two types of Fundamental Rights — one which can be enforced in the Courts of law and the other which because of their different nature cannot be enforced in the law Courts. Later on however, the former were put under the head ‘Fundamental Rights’ as Part III which we have already discussed and the latter were put separately in Part IV of the Constitution under the heading ‘Directive Principles of State Policy’ which are discussed in the following pages. The Articles included in Part IV of the Constitution (Articles 36 to 51) contain certain Directives which are the guidelines for the Government to lead the country. Article 37 provides that the ‘provisions contained in this part (i) shall not be enforceable by any Court, but the principles therein laid down are neverthless (ii) fundamental in the governance of the country and it shall be the duty of the state to apply these principles in making laws. The Directives, however, differ from the fundamental rights contained in PartIII of the Constitution or the ordinary laws of the land in the following respects: (i) The Directives are not enforceable in the courts and do not create any justiciable rights in favour of individuals. (ii) The Directives require to be implemented by legislation and so long as there is no law carrying out the policy laid down in a Directive, neither the state nor an individual can violate any existing law. (iii) The Directives per-se do not confer upon or take away any legislative power from the appropriate legislature. (iv) The courts cannot declare any law as void on the ground that it contravenes any of the Directive Principles. (v) The courts are not competent to compel the Government to carry out any Directives or to make any law for that purpose. (vi) Though it is the duty of the state to implement the Directives, it can do so only subject to the limitations imposed by the different provisions of the Constitution upon the exercise of the legislative and executive power by the state.Q. Sahil, an Indian citizen, submitted a petition to the High Court, contesting the constitutional validity of a state law that permitted private companies to acquire agricultural land for industrial purposes without obtaining the consent of farmers. Sahils argument centered on the assertion that this law contravened the Directive Principles of State Policy found in Part IV of the Constitution. These principles mandate that the state must safeguard the interests of farmers and promote agriculture. In response, the state government argued that the law was valid because it had been enacted to attract investments and generate employment opportunities, which are also significant constitutional objectives. Which of the following options accurately characterizes the relationship between the Directive Principles of State Policy and the fundamental rights of citizens?

View answer

Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.Part IV of the Constitution contains Directive Principles of State Policy which provide guidelines for the government to govern the country. These Directives are different from the Fundamental Rights contained in Part III of the Constitution and the ordinary laws of the land in several respects. They are not enforceable in courts and do not create any justiciable rights in favor of individuals. They require implementation by legislation and do not confer or take away any legislative power from the appropriate legislature. The courts cannot declare any law as void on the ground that it contravenes any of the Directive Principles, nor can they compel the government to carry out any Directives or to make any law for that purpose. However, it is the duty of the state to implement the Directives subject to the limitations imposed by different provisions of the Constitution upon the exercise of legislative and executive power by the state The Sub-committee on Fundamental Rights constituted by the Constituent Assembly suggested two types of Fundamental Rights — one which can be enforced in the Courts of law and the other which because of their different nature cannot be enforced in the law Courts. Later on however, the former were put under the head ‘Fundamental Rights’ as Part III which we have already discussed and the latter were put separately in Part IV of the Constitution under the heading ‘Directive Principles of State Policy’ which are discussed in the following pages. The Articles included in Part IV of the Constitution (Articles 36 to 51) contain certain Directives which are the guidelines for the Government to lead the country. Article 37 provides that the ‘provisions contained in this part (i) shall not be enforceable by any Court, but the principles therein laid down are neverthless (ii) fundamental in the governance of the country and it shall be the duty of the state to apply these principles in making laws. The Directives, however, differ from the fundamental rights contained in PartIII of the Constitution or the ordinary laws of the land in the following respects: (i) The Directives are not enforceable in the courts and do not create any justiciable rights in favour of individuals. (ii) The Directives require to be implemented by legislation and so long as there is no law carrying out the policy laid down in a Directive, neither the state nor an individual can violate any existing law. (iii) The Directives per-se do not confer upon or take away any legislative power from the appropriate legislature. (iv) The courts cannot declare any law as void on the ground that it contravenes any of the Directive Principles. (v) The courts are not competent to compel the Government to carry out any Directives or to make any law for that purpose. (vi) Though it is the duty of the state to implement the Directives, it can do so only subject to the limitations imposed by the different provisions of the Constitution upon the exercise of the legislative and executive power by the state.Q. What is the duty of the state regarding the implementation of Directive Principles?

View answer

Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.Part IV of the Constitution contains Directive Principles of State Policy which provide guidelines for the government to govern the country. These Directives are different from the Fundamental Rights contained in Part III of the Constitution and the ordinary laws of the land in several respects. They are not enforceable in courts and do not create any justiciable rights in favor of individuals. They require implementation by legislation and do not confer or take away any legislative power from the appropriate legislature. The courts cannot declare any law as void on the ground that it contravenes any of the Directive Principles, nor can they compel the government to carry out any Directives or to make any law for that purpose. However, it is the duty of the state to implement the Directives subject to the limitations imposed by different provisions of the Constitution upon the exercise of legislative and executive power by the state The Sub-committee on Fundamental Rights constituted by the Constituent Assembly suggested two types of Fundamental Rights — one which can be enforced in the Courts of law and the other which because of their different nature cannot be enforced in the law Courts. Later on however, the former were put under the head ‘Fundamental Rights’ as Part III which we have already discussed and the latter were put separately in Part IV of the Constitution under the heading ‘Directive Principles of State Policy’ which are discussed in the following pages. The Articles included in Part IV of the Constitution (Articles 36 to 51) contain certain Directives which are the guidelines for the Government to lead the country. Article 37 provides that the ‘provisions contained in this part (i) shall not be enforceable by any Court, but the principles therein laid down are neverthless (ii) fundamental in the governance of the country and it shall be the duty of the state to apply these principles in making laws. The Directives, however, differ from the fundamental rights contained in PartIII of the Constitution or the ordinary laws of the land in the following respects: (i) The Directives are not enforceable in the courts and do not create any justiciable rights in favour of individuals. (ii) The Directives require to be implemented by legislation and so long as there is no law carrying out the policy laid down in a Directive, neither the state nor an individual can violate any existing law. (iii) The Directives per-se do not confer upon or take away any legislative power from the appropriate legislature. (iv) The courts cannot declare any law as void on the ground that it contravenes any of the Directive Principles. (v) The courts are not competent to compel the Government to carry out any Directives or to make any law for that purpose. (vi) Though it is the duty of the state to implement the Directives, it can do so only subject to the limitations imposed by the different provisions of the Constitution upon the exercise of the legislative and executive power by the state.Q. Can a court challenge the government of a states law allowing industries in ecologically sensitive areas on the basis of it going against the Directive Principles of State Policy?

View answer

Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.Part IV of the Constitution contains Directive Principles of State Policy which provide guidelines for the government to govern the country. These Directives are different from the Fundamental Rights contained in Part III of the Constitution and the ordinary laws of the land in several respects. They are not enforceable in courts and do not create any justiciable rights in favor of individuals. They require implementation by legislation and do not confer or take away any legislative power from the appropriate legislature. The courts cannot declare any law as void on the ground that it contravenes any of the Directive Principles, nor can they compel the government to carry out any Directives or to make any law for that purpose. However, it is the duty of the state to implement the Directives subject to the limitations imposed by different provisions of the Constitution upon the exercise of legislative and executive power by the state The Sub-committee on Fundamental Rights constituted by the Constituent Assembly suggested two types of Fundamental Rights — one which can be enforced in the Courts of law and the other which because of their different nature cannot be enforced in the law Courts. Later on however, the former were put under the head ‘Fundamental Rights’ as Part III which we have already discussed and the latter were put separately in Part IV of the Constitution under the heading ‘Directive Principles of State Policy’ which are discussed in the following pages. The Articles included in Part IV of the Constitution (Articles 36 to 51) contain certain Directives which are the guidelines for the Government to lead the country. Article 37 provides that the ‘provisions contained in this part (i) shall not be enforceable by any Court, but the principles therein laid down are neverthless (ii) fundamental in the governance of the country and it shall be the duty of the state to apply these principles in making laws. The Directives, however, differ from the fundamental rights contained in PartIII of the Constitution or the ordinary laws of the land in the following respects: (i) The Directives are not enforceable in the courts and do not create any justiciable rights in favour of individuals. (ii) The Directives require to be implemented by legislation and so long as there is no law carrying out the policy laid down in a Directive, neither the state nor an individual can violate any existing law. (iii) The Directives per-se do not confer upon or take away any legislative power from the appropriate legislature. (iv) The courts cannot declare any law as void on the ground that it contravenes any of the Directive Principles. (v) The courts are not competent to compel the Government to carry out any Directives or to make any law for that purpose. (vi) Though it is the duty of the state to implement the Directives, it can do so only subject to the limitations imposed by the different provisions of the Constitution upon the exercise of the legislative and executive power by the state.Q. How do Directive Principles of State Policy differ from Fundamental Rights?

View answer

Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.Part IV of the Constitution contains Directive Principles of State Policy which provide guidelines for the government to govern the country. These Directives are different from the Fundamental Rights contained in Part III of the Constitution and the ordinary laws of the land in several respects. They are not enforceable in courts and do not create any justiciable rights in favor of individuals. They require implementation by legislation and do not confer or take away any legislative power from the appropriate legislature. The courts cannot declare any law as void on the ground that it contravenes any of the Directive Principles, nor can they compel the government to carry out any Directives or to make any law for that purpose. However, it is the duty of the state to implement the Directives subject to the limitations imposed by different provisions of the Constitution upon the exercise of legislative and executive power by the state The Sub-committee on Fundamental Rights constituted by the Constituent Assembly suggested two types of Fundamental Rights — one which can be enforced in the Courts of law and the other which because of their different nature cannot be enforced in the law Courts. Later on however, the former were put under the head ‘Fundamental Rights’ as Part III which we have already discussed and the latter were put separately in Part IV of the Constitution under the heading ‘Directive Principles of State Policy’ which are discussed in the following pages. The Articles included in Part IV of the Constitution (Articles 36 to 51) contain certain Directives which are the guidelines for the Government to lead the country. Article 37 provides that the ‘provisions contained in this part (i) shall not be enforceable by any Court, but the principles therein laid down are neverthless (ii) fundamental in the governance of the country and it shall be the duty of the state to apply these principles in making laws. The Directives, however, differ from the fundamental rights contained in PartIII of the Constitution or the ordinary laws of the land in the following respects: (i) The Directives are not enforceable in the courts and do not create any justiciable rights in favour of individuals. (ii) The Directives require to be implemented by legislation and so long as there is no law carrying out the policy laid down in a Directive, neither the state nor an individual can violate any existing law. (iii) The Directives per-se do not confer upon or take away any legislative power from the appropriate legislature. (iv) The courts cannot declare any law as void on the ground that it contravenes any of the Directive Principles. (v) The courts are not competent to compel the Government to carry out any Directives or to make any law for that purpose. (vi) Though it is the duty of the state to implement the Directives, it can do so only subject to the limitations imposed by the different provisions of the Constitution upon the exercise of the legislative and executive power by the state.Q. According to Article 37 of the Constitution, what is the nature of the Directive Principles?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Crash Course for CLAT

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

English for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Crash Course for CLAT

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

English for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

View all

Question Description
What is a key concern raised by the Government regarding the introduction of Zero Hour in the Himachal Assembly?a) It will reduce the number of assembly sessionsb) It was implemented without consulting the governmentc) It will lead to longer discussions on non-urgent mattersd) It will be a waste of legislative timeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about What is a key concern raised by the Government regarding the introduction of Zero Hour in the Himachal Assembly?a) It will reduce the number of assembly sessionsb) It was implemented without consulting the governmentc) It will lead to longer discussions on non-urgent mattersd) It will be a waste of legislative timeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What is a key concern raised by the Government regarding the introduction of Zero Hour in the Himachal Assembly?a) It will reduce the number of assembly sessionsb) It was implemented without consulting the governmentc) It will lead to longer discussions on non-urgent mattersd) It will be a waste of legislative timeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for What is a key concern raised by the Government regarding the introduction of Zero Hour in the Himachal Assembly?a) It will reduce the number of assembly sessionsb) It was implemented without consulting the governmentc) It will lead to longer discussions on non-urgent mattersd) It will be a waste of legislative timeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of What is a key concern raised by the Government regarding the introduction of Zero Hour in the Himachal Assembly?a) It will reduce the number of assembly sessionsb) It was implemented without consulting the governmentc) It will lead to longer discussions on non-urgent mattersd) It will be a waste of legislative timeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of What is a key concern raised by the Government regarding the introduction of Zero Hour in the Himachal Assembly?a) It will reduce the number of assembly sessionsb) It was implemented without consulting the governmentc) It will lead to longer discussions on non-urgent mattersd) It will be a waste of legislative timeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for What is a key concern raised by the Government regarding the introduction of Zero Hour in the Himachal Assembly?a) It will reduce the number of assembly sessionsb) It was implemented without consulting the governmentc) It will lead to longer discussions on non-urgent mattersd) It will be a waste of legislative timeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of What is a key concern raised by the Government regarding the introduction of Zero Hour in the Himachal Assembly?a) It will reduce the number of assembly sessionsb) It was implemented without consulting the governmentc) It will lead to longer discussions on non-urgent mattersd) It will be a waste of legislative timeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice What is a key concern raised by the Government regarding the introduction of Zero Hour in the Himachal Assembly?a) It will reduce the number of assembly sessionsb) It was implemented without consulting the governmentc) It will lead to longer discussions on non-urgent mattersd) It will be a waste of legislative timeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.